Understanding Clinical Significance in Rehabilitation: A Primer for Researchers and Clinicians

The role of single case experimental designs in evidence creation in rehabilitation

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard of evidence guiding intervention selection in rehabilitation. However, conduct of sufficiently powered RCTs in rehabilitation can be expensive, pose ethical and attrition concerns when participants are assigned to ineffective treatment as usual conditions, and are infeasible with low-incidence populations. Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs), including N-of-1 RCTs are causal inference studies for small numbers of participants and not necessarily one participant as the name implies. These designs are increasingly used to evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions in diverse clinical settings and employ design features including but not limited to randomization and each participant serving as their own control. These and other internal validity enhancements can increase the confidence in study results coming from these designs. This manuscript discusses the expanded application of SCEDs in rehabilitation contexts to answer everyday clinical rehabilitation research questions with emphasis on strategies to use: 1) to maximize internal validity of this family of designs; 2) improve utility, effectiveness, and acceptability of these designs for rehabilitation end-users (clinicians, policymakers, and participants); 3) build evidence bases in areas of rehabilitation where RCTs are uncommonly used. Primary considerations for situating SCEDs within the continuum of experimental designs include increasing internal validity within designs, improving transparency in conduct and reporting of these studies, and increasing access to advanced research methods training for rehabilitation professionals.

Investigating the Salience of Clinical Meaningfulness and Clinically Meaningful Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer Care Delivery

PURPOSE

As metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treatment evolves, there is a need to understand how clinical meaningfulness, or a meaningful change in a patient's daily life, and clinically meaningful outcomes inform patient-centered care. Partnering with key stakeholders ensures patient-centered research incorporates the knowledge and expertise of advisors with lived experience. We describe a multistakeholder engagement approach to examine how people living with mBC (PLWmBC), caregivers, and health care providers interpret clinical meaningfulness and clinically meaningful outcomes and their influence on mBC treatment decision making and care.

METHODS

Qualitative focus groups with PLWmBC, caregivers, and health care providers were conducted and analyzed along three overarching themes: interpretations of clinical meaningfulness and clinically meaningful outcomes; treatment recommendations, preferences, and decisions; and implications for clinical practice. Patient-led and professional organizations served as research partners in study design, implementation, and interpretation of findings.

RESULTS

Partnerships were established with four patient-led and three professional organizations representing diverse constituencies throughout the United States. Twenty-two focus groups were conducted with 50 PLWmBC, 24 caregivers, and 41 health care providers (oncologists, n = 11; advanced practice providers, n = 13; oncology nurses, n = 17) between March and June 2023. PLWmBC and caregivers were unfamiliar with the concepts of clinical meaningfulness and clinically meaningful outcomes. Although health care providers were familiar, they did not use the terms when discussing treatment with PLWmBC. Across groups, participants emphasized the importance of meaningful outcomes beyond overall survival, including quality of life and improvement in symptoms and functioning. Participants noted that outcomes considered meaningful are individualized and dynamic.

CONCLUSION

This study offers insight into how partnering with patient advocacy and professional organizations can enhance research quality and aid translation of findings to clinical practice, thereby supporting patient-centered care.

Intention-to-Treat Analysis in Clinical Research: Basic Concepts for Clinicians

ABSTRACT

This review presents a comprehensive summary and critical evaluation of intention-to-treat analysis, with a particular focus on its application to randomized controlled trials within the field of rehabilitation. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a methodological review that encompassed electronic and manual search strategies to identify relevant studies. Our selection process involved two independent reviewers who initially screened titles and abstracts and subsequently performed full-text screening based on established eligibility criteria. In addition, we included studies from manual searches that were already cataloged within the first author's personal database. The findings are synthesized through a narrative approach, covering fundamental aspects of intention to treat, including its definition, common misconceptions, advantages, disadvantages, and key recommendations. Notably, the health literature offers a variety of definitions for intention to treat, which can lead to misinterpretations and inappropriate application when analyzing randomized controlled trial results, potentially resulting in misleading findings with significant implications for healthcare decision making. Authors should clearly report the specific intention-to-treat definition used in their analysis, provide details on participant dropouts, and explain upon their approach to managing missing data. Adherence to reporting guidelines, such as the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for randomized controlled trials, is essential to standardize intention-to-treat information, ensuring the delivery of accurate and informative results for healthcare decision making.

