1
|
Muzaffar S, Abdullah SR. Endometrioid tubal intraepithelial neoplasia (E-TIN): case report & literature review. J Mol Histol 2024; 56:6. [PMID: 39612010 DOI: 10.1007/s10735-024-10282-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2024] [Accepted: 11/06/2024] [Indexed: 11/30/2024]
Abstract
An endometrioid carcinogenic pathway of the fallopian tube with possible potential precursors including type II SCOUTs (secretory cell outgrowths) and E-TIN (endometrioid tubal intraepithelial neoplasia) has been recently documented. We report an incidental focus of E-TIN identified in a hysterectomy specimen for Grade 1 endometrioid type endometrial carcinoma. The lesion was present at the fimbriated end of left fallopian tube involving 1 plica. It comprised crowded glandular proliferation with a pseudostratified columnar lining. The cells displayed elongated nuclei with no remarkable nuclear atypia.Immunohistochemistry showed patchy loss of PAX 2 expression with multifocal aberrant nuclear and cytoplasmic staining for B-catenin. p53 was wild-type and ER was positive.In view of the co-existing endometrioid type endometrial carcinoma, a possible metastatic spread to the fallopian tube was considered. However, morphologically no obvious nuclear atypia noted, and no associated inflammatory response or desmoplastic stromal reaction identified within the tubal lesion. And on immunostaining, the endometrial tumour was distinct from the tubal lesion. For instance, PTEN was negative/lost in the endometrial tumour but retained in the tubal lesion and B-catenin was membranous in the endometrial tumour but aberrant with multifocal nuclear and cytoplasmic overexpression in the tubal lesion. WT1 was negative in the endometrial tumour but positively expressed by the tubal lesion. All the above findings favoured the possibility of the tubal lesion as being independent of the endometrial primary. In conclusion, we describe an incidental B-catenin aberrant endometrioid type proliferation of the fallopian tube/E-TIN, to raise awareness of such lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadaf Muzaffar
- Department of Histopathology and Cytopathology, Cotman Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UB, UK
| | - Shireen R Abdullah
- Department of Histopathology and Cytopathology, Cotman Centre, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Donthi D, Chen H, Peng Y, Niu S. Ovarian Microcystic Stromal Tumor With Intraovarian Recurrence and Peritoneal and Omental Spread: A Case Report With Morphological, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Analysis. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2023; 42:491-495. [PMID: 36044304 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Microcystic stromal tumors (MCSTs) are rare ovarian stromal tumors. They harbor CTNNB1 or APC mutations, resulting in β-catenin nuclear expression. To date, all MCST cases treated with oophorectomy or more extensive surgery have followed benign clinical courses. However, 1 of the 3 cases treated with ovarian cystectomy/tumor resection recurred in the residual ovary and iliac fossa 9 years after ovarian cystectomy. Here, we report a case of recurrent MCST in a 38-year-old woman. The patient underwent ovarian cystectomy for a 7.5 cm solid-cystic right ovarian mass, which showed classic morphological and immunophenotypical features of MCST. Four years later, the tumor recurred in the residual right ovary as a 21 cm mass, involving the pelvic peritoneum and omentum. Molecular analysis using next-generation sequencing revealed a single C TNNB1 exon 3 S37A mutation in the recurrent tumor. To the best of our knowledge, this is the second case of recurrent MCST, which presents more evidence that MCST has the potential to recur and spread locally. Rather than ovarian cystectomy/tumor resection, more aggressive surgery, such as unilateral oophorectomy, may be necessary to decrease the risk of recurrence. Long-term postsurgery follow up is needed, especially after simple ovarian cystectomy/tumor resection.
