1
|
Beckett M, Gaudet M, Bourque JM, Dennis K, Abdel-Wahab M. Equity in adjuvant radiotherapy utilization in locally advanced head and neck cancer: A SEER-data based study. Head Neck 2023; 45:921-930. [PMID: 36797802 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Not all patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) who are eligible for adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following upfront surgery appear to receive it. METHODS Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Selected patients from 2009 to 2018 had locally advanced HNC, underwent upfront surgery, and were eligible for adjuvant RT. Multivariable logistic regression and chi-squared test were used to analyze available patient and tumor characteristics. RESULTS Of 12 549 patients, 84.5% underwent adjuvant RT, 15.5% did not. Characteristics associated with lowest adjuvant RT utilization included cancers of the larynx (p < 0.0001) and gingivae (p < 0.0001), age 80 and above (p < 0.0001), unpartnered status (p < 0.0001), and residence within a nonmetropolitan area (p < 0.0024). CONCLUSIONS Tumor subsite, age, partnered status, and rural/urban residence correlate with omission of adjuvant RT in locally advanced HNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Beckett
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marc Gaudet
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jean-Marc Bourque
- Département Radio-Oncologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Kristopher Dennis
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - May Abdel-Wahab
- Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hypofractionated preoperative radiotherapy for high risk soft tissue sarcomas in a geriatric patient population. Radiol Oncol 2021; 55:459-466. [PMID: 34821137 PMCID: PMC8647799 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2021-0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Standard therapy for localised, resectable high risk soft tissue sarcomas consists of wide excision and radiotherapy over several weeks. This treatment schedule is hardly feasible in geriatric and frail patients. In order not to withhold radiotherapy from these patients, hypofractionated radiotherapy with 25 Gy in 5 fractions was evaluated in a geriatric patient population. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis was performed of 18 geriatric patients with resectable high risk soft tissue sarcomas of extremities and thoracic wall. Wound healing and short term oncologic outcome were analysed. In addition, dose constraints for radiotherapy of the extremities were transferred from normofractionated to hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens. Results Feasibility was good with 17/18 patients completing treatment as planned. Wound healing complication rate was in the range of published data. Two patients developed local and distant recurrence, two patients isolated distant recurrences. No isolated local recurrences were observed. Keeping the constraints was possible in all cases without compromising the coverage of the target volume. Conclusions Hypofractionated radiotherapy and surgery was well tolerated even in this specific patient population. With feasibility concerning early wound healing problems and adapted constraints, which allow for the treatment of most resectable extremity tumours, the concept warrants further evaluation in patients unfit for standard radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
3
|
Di Capua B, Bellieni A, Fusco D, Gambacorta MA, Tagliaferri L, Villani ER, Bernabei R, Valentini V, Colloca GF. Perspectives and limits of cancer treatment in an oldest old population. Aging Clin Exp Res 2021; 33:2831-2837. [PMID: 33704699 PMCID: PMC8531055 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-021-01821-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population of oldest old will grow dramatically in the next future and cancer, physiologically related to aging, will be very prevalent among them. Lack of evidence is a huge problem to manage cancer in oldest old and will be more and more in the next years. AIMS Our purpose was to investigate the characteristics of a population of oldest old patients with cancer treated in the Radiation Oncology Unit of Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study. The primary outcome was to evaluate which characteristics of the population could influence the choice of oncological treatment (with radical or non-radical intent). RESULTS We identified a total of 348 patients: 140 were on follow-up; 177 were under treatment; 31 were considered not eligible for treatments. Patients under treatment had a high comorbidity index (mean Charlson Comorbidity Index 5.4), and a high prevalence of polypharmacy (mean number of drugs 5.6). More than half (53.1%) was treated with radical intent. Patients treated with radical intent were 1 year younger (87.1 years old vs 88.1 years old), more performant (ECOG 0.7 vs 1.3), and had less prevalence of metastatic neoplasia (6.4% vs 34.9%); comorbidities and drugs did not show differences in the two groups. CONCLUSION Oldest old, usually not considered in international guidelines, are treated for oncological disease, often with radical intent. The treatment seems not to be tailored considering comorbidities but on performance status.
