Assessing Different Partner Notification Methods for Assuring Partner Treatment for Gonorrhea: Looking for the Best Mix of Options

Population-Level Outcomes of Partner Notification Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Report Sex With Men Diagnosed With Infectious Syphilis in British Columbia, Canada

BACKGROUND

Syphilis testing, treatment, and partner notification (PN) are centrally coordinated in British Columbia (BC), Canada. Public health (PH) nurses (PHNs) contact almost all syphilis patients and either notify partners of syphilis exposure (PH-initiated PN) or support patients to notify their own partners (patient-initiated PN). In the context of an ongoing syphilis epidemic among gay, bisexual, and other men who report sex with men (gbMSM), we measured population-level yields and compared PN approaches to inform prevention and control efforts.

METHODS

All gbMSM diagnosed with infectious syphilis in 2016 in BC were included. We calculated indicators of engagement with PN among patients and PN outcomes among notifiable partners using a cascade-of-care framework. χ2 Tests compared indicators between PN approaches.

RESULTS

Of the 759 syphilis diagnoses, 85.4% (648/759) were among gbMSM and 94.7% (614/648) were treated within 30 days of testing (mean [SD], 5.5 [5.2] days). Among patients, 87.7% (568/648) discussed PN with PHNs and 49.5% (281/568) named at least 1 notifiable partner, for a total of 1094 partners (mean [SD], 3.9 [5.5] partners/patient). Compared with PH-initiated PN, patient-initiated PN resulted in a greater proportion of partners notified (70.1% [573/817] vs. 89.8% [211/235]; P = 1.88 × 10-9), but there was no difference in the proportion of partners tested and/or treated (90.2% [517/573] vs. 86.7% [183/211]; P = 0.203), and diagnosed (12.8% [66/517] vs. 16.4% [30/183]; P > 0.271).

CONCLUSIONS

Public health- and patient-initiated PN had similarly high yields of partners tested and/or treated, and diagnosed, demonstrating that gbMSM can contribute to syphilis PN when supported by resource-equipped PHNs.

Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT) increases the frequency of partner notification among MSM in Lima, Peru: a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT) has been shown to improve treatment outcomes among heterosexual partners of individuals with curable sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Although the use of EPT with men who have sex with men (MSM) has been debated, due to the potential for missed opportunities to diagnose unidentified cases of HIV and syphilis infection in symptomatic partners, increases in partner notification (PN) resulting from use of EPT may promote testing and treatment of otherwise unidentified partners. We assessed the impact of EPT on self-reported PN among MSM in Peru with gonorrheal (GC) and/or chlamydial (CT) infection.

METHODS

We enrolled 173 MSM in Lima, Peru with symptomatic or asymptomatic GC and/or CT infection between 2012 and 2014. We enrolled 44 MSM with symptomatic urethritis/proctitis and 129 MSM with asymptomatic GC/CT infection, diagnosed based on nucleic acid testing (Aptima Combo 2 Transcription-Mediated Amplification [TMA]) from urethral, pharyngeal, and rectal sites. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive either standard PN counseling (n = 84) or counseling plus EPT (cefixime 400 mg/azithromycin 1 g) for up to five recent partners (n = 89). Self-reported notification was assessed by computer-assisted self-administered survey among 155 participants who returned for 14-day follow-up.

RESULTS

The median age of participants was 26 (interquartile range [IQR]: 23-31) with a median of 3 sexual partners (IQR: 2-4) in the previous 30-day period. Among all participants, 111/155 (71.6%) notified at least one partner at 14-day follow-up with a median of 1 partner notified per participant (IQR: 0-2). For participants randomized to receive EPT, 69/83 (83.1%) reported notifying at least one partner, compared with 42/72 (58.3%) of participants in the control arm (odds ratio = 3.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.68-7.39). The proportion of all recent partners notified was significantly greater in the EPT than in the control arm (53.5%, 95% CI: 45.0-62.0% versus 36.4%, 95% CI: 27.0-47.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Provision of EPT led to significant increases in notification among Peruvian MSM diagnosed with GC/CT infection. Additional research is needed to assess the impact of EPT on biological outcomes, including persistent or recurrent infection, antimicrobial resistance, and HIV/STI transmission, in MSM sexual networks.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01720654 . Registered on 10/29/2012.