1
|
Turashvili G, Hanley K. Practical Updates and Diagnostic Challenges in Endometrial Carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2024; 148:78-98. [PMID: 36943242 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0280-ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Clinical management of endometrial carcinoma largely depends on the morphologic parameters ascertained based on the pathologic evaluation of surgical resection specimens. However, there are numerous controversial and nonstandardized aspects of both the macroscopic and microscopic assessment of surgical specimens, including grossing, adequate sampling, diagnosis, staging, reporting, and ancillary testing. OBJECTIVE.— To provide a comprehensive practical review of standardized grossing, key morphologic findings for reporting and staging, and diagnostic and prognostic use of ancillary testing in endometrial carcinomas. DATA SOURCES.— The existing literature, recommendations of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists, and specialty consensus guidelines. CONCLUSIONS.— This review article summarizes important aspects of the grossing and sampling of surgical resection specimens for microscopic examination, key morphologic parameters that are required for reporting and staging, and morphologic features and immunoprofiles helpful in the differential diagnosis of low-grade and high-grade endometrial carcinomas, as well as the current status of the molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in serous carcinoma. The information presented herein can be helpful in overcoming diagnostic challenges and issues related to the pathology reporting of endometrial carcinoma to practicing anatomic pathologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gulisa Turashvili
- From the Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Krisztina Hanley
- From the Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Evans SM, Ivanova K, Rome R, Cossio D, Pilgrim C, Zalcberg J, Antill Y, Blake L, Du Guesclin A, Garrett A, Giffard D, Golobic N, Moir D, Parikh S, Parisi A, Sanday K, Shadbolt C, Smith M, Te Marvelde L, Williams K. Registry-derived stage (RD-Stage) for capturing cancer stage at diagnosis for endometrial cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1222. [PMID: 38087227 PMCID: PMC10714535 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11615-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Capture of cancer stage at diagnosis is important yet poorly reported by health services to population-based cancer registries. In this paper we describe current completeness of stage information for endometrial cancer available in Australian cancer registries; and develop and validate a set of rules to enable cancer registry medical coders to calculate stage using data available to them (registry-derived stage or 'RD-Stage'). METHODOLOGY Rules for deriving RD-stage (Endometrial carcinoma) were developed using the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) TNM (tumour, nodes, metastasis) Staging System (8th Edition). An expert working group comprising cancer specialists responsible for delivering cancer care, epidemiologists and medical coders reviewed and endorsed the rules. Baseline completeness of data fields required to calculate RD-Stage, and calculation of the proportion of cases for whom an RD stage could be assigned, was assessed across each Australian jurisdiction. RD-Stage (Endometrial cancer) was calculated by Victorian Cancer Registry (VCR) medical coders and compared with clinical stage recorded by the patient's treating clinician and captured in the National Gynae-Oncology Registry (NGOR). RESULTS The necessary data completeness level for calculating RD-Stage (Endometrial carcinoma) across various Australian jurisdictions varied from 0 to 89%. Three jurisdictions captured degree of spread of cancer, rendering RD-Stage unable to be calculated. RD-Stage (Endometrial carcinoma) could not be derived for 64/485 (13%) cases and was not captured for 44/485 (9%) cases in NGOR. At stage category level (I, II, III, IV), there was concordance between RD-Stage and NGOR captured stage in 393/410 (96%) of cases (95.8%, Kendall's coefficient = 0.95). CONCLUSION A lack of consistency in data captured by, and data sources reporting to, population-based cancer registries meant that it was not possible to provide national endometrial carcinoma stage data at diagnosis. In a sample of Victorian cases, where surgical pathology was available, there was very good concordance between RD-Stage (Endometrial carcinoma) and clinician-recorded stage data available from NGOR. RD-Stage offers promise in capturing endometrial cancer stage at diagnosis for population epidemiological purposes when it is not provided by health services, but requires more extensive validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Evans
- Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - K Ivanova
- Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - R Rome
- Epworth Health Care, Melbourne, Australia
| | - D Cossio
- Cancer Alliance Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Chc Pilgrim
- Central Clinical School, Department of Surgery, The Alfred, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - J Zalcberg
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Y Antill
- Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - L Blake
- Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Du Guesclin
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Garrett
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - D Giffard
- Cancer Alliance Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - N Golobic
- Cancer Alliance Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - D Moir
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S Parikh
- Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Parisi
- ACT Cancer Registry Australian Capital Territory Health, Deakin, Australia
| | - K Sanday
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - C Shadbolt
- Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M Smith
- ACT Cancer Registry Australian Capital Territory Health, Deakin, Australia
| | | | - K Williams
- Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Park KJ, Selinger CI, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Duggan MA, Kiyokawa T, Mills AM, Ordi J, Otis CN, Plante M, Stolnicu S, Talia KL, Wiredu EK, Lax SF, McCluggage WG. Dataset for the Reporting of Carcinoma of the Cervix: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:S64-S89. [PMID: 36305535 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Cervical carcinoma remains one of the most common cancers affecting women worldwide, despite effective screening programs being implemented in many countries for several decades. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) dataset for cervical carcinoma was first developed in 2017 with the aim of developing evidence-based standardized, consistent and comprehensive surgical pathology reports for resection specimens. This 4th edition update to the ICCR dataset on cervical cancer was undertaken to incorporate major changes based upon the updated International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (FIGO) staging for carcinoma of the cervix published in 2018 and the 5th Edition World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Female Genital Tumors published in 2020 and other significant developments in pathologic aspects of cervical cancer. This updated dataset was developed by a panel of expert gynecological pathologists and an expert gynecological oncologist, with a period of open consultation. The revised dataset includes "core" and "noncore" elements to be reported; these are accompanied by detailed explanatory notes and references providing the rationale for the updates. Standardized reporting using datasets such as this helps facilitate consistency and accuracy, data collection across different sites and comparison of epidemiological and pathologic parameters for quality and research purposes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Dataset for the Reporting of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:S34-S43. [DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
5
|
Matias-Guiu X, Selinger CI, Anderson L, Buza N, Ellenson LH, Fadare O, Ganesan R, Ip PPC, Palacios J, Parra-Herran C, Raspollini MR, Soslow RA, Werner HMJ, Lax SF, McCluggage WG. Data Set for the Reporting of Endometrial Cancer: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:S90-S118. [PMID: 36305536 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is one of the most common cancers among women. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) developed a standardized endometrial cancer data set in 2011, which provided detailed recommendations for the reporting of resection specimens of these neoplasms. A new data set has been developed, which incorporates the updated 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Female Genital Tumors, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) molecular classification of endometrial cancers, and other major advances in endometrial cancer reporting, all of which necessitated a major revision of the data set. This updated data set has been produced by a panel of expert pathologists and an expert clinician and has been subject to international open consultation. The data set includes core elements which are unanimously agreed upon as essential for cancer diagnosis, clinical management, staging, or prognosis and noncore elements which are clinically important, but not essential. Explanatory notes are provided for each element. Adoption of this updated data set will result in improvements in endometrial cancer patient care.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wong RWC, Webster F, Bosse T, Focchi G, Gilks CB, Hoang L, Howitt BE, McAlpine J, Ordi J, Singh N, Lax SF, McCluggage WG. Data Set for the Reporting of Carcinomas of the Vagina: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:S23-S33. [PMID: 35703457 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Primary carcinomas of the vagina are uncommon and currently detailed recommendations for the reporting of resection specimens of these neoplasms are not widely available. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) is developing standardized, evidence-based reporting data sets for multiple cancer sites. We describe the development of a cancer data set by the ICCR expert panel for the reporting of primary vaginal carcinomas and present the core and noncore data elements with explanatory commentaries. This data set has incorporated the updates in the 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Female Genital Tumours, 5th edition. The data set addresses controversial issues such as tumor grading, margin assessment, and the role of ancillary studies. The adoption of this data set into clinical practice will help ensure standardized data collection across different countries, facilitate future research on vaginal carcinomas, and ultimately lead to improvements in patient care.
