Sodium channel blockade with QRS widening after an escitalopram overdose

Escitalopram-induced sinus bradycardia in coronary heart disease combined with depression: a case report and review of literature

For patients with cardiovascular disease, using the antidepressant escitalopram may lead to unexpected adverse events. Here, a rare repeated sinus bradycardia event due to escitalopram is first reported. In an 82-year-old female patient with cardiac dysfunction using digoxin, tachycardia (average heart rate of 93 beats/min) was demonstrated by electrocardiogram (ECG). She began to take escitalopram and lorazepam due to depression, but sinus bradycardia (93.7% heart rate was <60 beats/min) and sinus arrest were first detected after 3 months. Its proportion decreased to 0.1% after discontinuation of digoxin and escitalopram for 1 day, and the rhythm returned to normal 2 weeks later. After 2 months, escitalopram was prescribed again in combination with quetiapine; then, 17.1% heart rate was <60 beats/min. After escitalopram and quetiapine withdrawal, the ECG showed the heart rhythm had normalized again. No other drug changes were made during these periods. Escitalopram was deemed to be a highly possible cause of sinus bradycardia according to its Naranjo's Algorithm score. Furthermore, literature on escitalopram-mediated cardiovascular adverse events was reviewed and analyzed. Empirically, escitalopram should be discontinued immediately if iatrogenic causes cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, ECG monitoring in escitalopram-related cardiovascular adverse events is highlighted, especially in patients receiving certain drug classes simultaneously (i.e., sinoatrial node inhibitors, antipsychotics).

Synergistic Effects of the Combinational Use of Escitalopram Oxalate and 5-Fluorouracil on the Inhibition of Gastric Cancer SNU-1 Cells

Owing to its high recurrence rate, gastric cancer (GC) is the leading cause of tumor-related deaths worldwide. Besides surgical treatment, chemotherapy is the most commonly used treatment against GC. However, the adverse events associated with chemotherapy use limit its effectiveness in GC treatment. In this study, we investigated the effects of using combinations of low-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 0.001 and 0.01 mM) with different concentrations of escitalopram oxalate (0.01, 0.02, 0.06, and 0.2 mM) to evaluate whether the assessed combination would have synergistic effects on SNU-1 cell survival. 5-FU (0.01 mM) + escitalopram oxalate (0.02 mM) and 5-FU (0.01 mM) + escitalopram oxalate (0.06 mM) administered over 24 h showed synergistic effects on the inhibition of SNU-1 cell proliferation. Moreover, 5-FU (0.001 mM) + escitalopram oxalate (0.02 or 0.06 mM) and 5-FU (0.01 mM) + escitalopram oxalate (0.02, 0.06, or 0.2 mM) administered over 48 h showed synergistic effects on the inhibition of SNU-1 cell proliferation. Compared with controls, SNU-1 cells treated with 5-FU (0.01 mM) + escitalopram oxalate (0.02 mM) exhibited significantly increased levels of annexin V staining, reactive oxygen species, cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase, and caspase-3 proteins. Furthermore, 5-FU (12 mg/kg) + escitalopram oxalate (12.5 mg/kg) significantly attenuated xenograft SNU-1 cell proliferation in nude mice. Our study is the first to report the synergistic effects of the combinational use of low-dose 5-FU and escitalopram oxalate on inhibiting SNU-1 cell proliferation. These findings may be indicative of an alternative option for GC treatment.

Contributions of S- and R-citalopram to the citalopram-induced modulation of the function of Nav1.5 voltage-gated sodium channels

Citalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), has been reported to have adverse effects such as cardiotoxicity, including prolongation of the QTc interval. Although citalopram is well known to be a racemic compound comprised of S-citalopram (escitalopram) and R-citalopram, it is still unclear which enantiomer is responsible for cardiotoxicity induced by citalopram. It is also unclear which biomolecule is the target that produces the adverse effect of citalopram. In this study, we investigated whether citalopram, escitalopram and R-citalopram had an electrophysiological effect on Nav1.5 voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) current and how their electrophysiological properties affected Nav1.5 VGSC. To examine the effects of the electrophysiological properties of them, whole-cell patch clamp recording was performed using HEK293 cells expressing human Nav1.5 VGSCs. Nav1.5 VGSC current decreased by 60.0 ± 6.3% and 55.1 ± 12.5% under treatment with 100 μM citalopram and escitalopram, respectively. However, 100 μM R-citalopram decreased Nav1.5 VGSC current by only 36.2 ± 8.7%. In addition, treatment with 100 μM citalopram and escitalopram changed the voltage-dependence of activation and induced a negative shift of the voltage of half-maximal activation compared to 100 μM R-citalopram. In contrast, treatment with 100 μM citalopram and escitalopram, but not R-citalopram, changed the voltage-dependence of inactivation, and the voltage at half-maximal inactivation slightly shifted toward negative potential. These results suggest that the adverse cardiac effect produced by citalopram might result from modification of the electrophysiological properties of Nav1.5 VGSCs, and escitalopram might contribute more to this adverse effect than R-citalopram.

