Assessment of Disease-related Knowledge Among Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and their Family Using IBD-KID2: Evaluating Tool Generalizability

Physicians' Explanatory Models of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Qualitative Interview Study

Explanatory models are culturally informed representations of illness that convey understandings of the etiology and expected course of disease. Substantial research has explored lay explanatory models, but examining physicians' clinical explanatory models can also provide insight into patients' understandings of illness because physicians are a foundational source of authoritative knowledge that shapes lay concepts of illness and disease. This study characterized the explanatory models used by pediatric gastroenterologists when explaining inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to children. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 20 pediatric gastroenterologists across the United States about their clinical communication and explanatory models. We identified two primary explanatory models used to describe immune dysregulation in pediatric IBD: the defense and protection model, which characterizes the immune system as an army that erroneously sees the body as "non-self" and attacks it; and the switch model, which conceptualizes treatment as activating a switch that turns off a faulty immune response. We also identified two models used by some physicians to describe inflammation: the scratch and scrape model, which compares IBD inflammation to scratches or scrapes on the skin; and the bonfire model, which compares inflammation to a fire in need of extinguishing. While the use of militaristic metaphors is pervasive in medicine, describing autoimmunity as a battle against the self may lead children to perceive their body as the enemy. This may be compounded by describing the immune system as "confused" while noting its ongoing protective function. Use of these explanatory models may nevertheless improve patient disease-related knowledge.

Knowledge Levels About Inflammatory Bowel Disease Vary Between Healthcare Professional Groups

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is one of the most serious chronic diseases affecting the global population. Clinical team members involved in the care of individuals with IBD should have sufficient knowledge about IBD.

AIMS

The study aim was to assess IBD knowledge among four health care professional groups in New Zealand: nurses, medical students, dietitians, and pharmacists.

METHODS

All four groups completed surveys on demographics, work experience, and contact with patients with IBD. All completed a validated IBD knowledge assessment questionnaire (IBD-KID2), and percentage scores with standard deviation (SD) for each group calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Participants included 200 nurses, 196 medical students, 45 dietitians, and 28 pharmacists. Mean IBD-KID2 percentage scores were nurses 69.7% (SD 14.7), medical students 77.6% (SD 14.5), dietitians 87.4% (SD 8.3), and pharmacists 83.4% (SD 10.1). Nurses scored lower than other HCP (P < 0.001). Independent variables were associated (P < 0.05) with higher scores for nurses having first degree relative with IBD, access to IBD guidelines, worked with children with IBD; medical students in their clinical years of study; and dietitians with IBD-specific education. Specific items scored poorly: growth, food triggers, heritability of IBD, and nutrient absorption.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge gaps exist among HCP that may be addressed with targeted education. Improvements in the knowledge of those caring for people with IBD may optimize patient outcomes.