Collapse
|
7
|
Nucci MR, Webster F, Croce S, George S, Howitt BE, Ip PPC, Lee CH, Rabban JT, Soslow RA, van der Griend R, Lax SF, McCluggage WG. Data Set for Reporting of Uterine Malignant and Potentially Malignant Mesenchymal Tumors: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:S44-S63. [PMID: 36305534 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) seeks to produce standardized, evidence-based protocols for the reporting of tumors with the aim of ensuring that all cancer reports generated worldwide will be of similar high quality and record the same elements. Herein, we describe the development of the data set for the reporting of uterine malignant and potentially malignant mesenchymal tumors by a panel of expert pathologists and a single clinician and provide the commentary and rationale for the inclusion of core and noncore elements. This data set, which incorporates the recent updates from the 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Female Genital Tumors, addresses several subjects of debate including which mesenchymal tumors should be graded, how to document extent of invasion, mitotic counts, and the role of ancillary testing in tumor diagnosis and patient management. The inclusion of elements is evidence-based or based on consensus of the expert panel with clinical relevance being the guiding standard.
Collapse
|
8
|
Hoang L, Webster F, Bosse T, Focchi G, Gilks CB, Howitt BE, McAlpine JN, Ordi J, Singh N, Wong RWC, Lax SF, McCluggage WG. Data Set for the Reporting of Carcinomas of the Vulva: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:S8-S22. [PMID: 36305532 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
A cogent and comprehensive pathologic report is essential for optimal patient management, cancer staging, and prognostication. This article details the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) process and the development of the vulval carcinoma reporting data set. It describes the "core" and "noncore" elements to be included in pathology reports for vulval carcinoma, inclusive of clinical, macroscopic, microscopic, and ancillary testing considerations. It provides definitions and commentary for the evidence and/or consensus-based deliberations for each element included in the data set. The commentary also discusses controversial issues, such as p16/human papillomavirus testing, tumor grading and measurements, as well as elements that show promise and warrant further evidence-based study. A summary and discussion of the updated vulval cancer staging system by the International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (FIGO) in 2021 is also provided. We hope the widespread implementation of this data set will facilitate consistent and accurate reporting, data collection, comparison of epidemiological and pathologic parameters between different populations, facilitate research, and serve as a platform to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
9
|
Fox SB, Webster F, Chen CJ, Chua B, Collins LC, Foschini MP, Mann GB, Millar EKA, Pinder SE, Rakha E, Shaaban AM, Tan BY, Tse GM, Watson PH, Tan PH. Dataset for pathology reporting of ductal carcinoma in situ, variants of lobular carcinoma in situ and low grade lesions: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Histopathology 2022; 81:467-476. [DOI: 10.1111/his.14725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- SB Fox
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Level 4 Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia
| | - F Webster
- International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting, Albion St, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia
| | - CJ Chen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sect. 4 Taichung 40705 Taiwan
| | - B Chua
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney The University of New South Wales Randwick NSW 2031 Australia
| | - LC Collins
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave and Harvard Medical School Boston MA 02215 USA
| | - MP Foschini
- Department Anatomic Pathology University of Bologna Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences Unit of Anatomic Pathology at Bellaria Hospital, Via Altura 3 40139 Bologna Italy
| | - GB Mann
- The Breast Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St Parkville VIC 3050 Australia
| | - EKA Millar
- Department of Anatomical Pathology Heath Pathology St George Hospital, Kogarah NSW 2217 & St George & Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW NSW Sydney Australia
| | - SE Pinder
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences King's College London, 9th Floor, Innovation Hub, Comprehensive Cancer Centre at Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond. London SE1 9RT United Kingdom
| | - E Rakha
- Department of Histopathology The University of Nottingham Nottingham City Hospital, Hucknall Road Nottingham NG5 1PB United Kingdom
| | - AM Shaaban
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham and Cancer and Genomic Sciences University of Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way Birmingham B15 2GW United Kingdom
| | - BY Tan
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital College Rd Singapore 169856
| | - GM Tse
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Ngan Shing Street Shatin Hong Kong
| | - PH Watson
- Department of Pathology, Biobanking and Biospecimen Research Services, Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Agency, 2410 Lee Ave Victoria BC V8R 6V5 Canada Victoria British Columbia Canada
| | - PH Tan
- Division of Pathology Singapore General Hospital Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dokter E, Anderson L, Cho SM, Cohen-Hallaleh V, Lam KM, Saidi SA, Kitzing YX. Radiology-pathology correlation of endometrial carcinoma assessment on magnetic resonance imaging. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:80. [PMID: 35467253 PMCID: PMC9038982 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01218-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynaecological cancer in developed countries. Most cases are low-volume/low-grade tumour at presentation; however, high-grade subtypes may present with locally advanced disease with higher propensity for spread outside of the pelvis. MRI has a role in local staging of the tumour and helping the clinicians in treatment decision making. This pictorial essay gives examples of endometrial carcinoma at different stages with histological correlation. It also explores the potential limitations and pitfalls of imaging in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eveline Dokter
- Department of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.,Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lyndal Anderson
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Soo-Min Cho
- Department of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Violette Cohen-Hallaleh
- Department of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Kim May Lam
- Department of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Samir A Saidi
- Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Lifehouse Gynaecological Oncology Group, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia
| | - Yu Xuan Kitzing
- Department of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hasan F, Hussein Z. The Association between Lower Uterine Segment Involvement in Corpus Located Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma with the (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) Grade and Stage. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2022. [DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2022.7418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although lower uterine segment (LUS) is regarded as an anatomically defined part that possess some histological differences, it is involvement by carcinoma have not been included in the criteria for definition in the staging system for endometrial carcinoma and there are few conflicting data focused on the effect of LUS involvement as a prognostic factor in endometrial cancer.
AIM: To find the association between LUS involvement in corpus located endometrioid carcinoma with the grading and staging system established by the international federation of gynecology and obstetrics (FIGO).
METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving data collected from achieves of histopathology departments of teaching laboratories within successive 4 years period in Medical City complex at Bagdad. Pathological analysis of 70 hysterectomy specimens of corpus located endometriod adenocarcinoma was done, histological sections from each case of endometrioid adenocarcinoma carcinoma were microscopically reviewed for appropriate grading and staging, in addition, meticulous search was applied for histological finding consistent with LUS involvement. The statistical comparison between the results was done using either independent sample t-test (for continuous data; mean ± SD) or Chi-square test at a significant p < 0.05.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 70 histological samples of endometrioid adenocarcinoma, the majority of the samples were of low grade and stage at presentation. Of total sample, 46 (65.71%) showed LUS involvement by tumor cells. There was a significant statistical relationship between LUS involvement and FIGO stage while a non-significant statistical association with FIGO grade was found.
