The Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided and Palpation-Guided Peroneal Tendon Sheath Injections

In-Plane Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin Injection to Lumbrical and Interosseus Upper Limb Muscles: Technical Report

This technical report presents an innovative approach utilizing in-plane ultrasound-guided injections to precisely target the lumbrical and interosseous muscles within the upper limb. The report also elucidates the rationale and advantages of incorporating ultrasound guidance in the administration of Botulinum toxin (BTX) injections, encompassing the real-time visualization of needle trajectory and accurate localization of the target muscle groups while delving into the pertinent anatomical details of these muscles and their significance in diverse neuromuscular conditions. The step-by-step procedure for conducting in-plane ultrasound-guided BTX injections to the lumbrical and interosseous muscles is delineated, emphasizing critical technical considerations and potential pitfalls to be vigilant of during the procedure. Furthermore, the article addresses the significance of selecting appropriate BTX dosages and injection sites based on individual patient presentations and clinical indications. Overall, the in-plane ultrasound-guided BTX injection technique presents a promising approach for providing precise and targeted treatment to the lumbrical and interosseous muscles in the upper limb. It offers clinicians an alternative to injections performed without guidance or out-of-plane ultrasound-guided injections, potentially decreasing the likelihood of complications and enhancing treatment outcomes for patients with a range of neuromuscular conditions. However, further research and comparative studies are necessary to establish the long-term efficacy and safety of this technique, thus confirming its role in clinical practice.

Clinical outcomes of posterior tibial tendon sheath ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections into the posterior tibial tendon sheath for posterior tibialis tendinopathy. Secondary outcomes include duration of pain relief, amount of pain relief, need for repeat injections and progression to surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all patients in our electronic medical record who underwent a posterior tibial tendon sheath (PTTS) steroid injection between 2015 and 2020 for the diagnosis of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction and/or posterior tibialis tendon insufficiency, and/or ankle pain. Demographic information was obtained from the patient record in addition to MRI data, clinical response to injection based on follow-up visits, number of total injections and progression to surgery. Thirty-eight posterior tibial tendon sheath ultrasound-guided injections were administered in 33 patients who met inclusion criteria during the 5-year study period.

Results

Thirty-three patients were included in the study with a total of 38 injections performed. Eighteen of 38 (47%) injections yielded good or better pain relief. Seven of 33 patients (21%) progressed to surgery. There were no reported complications with the 38 performed injections.

Conclusion

Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection into the posterior tibial tendon sheath is a safe nonoperative treatment modality for progressive collapsing foot deformity. The efficacy of the injection appears highly variable with 47% of injections yielding 'good' or better clinical results. When evaluating body mass index (BMI), obese patients (BMI ≥30.0) were found to have a more sustained response to injection (P = 0.029) and more pain relief (P = 0.049) than non-obese patients.

Trigger Point Injections

Myofascial pain and myofascial pain syndromes are among some of the most common acute and chronic pain conditions. Many interventional procedures can be performed in both an acute and chronic pain setting to address myofascial pain syndromes. Trigger point injections can be performed with or without imaging guidance such as fluoroscopy and ultrasound; however, the use of imaging in years past has been recommended to improve patient outcome and safety. Injections can be performed using no injectate (dry needling), or can involve the administration of local anesthetics, botulinum toxin, or corticosteroids.

A Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Corticosteroid Injections of Tendon Sheaths, Excluding Stenosing Tenosynovitis of the Wrist and Hand

OBJECTIVE

Corticosteroid injections into tendon sheaths are common in clinical practice for treatment of a variety of tendon disorders. Previous systematic reviews have been performed on injections for stenosing tenosynovitis (DeQuervain tenosynovitis and trigger finger), but little high-level evidence remains for other tendon sheath injections. This systematic review analyzes the available literature on improvements in pain and function after these injections.

DESIGN

This systematic review of MEDLINE and Embase databases, as well as article bibliographies, examined studies of adult tendon sheath injections, excluding DeQuervain and trigger finger injections. Studies with and without comparison groups were examined. Risk of bias assessment was additionally performed.