Collapse
|
3
|
Vibert R, Le Gall J, Buecher B, Mouret-Fourme E, Bataillon G, Becette V, Trabelsi-Grati O, Moncoutier V, Dehainault C, Carriere J, Schwartz M, Suybeng V, Bieche I, Colas C, Vincent-Salomon A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Golmard L. APC germline pathogenic variants and epithelial ovarian cancer: causal or coincidental findings? J Med Genet 2023; 60:460-463. [PMID: 36270768 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
APC germline pathogenic variants result in predisposition to familial adenomatous polyposis and extraintestinal tumours such as desmoid fibromatosis, medulloblastomas and thyroid cancers. They have also been recently involved in ovarian microcystic stromal tumours. APC inactivation has been described at the tumour level in epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs). Here, we report the identification of APC germline pathogenic variants in two patients diagnosed with premenopausal EOC in early 30s, with no other pathogenic variant detected in the known ovarian cancer predisposing genes. Subsequent tumour analysis showed neither a second hit of APC inactivation nor β-catenin activation. Both tumours did not have a homologous recombination (HR) deficiency, pointing towards the implication of other genes than those involved in HR. APC may contribute to the carcinogenesis of EOC in a multifactorial context. Further studies are required to clarify the role of APC in predisposition to EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roseline Vibert
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Jessica Le Gall
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Bruno Buecher
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | | | - Guillaume Bataillon
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Véronique Becette
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Olfa Trabelsi-Grati
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Virginie Moncoutier
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Catherine Dehainault
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Jennifer Carriere
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Mathias Schwartz
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Voreak Suybeng
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Ivan Bieche
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Chrystelle Colas
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France
- INSERM U830, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Lisa Golmard
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tchrakian N, Oliva E, Chong AS, Rivera-Polo B, Bennett JA, Nucci MR, Sah S, Schoolmeester JK, van der Griend RA, Foulkes WD, Clarke BA, Young RH, McCluggage WG. Ovarian Signet-ring Stromal Tumor: A Morphologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Study of 7 Cases With Discussion of the Differential Diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol 2022; 46:1599-1610. [PMID: 36040033 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Signet-ring stromal tumor (SRST) is a rare ovarian stromal neoplasm characterized by a population of bland signet-ring cells, devoid of mucin or lipid, in a generally cellular fibromatous stroma. Previous reports have described heterogenous immunohistochemical and molecular genetic findings, including occasional nuclear β-catenin expression and/or CTNNB1 mutations. We report 10 ovarian stromal neoplasms originally diagnosed as SRST. All but 1 tumor underwent detailed immunohistochemical analysis (including β-catenin) and 5 of 10 had CTNNB1 mutation analysis performed. All tumors contained a population of morphologically bland signet-ring cells that ranged from 15% to 95% of the neoplasm, characterized by a single large empty intracytoplasmic vacuole, mostly with nuclear indentation. Six of the 10 tumors contained cellular fibroma-like areas, comprising from 10% to 85% of the neoplasm. Three of the 10 tumors were reclassified as microcystic stromal tumor with signet-ring cells on the basis of the microcyst formation and hyalinized stroma, beta-catenin and cyclin D1 nuclear expression and/or CTNNB1 mutation, CD10 staining and largely absent expression of inhibin and calretinin. In the remaining 7 tumors, the diagnosis of SRST remained, constituting the largest series of SRST reported in the literature to date. The results of our study suggest that a subset of tumors diagnosed as ovarian SRST, especially those which show β-catenin nuclear positivity and/or CTNNB1 mutation, likely represent microcystic stromal tumor with variant morphology. We also suggest that at least a subset of SRSTs without evidence of Wnt/β-catenin pathway abnormalities may be related to ovarian fibromas. We discuss the differential diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms containing signet-ring cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nairi Tchrakian
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, ON
| | - Esther Oliva
- Pathology Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Department, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Harvard Medical School
| | - Anne-Sophie Chong
- Cancer Research Program, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre
| | - Barbara Rivera-Polo
- Cancer Research Program, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre
- Gerald Bronfman Institute of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jennifer A Bennett
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Marisa R Nucci
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Shatrughan Sah
- Department of Histopathology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Walsgrave, Coventry
| | | | | | - William D Foulkes
- Cancer Research Program, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre
| | - Blaise A Clarke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, ON
| | - Robert H Young
- Pathology Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Department, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Harvard Medical School
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Parra-Herran C, McCluggage WG. Ovarian microcystic stromal tumour: From morphological observations to syndromic associations. Histopathology 2022; 80:898-904. [PMID: 35020947 DOI: 10.1111/his.14616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Microcystic stromal tumour (MST) is a rare, usually benign, ovarian neoplasm characterised morphologically in its classic form by a distinctive triad of features comprising microcysts, solid cellular regions and fibrous stroma. Variant morphology also occurs, including the presence of nests, tubules, cords, and signet ring cells. Immunohistochemically, this neoplasm is characterised by diffuse nuclear expression of β-catenin, cyclin D1, WT1 and SF1, as well as diffuse staining with FOXL2 and CD10. Inhibin and calretinin are typically negative. At the genomic level, these neoplasms harbour mutually exclusive mutations in CTNNB1 or APC genes with the former being significantly more common. This molecular characteristic raises possible links to other rare ovarian lesions including solid pseudopapillary tumour, signet-ring stromal tumour and Sertoli cell tumour. Rarely, MST is an extracolonic manifestation of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and serves as a sentinel event that could trigger the identification of the syndrome. Herein, we review the published literature on ovarian MST and provide practical advice for pathologists reporting these rare neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Parra-Herran
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|