CONCLUSION: LUS involvement by corpus located endometrioid adenocarcinoma is associated with an advanced FIGO stage at presentation while non-significant relationship was found between patient age and tumor grade.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kasius JC, Pijnenborg JMA, Lindemann K, Forsse D, van Zwol J, Kristensen GB, Krakstad C, Werner HMJ, Amant F. Risk Stratification of Endometrial Cancer Patients: FIGO Stage, Biomarkers and Molecular Classification. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13225848. [PMID: 34831000 PMCID: PMC8616052 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecologic malignancy in developed countries. The main challenge in EC management is to correctly estimate the risk of metastases at diagnosis and the risk to develop recurrences in the future. Risk stratification determines the need for surgical staging and adjuvant treatment. Detection of occult, microscopic metastases upstages patients, provides important prognostic information and guides adjuvant treatment. The molecular classification subdivides EC into four prognostic subgroups: POLE ultramutated; mismatch repair deficient (MMRd); nonspecific molecular profile (NSMP); and TP53 mutated (p53abn). How surgical staging should be adjusted based on preoperative molecular profiling is currently unknown. Moreover, little is known whether and how other known prognostic biomarkers affect prognosis prediction independent of or in addition to these molecular subgroups. This review summarizes the factors incorporated in surgical staging (i.e., peritoneal washing, lymph node dissection, omentectomy and peritoneal biopsies), and its impact on prognosis and adjuvant treatment decisions in an era of molecular classification of EC. Moreover, the relation between FIGO stage and molecular classification is evaluated including the current gaps in knowledge and future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenneke C. Kasius
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.C.K.); (J.v.Z.)
| | | | - Kristina Lindemann
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, 0188 Oslo, Norway;
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway
| | - David Forsse
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway; (D.F.); (C.K.)
| | - Judith van Zwol
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.C.K.); (J.v.Z.)
| | - Gunnar B. Kristensen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Camilla Krakstad
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway; (D.F.); (C.K.)
| | - Henrica M. J. Werner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, GROW, Maastricht University School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands;
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (J.C.K.); (J.v.Z.)
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynaecology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Srigley JR, Judge M, Helliwell T, Birdsong GG, Ellis DW. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR): a decade of progress towards global pathology standardisation and data interoperability. Histopathology 2021; 79:897-901. [PMID: 34783048 DOI: 10.1111/his.14431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John R Srigley
- Trillium Health Partners and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meagan Judge
- International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tim Helliwell
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - George G Birdsong
- Emory University School of Medicine at Grady Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, Ledermann J, Bosse T, Chargari C, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Martin AG, Lax S, Lorusso D, Marth C, Morice P, Nout RA, O'Donnell D, Querleu D, Raspollini MR, Sehouli J, Sturdza A, Taylor A, Westermann A, Wimberger P, Colombo N, Planchamp F, Creutzberg CL. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2021; 154:327-353. [PMID: 33712263 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria; Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Germany.
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, CIBERONC, Irblleida, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Idibell, Spain
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, UK
| | | | - Sigurd Lax
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz II, Austria; School of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Maria Rosaria Raspollini
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Germany
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Anneke Westermann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TU Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Germany
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan and University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy
| | | | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Concin N, Creutzberg CL, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, Ledermann JA, Bosse T, Chargari C, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, González-Martín A, Lax SF, Lorusso D, Marth C, Morice P, Nout RA, O'Donnell DE, Querleu D, Raspollini MR, Sehouli J, Sturdza AE, Taylor A, Westermann AM, Wimberger P, Colombo N, Planchamp F, Matias-Guiu X. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Virchows Arch 2021; 478:153-190. [PMID: 33604759 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-020-03007-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multidisciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (27 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2014, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 191 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. The guidelines comprehensively cover endometrial carcinoma staging, definition of prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers, pre- and intra-operative work-up, fertility preservation, management for early, advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease and palliative treatment. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria. .,Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
| | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Sigurd F Lax
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz II, Graz, Austria.,School of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Maria Rosaria Raspollini
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alina E Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Anneke M Westermann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TU Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, CIBERONC, Irblleida, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Idibell, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Is It Possible to Develop a Prediction Model for Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer? Int J Gynecol Pathol 2021; 39:213-220. [PMID: 31033799 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this retrospective study was to define a risk index that would serve as a surrogate marker of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in women with endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Final pathology reports of 498 women who underwent surgery with curative intent for endometrioid EC between January 2008 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic regression was used to investigate clinicopathologic factors associated with positive LVSI status. Independent risk factors for LVSI were used to build a risk model and "risk of LVSI index" was defined as "tumor grade×primary tumor diameter×percentage of myometrium involved." The scores used in the "risk of LVSI index" were weighted according to the odds ratios assigned for each variable. The risk of LVSI index was noted for each patient. The diagnostic performance of the model was expressed as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio. RESULTS According to the "risk of LVSI index," presence of LVSI was correctly estimated in 89 of 104 LVSI-positive women at a cutoff of 161.0 (sensitivity 85.5%, specificity 79.4%, negative predictive value 95.4%, positive predictive value 52.3%, positive likelihood ratio 4.15, negative likelihood ratio 0.18). The area under curve of the receiver-operating characteristics was 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.93) at this cutoff. CONCLUSIONS It seems possible to predict the presence of LVSI in women with endometrioid EC when the "risk of LVSI index" is calculated. However, external validation of this model is warranted.
Collapse
|
17
|
Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Marnitz S, Ledermann J, Bosse T, Chargari C, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Gonzalez Martin A, Lax S, Lorusso D, Marth C, Morice P, Nout RA, O'Donnell D, Querleu D, Raspollini MR, Sehouli J, Sturdza A, Taylor A, Westermann A, Wimberger P, Colombo N, Planchamp F, Creutzberg CL. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 31:12-39. [PMID: 33397713 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 854] [Impact Index Per Article: 213.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A European consensus conference on endometrial carcinoma was held in 2014 to produce multi-disciplinary evidence-based guidelines on selected questions. Given the large body of literature on the management of endometrial carcinoma published since 2014, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines and to cover new topics in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria .,Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, CIBERONC, Irblleida, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Idibell, Spain
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Sigurd Lax
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz II, Graz, Austria.,School of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Maria Rosaria Raspollini
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Anneke Westermann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TU Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Varma M, Srigley JR, Brimo F, Compérat E, Delahunt B, Koch M, Lopez-Beltran A, Reuter V, Samaratunga H, Shanks JH, Tsuzuki T, van der Kwast T, Webster F, Grignon D. Dataset for the reporting of urinary tract carcinoma-biopsy and transurethral resection specimen: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Mod Pathol 2020; 33:700-712. [PMID: 31685965 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0403-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) is an alliance of major pathology organisations in Australasia, Canada, Europe, United Kingdom, and United States of America that develops internationally standardised, evidence-based datasets for the pathology reporting of cancer specimens. This dataset was developed by a multidisciplinary panel of international experts based on previously published ICCR guidelines for the production of cancer datasets. It is composed of Required (core) and Recommended (noncore) elements identified on the basis of literature review and expert consensus. The document also includes an explanatory commentary explaining the rationale behind the categorization of individual data items and provides guidance on how these should be collected and reported. The dataset includes nine required and six recommended elements for the reporting of cancers of the urinary tract in biopsy and transurethral resection (TUR) specimens. The required elements include specimen site, operative procedure, histological tumor type, subtype/variant of urothelial carcinoma, tumor grade, extent of invasion, status of muscularis propria, noninvasive carcinoma, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). The recommended elements include clinical information, block identification key, extent of T1 disease, associated epithelial lesions, coexistent pathology, and ancillary studies. The dataset provides a structured template for globally harmonized collection of pathology data required for management of patients diagnosed with cancer of the urinary tract in biopsy and TUR specimens. It is expected that this will facilitate international collaboration, reduce duplication of effort in updating current national/institutional datasets, and be particularly useful for countries that have not developed their own datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Varma