RESULTS

Abstracts from 1293 records were screened, and 187 full-text articles were reviewed. Seven articles met final inclusion criteria, of which five were prospective trials and none were compared with a placebo. The proximal biceps, peroneal, finger flexor, and posterior tibialis tendons were explicitly examined. All articles reported at least short-term improvements in pain, and some reported improvement in function.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-quality studies exist that suggest tendon sheath injections may provide at least short-term improvement in pain. Controlled studies are required to fully demonstrate efficacy.

Peroneal Tendon Pathology: Treatment and Reconstruction of Peroneal Tears and Instability

Peroneal tendon pathology is becoming an increasingly recognized source of lateral-sided ankle pain. High clinical suspicion, along with judicious physical examination coupled with confirmatory advanced imaging modalities, are necessary to make an accurate diagnosis and aid in guiding treatment. Peroneal pathology encompasses several distinct conditions. Peroneal tendon tears and injuries to the peroneal retinaculum must be identified to guide treatment. Patients with peroneal pathology report high levels of satisfaction after surgical management with most returning to their preinjury level of function. An early and accurate diagnosis, along with treatment tailored to the individual, is necessary to obtain optimal outcomes.

Feasibility of Ultrasound-Guided Trigger Point Injection in Patients with Myofascial Pain Syndrome

We compared the feasibility of ultrasound (US)-guided myofascial trigger point (MTrP) injection with that of a blind injection technique following the use of shear wave elastography (SWE) for the measurement of stiffness at the MTrPs in patients with trapezius myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). A total of 41 patients (n = 41) were randomized to either the trial group (n = 21, SWE combined with US-guided injection) or the control group (n = 20, SWE combined with blind injection). At baseline and four weeks, they were evaluated for the manual muscle test (MMT), the range of motion (ROM), pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores during the abduction, adduction, flexion, extension, external rotation and internal rotation of the shoulder joint. Differences in changes in pain VAS scores, NDI scores and SPADI scores at four weeks from baseline between the two groups reached statistical significance (p = 0.003, 0.012, and 0.018, respectively). US-guided MTrP injection is a more useful modality as compared with a blind injection in patients with MPS.

Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Peroneal Tendon Sheath Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injection

BACKGROUND

The treatment of symptomatic peroneal tendinopathy and tears traditionally begins with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, activity modification, physical therapy, and immobilization, with surgery typically reserved for those failing nonoperative treatment. Ultrasound-(US)-guided peroneal tendon sheath (PTS) corticosteroid injection is an additional nonoperative modality, but limited data exist on its safety and efficacy. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes following US-guided PTS corticosteroid injection for chronic tendinopathy or tears.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients who had undergone US-guided PTS corticosteroid injection for pain due to peroneal tendinopathy, tears, or subluxation at our institution from 2012 to 2018. Underlying diagnosis was based on clinical examination, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results, and/or intraoperative findings, when available. Medical record data were supplemented by e-mail or telephone follow-up. Collected information included patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, workers' compensation status, prior surgeries about the foot and ankle, duration of symptoms prior to injection, perceived improvement in pain following injection and its duration, number of injections, progression to surgery, and any adverse outcomes of injection. We identified 96 patients (109 injections). Thirty-seven (38.5%) had previous foot and ankle surgery, with 17 (17.7%) having surgery specifically on the peroneal tendons.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of 96 (25%) progressed to have surgery on their peroneal tendons following injection. Following injection, 38/87 (43.7%) of patients reported 0-1 weeks of pain relief, 11/87 (12.6%) 2-6 weeks, 6/87 (6.9%) 7-12 weeks, and 32/87 (36.8%) greater than 12 weeks. Preinjection duration of symptoms was associated with postinjection duration of pain relief (P=.036). There were 2 reported complications (1.8%): 1 case of self-limited sural nerve irritation and 1 of peroneus longus tear progression.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates US-guided PTS corticosteroid injection was safe and relatively effective in patients with symptomatic peroneal tendon tears or tendinopathy, including those who had undergone prior surgery, and may be considered in a comprehensive protocol of nonoperative management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

[Injuries of the peroneal tendons : Often overlooked]

CLINICAL ISSUE

Injuries of the peroneal tendons are rare and often overlooked. Typical pathologies are tendinitis, tears and dislocation. Accompanying injuries are fractures. They are often associated with instability in the ankle and rearfoot deformities; therefore, these pathologies should be excluded or taken into consideration in the treatment. The clinical examination is crucial for the diagnosis.

DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP

Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations are very helpful; however, the true extent of the tendon pathology is often first seen during surgery. Bony injuries and deformities are assessed radiographically and by computed tomography (CT).

PERFORMANCE

Although conservative treatment is generally used at the beginning of therapy, progression is more likely to occur in the case of tears; therefore, the correct timing for an operative therapy should not be missed. Dislocations are the domain of operative therapy. Acute tendinitis, on the other hand, is usually accessible to conservative therapy if it is not the result of a gross deformity.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Rehabilitation after operative treatment is demanding and prolonged especially after operative therapy of peroneal tendon tears. The results to be expected appear promising.

Aspiration and Injection Techniques of the Lower Extremity

Orthopaedic surgeons frequently use aspirations and injections to both diagnose and treat disorders of the lower extremity. Comprehensive knowledge of regional anatomy, procedural indications, and appropriate techniques are essential. Clinicians must be well versed in a range of musculoskeletal aspiration and injection techniques, including patient positioning, equipment needs, injectable solutions, aspirate analysis, and potential complications. Safe and effective aspiration and injection techniques for the lower extremity, including the hip, knee, foot, and ankle, are reviewed. Image guidance modalities include fluoroscopy, ultrasonography, CT, and MRI.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Ankle Pain

Chronic ankle pain is a common clinical problem whose cause is often elucidated by imaging. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria for chronic ankle pain define best practices of image ordering. Clinical scenarios are followed by the imaging choices and their appropriateness. The information is in ordered tables with an accompanying narrative explanation to guide physicians to order the right test. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Efficacy of a non-image-guided diagnostic hip injection in patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of intra-articular hip pathology

The purpose of this study was to determine the likelihood of pain relief, as a measure of accurate diagnosis of intra-articular hip pathology and correct needle placement, with a non-image-guided intra-articular hip injection performed bedside in the clinic. A retrospective study of prospectively collected data was performed in a consecutive cohort of patients diagnosed with symptomatic intra-articular hip pathology who underwent a non-image-guided intra-articular injection in the clinic. All patients had clinical and radiographic evidence of hip impingement, hip instability, chondrolabral pathology, or other causes of intra-articular hip pain. A previously described technique for a non-image-guided hip injection was performed using 7-10 ml of 1% lidocaine for diagnostic evaluation with some patients receiving 2 ml of Kenalog^®-40 if clinically indicated. Ten minutes following each injection, the patient was asked to report the percent improvement in pain (from 0 to 100%) while physical examination and provocative tests were repeated. The final study cohort comprised 142 patients (161 injections). In three cases, patients were either unable to assess or quantify any change in pain level 10 min following the injection. In the remaining 158 hip injections, pain relief was noted in 156 cases (156/158, 98.7%), with at least 70% improvement in pain level noted in 152 cases (152/158, 96.2%). Average pain relief among all 158 injections was 89 ± 16%. A non-image-guided diagnostic intra-articular hip injection yields reliable short-term pain relief, simultaneously endorsing accurate diagnosis of hip pathology and intra-articular needle placement.

Acute Peroneal Injury

A high clinical suspicion and greater understanding of the anatomy and pathophysiology of lateral ankle injuries have enabled early diagnosis and treatment-improving outcomes of acute peroneal tendon tears. Multiple conditions can be the cause of lateral ankle pain attributed to the peroneal tendons: tenosynovitis, tendinosis, subluxation and dislocation, stenosing tenosynovitis, abnormality related to the os peroneum, as well as tears of the peroneal tendons. It is imperative for the clinician to maintain a high suspicion for peroneal tendon abnormality when evaluating patients with lateral ankle pain.

Musculoskeletal interventional procedures: With or without imaging guidance?

