1
|
Rodolakis A, Scambia G, Planchamp F, Acien M, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Farrugia M, Grynberg M, Pakiž M, Pavlakis K, Vermeulen N, Zannoni G, Zapardiel I, Tryde Macklon K. ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2023; 15:3-23. [PMID: 37010330 PMCID: PMC10392114 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.15.1.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma (EC) consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in EC in a multidisciplinary setting. While also addressing work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility sparing treatment.
Objectives: To define recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma.
Materials and Methods: ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of EC (11 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives.
Results: The multidisciplinary development group formulated 48 recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma in four sections: patient selection, tumour clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and special issues.
Conclusions: These recommendations provide guidance to professionals caring for women with endometrial carcinoma, including but not limited to professionals in the field of gynaecological oncology, onco-fertility, reproductive surgery, endoscopy, conservative surgery, and histopathology, and will help towards a holistic and multidisciplinary approach for this challenging clinical scenario.
What is new? A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, ESHRE and ESGE, aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.
Collapse
|
2
|
Rodolakis A, Scambia G, Planchamp F, Acien M, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Farrugia M, Grynberg M, Pakiz M, Pavlakis K, Vermeulen N, Zannoni G, Zapardiel I, Macklon KLT. ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma . Hum Reprod Open 2023; 2023:hoac057. [PMID: 36756380 PMCID: PMC9900425 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION How should fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma be performed? SUMMARY ANSWER Forty-eight recommendations were formulated on fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in endometrial carcinoma in a multidisciplinary setting. While addressing also work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility-sparing treatment. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practising clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (11 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgement was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The multidisciplinary development group formulated 48 recommendations in four sections; patient selection, tumour clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and special issues. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION Of the 48 recommendations, none could be based on level I evidence and only 16 could be based on level II evidence, implicating that 66% of the recommendations are supported only by observational data, professional experience and consensus of the development group. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS These recommendations provide guidance to professionals caring for women with endometrial carcinoma, including but not limited to professionals in the field of gynaecological oncology, onco-fertility, reproductive surgery, endoscopy, conservative surgery and histopathology, and will help towards a holistic and multidisciplinary approach for this challenging clinical scenario. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS All costs relating to the development process were covered from ESGO, ESHRE and ESGE funds. There was no external funding of the development process or manuscript production. G.S. has reported grants from MSD Italia S.r.l., advisory boards for Storz, Bayer, Astrazeneca, Metronic, TESARO Bio Italy S.r.l and Johnson & Johnson, and honoraria for lectures from Clovis Oncology Italy S.r.l. M.G. has reported advisory boards for Gedeon Richter and Merck. The other authors have reported no conflicts of interest. DISCLAIMER This document represents the views of ESHRE, ESGO and ESGE which are the result of consensus between the relevant stakeholders and where relevant based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. The recommendations should be used for informational and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care, or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, nor variations based on locality and facility type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandros Rodolakis
- Correspondence address. Unit of Gynaecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Health Sciences, Athens 115 28, Greece. E-mail:
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS—Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Maribel Acien
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, San Juan University Hospital, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain
| | - Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | | | - Michael Grynberg
- AP-HP, Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine-Béclère, Clamart, France,AP-HP, Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Bondy, France,University Paris-Saclay, Saint-Aubin, France
| | - Maja Pakiz
- Department for Gynecologic and Breast Oncology, University Medical Centre, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Kitty Pavlakis
- 1st Pathology Department, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Health Sciences, Athens, Greece,Pathology Department, “IASO” Women's Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Nathalie Vermeulen
- European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Strombeek-Bever, Belgium
| | - Gianfranco Zannoni
- Department of Pathology, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rodolakis A, Scambia G, Planchamp F, Acien M, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Farrugia M, Grynberg M, Pakiz M, Pavlakis K, Vermeulen N, Zannoni G, Zapardiel I, Macklon KLT. ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:208-222. [PMID: 36746507 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma, consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive information on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in endometrial carcinoma in a multidisciplinary setting. While addressing also work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility-sparing treatment.A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment (patient selection, tumor clinicopathological characteristics, treatment, special issues) in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (11 experts from across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified by a systematic search, was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandros Rodolakis
- Unit of Gynaecologic Oncology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Health Sciences, Athens, Greece
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Maribel Acien
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, San Juan University Hospital, Miguel Hernández University, Alicante, Spain
| | - Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | | | - Michael Grynberg
- AP-HP, Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine-Béclère, Clamart, France.,AP-HP, Department of Reproductive Medicine & Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Bondy, France.,University Paris-Saclay, Saint-Aubin, France
| | - Maja Pakiz
- Department for Gynecologic and Breast Oncology, University Medical Centre, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Kitty Pavlakis
- 1st Pathology Department, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Health Sciences, Athens, Greece.,Pathology Department, "IASO" Women's Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Nathalie Vermeulen
- European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Strombeek-Bever, Belgium
| | - Gianfranco Zannoni
- Department of Pathology, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rodolakis A, Scambia G, Planchamp F, Acien M, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Farrugia M, Grynberg M, Pakiž M, Pavlakis K, Vermeulen N, Zannoni G, Zapardiel I, Tryde Macklon KL. ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2023; 15. [PMID: 36739613 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.14.4.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma (EC) consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in EC in a multidisciplinary setting. While also addressing work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility sparing treatment. Objectives To define recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Materials and Methods ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of EC (11 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. Results The multidisciplinary development group formulated 48 recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma in four sections: patient selection, tumour clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and special issues. Conclusions These recommendations provide guidance to professionals caring for women with endometrial carcinoma, including but not limited to professionals in the field of gynaecological oncology, onco-fertility, reproductive surgery, endoscopy, conservative surgery, and histopathology, and will help towards a holistic and multidisciplinary approach for this challenging clinical scenario. What is new? A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, ESHRE and ESGE, aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.