Drug-specific risk of severe QT prolongation following acute drug overdose

Background: Severe QT prolongation (SQTP) has been identified as a strong predictor of adverse cardiovascular events in acute drug overdose, but drug-specific causes of SQTP in the setting of acute drug overdose remain unclear. We aimed to perform the most definitive study to date describing drug-specific risk of SQTP following acute drug overdose.Methods: This was a prospective multicenter cohort study at >50 hospital sites across the US using the ToxIC Registry between 2015 and 2018. Inclusion criteria were adults (≥18 years) receiving medical toxicology consultation for acute drug overdose. The primary outcome was SQTP, which was defined using the computer automated Bazett QT correction (QTc) on the ECG with the previously validated cut point of 500 milliseconds. Mean difference in QTc was also calculated for specific drugs. Drugs associated with SQTP were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression to control for known confounders of QT risk (age, sex, race, cardiac disease).Results: From 25,303 patients screened, 6473 met inclusion criteria with SQTP occurring in 825 (13%). Drugs associated with increased adjusted odds of SQTP included Class III antidysrhythmics (sotalol), sodium channel blockers (amitriptyline, diphenhydramine, doxepin, imipramine, nortriptyline), antidepressants (bupropion, citalopram, escitalopram, trazodone), antipsychotics (haloperidol, quetiapine), and the antiemetic serotonin antagonist ondansetron.Conclusions: This large US cohort describes drug-specific risk of SQTP following acute drug overdose. Healthcare providers caring for acute drug overdoses from any of these implicated drugs should pay close attention to cardiac monitoring for occurrence of SQTP.

Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles-Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections

Introduction

Universal QT correction formulas are potentially problematic in corrected QT (QTc) interval comparisons at different heart rates. Instead of individual-specific corrections, population-specific corrections are occasionally used based on QT/RR data pooled from all study subjects.

Objective

To investigate the performance of individual-specific and population-specific corrections, a statistical modeling study was performed using QT/RR data of 523 healthy subjects.

Methods

In each subject, full drug-free QT/RR profiles were available, characterized using non-linear regression models. In each subject, 50 baseline QT/RR readings represented baseline data of standard QT studies. Using these data, linear and log-linear heart rate corrections were optimized for each subject and for different groups of ten and 50 subjects. These corrections were applied in random combinations of heart rate changes between − 10 and + 25 beats per minute (bpm) and known QTc interval changes between − 25 and + 25 ms.

Results

Both the subject-specific and population-specific corrections based on the 50 baseline QT/RR readings tended to underestimate/overestimate the QTc interval changes when heart rate was increasing/decreasing, respectively. The result spread was much wider with population-specific corrections, making the estimates of QTc interval changes practically unpredictable.

Conclusion

Subject-specific heart rate corrections based on limited baseline drug-free data may lead to inconsistent results and, in the presence of underlying heart rate changes, may potentially underestimate or overestimate QTc interval changes. The population-specific corrections lead to results that are much more influenced by the combination of individual QT/RR patterns than by the actual QTc interval changes. Subject-specific heart rate corrections based on full profiles derived from drug-free baseline recordings with wide QT/RR distribution should be used when studying drugs expected to cause heart rate changes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40264-018-0736-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A randomized, double-blind, 6-week prospective pilot study on the efficacy and safety of dose escalation in non-remitters in comparison to those of the standard dose of escitalopram for major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND

Escalating doses of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are often used to treat patients with a suboptimal response to the standard dose. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of dose escalation of escitalopram, up to 30 mg, in non-remitters with major depressive disorder (MDD) after treatment with the standard dose.