Aspiration and injection of joints and soft tissues is an indispensable skill used in everyday practice by the clinical rheumatologist. Most rheumatologists recognise that performing these procedures using anatomical landmarks is not always successful, particularly in the case of small or infrequently injected joints, bursae or tendon sheaths. Musculoskeletal ultrasound confirms the local pathological-anatomical diagnosis and is the most applicable and feasible imaging method that can be applied in clinical practice in guiding musculoskeletal interventional procedures. From 1993, there has been substantial examination of the accuracy of landmark- and imaging-guided procedures. We have searched the literature and ascertained whether imaging techniques improve the accuracy of musculoskeletal procedures and whether the accuracy of needle placement can be translated into improved clinical outcome (efficacy).

Accuracy of Palpation-Guided Catheter Placement for Muscle Pressure Measurements in Suspected Deep Posterior Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome of the Lower Leg: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

BACKGROUND

A diagnosis of lower leg deep posterior chronic exertional compartment syndrome (dp-CECS) is made by a dynamic pressure measurement. The insertion of a pressure catheter is guided by anatomic landmarks (freehand) or by ultrasound. The catheter tip is ideally positioned in the tibialis posterior muscle (TP). The accuracy of in vivo catheter placement using lower leg magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in healthy patients suspected of having dp-CECS has never been studied.

PURPOSE

To analyze whether a freehand catheter insertion results in accurate positioning in the TP as confirmed by MRI in patients with suspected dp-CECS.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Catheters were inserted into central portions of the TP using a standard puncturing technique guided by lower leg anatomic landmarks. After timed muscle pressure measurements during a standard provocative treadmill running test, lower leg MRI scans were obtained and evaluated by 2 skilled radiologists. Catheter tip placement was termed accurate (in the TP), suboptimal (in the deep posterior compartment but outside the TP), or inaccurate (outside the deep posterior compartment).

RESULTS

Between March 2013 and September 2014, a total of 24 patients (8 male, 16 female; mean age, 30 years [range, 18-54 years]) underwent an intracompartmental pressure (ICP) measurement, followed by MRI. Cardinal symptoms were pain during exertion (20% very severe, 53% severe, and 20% moderate) and tightness (29% very severe, 43% severe). Symptoms were bilateral in 74% of patients. Nine of the 24 patients were diagnosed with dp-CECS based on elevated ICPs. Of the 24 patients, catheter tip placement was accurate in 10 (42%), whereas suboptimal placement was achieved in 9 (38%). Five procedures were inaccurate (transition zone between the deep and superficial compartments, n = 3; in the superficial lower leg compartment, n = 2). Signs of a hematoma were found in 38% of the patients, although there were no associated clinical symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Palpation-guided placement of catheters for TP pressure measurements is suboptimal in more than half of the patients with suspected lower leg dp-CECS. Optimizing the pressure catheter tip positioning technique may improve diagnostic accuracy in dp-CECS.

Management of sports injuries of the foot and ankle

Sporting injuries around the ankle vary from simple sprains that will resolve spontaneously within a few days to severe injuries which may never fully recover and may threaten the career of a professional athlete. Some of these injuries can be easily overlooked altogether or misdiagnosed with potentially devastating effects on future performance. In this review article, we cover some of the common and important sporting injuries involving the ankle including updates on their management and outcomes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:874–83.

Ultrasound-guided procedures in rheumatology. What is the evidence?

Ultrasound (US) is a cost-effective, noninvasive, and accessible imaging modality that clinicians use at the point of care to assess disease activity and therapeutic efficacy in different rheumatic conditions. It can play a relevant role in invasive procedures performed by the rheumatologist, potentially ensuring a higher degree of accuracy. However, US-guided injections are still underused, and the conventional blind injection the most commonly adopted approach. In this article, we analyze the current evidence supporting the use of US-guided procedures, emphasizing comparative studies between conventional and US-guided procedures and their benefits in the daily rheumatological practice.

