Immunohistochemical and functional biomarkers of value in female genital tract lesions: a systematic review with statistical meta-analysis

Mesonephric adenocarcinoma of the cervix: a case report with a three-year follow-up, lung metastases, and next-generation sequencing analysis

Background

Mesonephric adenocarcinoma (MNAC) is a rare tumor of the female genital tract, which originates from mesonephric duct remnants. Its diagnosis is pathologically challenging, because MNAC may exhibit a mixture of morphological patterns that complicates the differential diagnosis.

Case presentation

The patient in this case was a 48-year-old woman with a polypoid mass protruding into the endocervical canal. The patient underwent a total hysterectomy outside the institution. During biopsy, the mass showed a cerebroid aspect. Histological study revealed a tumor with a predominantly tubular and ductal growth pattern. The immunoprofile showed negative staining for calretinin, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEAm), estrogen receptors (ER), and progesterone receptors (PR), and positive staining for CD10, p16, and PAX2. The Ki-67 score was 46%. Using a next-generation sequencing assay, we documented genomic alterations in KRAS and CTNNB1, low tumor mutation burden (TMB), and an absence of microsatellite instability. In addition, gain of the long arm of chromosome 1 (1q) was also documented using chomogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). Three years later, the patient presented pulmonary nodules in the lingula and left basal lobe that were resected by thoracotomy. The histopathologic study of the pulmonary nodules confirmed the presence of metastases.

Conclusion

Carcinomas of mesonephric origin are among the rarest subtypes of cervical tumors. We report the first case of mesonephric adenocarcinoma of the cervix with lung metastases showing a CTNNB1 gene mutation.

Immunohistochemical biomarkers of value in distinguishing primary ovarian carcinoma from gastric carcinoma: a systematic review with statistical meta-analysis

AIMS

To compare the relative risk of antigen expression being detected immunohistochemically in ovarian and gastric carcinoma aggregated from studies performed for diagnostic purposes, with the relative risks of their expression in all patients in the English literature.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Both types of series indicated that cytokeratin (CK) 7 expression was greater and that of CK20 and carcinoembryonic antigen less in ovarian than in gastric carcinoma (P < 0.05). Synthesis of all data available for MUC-2 suggested it was more commonly expressed in ovarian carcinoma, whereas the relative risk in papers that directly compared its expression suggested that it was more common in the gastric carcinoma (P = 0.2, NS). Aggregating all possible data suggested villin was more likely to be expressed in ovarian cancers, whereas studies in which its expression was compared directly in both tumours suggested the opposite. Although statistically significant, patient numbers were small.

CONCLUSION

Provided sufficient numbers of cases are studied, analysis of studies comparing antigen expression for diagnostic purposes in tumours from two body sites is likely to be supported in the wider literature. The design of such comparative studies is informed by aggregating data from single tumour studies.