Botulinum toxin type A injection into the masticatory muscles and its effects on mandibular bone resorption and density. A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to summarize and synthesize the evidence that investigates the secondary effects of the application of botulinum toxin (BT) into the masticatory muscles and its effects on bone density.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Database searches were conducted until March 19th, 2024. The quality of the studies was assessed by the Cochrane tool risk of bias for the randomized controlled trials and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. The Cochrane Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to evaluate the confidence in the overall evidence.

RESULTS

Five studies looking at the effects of botulinum toxin on bone density and resorption when applied to masticatory muscles were found. No significant changes were observed in most of the studies when looking at the effects of botulinum toxin on mandibular condyle volume, density, mandibular angle thickness, and coronoid process volume. The only finding that was statistically and clinically relevant was the difference between patients who received a double application of BT when compared with patients who received a single application (SMD: -0.99 [95%CI: -1.94,-0.05]) on the volume of the mandibular angle.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no clear pattern on whether the application of botulinum toxin is associated with bone resorption or not. Although some studies show statistical significance of the findings, the magnitude of the changes in bone density and their clinical significance are not completely clear.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

To understand the effectiveness of the use of botulinum toxin into the masticatory muscles and its possible secondary adverse effects on the density of the mandible.

Noninvasive spinal stimulation improves walking in chronic stroke survivors: a proof-of-concept case series

BACKGROUND

After stroke, restoring safe, independent, and efficient walking is a top rehabilitation priority. However, in nearly 70% of stroke survivors asymmetrical walking patterns and reduced walking speed persist. This case series study aims to investigate the effectiveness of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) in enhancing walking ability of persons with chronic stroke.

METHODS

Eight participants with hemiparesis after a single, chronic stroke were enrolled. Each participant was assigned to either the Stim group (N = 4, gait training + tSCS) or Control group (N = 4, gait training alone). Each participant in the Stim group was matched to a participant in the Control group based on age, time since stroke, and self-selected gait speed. For the Stim group, tSCS was delivered during gait training via electrodes placed on the skin between the spinous processes of C5-C6, T11-T12, and L1-L2. Both groups received 24 sessions of gait training over 8 weeks with a physical therapist providing verbal cueing for improved gait symmetry. Gait speed (measured from 10 m walk test), endurance (measured from 6 min walk test), spatiotemporal gait symmetries (step length and swing time), as well as the neurophysiological outcomes (muscle synergy, resting motor thresholds via spinal motor evoked responses) were collected without tSCS at baseline, completion, and 3 month follow-up.

RESULTS

All four Stim participants sustained spatiotemporal symmetry improvements at the 3 month follow-up (step length: 17.7%, swing time: 10.1%) compared to the Control group (step length: 1.1%, swing time 3.6%). Additionally, 3 of 4 Stim participants showed increased number of muscle synergies and/or lowered resting motor thresholds compared to the Control group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides promising preliminary evidence that using tSCS as a therapeutic catalyst to gait training may increase the efficacy of gait rehabilitation in individuals with chronic stroke. Trial registration NCT03714282 (clinicaltrials.gov), registration date: 2018-10-18.

The minimal important difference of patient-reported outcome measures related to female urinary incontinence: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The minimal important difference is a valuable metric in ascertaining the clinical relevance of a treatment, offering valuable guidance in patient management. There is a lack of available evidence concerning this metric in the context of outcomes related to female urinary incontinence, which might negatively impact clinical decision-making.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the minimal important difference of patient-reported outcome measures associated with urinary incontinence, calculated according to both distribution- and anchor-based methods.