Resident Accuracy of Electromyography Needle Electrode Placement Using Ultrasound Verification

BACKGROUND

Electromyography (EMG) and musculoskeletal (MSK) ultrasound (US) are core learning objectives during physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) training. However, there have been no prior studies using MSK US to assess the acquisition of EMG procedural skills during residency training. This study aims to demonstrate the differences in skillful needle placement between junior and senior physiatry residents. The integration of both EMG and MSK US may have tremendous potential for additional learning opportunities related to electrodiagnostic education.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of anatomic landmark-guided EMG needle electrode placement in commonly used muscles by PM&R resident physicians.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

An academic PM&R residency program.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve (5 postgraduate year [PGY] -3 and 7 PGY-4) PM&R resident physicians participating in a MSK US training course.

METHODS

Twelve PM&R residents in the eighth month of their third and fourth years of postgraduate training performed anatomic landmark-guided needle placement to the extensor indicis proprius (EIP), pronator teres (PT), peroneus longus (PL), and soleus muscles of live subjects. Once the needle electrode was satisfactorily placed, needle localization was verified with US.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Accuracy of EMG needle electrode placement.

RESULTS

The overall accuracy of needle electrode placement for all resident participants was 68.8%. The mean accuracy of the 4 selected muscles was 50% by PGY-3 residents and 82.1% for PGY-4 residents (P = .01). EIP was the most commonly missed muscle, with correct placement performed by 20% of PGY-3 and 42.9% of PGY-4 residents. PGY-3 residents demonstrated 60% accuracy with localizing the PT, PL, and soleus muscles. PGY-4 residents demonstrated 85.7% accuracy for PT, and 100% accuracy for both PL and soleus muscles.

CONCLUSIONS

Senior residents demonstrated greater accuracy of landmark-guided needle placement than junior residents. EMG procedural skills are important milestones in PM&R training, and MSK US may be a useful tool to enhance resident learning.

American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) position statement: interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound in sports medicine

The use of diagnostic and interventional ultrasound has significantly increased over the past decade. A majority of the increased utilization is by nonradiologists. In sports medicine, ultrasound is often used to guide interventions such as aspirations, diagnostic or therapeutic injections, tenotomies, releases, and hydrodissections. This American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) position statement critically reviews the literature and evaluates the accuracy, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided injections in major, intermediate, and small joints, and soft tissues, all of which are commonly performed in sports medicine. New ultrasound-guided procedures and future trends are also briefly discussed. Based upon the evidence, the official AMSSM position relevant to each subject is made.

Lower Extremity Injury Patterns in Elite Ballet Dancers: Ultrasound/MRI Imaging Features and an Institutional Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Interventions

BACKGROUND

Altered biomechanics from repetitive microtrauma, such as long practice hours in en pointe (tip of the toes) or demi pointe (balls of the feet) predispose ballet dancers to a multitude of musculoskeletal pathologies particularly in the lower extremities. Both ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are radiation-sparing modalities which can be used to confidently evaluate these injuries, with ultrasound (US) offering the added utility of therapeutic intervention at the same time in experienced hands.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purposes of this paper were: (1) to illustrate the US and MRI features of lower extremity injury patterns in ballet dancers, focusing on pathologies commonly encountered at a single orthopedic hospital; (2) to present complementary roles of both ultrasound and MRI in the evaluation of these injuries whenever possible; (3) to review and present our institutional approach towards therapeutic ultrasound-guided interventions by presenting explicit cases.

METHODS

Online searches were performed using the search criteria of "ballet biomechanics" and "ballet injuries." The results were then further narrowed down by limiting articles published in the past 15 years, modality (US and MRI), anatomical region (foot and ankle, hip and knee) and to major radiology, orthopedics, and sports medicine journals.

RESULTS

Performing ballet poses major stress to lower extremities and predisposes dancer to several musculoskeletal injuries. These can be adequately evaluated by both US and MRI. US is useful for evaluating superficial structures such as soft tissues, tendons, and ligaments, particularly in the foot and ankle. MRI provides superior resolution of deeper structures such as joints, bone marrow, and cartilage. In addition, US can be used as a therapeutic tool for providing quick symptomatic improvement in these athletes for who "time is money".

CONCLUSION

Performing ballet may cause major stress to the lower extremities, predominantly affecting the foot and ankle, followed by the knee and hip. US and MRI play complementary roles in evaluating various orthopedic conditions in ballet dancers, with US allowing for dynamic evaluation and guidance for interventions.