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
| | - J R Srigley
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - F Brimo
- Department of Pathology, McGill University Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - E Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Hopital Tenon, HUEP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - B Delahunt
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - M Koch
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - A Lopez-Beltran
- Department of Pathology, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - V Reuter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - H Samaratunga
- Aquesta Specialized Uropathology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,The University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - J H Shanks
- Department of Histopathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - T Tsuzuki
- Department of Pathology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - T van der Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - F Webster
- International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - D Grignon
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, IUH Pathology Laboratory, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Horn LC, Brambs CE, Opitz S, Einenkel J, Mayr D. [TNM classification of gynecologic malignancies : What remains to be done beyond 2017?]. DER PATHOLOGE 2019; 40:73-79. [PMID: 30707273 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-018-0559-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
For some gynecologic malignancies, there are disagreements between the most recent WHO and TNM classifications and the recommendations of the International Collaboration of Cancer Reporting. These discrepancies are addressed and discussed in this paper. The WHO definition for primary vaginal cancer does not match the TNM definition. The paper also discusses and provides TNM classifications for rare gynecologic tumors like primary malignant vulvar melanomas, sarcomas of the vulva, perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PECom) of the uterus, undifferentiated uterine sarcomas, and extra-intestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and provides some recommendations for the reporting and categorization of regional lymph nodes in nonuterine serous pelvic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L-C Horn
- Institut für Pathologie, Abteilung Mamma‑, Gynäko- & Perinatalpathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstraße 26, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
| | - C E Brambs
- Frauenklinik des Klinikums rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | - S Opitz
- Institut für Pathologie, Abteilung Mamma‑, Gynäko- & Perinatalpathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstraße 26, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - J Einenkel
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Leipzig (Triersches Institut) im Zentrum für Frauen- und Kindermedizin, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - D Mayr
- Pathologisches Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Horn LC, Emons G, Aretz S, Bock N, Follmann M, Lax S, Nothacker M, Steiner E, Mayr D. [S3 guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of carcinoma of the endometrium : Requirements for pathology]. DER PATHOLOGE 2019; 40:21-35. [PMID: 30756154 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-019-0574-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The present article summarises the relevant aspects of the S3 guidelines on endometrioid carcinomas. The recommendations include the processing rules of fractional currettings as well as for hysterectomy specimens and lymph node resections (including sentinel lymph nodes). Besides practical aspects, the guidelines consider the needs of the clinicians for appropriate surgical and radiotherapeutic treatment of the patients. Carcinosarcomas are assigned to the endometrial carcinoma as a special variant. For the first time, an algorithmic approach for evaluation of the tumour tissue for Lynch syndrome is given. Prognostic factors based on morphologic findings are summarised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L-C Horn
- Abteilung Mamma‑, Gynäko- & Perinatalpathologie, Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstraße 24, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
| | - G Emons
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland
| | - S Aretz
- Institut für Humangenetik, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - N Bock
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland
| | - M Follmann
- Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - S Lax
- Institut für Pathologie, Landeskrankenhaus Graz West, Graz, Österreich
| | - M Nothacker
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - E Steiner
- Frauenklinik, GPR Klinikum Rüsselsheim, Rüsselsheim, Deutschland
| | - D Mayr
- Pathologisches Institut, Medizinische Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shanks JH, Srigley JR, Brimo F, Comperat E, Delahunt B, Koch M, Lopez‐Beltran A, Reuter VE, Samaratunga H, Tsuzuki T, Kwast T, Varma M, Grignon D. Dataset for reporting of carcinoma of the urethra (in urethrectomy specimens): recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Histopathology 2019; 75:453-467. [DOI: 10.1111/his.13877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan H Shanks
- Department of Histopathology The Christie NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK
| | - John R Srigley
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
| | - Fadi Brimo
- McGill University Health Center Montréal QC Canada
| | - Eva Comperat
- Department of Pathology Hospital Tenon, HUEP, Sorbonne University Paris France
| | - Brett Delahunt
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Otago Wellington New Zealand
| | - Michael Koch
- Department of Urology Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis IN USA
| | | | - Victor E Reuter
- Department of Pathology Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA
| | - Hemamali Samaratunga
- Aquesta Specialized Uropathology Brisbane Qld, Australia
- Centre for Clinical Research The University of Queensland Brisbane Qld, Australia
- Princess Alexandra Hospital Brisbane Qld Australia
| | | | - Theo Kwast
- Laboratory Medicine Program University Health Network, University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
| | - Murali Varma
- Department of Cellular Pathology University Hospital of Wales Cardiff UK
| | - David Grignon
- IUH Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis IN USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dataset for the reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens: updated recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting. Virchows Arch 2019; 475:263-277. [DOI: 10.1007/s00428-019-02574-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Revised: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
23
|
Pathologic Prognostic Factors in Endometrial Carcinoma (Other Than Tumor Type and Grade). Int J Gynecol Pathol 2019; 38 Suppl 1:S93-S113. [PMID: 30550486 PMCID: PMC6296841 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Although endometrial carcinoma (EC) is generally considered to have a good prognosis, over 20% of women with EC die of their disease, with a projected increase in both incidence and mortality over the next few decades. The aim of accurate prognostication is to ensure that patients receive optimal treatment and are neither overtreated nor undertreated, thereby improving patient outcomes overall. Patients with EC can be categorized into prognostic risk groups based on clinicopathologic findings. Other than tumor type and grade, groupings and recommended management algorithms may take into account age, body mass index, stage, and presence of lymphovascular space invasion. The molecular classification of EC that has emerged from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) study provides additional, potentially superior, prognostic information to traditional histologic typing and grading. This classifier does not, however, replace clinicopathologic risk assessment based on parameters other than histotype and grade. It is envisaged that molecular and clinicopathologic prognostic grouping systems will work better together than either alone. Thus, while tumor typing and grading may be superseded by a classification based on underlying genomic abnormalities, accurate assessment of other pathologic parameters will continue to be key to patient management. These include those factors related to staging, such as depth of myometrial invasion, cervical, vaginal, serosal surface, adnexal and parametrial invasion, and those independent of stage such as lymphovascular space invasion. Other prognostic parameters will also be discussed. These recommendations were developed from the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists Endometrial Carcinoma project.
Collapse
|
24
|
Endometrial Carcinoma, Grossing and Processing Issues: Recommendations of the International Society of Gynecologic Pathologists. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2019; 38 Suppl 1:S9-S24. [PMID: 30550481 PMCID: PMC6296844 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic neoplasm in developed countries; however, updated universal guidelines are currently not available to handle specimens obtained during the surgical treatment of patients affected by this disease. This article presents recommendations on how to gross and submit sections for microscopic examination of hysterectomy specimens and other tissues removed during the surgical management of endometrial cancer such as salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and lymph node dissection—including sentinel lymph nodes. In addition, the intraoperative assessment of some of these specimens is addressed. These recommendations are based on a review of the literature, grossing manuals from various institutions, and a collaborative effort by a subgroup of the Endometrial Cancer Task Force of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists. The aim of these recommendations is to standardize the processing of endometrial cancer specimens which is vital for adequate pathological reporting and will ultimately improve our understanding of this disease.
