The Polyembryoma: One of the Most Intriguing Human Neoplasms, With Comments on the Investigator Who Brought it to Light, Albert Peyron

Embryoid Bodies and Related Proliferations in Ovarian Germ Cell Tumors

We investigated the frequency and associated pathology of embryoid bodies in ovarian tumors by evaluating neoplasms in which they are known to occur: 100 immature teratomas, 125 malignant mixed germ cell tumors, and 6 polyembryomas. Three immature teratomas contained a single relatively well-formed embryoid body, whereas these and 11 others showed foci we categorized as embryoid body remnants consisting of microscopic aggregates of embryonal or yolk sac-type epithelium associated with spaces consistent with yolk sac or amniotic cavity but lacking a classic embryoid body structure. Teratomas with these foci were all high grade. A well-formed embryoid body was found in only 1 malignant mixed tumor, but embryoid body remnants were present in 25%, invariably associated with foci of immature teratoma (100%) and often with yolk sac tumor (97%), embryonal carcinoma (35%), or both (32%). These foci usually took the form of round to oval aggregates, often well-circumscribed, for which the term "polyembryoma background" has been proposed. The polyembryomas were typically grossly hemorrhagic and occurred in patients from 9 to 43 years of age. The embryoid bodies in them generally grew in lobules within an edematous to occasionally myxoid stroma. Four tumors contained liver-like cells, 4 numerous glands likely recapitulating the allantois, 3 syncytiotrophoblast cells, 2 prominent cysts, and 2 striking vascular proliferations. This study indicates that (1) typical embryoid bodies are rare in immature teratomas but about 14% of them have embryoid body remnants. (2) Embryoid body remnants are seen in 25% of malignant mixed germ cell tumors with a teratomatous component and often proliferate to form yolk sac tumor and embryonal carcinoma. (3) Well-formed embryoid bodies growing in a confluent manner (polyembryoma) are rare, and minor foci of teratoma, yolk sac tumor, or embryonal carcinoma are almost always present, indicating that these are fundamentally malignant mixed germ cell tumors but the polyembryoma component is dominant and distinctive which, in our opinion, justifies its own nomenclature. (4) Embryoid bodies are not a feature of other germ cell tumors.

Ovarian Malignant Mixed Germ Cell Tumor With Prominent Embryoid Bodies (Polyembryoma Background): A Case Report and Literature Review

Ovarian malignant mixed germ cell tumors are rare tumors occurring in young women. The presence of prominent embryoid bodies in these tumors is extremely uncommon. Herein, we report such a case, with a histomorphologic description and immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses.

Malignant Mixed Germ Cell Tumors of the Ovary: An Analysis of 100 Cases Emphasizing the Frequency and Interrelationships of Their Tumor Types

One hundred malignant mixed germ cell tumors of the ovary that occurred in patients 3 to 55 years (mean: 20 y) of age are described. The clinical presentation was usually that of any highly malignant tumor of the ovary (abdominal pain and distension), but rarely (3 cases) endocrine manifestations were present. The tumors were usually unilateral (96%), ranged from 4 to 38 cm (mean: 16 cm), and were uniformly solid or, more often, solid and cystic; occasionally the typical appearance of dysgerminoma could be appreciated. The most common tumor type was yolk sac tumor (91%), followed by dysgerminoma (61%), immature teratoma (58%), embryonal carcinoma (38%), and choriocarcinoma (11%). A variety of admixtures were encountered; dysgerminoma and yolk sac tumor was the most common combination (25% of the tumors) with the 2 components often being sharply demarcated. Immature teratoma and yolk sac tumor was the next most common pairing (20%) followed by yolk sac tumor and embryonal carcinoma, with or without immature teratoma (16%). Tumors with a choriocarcinoma component had the most varied combinations of tumor types. Embryoid bodies were seen in 21% of the tumors, most often as fragmented forms arranged in a nodular manner with yolk sac tumor and/or embryonal carcinoma; uncommonly they occurred singly or in clusters. Numerous confluent well-formed embryoid bodies (polyembryoma) were prominent in 2 tumors. Three tumors had a focal diffuse embryoma pattern. The specific tumor types showed the known diverse spectrum of microscopic appearances, but the frequent haphazard arrangement of 2 or more subtypes often resulted in complex morphology. Overgrowth of another neoplastic component, most often primitive neuroectodermal tumor, occurred in 10% of the tumors further complicating the histologic picture. This is the largest series of ovarian malignant mixed germ cell tumors reported and details their characteristics including associations of their subtypes and the frequent apparent role of embryoid bodies in giving rise to yolk sac tumor and embryonal carcinoma components.