Collapse
|
5
|
Shah VI, McCluggage WG. Clinical utility of pathology data: endometrial and tubo-ovarian carcinomas. Clin Mol Pathol 2022; 75:529-536. [PMID: 35853653 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2022-208207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Cancer resection specimens are usually reported using standardised proformas that consist of a list of elements, which include core (required) and non-core (recommended) items. Although all elements are generally included in the reports, the clinical importance of a particular parameter often depends on a variety of factors, including the clinical setting, local management guidelines and other pathological parameters. In this review, we briefly outline how histopathology data are used to guide management of patients with endometrial and tubo-ovarian cancers, the most common gynaecological malignancies, and provide advice as to which data elements are important in particular scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Royal Group of Hospitals and Dental Hospital Health and Social Services Trust, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhao M, Wen F, Shi J, Song J, Zhao J, Song Q, Lai Q, Luo Y, Yu T, Jiang X, Jiang W, Dong Y. MRI-based radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of deep myometrial invasion of FIGO I stage endometrial carcinoma. Med Phys 2022; 49:6505-6516. [PMID: 35758644 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is one of the most common gynecological malignancies with an increasing incidence, and an accurate preoperative diagnosis of deep myometrial invasion (DMI) is crucial for personalized treatment. OBJECTIVE To determine the predictive value of an MRI-based radiomics nomogram for the presence of DMI in FIGO I stage EC. METHODS We retrospectively collected 163 patients with pathologically confirmed stage I EC from two centers and divided all samples into a training group (center 1) and a validation group (center 2). Clinical and routine imaging indicators were analyzed by logistical regression to construct a conventional diagnostic model (M1). Radiomics features extracted from the axial T2-weighted (T2W) and axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1W) images were treated with the intraclass correlation coefficient, Mann-Whitney U test, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and logistic regression analysis with Akaike information criterion (AIC) to build a combined radiomics signature (M2). A nomogram (M3) was constructed by M1 and M2. Calibration and decision curves were drawn to evaluate the nomogram in the training and validation cohorts. The diagnostic performance of each indicator and model was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULT The four most significant radiomics features were finally selected from the CE-T1W MRI. For the diagnosis of DMI, the AUCT /AUCV of M1 was 0.798/0.738, the AUCT /AUCV of M2 was 0.880/0.852, and the AUCT /AUCV of M3 was 0.936/0.871 in the training and validation groups, respectively. The calibration curves showed that M3 was in good agreement with the ideal values. The decision curve analysis suggested potential clinical application values of the nomogram. CONCLUSION A nomogram based on MRI radiomics and clinical imaging indicators can improve the diagnosis of DMI in patients with FIGO I stage EC. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingli Zhao
- Radiology Department, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110042, China
| | - Feng Wen
- Radiology Department, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110122, China
| | - Jiaxin Shi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110001, China
| | - Jing Song
- Radiology Department, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110122, China
| | - Jiaqi Zhao
- Radiology Department, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110042, China
| | - Qingling Song
- Radiology Department, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110042, China
| | - Qingyuan Lai
- Radiology Department, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110042, China
| | - Yahong Luo
- Radiology Department, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110042, China
| | - Tao Yu
- Radiology Department, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110042, China
| | - Xiran Jiang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Intelligent Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110001, China
| | - Wenyan Jiang
- Department of Scientific Research and Academic, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110042, China
| | - Yue Dong
- Radiology Department, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110042, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lu W, Chen X, Ni J, Li Z, Su T, Li S, Wan X. A Model to Identify Candidates for Lymph Node Dissection Among Patients With High-Risk Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma According to Mayo Criteria. Front Oncol 2022; 12:895834. [PMID: 35795035 PMCID: PMC9251056 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.895834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Mayo criteria are the most widely accepted algorithm for predicting the risk of lymph node metastasis in endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC). However, the clinical value of these criteria in high-risk patients is limited and inconclusive. Methods A total of 240 patients with EEC meeting the Mayo high-risk criteria between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018 were included in our study. We retrospectively collected the laboratory reports, basic clinical information, clinicopathological and immunohistochemistry (IHC) findings, and the sequences of molecular pathological markers of these patients. A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of positive lymph node status was established based on these parameters. Results Among the 240 patients, 17 were diagnosed with lymph node metastasis. The univariable analyses identified myometrial invasion >50%, aberrant p53 expression, microsatellite instable (MSI), and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) ≥35 U/ml as potential risk factors for lymph node metastasis. The multivariable analyses showed that aberrant p53 expression, MSI, and CA125 ≥35 U/ml were independent predictors of lymph node metastasis. The area under the curve (AUC) for the nomogram was 0.870, as compared to 0.665 for the Mayo criteria. Conclusions Our novel prediction model effectively identifies patients at high risk for lymphatic metastasis. This model is a promising strategy for personalized surgery in patients with high risk according to the Mayo criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Lu
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tong Ji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoyue Chen
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tong Ji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingyi Ni
- Department of Clinical Research Center, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tong Ji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen Li
- Department of Clinical Research Center, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tong Ji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Su
- Department of Gynecology, The International Peace Maternity & Child Health Hospital of China Welfare Institute, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuangdi Li
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tong Ji University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Shuangdi Li, ; Xiaoping Wan,
| | - Xiaoping Wan
- Department of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tong Ji University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Shuangdi Li, ; Xiaoping Wan,
| |
Collapse
|