Collapse
|
25
|
Berney DM, Comperat E, Feldman DR, Hamilton RJ, Idrees MT, Samaratunga H, Tickoo SK, Yilmaz A, Srigley JR. Datasets for the reporting of neoplasia of the testis: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting. Histopathology 2019; 74:171-183. [PMID: 30565308 DOI: 10.1111/his.13736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
We here describe the development of an evidence-based cancer dataset by an International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting expert panel for the reporting of primary testicular neoplasia, and present the 'required' and 'recommended' elements to be included in the pathology report, as well as a commentary. This dataset encompasses the updated 2016 World Health Organisation classification of urological tumours, the results of an International Society of Urological Pathology consultation, and also staging with our preferred method: the American Joint Committee on Cancer version 8. Implementation of this dataset will facilitate consistent and accurate data collection between different cohorts, facilitate research, and hopefully result in improved patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan M Berney
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Eva Comperat
- Hôpital Tenon, HUEP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Darren R Feldman
- Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Muhammad T Idrees
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Hemamali Samaratunga
- Aquesta Specialised Uropathology and Department of Pathology, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
| | - Satish K Tickoo
- Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Asli Yilmaz
- Department of Pathology, Calgary Laboratory Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - John R Srigley
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Renshaw AA, Mena-Allauca M, Gould EW, Sirintrapun SJ. Synoptic Reporting: Evidence-Based Review and Future Directions. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2018; 2:1-9. [PMID: 30652566 PMCID: PMC6873952 DOI: 10.1200/cci.17.00088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew A. Renshaw
- Andrew A. Renshaw, Mercy Mena-Allauca, and Edwin W. Gould, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL; and S. Joseph Sirintrapun, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mercy Mena-Allauca
- Andrew A. Renshaw, Mercy Mena-Allauca, and Edwin W. Gould, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL; and S. Joseph Sirintrapun, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Edwin W. Gould
- Andrew A. Renshaw, Mercy Mena-Allauca, and Edwin W. Gould, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL; and S. Joseph Sirintrapun, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - S. Joseph Sirintrapun
- Andrew A. Renshaw, Mercy Mena-Allauca, and Edwin W. Gould, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL; and S. Joseph Sirintrapun, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Burt AD, Alves V, Bedossa P, Clouston A, Guido M, Hübscher S, Kakar S, Ng I, Park YN, Reeves H, Wyatt J, Yeh MM, Ellis DW. Data set for the reporting of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Histopathology 2018; 73:369-385. [DOI: 10.1111/his.13520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alastair D Burt
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences; University of Adelaide; Adelaide Australia
| | - Venâncio Alves
- Department of Pathology; University of São Paulo School of Medicine; São Paulo Brazil
| | - Pierre Bedossa
- Pathology Department; AP-HP; Beaujon Hospital; Clichy France
- Centre de Recherche Bichat-Beaujon; University Paris-Diderot; Paris France
| | - Andrew Clouston
- Envoi Specialist Pathologists; Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Maria Guido
- Surgical Pathology and Cytopathology Unit; Department of Medicine-DIMED; University of Padova; Padova Italy
| | - Stefan Hübscher
- Department of Cellular Pathology; Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy; University of Birmingham; Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Birmingham UK
| | | | - Irene Ng
- Department of Pathology; State Key Laboratory for Liver Research; The University of Hong Kong; Hong Kong Hong Kong
| | - Young N Park
- Department of Pathology Yonsei; Univesity College of Medicine Seodaemun-gu; Seoul Korea
| | - Helen Reeves
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University; Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| | - Judith Wyatt
- Department of Histopathology; St James University Hospital; Leeds UK
| | - Matthew M Yeh
- Department of Pathology; University of Washington School of Medicine; Seattle WA USA
| | - David W Ellis
- Clinpath Laboratories; Kent Town South Australia Australia
- ICCR Steering Group Representative; Adelaide Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
|
29
|
Abstract
Accurate staging of cancers is an important determinant of prognosis and guides optimal patient treatment. Although the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting recommends that endometrial cancers (including carcinosarcomas) are pathologically staged using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 system, in many areas TNM [American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) or Union for International Cancer Control (UICC)] staging is used or even mandated; these latter systems are based on FIGO 2009. In this review, areas of difficulty in the pathologic staging of endometrial carcinomas are covered with practical advice for the reporting pathologist. These include issues regarding the assessment of the depth of myometrial involvement (which may be rendered difficult due to a variety of factors), tumor involvement of adenomyosis, and assessment of cervical and uterine serosal involvement. Although not included in the FIGO staging system, the issue of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is covered as this is of prognostic importance and there are multiple problems in the pathologic assessment of this. One important point is that tumors should not be upstaged based on the presence of LVSI alone without tissue involvement; for example, the presence of LVSI in the outer half of the myometrium or in cervical or adnexal vessels in a carcinoma with myoinvasion confined to the inner half of the myometrium is still FIGO stage IA. The issue of simultaneously occurring tumors of the endometrium and adnexa is also covered with advice on how to distinguish between synchronous independent and metastatic neoplasms of both endometrioid and nonendometrioid types. Recent molecular evidence showing that simultaneously occurring endometrioid carcinomas of the endometrium and ovary are clonal and thus probably represent metastatic disease from the endometrium to the ovary rather than synchronous independent neoplasms, as is widely assumed, is discussed.
Collapse
|
30
|
Difference in Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters Between Endometrioid Endometrial Adenocarcinoma and Uterine Serous Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 27:1708-1713. [PMID: 28945213 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to elucidate the difference in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters between endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (EEA) and uterine serous adenocarcinoma (SA). METHODS Data of patients with pathologically confirmed EEA or SA who underwent DWI and DTI scanning between May 2013 and July 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value from DWI and ADC from DTI (ADC) map and fractional anisotropy (FA) values from DTI were analyzed and compared statistically. The correlation between ADC and ADC was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis. Apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC, and FA between the 2 groups were compared using independent t test. The effect of ADC, ADC, and FA in distinguishing EEA and SA was evaluated by receiver operator characteristic curve. RESULT Thirty-three patients were enrolled into the study, including 13 cases of SA and 20 cases of EEA. Pearson correlation analysis suggested that the value of ADC was highly related with ADC in both the SA group (r = 0.812, P = 0.001) and the EEA group (r = 0.858, P < 0.001). The value of ADC and ADC in the SA group was significantly lower than that in the EEA group; FA was significantly higher than that in the EEA group. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis showed that ADC and ADC have high sensitivity and specificity; FA has low sensitivity and high specificity. CONCLUSIONS We suggest that both DWI and DTI could be used in distinguishing EEA from SA. Apparent diffusion coefficient and ADC possess potential diagnostic value with high sensitivity and specificity.