Ovarian tumors: a survey of selected advances of note during the life of this journal

The author reviews highlights of advances in knowledge concerning ovarian tumor pathology since the time of an essay in the first issue of this Journal written by Dr Robert E. Scully, who, both before and for several decades after the Journal was instituted, made many original contributions to the field and was the major architect of the 1973 World Health Organization classification of ovarian tumors which was much more clear and logical than prior ones. The current review considers the neoplasms in essentially the same order as was done in the first issue of this journal and presents a personal look at the highlights of new information concerning various well-known categories, surface epithelial, germ cell, sex cord-stromal, metastatic neoplasms and briefly, benign so-called tumor-like lesions. Some of the most notable developments are as follows: (1) an orderly approach to the classification of implants of serous borderline tumors into noninvasive and invasive categories; (2) recognition of distinctive micropapillary patterns seen in some borderline tumors and low-grade carcinomas; (3) a remarkable propensity for some endometrioid carcinomas to mimic sex cord- stromal tumors; (4) appreciation of the differences between primary mucinous tumors of intestinal and müllerian types; (5) the importance of distinguishing within primary mucinous carcinomas between expansile and destructive stromal invasion; (6) emphasis on the diagnosis of immature teratoma being based on the presence of primitive-embryonic-appearing tissues; (7) appreciation of variant morphology of cases of struma ovarii which may lead to significant diagnostic problems; (8) subdivision of granulosa cell tumors into adult and juvenile types because of the differing features of the two groups including in the second category the propensity for more malignant neoplasms to be mimicked; (9) recognition of a distinctive form of Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor, the retiform variant, with a propensity to occur in the young; (10) appreciation of a unique highly malignant neoplasm that typically afflicts the young and may be associated with hypercalcemia, so-called small cell carcinoma of hypercalcemic type; (11) greater awareness than was hitherto the case of the propensity for metastatic intestinal adenocarcinoma to mimic primary endometrioid carcinoma and similarly for metastatic mucinous carcinomas to simulate primary mucinous cystic tumors; (12) recognition of the distinctive features of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms that spread to the ovary and are typically associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei; and (13) appreciation that the histologic spectrum seen in cases of Krukenberg tumor is broader than often previously thought.

The history of urologic pathology: an overview

This article begins with the testis and a legendary figure, Sir Astley Cooper, who wrote an early text on the organ. The early 20th century saw the first major development, the description of the seminoma by the French investigator Maurice Chevassu, but the pace of knowledge did not accelerate until after World War II with a major article from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) by Nathan B. Friedman and Robert A. Moore, soon followed by the first series testis fascicle by Frank J. Dixon and Moore. Other noteworthy contributions were made by two masters of gonadal pathology, Gunnar Teilum and Robert E. Scully. In the 1970s, Niels E. Skakkebaek played a seminal role in elaborating in-situ neoplasia of the testis. The school of British testicular tumour authored, in the mid-1970s, under the editorship of Roger C. B. Pugh, one of the best texts on testicular pathology. Advances in more recent years have been largely spearheaded by Thomas M. Ulbright of the Indiana University School of Medicine. Observations on the prostate gland date back to Andreas Vesalius and William Cheselden, the latter appearing to have introduced the word for the gland. Note is made of contributions on the anatomy and histology of the gland by Oswald Lowsley, L. M. Franks, and John McNeal. Diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate was brought into the modern age in a landmark 1953 article by Robert S. Totten et al. In the 1960s, Donald F. Gleason introduced a grading system that is now in use worldwide. The topic of premalignant lesions has been well established only for approximately three decades, based initially on the work of Dr McNeal and David G. Bostwick. One of the first to write a book on the bladder was the remarkable British surgeon-pathologist Sir Henry Thompson. Workers at the AFIP, including Colonel James E. Ash and Fatallah K. Mostofi, wrote many outstanding articles on bladder pathology. The roles of other institutions, such as Johns Hopkins University, the Mayo Clinic, and St Peter's Hospital Institute of Urology, London, and those who worked there are noted. Knowledge of the pathology of the urachus dates largely back to the remarkable book on the topic in 1916 by the Hopkins investigator Thomas S. Cullen. Information on renal tumours dates largely to the work of Paul Grawitz, but awareness of the many variants of renal cell carcinoma in general was slow to evolve, and has only accelerated in recent years. The AFIP group of Dr Mostofi, ably assisted by Colonel Charles J. Davis and Isabell A. Sesterhenn, has contributed to knowledge of renal neoplasia with articles of note on oncocytoma, metanephric adenoma, and medullary carcinoma. In the mid-1980s, the German workers Wolfgang Thoenes and Stephan Störkel recognised the distinctive tumour known as chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Work on renal tumours in the young owes much to J. Bruce Beckwith. The observational talents of numerous investigators have, in just over a century, advanced our knowledge of diseases of the urinary tract and testis remarkably.

