Nuclear Beta-Catenin Expression in Endometrioid Intraepithelial Neoplasia (Atypical Hyperplasia) Does Not Predict Carcinoma on Subsequent Hysterectomy

Nuclear β-Catenin Expression in the Context of Abnormal p53 Expression Indicates a Nonserous Histotype in Endometrial Carcinoma

The interobserver reproducibility is poor for histotyping within the p53-abnormal molecular category of endometrial carcinomas (ECs); therefore, biomarkers that improve histologic classification are useful. β-catenin has been proposed to have prognostic significance in specific clinicopathologic and molecular contexts. The diagnostic utility for β-catenin expression patterns in determining the histotype of p53-abnormal ECs has not been well studied. We identified ECs molecularly classified as "p53-abnormal." The p53-abnormal classification was assigned when (1) no POLE exonuclease domain hotspot mutations identified, (2) mismatch-repair protein expression was retained, and (3) abnormal p53 expression (null or overexpression) was present. Morphology was re-reviewed and β-catenin immunohistochemistry was scored as abnormal (nuclear) or normal (membranous, non-nuclear). Eighty ECs were identified in the "p53-abnormal" category; 27 (33.75%) were uterine serous carcinomas, and 53 were of nonserous histotype: 28 uterine carcinosarcomas (35%), 16 endometrioid carcinomas (20%), 2 clear cell carcinomas (2.5%), and 7 high-grade EC with ambiguous morphology (8.75%). All 27 uterine serous carcinomas demonstrated membranous β-catenin staining. Of the 53 nonserous ECs, 11 (21%) showed abnormal β-catenin expression: 6 endometrioid carcinomas, 4 uterine carcinosarcoma, and 1 high-grade EC with ambiguous morphology. The specificity of abnormal β-catenin expression for nonserous EC is high (100%) but the sensitivity is low (21%) with positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 60%, respectively. Our data shows that abnormal β-catenin expression in the context of p53-abnormal EC is highly specific, but not sensitive, for nonserous ECs and may be of value as part of a panel in classifying high-grade EC, particularly to exclude uterine serous carcinoma when nuclear staining is present.

The Evolving Spectrum of Endometrial Glandular Proliferations With Corded and Hyalinized Features

We present the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features of 14 endometrial glandular proliferations with conspicuous corded and hyalinized (CH) features comprised entirely or predominantly of endometrial hyperplasia. Endometrial glandular lesions ranged in severity from endometrial hyperplasia with and without cytologic atypia (5/14 [36%]) to hyperplasia with architectural complexity bordering on well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma (3/14 [21%]) to frank corded and hyalinized endometrial carcinoma ("CHEC") (6/14 [43%]). In addition to sex cord-like growth and hyalinized stroma, other common histologic features included prominent spindle cells (11/14 [79%]), keratinizing and/or morular squamous differentiation (10/14 [71%]), and osseous metaplasia (6/14 [43%]). Immunohistochemical characterization revealed aberrant nuclear beta-catenin in all cases (14/14 [100%]); additionally, all cases demonstrated positive estrogen receptors, intact PTEN, PMS2 and MSH6, and wild-type p53 expression. Patients ranged in age from 24 to 58 (mean 38) years. Of 5 patients with hyperplasia with CH features, 2 experienced complete resolution after progestin therapy and none progressed to adenocarcinoma (mean follow-up 15.6 mo, range 2 to 64). By contrast, of 2 patients with hyperplasia bordering on CHEC and with available follow-up, both subsequently developed adenocarcinoma, suggesting that even focal increased architectural complexity may predict an elevated risk of malignancy. We conclude that CH morphology is not limited to endometrioid carcinoma and may occur across a spectrum of neoplastic proliferations, including those without sufficient architectural complexity or cytologic atypia to warrant classification as adenocarcinoma. We propose the term "corded and hyalinized endometrial hyperplasia" to describe this precursor lesion and report favorable outcomes with conservative treatment.

Reliable Identification of Endometrial Precancers Through Combined Pax2, β-Catenin, and Pten Immunohistochemistry

The diagnosis of endometrial atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (AH/EIN) remains challenging and subjective in some cases, with variable histologic criteria and differences of opinion among gynecologic pathologists, potentially leading to under/overtreatment. There has been growing interest in the use of specific immunohistochemical markers as adjuncts in AH/EIN diagnosis. For example, the World Health Organization 2020 Classification specifies that loss of Pten, Pax2, or mismatch repair proteins are desirable diagnostic criteria. Other markers, most notably β-catenin and Arid1a, are also aberrantly expressed in some AH/EIN. However, the performance of some markers individually-and more importantly as a group-has not been rigorously explored, raising questions as to which marker(s) or combination(s) is the most effective in practice. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections from AH/EIN cases (n=111) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for 6 markers: Pax2, Pten, Mlh1, β-catenin, Arid1a, and p53. Aberrant expression was tabulated for each case and marker. An additional set of normal endometria (n=79) was also analyzed to define optimal diagnostic criteria for marker aberrance. The performance characteristics of each marker, the entire panel, and subsets thereof were quantitatively and statistically analyzed. In order of number of cases detected, the most frequently aberrant markers in AH/EIN were Pax2 (81.1% of cases), Pten (50.5%), β-catenin (47.7%), Arid1a (7.2%), Mlh1 (4.5%), and p53 (2.7%). The majority of cases showed aberrant expression of ≥2 markers. All 6 markers together identified 92.8% of cases. Arid1a, Mlh1, and p53 were robust and readily scored markers, but all cases showing aberrant expression of these 3 markers were also detected by Pax2, Pten, or β-catenin. A focused panel of only 3 markers (Pax2, Pten, and β-catenin) showed optimal performance characteristics as a diagnostic adjunct in the histopathologic diagnosis of AH/EIN. Use of this panel is practicable and robust, with at least 1 of the 3 markers being aberrant in 92.8% of AH/EIN.

Histopathologic diagnosis of endometrial precancers: Updates and future directions

Early detection of endometrial cancer, especially its precancers, remains a critical and evolving issue in patient management and the quest to decrease mortality due to endometrial cancer. Due to many factors such as specimen fragmentation, the confounding influence of endogenous or exogenous hormones, and variable or overlapping histologic features, identification of bona fide endometrial precancers and their reliable discrimination from benign mimics remains one of the most challenging areas in diagnostic pathology. At the same time, the diagnosis of endometrial precancer, or the presence of suspicious but subdiagnostic features in an endometrial biopsy, can lead to long clinical follow-up with multiple patient visits and serial endometrial sampling, emphasizing the need for accurate diagnosis. Our understanding of endometrial precancers and their diagnosis has improved due to systematic investigations into morphologic criteria, the molecular genetics of endometrial cancer and their precursors, the validation of novel biomarkers and their use in panels, and more recent methods such digital image analysis. Although precancers for both endometrioid and non-endometrioid carcinomas will be reviewed, emphasis will be placed on the former. We review these advances and their relevance to the histopathologic diagnosis of endometrial precancers, and the recently updated 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Female Genital Tumors.