METHOD

We recruited 98 patients with MDD (aged 18-65 years). After 4 weeks of open-label treatment with 10-20 mg of escitalopram per day, non-remitters [Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score > 10] were randomized 1:1 for double-blind treatment with either escitalopram (30 mg per day) or escitalopram (20 mg per day) plus placebo for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was a change in the total MADRS score.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks of open-label treatment, 12 patients achieved remission, and 36 dropped out, leaving 50 non-remitters, of whom 44 (88%) completed the double-blind study. The primary outcome measure, the least-squares mean (standard error) change in the total MADRS score at week 6 was significantly different (p = 0.046) between the groups [-8.0 (1.2) in the placebo dose-escalation and -11.8 (1.2) in the escitalopram dose-escalation]. The dose escalation of escitalopram was well tolerated. However, the response and remission rates and quality of life showed no significant differences.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size and short follow-up period CONCLUSION: This study suggests that dose escalation of escitalopram up to 30 mg per day may be beneficial for the treatment of depressive symptoms in non-remitters after standard (10-20 mg/day) treatment.

A Literature Review of the Use of Sodium Bicarbonate for the Treatment of QRS Widening

Sodium bicarbonate is a well-known antidote for tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) poisoning. It has been used for over half a century to treat toxin-induced sodium channel blockade as evidenced by QRS widening on the electrocardiogram (ECG). The purpose of this review is to describe the literature regarding electrophysiological mechanisms and clinical use of this antidote after poisoning by tricyclic antidepressants and other agents. This article will also address the literature supporting an increased serum sodium concentration, alkalemia, or the combination of both as the responsible mechanism(s) for sodium bicarbonate's antidotal properties. While sodium bicarbonate has been used as a treatment for cardiac sodium channel blockade for multiple other agents including citalopram, cocaine, flecainide, diphenhydramine, propoxyphene, and lamotrigine, it has uncertain efficacy with bupropion, propranolol, and taxine-containing plants.

QTc interval prolongation and torsade de pointes associated with second-generation antipsychotics and antidepressants: a comprehensive review

We comprehensively reviewed published literature to determine whether it supported the link between corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation and torsade de pointes (TdP) for the 11 second-generation antipsychotics and seven second-generation antidepressants commonly implicated in these complications. Using PubMed and EMBASE, we identified four thorough QT studies (one each for iloperidone, ziprasidone, citalopram, and escitalopram), 40 studies specifically designed to assess QTc interval prolongation or TdP, 58 publications based on data from efficacy and safety trials, 18 toxicology studies, and 102 case reports. Thorough QT studies, QTc prolongation-specific studies, and studies based on efficacy and safety trials did not link drug-associated QTc interval prolongation with TdP. They only showed that the drugs reviewed caused varying degrees of QTc interval prolongation, and even that information was not clear and consistent enough to stratify individual drugs for this risk. The few toxicology studies provided valuable information but their findings are pertinent only to situations of drug overdose. Case reports were most informative about the drug-QTc interval prolongation-TdP link. At least one additional well established risk factor for QTc prolongation was present in 92.2 % of case reports. Of the 28 cases of TdP, six (21.4 %) experienced it with QTc interval <500 ms; 75 % of TdP cases occurred at therapeutic doses. There is little evidence that drug-associated QTc interval prolongation by itself is sufficient to predict TdP. Future research needs to improve its precision and broaden its scope to better understand the factors that facilitate or attenuate progression of drug-associated QTc interval prolongation to TdP.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a common heterogeneous psychiatric disorder manifesting with obsessions and compulsions. Obsessions are intrusive, recurrent, and persistent unwanted thoughts. Compulsions are repetitive behaviors or mental acts that an individual feels driven to perform in response to the obsessions. The heterogeneity of OCD includes themes of obsessions, types of rituals, presence or absence of tics, etiology, genetics, and response to pharmacotherapy. Complications of OCD include interpersonal difficulties, unemployment, substance abuse, criminal justice issues, and physical injuries. Areas of the brain involved in the pathophysiology include the orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate gyrus, and basal ganglia. Overall, OCD may be due to a malfunction in the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuit in the brain. Neurotransmitters implicated in OCD include serotonin, dopamine, and glutamate. Numerous drugs such as atypical antipsychotics and dopaminergic agents can cause or exacerbate OCD symptoms. The etiology includes genetics and neurological insults. Treatment of OCD includes psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, electroconvulsive therapy, transcranial magnetic simulation, and in extreme cases surgery. Exposure and response prevention is the most effective form of psychotherapy. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the preferred pharmacotherapy. Higher doses than listed in the package insert and a longer trial are often needed for SSRIs than compared to other psychiatric disorders. Alternatives to SSRIs include clomipramine and serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Treatment of resistant cases includes augmentation with atypical antipsychotics, pindolol, buspirone, and glutamate-blocking agents.