Appropriate Statistical Analysis and Data Reporting for Weight Estimation Studies

Total body weight estimation by 3D camera systems: Potential high-tech solutions for emergency medicine applications? A scoping review

Background

Weight estimation is required in adult patients when weight-based medication must be administered during emergency care, as measuring weight is often not possible. Inaccurate estimations may lead to inaccurate drug dosing, which may cause patient harm. High-tech 3D camera systems driven by artificial intelligence might be the solution to this problem. The aim of this review was to describe and evaluate the published literature on 3D camera weight estimation methods.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed for articles that studied the use of 3D camera systems for weight estimation in adults. Data on the study characteristics, the quality of the studies, the 3D camera methods evaluated, and the accuracy of the systems were extracted and evaluated.

Results

A total of 14 studies were included, published from 2012 to 2024. Most studies used Microsoft Kinect cameras, with various analytical approaches to weight estimation. The 3D camera systems often achieved a P10 of 90% (90% of estimates within 10% of actual weight), with all systems exceeding a P10 of 78%. The studies highlighted a significant potential for 3D camera systems to be suitable for use in emergency care.

Conclusion

The 3D camera systems offer a promising method for weight estimation in emergency settings, potentially improving drug dosing accuracy and patient safety. Weight estimates were satisfactorily accurate, often exceeding the reported accuracy of existing weight estimation methods. Importantly, 3D camera systems possess characteristics that could make them very appropriate for use during emergency care. Future research should focus on developing and validating this methodology in larger studies with true external and clinical validation.

The accuracy of total body weight estimation in adults - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Weight estimation is required in adult patients when weight-based medication must be administered during emergency care, as measuring weight is often impossible. Inaccurate estimations may lead to inaccurate drug doses, which may cause patient harm. Little is known about the relative accuracy of different methods of weight estimation that could be used during resuscitative care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance and suitability of existing weight estimation methods for use in adult emergency care.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed for suitable articles that studied the accuracy of weight estimation systems in adults. The study characteristics, the quality of the studies, the weight estimation methods evaluated, the accuracy data, and any information on the ease-of-use of the method were extracted and evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 95 studies were included, in which 27 different methods of total body weight estimation were described, with 42 studies included in the meta-analysis. The most accurate methods, determined from the pooled estimates of accuracy (the percentage of estimates within 10% of true weight, with 95% confidence intervals) were 3-D camera estimates (88.8% (85.8 to 91.8%)), patient self-estimates (88.7% (87.7 to 89.7%)), the Lorenz method (77.5% (76.4 to 78.6%)) and family estimates (75.0% (71.5 to 78.6%)). However, no method was without significant potential limitations to use during emergency care.

CONCLUSION

Patient self-estimations of weight were generally very accurate and should be the method of choice during emergency care, when possible. However, since alternative estimation methods must be available when confused, or otherwise incapacitated, patients are unable to provide an estimate, alternative strategies of weight estimation should also be available.