METHODS

This is a systematic review conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The search strategy including the main terms for urinary incontinence and minimal important difference were used in five different databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus) in 09 June 2021 and were updated in January 09, 2024 with no limits for date, language or publication status. Studies that provided minimal important difference (distribution- or anchor-based methods) for patient-reported outcome measures related to female urinary incontinence outcomes were included. The study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two different researchers. Only studies that reported the minimal important difference according to anchor-based methods were assessed by credibility and certainty of the evidence. When possible, absolute minimal important differences were calculated for each study separately according to the mean change of the group of participants that slightly improved.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included. Thirteen questionnaires with their respective minimal important differences reported according to distribution (effect size, standard error of measurement, standardized response mean) and anchor-based methods were found. Most of the measures for anchor methods did not consider the smallest difference identified by the participants to calculate the minimal important difference. All reports related to anchor-based methods presented low credibility and very low certainty of the evidence. We pooled 20 different estimates of minimal important differences using data from primary studies, considering different anchors and questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high variability around the minimal important difference related to patient-reported outcome measures for urinary incontinence outcomes according to the method of analysis, questionnaires, and anchors used, however, the credibility and certainty of the evidence to support these is still limited.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Measurement Properties Analysis of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the ICIQ-VS

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The high prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in women requires assessments using validated instruments. We aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt to Brazilian Portuguese, and analyze the measurement properties of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Vaginal Symptoms Module (ICIQ-VS-Br).

METHODS

Participants were Brazilian women older than 18 years presenting vulvovaginal symptoms according to the Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ-Br). The development of the ICIQ-VS-Br included the steps of translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert meeting, and pre-test. We analyzed construct validity by correlating the ICIQ-VS-Br and VSQ-Br. The participants answered the ICIQ-VS-Br the second time 7 to 10 days after the first response. We measured test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, and construct validity using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The study included 313 women. Reproducibility was analyzed for the three subscales of the ICIQ-VS-Br, resulting in an ICC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.94) for "vaginal symptoms," 0.85 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.89) for "sexual matters," and 0.87 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.91) for "quality of life." Construct validity showed a moderate correlation between ICIQ-VS-Br and VSQ-Br, confirming our hypotheses.

CONCLUSIONS

The ICIQ-VS-Br demonstrated validity and reproducibility, indicating that the instrument can be used in scientific research and clinical practice.

Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

The Scientific Investigation Committee of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry offers this review of the 2022 dental literature to briefly touch on several topics of interest to modern restorative dentistry. Each committee member brings discipline-specific expertise in their subject areas that include (in order of the appearance in this report): prosthodontics; periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; dental materials and therapeutics; occlusion and temporomandibular disorders; sleep-related breathing disorders; oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial surgery; and dental caries and cariology. The authors focused their efforts on reporting information likely to influence the daily dental treatment decisions of the reader with an emphasis on innovations, new materials and processes, and future trends in dentistry. With the tremendous volume of literature published daily in dentistry and related disciplines, this review cannot be comprehensive. Instead, its purpose is to update interested readers and provide valuable resource material for those willing to subsequently pursue greater detail on their own. Our intent remains to assist colleagues in navigating the tremendous volume of newly minted information produced annually. Finally, we hope that readers find this work helpful in managing patients.

The Brazilian Portuguese version of the ICIQ-FLUTSsex: cross-cultural adaptation and measurement property analysis

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The worldwide prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women is high; therefore, an adequate assessment of this condition is necessary, with instruments validated for the Brazilian population. The aim was to translate and adapt the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Female Sexual Matters Associated with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms into Brazilian Portuguese (ICIQ-FLUTSsex-Br) and analyze its measurement properties.

METHODS

We recruited Brazilian women, literate, over 18 years old, who had had sexual intercourse in the last 4 weeks and had urinary loss. The translation and cross-cultural adaptation were performed following five stages: translation, synthesis, back translation, expert committee review, and pre-test. Measurement properties were analyzed using SPSS software, as follows: test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); construct validity using Pearson's correlation coefficient, by correlating the ICIQ-FLUTSsex-Br with the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12).

RESULTS

A total of 328 women participated in the study. The reproducibility was 0.88, the standard error of measurement was 0.29, and the minimal detectable change was 0.80 (95% CI). Moderate correlations were found between the total scores of the ICIQ-FLUTSsex and PISQ-12 questionnaires (0.54, p<0.01), confirming the hypotheses outlined. Weak correlations were also found for comparisons between the FSFI and ICIQ-FLUTSsex total scores (-0.56, p<0.01) and the PISQ-12 question about fear of incontinence hindering sexual intercourse (0.26, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The Portuguese-language version of the ICIQ-FLUTSsex-Br showed validity and reproducibility, making it a tool to be used in research and clinical practice by health professionals in Brazil.