Germ cell tumour growth patterns originating from clear cell carcinomas of the ovary and endometrium: a comparative immunohistochemical study favouring their origin from somatic stem cells

AIMS

To report a series of 11 ovarian and one endometrial neoplasm in elderly patients with mixed clear cell tumour and germ cell tumour (GCT) components, to compare their immunohistochemical profiles and demonstrate a putative stem cell population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The clear cell tumours included 11 clear cell carcinomas (CCC) and one borderline clear cell tumour, while the GCT always included glandular yolk sac tumour (YST). In four cases, there were also foci of teratoma with immature neuroepithelial and endodermal tissues and undifferentiated areas showing true embryoids. To distinguish between the clear cell and YST components, the following antibodies were used: HNF1-β, napsin-A, cytokeratin 7 (CK7), PAX8, EMA, AFP, SALL4, villin, glypican-3 (GPC-3), GATA3, HepPar-1, OCT4, CDX2, CD30 and SOX2. HNF1-β, CK7, EMA and GPC-3 were often expressed in both components. Other markers had higher specificity for each cellular lineage; napsin-A and PAX8 were expressed only in CCC, while SALL4, villin, AFP and HepPar-1 were positive in the glandular YST component but negative in the clear cell component. OCT4 expression occurred in six of 10 cases and consistently in teratoma (four of four).

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable immunophenotypical overlap between the two components in these mixed neoplasms, and a panel of markers should be used to facilitate the distinction. We propose that OCT4-expressing somatic cancer cells differentiate into GCT and represent spontaneously induced pluripotent stem cells, possibly conditioned by age-related epigenetic factors. These neoplasms have features of prepubertal type GCT showing lack of 12p gain, preponderance of YST and coexistence with immature neuroectoderm. However, there may also be undifferentiated stem cell areas with embryoid bodies, of the type seen in postpubertal testicular GCT, but lacking a complete embryonal carcinoma immunophenotype.

Polyembryoma of the testis: a report of two cases dominant within mixed germ cell tumors and review of gonadal polyembryomas

Two testicular mixed germ cell tumors, from men of 21 and 41 years, in which polyembryoma predominated are described. A literature review uncovered an additional five testicular and nine ovarian cases. One tumor occurred in a 60-year-old man, but all others occurred within the typical age range of gonadal germ cell tumors. One male presented with gynecomastia and one female with sexual precocity, but all otherwise had standard clinical manifestations. These tumors are typically large with non-specific gross features, but a few have a prominent hemorrhagic appearance. No tumor is known to have been entirely composed of embryoid bodies, the unit upon which the diagnosis of polyembryoma is based. The most common additional germ cell tumor component is teratoma, present in the great majority of cases, with an approximately equal smaller number of tumors being associated with embryonal carcinoma and yolk-sac tumor, manifest as overgrowths of these elements, derived from the parent epithelium within the embryoid body. Rarely there is choriocarcinoma, and syncytiotrophoblast and hepatoid cells are occasionally present. The microscopic features of the tumors vary according to the arrangement of embryoid bodies with other elements, the prominence of associated typically myxoid to edematous stroma, and the degree to which embryoid bodies are perfectly or imperfectly formed. Although its presence in a gonadal mixed germ cell tumor is probably not associated with any special behavior, its unique features should result in polyembryoma being recorded, particularly when present in significant amount. Furthermore, awareness of its features may facilitate recognition, particularly when seen at metastatic sites or extra-gonadal sites of primary germ cell neoplasia. Whether polyembroma should be considered a distinctive pattern of mixed germ cell neoplasia or a particular variant of high-grade immature teratoma is considered, herein, and arguments can be made in favor of each viewpoint.