Rehabilitation Interventions for Improving Balance in Parkinson's Disease: A Narrative Review

A wearable system for visual cueing gait rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease: a randomized non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Gait disturbances represent one of the most disabling features of Parkinson's disease (PD).

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the non-inferiority of a new wearable visual cueing system (Q-Walk) for gait rehabilitation in PD subjects, compared to traditional visual cues (stripes on the floor).

DESIGN

Open-label, monocentric, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

SETTING

Outpatients.

POPULATION

Patients affected by idiopathic PD without cognitive impairment, Hoehn and Yahr stage II-IV, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor section III ≥2, stable drug usage since at least 3 weeks.

METHODS

At the enrollment (T0), all subjects underwent a clinical/functional evaluation and the instrumental gait and postural analysis; then they were randomly assigned to the Study Group (SG) or Control Group (CG). Rehabilitation program consisted in 10 consecutive individual sessions (5 sessions/week for 2 consecutive weeks). Each session included 60 minutes of conventional physiotherapy plus 30 minutes of gait training by Q-Walk (SG) or by traditional visual cues (CG). Follow-up visits were scheduled at the end of the treatment (T1) and after 3 months (T2).

RESULTS

Fifty-two subjects were enrolled in the study, 26 in each group. The within-groups analysis showed a significant improvement in clinical scales and instrumental data at T1 and at T2, compared to baseline, in both groups. According to the between-group analysis, Q-Walk cueing system was not-inferior to the traditional cues for gait rehabilitation. The satisfaction questionnaire revealed that most subjects described the Q-Walk cueing system as simple, motivating and easily usable, possibly suitable for home use.

CONCLUSIONS

Data showed that motor rehabilitation of PD subjects performed by means of the new wearable Q-Walk cueing system was feasible and as effective as traditional cues in improving gait parameters and balance.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

Wearable devices can act as an additional rehabilitation strategy for long-term and continuous care, allowing patients to train intensively and extensively in household settings, favoring a tailor-made and personalized approach as well as remote monitoring.

Comparing the effects of augmented virtual reality treadmill training versus conventional treadmill training in patients with stage II-III Parkinson's disease: the VIRTREAD-PD randomized controlled trial protocol

Background

Intensive treadmill training (TT) has been documented to improve gait parameters and functional independence in Parkinson's Disease (PD), but the optimal intervention protocol and the criteria for tailoring the intervention to patients' performances are lacking. TT may be integrated with augmented virtual reality (AVR), however, evidence of the effectiveness of this combined treatment is still limited. Moreover, prognostic biomarkers of rehabilitation, potentially useful to customize the treatment, are currently missing. The primary aim of this study is to compare the effects on gait performances of TT + AVR versus TT alone in II-III stage PD patients with gait disturbance. Secondary aims are to assess the effects on balance, gait parameters and other motor and non-motor symptoms, and patient's satisfaction and adherence to the treatment. As an exploratory aim, the study attempts to identify biomarkers of neuroplasticity detecting changes in Neurofilament Light Chain concentration T0-T1 and to identify prognostic biomarkers associated to blood-derived Extracellular Vesicles.

Methods

Single-center, randomized controlled single-blind trial comparing TT + AVR vs. TT in II-III stage PD patients with gait disturbances. Assessment will be performed at baseline (T0), end of training (T1), 3 (T2) and 6 months (T3, phone interview) from T1. The primary outcome is difference in gait performance assessed with the Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment gait scale at T1. Secondary outcomes are differences in gait performance at T2, in balance and spatial-temporal gait parameters at T1 and T2, patients' satisfaction and adherence. Changes in falls, functional mobility, functional autonomy, cognition, mood, and quality of life will be also assessed at different timepoints. The G*Power software was used to estimate a sample size of 20 subjects per group (power 0.95, α < 0.05), raised to 24 per group to compensate for potential drop-outs. Both interventions will be customized and progressive, based on the participant's performance, according to a predefined protocol.

Conclusion

This study will provide data on the possible superiority of AVR-associated TT over conventional TT in improving gait and other motor and non-motor symptoms in persons with PD and gait disturbances. Results of the exploratory analysis could add information in the field of biomarker research in PD rehabilitation.