Collapse
|
31
|
Identifiable Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastases in Grade 1 Endometrial Carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017; 27:1694-1700. [DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
32
|
Horn LC, Mayr D, Brambs CE, Einenkel J, Sändig I, Schierle K. [Grading of gynecological tumors : Current aspects]. DER PATHOLOGE 2017; 37:337-51. [PMID: 27379622 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-016-0183-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Histopathological assessment of the tumor grade and cell type is central to the management and prognosis of various gynecological malignancies. Conventional grading systems for squamous carcinomas and adenocarcinomas of the vulva, vagina and cervix are poorly defined. For endometrioid tumors of the female genital tract as well as for mucinous endometrial, ovarian and seromucinous ovarian carcinomas, the 3‑tiered FIGO grading system is recommended. For uterine neuroendocrine tumors the grading system of the gastrointestinal counterparts has been adopted. Uterine leiomyosarcomas are not graded. Endometrial stromal sarcomas are divided into low and high grades, based on cellular morphology, immunohistochemical and molecular findings. A chemotherapy response score was established for chemotherapeutically treated high-grade serous pelvic cancer. For non-epithelial ovarian malignancies, only Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors and immature teratomas are graded. At this time molecular profiling has no impact on the grading of tumors of the female genital tract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L-C Horn
- Institut für Pathologie, Abteilung Mamma-, Gynäko- & Perinatalpathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstraße 26, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
| | - D Mayr
- Pathologisches Institut, Ludwig-Maximilins-Universität, München, Deutschland
| | - C E Brambs
- Frauenklinik des Klinikums rechts der Isar, Technischen Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | - J Einenkel
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Leipzig (Triersches Institut) im Zentrum für Frauen- und Kindermedizin, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - I Sändig
- Institut für Pathologie, Abteilung Mamma-, Gynäko- & Perinatalpathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstraße 26, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - K Schierle
- Institut für Pathologie, Abteilung Mamma-, Gynäko- & Perinatalpathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstraße 26, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Renshaw MA, Renshaw SA, Mena-Allauca M, Carrion PP, Mei X, Narciandi A, Gould EW, Renshaw AA. Performance of a Web-based Method for Generating Synoptic Reports. J Pathol Inform 2017; 8:13. [PMID: 28382227 PMCID: PMC5364739 DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_91_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Accepted: 01/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT The College of American Pathologists (CAP) requires synoptic reporting of all tumor excisions. OBJECTIVE To compare the performance of different methods of generating synoptic reports. METHODS Completeness, amendment rates, rate of timely ordering of ancillary studies (KRAS in T4/N1 colon carcinoma), and structured data file extraction were compared for four different synoptic report generating methods. RESULTS Use of the printed tumor protocols directly from the CAP website had the lowest completeness (84%) and highest amendment (1.8%) rates. Reformatting these protocols was associated with higher completeness (94%, P < 0.001) and reduced amendment (1%, P = 0.20) rates. Extraction into a structured data file was successful 93% of the time. Word-based macros improved completeness (98% vs. 94%, P < 0.001) but not amendment rates (1.5%). KRAS was ordered before sign out 89% of the time. In contrast, a web-based product with a reminder flag when items were missing, an embedded flag for data extraction, and a reminder to order KRAS when appropriate resulted in improved completeness (100%, P = 0.005), amendment rates (0.3%, P = 0.03), KRAS ordering before sign out (100%, P = 0.23), and structured data extraction (100%, P < 0.001) without reducing the speed (P = 0.34) or accuracy (P = 1.00) of data extraction by the reader. CONCLUSION Completeness, amendment rates, ancillary test ordering rates, and data extraction rates vary significantly with the method used to construct the synoptic report. A web-based method compares favorably with all other methods examined and does not reduce reader usability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mercy Mena-Allauca
- Department of Cancer Services, Baptist Hospital and Baptist Health of South Florida Healthcare System, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Patricia P. Carrion
- Department of Information Technology, Baptist Hospital and Baptist Health of South Florida Healthcare System, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Xiaorong Mei
- Department of Information Technology, Baptist Hospital and Baptist Health of South Florida Healthcare System, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Arniris Narciandi
- Department of Information Technology, Baptist Hospital and Baptist Health of South Florida Healthcare System, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Edwin W. Gould
- Department of Pathology, Baptist Hospital and Baptist Health of South Florida Healthcare System, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Andrew A. Renshaw
- Department of Pathology, Baptist Hospital and Baptist Health of South Florida Healthcare System, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Pathology, Baptist Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Renshaw AA, Gould EW. Comparison of Accuracy and Speed of Information Identification by Nonpathologists in Synoptic Reports With Different Formats. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017; 141:418-422. [PMID: 28055242 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0216-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT - The College of American Pathologists requires synoptic reports for specific types of pathology reports. OBJECTIVE - To compare the accuracy and speed of information retrieval in synoptic reports of different formats. DESIGN - We assessed the performance of 28 nonpathologists from 4 different types of users (cancer registrars, MDs, medical non-MDs, and nonmedical) at identifying specific information in various formatted synoptic reports, using a computerized quiz that measured both accuracy and speed. RESULTS - There was no significant difference in the accuracy of data identification for any user group or in any format. While there were significant differences in raw time between users, these were eliminated when normalized times were used. Compared with the standard format of a required data element (RDE) and response on 1 line, both a list of responses without an RDE (21%, P < .001) and a paired response with more concise text (33%, P < .001) were significantly faster. In contrast, both the 2-line format (RDE header on one line, response indented on the second line) (12%, P < .001) and a report with the RDE response pairs in a random order were significantly slower (16%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS - There are significant differences in ease of use by nonpathologists between different synoptic report formats. Such information may be useful in deciding between different format options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edwin W Gould
- From the Department of Pathology, Baptist Hospital and Baptist Health of South Florida Healthcare System, Miami
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Nicholson AG, Detterbeck F, Marx A, Roden AC, Marchevsky AM, Mukai K, Chen G, Marino M, den Bakker MA, Yang WI, Judge M, Hirschowitz L. Dataset for reporting of thymic epithelial tumours: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Histopathology 2016; 70:522-538. [PMID: 27735079 DOI: 10.1111/his.13099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) is a not-for-profit organization formed by the Royal Colleges of Pathologists of Australasia and the United Kingdom, the College of American Pathologists, the Canadian Association of Pathologists-Association Canadienne des Pathologists in association with the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, and the European Society of Pathology. Its goal is to produce standardized, internationally agreed, evidence-based datasets for use throughout the world. METHODS AND RESULTS This article describes the development of a cancer dataset by the multidisciplinary ICCR expert panel for the reporting of thymic epithelial tumours. The dataset includes 'required' (mandatory) and 'recommended' (non-mandatory) elements, which are validated by a review of current evidence and supported by explanatory text. Seven required elements and 12 recommended elements were agreed by the international dataset authoring committee to represent the essential information for the reporting of thymic epithelial tumours. CONCLUSIONS The use of an internationally agreed, structured pathology dataset for reporting thymic tumours provides all of the necessary information for optimal patient management, facilitates consistent and accurate data collection, and provides valuable data for research and international benchmarking. The dataset also provides a valuable resource for those countries and institutions that are not in a position to develop their own datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew G Nicholson
- Department of Histopathology, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and National Heart and Lung Division, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Frank Detterbeck
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, CN, USA
| | - Alexander Marx
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anja C Roden
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alberto M Marchevsky
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kiyoshi Mukai
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Gang Chen
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mirella Marino
- Department of Pathology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Michael A den Bakker
- Department of Pathology, Maasstad Hospital and Department of Pathology of the Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Woo-Ick Yang
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Meagan Judge
- Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lynn Hirschowitz
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Black JO, Coffin CM, Parham DM, Hawkins DS, Speights RA, Spunt SL. Opportunities for Improvement in Pathology Reporting of Childhood Nonrhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Report From Children's Oncology Group (COG) Study ARST0332. Am J Clin Pathol 2016; 146:328-38. [PMID: 27510717 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Treatment of soft tissue tumors in young patients relies on the diagnostic information conveyed in the pathology report. We examined pathology reports from Children's Oncology Group ARST0332 for inclusion of data elements required in published guidelines. METHODS Pathology reports for 551 eligible patients were examined for required data elements defined by the College of American Pathologists, including tissue type, procedure, tumor site, tumor maximum diameter, macroscopic extent of tumor, histologic type, mitotic rate, extent of necrosis, tumor grade, margin status, use of ancillary studies, and pathologic stage. RESULTS Only 65 (12%) of 551 reports included all required data elements. Of reports containing synoptic templates, 57% were complete. CONCLUSIONS This study reveals significant opportunity to improve the quality of pathology reports in young patients with soft tissue tumors. Use of templates or checklists improves completeness of reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer O Black
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Colorado, Aurora
| | - Cheryl M Coffin
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, Immunology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
| | - David M Parham
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Douglas S Hawkins
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA
| | - Rose A Speights
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Sheri L Spunt
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
van der Putten LJM, Wollinga T, Pijnenborg JMA. Letter-to-the-Editor "Laparoscopic treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer with and without uterine manipulator: Our experience and review of literature" by Tinelli R et al. (Surgical Oncology 25 (2016) 98-103). Surg Oncol 2016; 33:189-190. [PMID: 27262493 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2016.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2016] [Accepted: 05/19/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Louis J M van der Putten
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tim Wollinga