Collapse
|
4
|
Rosa C, Di Tommaso M, Caravatta L, Taraborrelli M, Gasparini L, Di Guglielmo FC, Delli Pizzi A, Cinalli S, Marchioni M, Di Nicola M, Lanci C, Ausili Cefaro G, Genovesi D. Clinical outcomes in elderly rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: impact of tumor regression grade : Tumor regression grade after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in elderly rectal cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020; 147:1179-1188. [PMID: 33026518 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03403-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and the relationship between pathological complete response (pCR) with clinical outcomes has been evaluated in elderly locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 117 LARC patients treated with conformal RT and concomitant fluoropirimidine-based chemotherapy. A dose of 4500 cGy, on the pelvis, up to 5500 cGy on the tumor was delivered. Multidisciplinary evaluation, including geriatric assessment, was previously performed to identify frail patients unsuitable for combined treatment. RESULTS The median age was 75 (range 70-88 years), and 103 (88%) patients had ECOG Performance Status (PS) = 0. All patients except one completed CRT. Ten (8.5%) patients temporarily suspended CRT for acute severe hematologic complication, diarrhea and/or proctitis and hypokalemia. Of the 103 operated patients (88%), a pCR, according to Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG) score, was obtained in 28 patients (27.2%), with TRG1-2 rate of 43.7%. The 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 80.2% ± 4.2% and 68.0% ± 5.2%, 72.4% ± 4.5% and 57.8% ± 5.2% for disease-free survival (DFS), and 92.2% ± 2.8% and 89.5% ± 3.9% for loco-regional control. Patients with TRG1-2 had 3- and 5-year OS rates of 84.1% ± 6.6% and 84.1% ± 6.6% compared with 82.8% ± 5.5% and 67.7% ± 7.2% for patients with TRG3-5 (p = 0.012). The 3- and 5-year DFS rates for patients with TRG1-2 were 77.6% ± 7.0% and 74.2% ± 7.5% compared with 70.9% ± 6.3% and 54.7% ± 7.3% for patients with TRG3-5 (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION Our results reported good tolerability and clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant CRT, with a benefit in patients ≥ 70 years, confirming the prognostic role of pCR on clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Consuelo Rosa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy.,Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Monica Di Tommaso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy
| | - Luciana Caravatta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Maria Taraborrelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Gasparini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy
| | - Fiorella Cristina Di Guglielmo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy
| | - Andrea Delli Pizzi
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.,Department of Radiology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Michele Marchioni
- Laboratory of Biostatistics, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Marta Di Nicola
- Laboratory of Biostatistics, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Carmine Lanci
- Department of Surgery, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giampiero Ausili Cefaro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy
| | - Domenico Genovesi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Via Dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy.,Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Desideri I, Salvestrini V, Livi L. Recent advances in de-intensification of radiotherapy in elderly cancer patients. F1000Res 2020; 9. [PMID: 32518630 PMCID: PMC7255897 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.21151.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer in the elderly remains an evolving issue and a health challenge. Several improvements in the radiotherapy field allow the delivery of higher doses/fractions with a safe toxicity profile, permitting the reduction of radiation treatment protocols in the elderly. Regarding breast, prostate, and lung cancer, the under-representation of older patients in clinical trials limits the extension of treatment recommendations to elderly patients in routine clinical practice. Among the feasible alternatives to standard whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) in older patients are shorter courses using higher hypofractionation (HF) and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). The boost continues to be used in women at high risk of local recurrence but is less widely accepted for women at lower risk and patients over 70 years of age. Regarding prostate cancer, there are no published studies with a focus on the elderly. Current management decisions are based on life expectancy and geriatric assessment. Regimens of HF and ultra-HF protocols are feasible strategies for older patients. Several prospective non-randomized studies have documented the safe delivery of ultra-HF for patients with localized prostate cancer, and multiple phase III trials and meta-analyses have confirmed that the HF regimen should be offered with similar acute toxicity regardless of patient age and comorbidity. A recent pooled analysis from two randomized trials comparing surgery to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in older adult patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer did show comparable outcomes between surgery and SBRT. Elderly cancer patients are significantly under-represented in all clinical trials. Thus, the inclusion of older patients in clinical studies should be strongly encouraged to strengthen the evidence base for this age group. We suggest that the creation of oncogeriatric coordination units may promote individualized care protocols, avoid overtreatment with aggressive and unrecommended therapies, and support de-escalating treatment in elderly cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isacco Desideri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences Biochemistry, Radiotherapy Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences Biochemistry, Radiotherapy Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences Biochemistry, Radiotherapy Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim E, Jang WI, Kim MS, Paik EK, Kim HJ, Yoo HJ, Yang K, Cho CK. Clinical utilization of radiation therapy in Korea, 2016. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2020; 61:249-256. [PMID: 31913473 PMCID: PMC7246057 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrz095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Revised: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the primary cancer treatment modalities. To estimate the actual utilization of RT and infrastructure in Korea, the current study was performed. Data from 2012 to 2016 were extracted from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. In addition, a nationwide survey was conducted to collect the statistics of RT facilities, equipment and human resources in Korea. The total number of patients treated with RT was 72 563 in 2016. The five cancers that were most commonly treated with RT in 2016 were breast, lung, colorectal, liver and prostate cancer. According to analyses of specific treatment modalities, the number of patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) and proton therapy increased from 6670, 6306 and 50 in 2012 to 21584, 9048 and 703 in 2016, respectively. Ninety radiation oncology centers were working in 2015 and there were a total of 213 megavoltage teletherapy machines. In 2015, 310 patients were treated per megavoltage RT machine, 246 patients per radiation oncologist, 501 patients per medical physicist and 111 patients per radiotherapy technologist. In conclusion, the number of patients who underwent RT in Korea has increased steadily from 2012 to 2016. The IMRT utilization rate remarkably increased in 2016, and the number of patients treated with advanced treatment modalities such as IMRT, SRT and proton therapy is expected to increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunji Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Il Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi-Sook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Kyung Paik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Jin Kim
- External Strategy Team, Strategic Planning Office, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyung Jun Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwangmo Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chul Koo Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|