Endometrioid Tubal Intraepithelial Neoplasia (E-TIN) of the Fallopian Tube: A Case Series

Practical Updates and Diagnostic Challenges in Endometrial Carcinoma

CONTEXT.—

Clinical management of endometrial carcinoma largely depends on the morphologic parameters ascertained based on the pathologic evaluation of surgical resection specimens. However, there are numerous controversial and nonstandardized aspects of both the macroscopic and microscopic assessment of surgical specimens, including grossing, adequate sampling, diagnosis, staging, reporting, and ancillary testing.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide a comprehensive practical review of standardized grossing, key morphologic findings for reporting and staging, and diagnostic and prognostic use of ancillary testing in endometrial carcinomas.

DATA SOURCES.—

The existing literature, recommendations of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists, and specialty consensus guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This review article summarizes important aspects of the grossing and sampling of surgical resection specimens for microscopic examination, key morphologic parameters that are required for reporting and staging, and morphologic features and immunoprofiles helpful in the differential diagnosis of low-grade and high-grade endometrial carcinomas, as well as the current status of the molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in serous carcinoma. The information presented herein can be helpful in overcoming diagnostic challenges and issues related to the pathology reporting of endometrial carcinoma to practicing anatomic pathologists.

Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: What Do We Really Know at this Point?

Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is the earliest morphologically recognizable step in the development of invasive high-grade serous carcinoma of the fallopian tube. Lesions occurring prior to STIC within the carcinogenic sequence for the pathogenesis of invasive high-grade serous carcinoma include the p53 signature and secretory cell outgrowth (SCOUT). Variable histologic criteria have been used for diagnosing STIC, but a combination of morphology and immunohistochemistry for p53/Ki-67 improves interobserver agreement. Half of all carcinomas identified in risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy specimens are in the form of STIC; however, STIC also may be incidentally found on occasion in specimens from women at low or average risk of ovarian/tubal/peritoneal carcinoma. TP53 mutation is the earliest known DNA sequence alteration in STIC and almost all invasive high-grade serous carcinomas of the ovary and peritoneum. Data on the clinical behavior of STIC are limited. While the short-term follow-up in the prior literature suggests a low risk of malignant progression, a more recent meta-analysis indicates a 10-year risk of 28%. STIC probably should be best regarded as a lesion with uncertain malignant potential at present, and future molecular analysis will help classify those with higher risk of dissemination. This review article provides an update on the current knowledge of STIC and related issues.

Endometrioid Tubal Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Bilateral Ovarian Microcystic Stromal Tumors Harboring APC Mutations: Report of a Case

Microcystic ovarian tumor of the ovary is a neoplasm of presumed stromal derivation characterized by CTNNB1 or APC alterations leading to nuclear β-catenin expression. This tumor has been described as unilateral and indolent in previously published series. The recently characterized endometrioid tubal intraepithelial neoplasia (eTIN) is an epithelial proliferation of the tube also characterized by nuclear β-catenin staining, and distinct from high-grade serous precursors. Herein, a case of bilateral ovarian microcystic stromal tumors and multiple left tubal eTINs discovered incidentally in a 41-yr-old woman with previous history of colon cancer is described. Both ovarian and tubal proliferations harbored APC inactivating mutations. Although history of familial adenomatous polyposis or a germline defect could not be confirmed, the history of colon cancer at a young age and the shared APC mutation in both microcystic stromal tumor and eTIN were suggestive of this possibility. Microcystic stromal tumor has been described in the setting of familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome. This case adds to this association by documenting for the first time bilateral ovarian involvement by microcystic stromal tumor. Moreover, it alerts to the possibility of endometrioid neoplasia of the fallopian tube secondary to APC mutations, a previously undescribed phenomenon.

Clinicopathological Characteristics of Microscopic Tubal Intraepithelial Metastases from Adenocarcinoma and Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix

BACKGROUND/AIM

Some metastatic tumors that involve the fallopian tube show intraepithelial spread, mimicking primary tubal neoplasm and representing a potential diagnostic pitfall. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of tubal intraepithelial metastasis (IEM) from cervical carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the clinical features, histological features, and immunophenotypes of IEMs in five patients with cervical carcinoma.

RESULTS

This study included usual-type (1/5), mucinous-type (1/5), and gastric-type (2/5) endocervical adenocarcinomas and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (1/5) cases. None of the patients had ovarian metastasis, but metastatic tumor cells spread along the tubal mucosal surface and partially replaced the lining epithelium. Histological features of metastatic tumors closely resembled those of the primary tumors in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Tubal IEM can mimic various tubal lesions including serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma. Morphological consistency between the primary and metastatic tumors and immunostaining help guide the differential diagnosis of challenging intraepithelial lesions of the fallopian tube.

Clinicopathological and molecular analyses of linearly expanded epithelial cells with β-catenin alterations, "β-catenin signature", in the normal fallopian tube

AIMS

Recent advances in next-generation sequencing have made it clear that clonal expansion of cells harbouring driver gene mutations occurs in physiologically normal epithelium. Molecular analysis of tubal epithelium has been almost exclusively confined to the TP53 pathway, which is involved in serous carcinogenesis. Other oncogenic events have not been explored in detail. Here, we report the linear expansion of fallopian tubal epithelial cells exhibiting an altered β-catenin profile (β-catenin signature). Through molecular analyses, we determined the incidence and clinicopathological significance of β-catenin signatures.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated 64 specimens of surgically removed bilateral fallopian tubes. Thirty-three β-catenin signatures were identified in 13 cases (20.3%); these patients were significantly younger than those without β-catenin signatures (median ages of 44 and 57 years, respectively, P = 0.0317). No correlation between β-catenin signature and any clinical factor was observed. CTNNB1 mutations were detected in three of eight β-catenin signatures when tissues were microdissected and subjected to Sanger sequencing in two representative cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of the CTNNB1 mutation in clusters of morphologically bland tubal epithelial cells. The results of this study indicate that β-catenin signatures are common, and they may be a part of diverse molecular alterations occurring in normal tubal epithelium.