- Erasmus University Medical Faculty, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Churg A, Attanoos R, Borczuk AC, Chirieac LR, Galateau-Sallé F, Gibbs A, Henderson D, Roggli V, Rusch V, Judge MJ, Srigley JR. Dataset for Reporting of Malignant Mesothelioma of the Pleura or Peritoneum: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016; 140:1104-10. [PMID: 27031777 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0073-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT -The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting is a not-for-profit organization formed by the Royal Colleges of Pathologists of Australasia and the United Kingdom; the College of American Pathologists; the Canadian Association of Pathologists-Association Canadienne des Pathologists, in association with the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer; and the European Society of Pathology. Its goal is to produce common, internationally agreed upon, evidence-based datasets for use throughout the world. OBJECTIVE -To describe a dataset developed by the Expert Panel of the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting for reporting malignant mesothelioma of both the pleura and peritoneum. The dataset is composed of "required" (mandatory) and "recommended" (nonmandatory) elements. DESIGN -Based on a review of the most recent evidence and supported by explanatory commentary. RESULTS -Eight required elements and 7 recommended elements were agreed upon by the Expert Panel to represent the essential information for reporting malignant mesothelioma of the pleura and peritoneum. CONCLUSIONS -In time, the widespread use of an internationally agreed upon, structured, pathology dataset for mesothelioma will lead not only to improved patient management but also provide valuable data for research and international benchmarks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Churg
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (Dr Churg); the Department of Cellular Pathology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom (Drs Attanoos and Gibbs); the Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell University Medical Center, New York, New York (Dr Borczuk); the Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Chirieac); the Department of Pathology, University Hospital Caen, and Department of Biopathology, Léon-Bérard Cancer Centre, Lyon, France (Dr Galateau-Sallé); the Department of Surgical Pathology, SA Pathology, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia (Dr Henderson); the Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Roggli); the Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (Dr Rusch); the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Ms Judge); and the Program of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Trillium Health Partners, and the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (Dr Srigley)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
McCluggage WG. A practical approach to the diagnosis of mixed epithelial and mesenchymal tumours of the uterus. Mod Pathol 2016; 29 Suppl 1:S78-91. [PMID: 26715175 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2015] [Accepted: 11/05/2015] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
The current 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of mixed epithelial and mesenchymal tumours of the uterus includes categories of carcinosarcoma, adenosarcoma, adenofibroma, adenomyoma and atypical polypoid adenomyoma, the last two lesions being composed of an admixture of benign epithelial and mesenchymal elements with a prominent smooth muscle component. In this review, each of these categories of uterine neoplasm is covered with an emphasis on practical tips for the surgical pathologist and new developments. In particular, helpful clues in the distinction between carcinosarcoma and dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma will be discussed. In addition, salient features to help distinguish between adenofibroma, adenosarcoma, embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma and other mesenchymal neoplasms in the differential diagnosis will be outlined. Finally, a discussion of adenomyoma and its main differential diagnostic considerations will be covered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lymphovascular space invasion and the treatment of stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 25:75-80. [PMID: 25356534 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Treatment of clinical early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) in The Netherlands consists of primary hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Adjuvant radiotherapy is given when 2 or more the following risk factors are present: 60 years or older, grade 3 histology, and 50% or more myometrial invasion. Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is a predictor of poor prognosis and early distant spread. It is unclear whether adjuvant radiotherapy is sufficient in patients with LVSI-positive EEC. METHODS/MATERIALS Eighty-one patients treated from 1999 until 2011 for stage I LVSI-positive EEC in 11 Dutch hospitals were included. The outcomes of patients with 0 to 1 risk factors were compared with those with 2 to 3 risk factors, and both were compared with the known literature. RESULTS Eighteen patients presented with recurrent disease, and 12 of those recurrences had a distant component. Overall and distant recurrence rates were 19.2% and 11.5% in patients with 0 to 1 risk factors followed by observation and 25.5% and 17% in patients with 2 to 3 risk factors who received adjuvant radiotherapy. Only 1 patient with grade 1 disease had a recurrence. CONCLUSIONS In stage I LVSI-positive EEC with 0 to 1 risk factors, observation might not be adequate. Moreover, despite adjuvant radiotherapy, a high overall and distant recurrence rate was observed in patients with 2 to 3 risk factors. The use of systemic treatment in these patients, with the exception of patients with grade 1 disease, should be investigated.
Collapse
|
41
|
Ellis DW, Srigley J. Does standardised structured reporting contribute to quality in diagnostic pathology? The importance of evidence-based datasets. Virchows Arch 2015; 468:51-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00428-015-1834-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2015] [Revised: 08/08/2015] [Accepted: 08/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
42
|
McCluggage WG, Judge MJ, Clarke BA, Davidson B, Gilks CB, Hollema H, Ledermann JA, Matias-Guiu X, Mikami Y, Stewart CJR, Vang R, Hirschowitz L. Data set for reporting of ovary, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal carcinoma: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Mod Pathol 2015; 28:1101-22. [PMID: 26089092 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.77] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2015] [Revised: 02/24/2015] [Accepted: 02/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
A comprehensive pathological report is essential for optimal patient management, cancer staging and prognostication. In many countries, proforma reports are used but these vary in their content. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) is an alliance formed by the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia, the Royal College of Pathologists of the United Kingdom, the College of American Pathologists, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer and the European Society of Pathology, with the aim of developing an evidence-based reporting data set for each cancer site. This will reduce the global burden of cancer data set development and reduplication of effort by different international institutions that commission, publish and maintain standardised cancer reporting data sets. The resultant standardisation of cancer reporting will benefit not only those countries directly involved in the collaboration but also others not in a position to develop their own data sets. We describe the development of a cancer data set by the ICCR expert panel for the reporting of primary ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma and present the 'required' and 'recommended' elements to be included in the report with an explanatory commentary. This data set encompasses the recent International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists staging system for these neoplasms and the updated World Health Organisation Classification of Tumours of the Female Reproductive Organs. The data set also addresses issues about site assignment of the primary tumour in high-grade serous carcinomas and proposes a scoring system for the assessment of tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The widespread implementation of this data set will facilitate consistent and accurate data collection, comparison of epidemiological and pathological parameters between different populations, facilitate research and hopefully will result in improved patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Meagan J Judge
- Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Blaise A Clarke
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ben Davidson
- 1] Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway [2] Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Harry Hollema
- Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Yoshiki Mikami
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Colin J R Stewart
- 1] Department of Histopathology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia [2] School for Women's and Infant's Health, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Russell Vang
- Department of Pathology (Division of Gynecologic Pathology), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lynn Hirschowitz
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
de Baca ME, Arnaout R, Brodsky V, Birdsong GG. Ordo ab Chao: framework for an integrated disease report. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015; 139:165-70. [PMID: 25611099 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0561-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The volume of information that must be assimilated to appropriately manage patients with complex or chronic disease can make this task difficult because of the number of data points, their variable temporal availability, and the fact that they may reside in different systems or even institutions. OBJECTIVE .- To outline a framework for building an integrated disease report (IDR) that takes advantage of the capabilities of electronic reporting to create a single, succinct, interpretative report comprising all disease pertinent data. DESIGN Disease pertinent data of an IDR include pathology results, laboratory and radiology data, pathologic correlations, risk profiles, and therapeutic implications. We used cancer herein as a representative process for proposing what is, to our knowledge, the first example of standardized guidelines for such a report. The IDR was defined as a modular, dynamic, electronic summary of the most current state of a patient in regard to a particular illness such as lung cancer or diabetes, which includes all information relevant for patient management. RESULTS We propose the following 11 core data concepts that an IDR should include: patient identification; patient demographics; disease, diagnosis, and prognosis; tumor board dispositions and decisions; graphic timeline; preresection workup and therapy; resection workup; interpretative comment summarizing pertinent findings; biobanking data; postresection workup; and disease and patient status at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS A well-executed IDR should improve patient care and efficiency for health care team members. It would demonstrate the added value of pathology interpretation and likely contribute to a reduction in errors and improved patient safety by decreasing the risk that important data will be overlooked.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica E de Baca
- From the Department of Hematopathology, Hematologics, Inc, Seattle, Washington (Dr de Baca); the Department of Pathology and Division of Clinical Informatics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and the Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Arnaout); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York (Dr Brodsky); and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine/Grady Health System, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Birdsong)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Adequacy of cervical sampling in hysterectomy specimens for endometrial cancer. Ann Diagn Pathol 2015; 19:43-4. [PMID: 25736616 DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2015] [Revised: 02/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
AIM To determine whether sampling one section, which includes the anterior and posterior cervical lips in hysterectomy specimens, provides the best prospect for detecting stromal invasion in hysterectomy specimens for endometrial cancers. METHODS To assess the most likely section in which cervical stromal invasion was identified in 29 cases. RESULTS Cervical stromal invasion was detected in first section in 75.8% cases, whereas 24.1% detected in random sections other than first section. CONCLUSION Cervical stromal invasion is most likely to be identified in one section taken in the midline, which includes anterior and posterior lips. However, in a significant number of cases, this one section missed invasion, which was detected in other random cervical sections. Therefore, sampling of one block (anterior and posterior) from the cervix is insufficient for detecting cervical stromal invasion for endometrial cancer.