Peroneal Tendon Disorders

Peroneal tendon pathology is often found in patients complaining of lateral ankle pain and instability. Conditions encountered include tendinosis; tendinopathy; tenosynovitis; tears of the peroneus brevis, peroneus longus, and both tendons; subluxation and dislocation; and painful os peroneum syndrome. Injuries can be acute as a result of trauma or present as chronic problems, often in patients with predisposing structural components such as hindfoot varus, lateral ligamentous instability, an enlarged peroneal tubercle, and a symptomatic os peroneum. Treatment begins with nonoperative care, but when surgery is required, reported results and return to sport are in general very good.

American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound in sports medicine

The use of diagnostic and interventional ultrasound has significantly increased over the past decade. A majority of the increased utilization is by nonradiologists. In sports medicine, ultrasound is often used to guide interventions such as aspirations, diagnostic or therapeutic injections, tenotomies, releases, and hydrodissections. This American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) position statement critically reviews the literature and evaluates the accuracy, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided injections in major, intermediate, and small joints, and soft tissues, all of which are commonly performed in sports medicine. New ultrasound-guided procedures and future trends are also briefly discussed. Based on the evidence, the official AMSSM position relevant to each subject is made.

American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) position statement: interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound in sports medicine

BACKGROUND

The use of diagnostic and interventional ultrasound has significantly increased over the past decade. A majority of the increased utilisation is by non-radiologists. In sports medicine, ultrasound is often used to guide interventions such as aspirations, diagnostic or therapeutic injections, tenotomies, releases and hydrodissections.

OBJECTIVE

Critically review the literature related to the accuracy, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided injections (USGIs) in major, intermediate and small joints; and soft tissues.

DESIGN

Systematic review of the literature.

RESULTS

USGIs are more accurate than landmark-guided injections (LMGIs; strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT) Evidence Rating=A). USGIs are more efficacious than LMGIs (SORT Evidence Rating=B). USGIs are more cost-effective than LMGIs (SORT Evidence Rating=B). Ultrasound guidance is required to perform many new procedures (SORT Evidence Rating=C).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this position statement indicate there is strong evidence that USGIs are more accurate than LMGI, moderate evidence that they are more efficacious and preliminary evidence that they are more cost-effective. Furthermore, ultrasound-guided (USG) is required to perform many new, advanced procedures and will likely enable the development of innovative USG surgical techniques in the future.

US in peroneal tendon tear

Peroneal tendon injuries are common also due to the recent increase in sports participants involved in amateur activities. Clinical evaluation generally provides a diagnosis, but diagnostic imaging is often required to confirm a clinical suspicion and make correct management decisions. Ultrasound (US) imaging is the method of choice in the study of peroneal tendon injuries due to the high resolution of the images and the possibility of performing dynamic studies. US is furthermore non-invasive and inexpensive and provides the possibility of performing US-guided steroid infiltration of the tendon sheath or the surrounding tissues. The present paper will address the normal anatomy of the peroneal tendons and related structures, US imaging techniques and the various conditions and injuries which may affect this anatomic region. Also more expensive imaging techniques, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, will be mentioned as well as their indications; however, they are required only in rare cases in which diagnosis remains uncertain or for pre-operative assessment.

Interventional musculoskeletal US: an update on materials and methods

Pain is one of the most common causes of reduced productivity. The annual cost of health-related reductions in productivity has been estimated at approximately 225 billion dollars in the United States alone. Ultrasound-guided locoregional infiltration procedures have frequently been shown to offer economical, effective, lasting relief of pain. In-depth familiarity with the equipment (probes and needles) and techniques used to perform these procedures are fundamental for safe, effective treatment. In fact, depending on the characteristics of the patient and the clinical problem, the approach and technique may have to be modified to simplify the procedure and ensure better results. Up-to-date knowledge of the drugs used for these infiltrations (indications, how they are used) is equally important. Our aim is to provide an update on the techniques and materials used in interventional musculoskeletal ultrasonography based on a review of the most recent literature as well as on our personal experience.