Collapse
|
45
|
Washington MK, Baker TP, Simpson J. Checklists, Protocols, and the “Gold Standard” Approach. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014; 138:159-60. [DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0519-ed] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Kay Washington
- From the Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Drs Washington and Simpson)
| | - Thomas P. Baker
- and The Joint Pathology Center, Joint Task Force National Capital Region Medical, Silver Spring, Maryland (Dr Baker)
| | - Jean Simpson
- From the Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Drs Washington and Simpson)
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
The pattern of myometrial invasion as a predictor of lymph node metastasis or extrauterine disease in low-grade endometrial carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2013; 37:1728-36. [PMID: 24061515 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0b013e318299f2ab] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine predictors of lymph node (LN) metastases or extrauterine disease (ED) in low-grade (FIGO grade 1 or 2) endometrioid carcinoma (LGEC) in a multi-institutional setting. For LGEC with and without LN metastasis or ED, each of the 9 participating institutions evaluated patients' age, tumor size, myometrial invasion (MI), FIGO grade, % solid component, the presence or absence of papillary architecture, microcystic, elongated, and fragmented glands (MELF), single-cell/cell-cluster invasion (SCI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), lower uterine segment (LUS) and cervical stromal (CX) involvement, and numbers of pelvic and para-aortic LNs sampled. A total of 304 cases were reviewed: LN(+) or ED(+), 96; LN(-)/ED(-), 208. Patients' ages ranged from 23 to 91 years (median 61 y). Table 1 summarizes the histopathologic variables that were noted for the LN(+) or ED(+) group: tumor size ≥2 cm, 93/96 (97%); MI>50%, 54/96 (56%); MELF, 67/96 (70%); SCI, 33/96 (34%); LVI, 79/96 (82%); >20% solid, 65/96 (68%); papillary architecture present, 68/96 (72%); LUS involved, 64/96 (67%); and CX involved, 41/96 (43%). For the LN(-)/ED(-) group, the results were as follows: tumor size ≥2 cm, 152/208 (73%); MI>50%, 56/208 (27%); MELF, 79/208 (38%); SCI, 19/208 (9%); LVI, 56/208 (27%); >20% solid, 160/208 (77%); papillary architecture present, 122/208 (59%); LUS involved, 77/208 (37%); CX involved, 24/208 (12%). There was no evidence of a difference in the number of pelvic or para-aortic LNs sampled between groups (P=0.9 and 0.1, respectively). After multivariate analysis, the depth of MI, CX involvement, LVI, and SCI emerged as significant predictors of advanced-stage disease. Although univariate analysis pointed to LUS involvement, MELF pattern of invasion, and papillary architecture as possible predictors of advanced-stage disease, these were not shown to be significant by multivariate analysis. This study validates MI, CX involvement, and LVI as significant predictors of LN(+) or ED(+). The association of SCI pattern with advanced-stage LGEC is a novel finding.
Collapse
|
47
|
Scolyer RA, Judge MJ, Evans A, Frishberg DP, Prieto VG, Thompson JF, Trotter MJ, Walsh MY, Walsh NMG, Ellis DW. Data set for pathology reporting of cutaneous invasive melanoma: recommendations from the international collaboration on cancer reporting (ICCR). Am J Surg Pathol 2013; 37:1797-814. [PMID: 24061524 PMCID: PMC3864181 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0b013e31829d7f35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
An accurate and complete pathology report is critical for the optimal management of cutaneous melanoma patients. Protocols for the pathologic reporting of melanoma have been independently developed by the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA), Royal College of Pathologists (United Kingdom) (RCPath), and College of American Pathologists (CAP). In this study, data sets, checklists, and structured reporting protocols for pathologic examination and reporting of cutaneous melanoma were analyzed by an international panel of melanoma pathologists and clinicians with the aim of developing a common, internationally agreed upon, evidence-based data set. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting cutaneous melanoma expert review panel analyzed the existing RCPA, RCPath, and CAP data sets to develop a protocol containing "required" (mandatory/core) and "recommended" (nonmandatory/noncore) elements. Required elements were defined as those that had agreed evidentiary support at National Health and Medical Research Council level III-2 level of evidence or above and that were unanimously agreed upon by the review panel to be essential for the clinical management, staging, or assessment of the prognosis of melanoma or fundamental for pathologic diagnosis. Recommended elements were those considered to be clinically important and recommended for good practice but with lesser degrees of supportive evidence. Sixteen core/required data elements for cutaneous melanoma pathology reports were defined (with an additional 4 core/required elements for specimens received with lymph nodes). Eighteen additional data elements with a lesser level of evidentiary support were included in the recommended data set. Consensus response values (permitted responses) were formulated for each data item. Development and agreement of this evidence-based protocol at an international level was accomplished in a timely and efficient manner, and the processes described herein may facilitate the development of protocols for other tumor types. Widespread utilization of an internationally agreed upon, structured pathology data set for melanoma will lead not only to improved patient management but is a prerequisite for research and for international benchmarking in health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A Scolyer
- *Melanoma Institute Australia Disciplines of †Pathology **Surgery, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney Departments of ‡Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology ††Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital §Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia, Sydney, NSW ¶¶Royal Adelaide Hospital and Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia ∥Department of Pathology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland ¶Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA #Departments of Pathology and Dermatology, University of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX ‡‡Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB ∥∥Department of Pathology, Capital District Health Authority and Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada §§Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|