Combinations of Bevacizumab With Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancer J. 2018;24:193-204. [PMID: 30119083 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000327]

A single arm Phase I/II trial on the combination of carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel and avastin as first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (TORG1424/OLCSG1402: CARNAVAL)

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab with platinum doublet therapy including paclitaxel + carboplatin improves the survival of patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. However, in a previous trial (CA031), paclitaxel + carboplatin led to Grade > 3 neutropenia in a Japanese population. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel exhibits an improved toxicity profile. We evaluated the safety, dosage and response rate of the nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab combination in a Japanese population.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer were included. The dosage schedule was established in the Phase I trial as follows: 4-6 cycles of carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve = 6 on Day 1) + nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8 and 15) + bevacizumab (15 mg/kg on Day 1), followed by maintenance therapy (nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel + bevacizumab). The response rate and presence of adverse effects were evaluated in the Phase II trial.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 56.5% (90% confidence interval: 44.5-68.5), and 93% of patients (43/46) showed tumor shrinkage or maintained a stable disease course. The primary endpoint was achieved. At the median follow-up duration of 42 months, the median overall survival was 18.9 (range: 10.5-32.4) months. The most frequently observed Grade ≥ 3 adverse effects were neutropenia (72%), leukopenia (50%) and anemia (30%).

CONCLUSIONS

All adverse effects were manageable and none resulted in patient death. In conclusion, the nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab combination is favorable and well tolerated in Japanese patients as first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Case report: Sustained remission after combined sintilimab, anti-VEGF therapy, and chemotherapy in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer harboring acquired EGFR 19Del/T790M/cis-C797S mutation resistance

Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are highly effective against tumors harboring the T790M mutation. However, patients treated with these inhibitors ultimately develop resistance, and the most common mechanism is the emergence of the EGFR C797S mutation. Few treatment regimens have been reported for this condition. In this report, we present a successful combination treatment with the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor sintilimab, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, and chemotherapy with pemetrexed and cisplatin in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who developed acquired resistance with EGFR 19 exon deletion (19Del)/T790M/cis-C797S mutation following progression with ametinib therapy. This regimen was well tolerated, and the patient has remained progression-free for 15 months. Our case provides clinical evidence that the combination of PD-1 inhibitor, anti-VEGF therapy, and chemotherapy may be an efficacious therapeutic strategy for NSCLC patients with acquired EGFR 19Del/T790M/cis-C797S mutation resistance following progression with EGFR TKI therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab in Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) remains an orphan disease with limited treatment options for patients unable to undergo surgical resection. Evidence supporting the efficacy of combined VEGF and PD-1 inhibition in other tumor types provided a compelling rationale for investigating this combination in AA, where immune checkpoint inhibitors have not been explored previously.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We conducted a prospective, single-arm phase II study evaluating efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in conjunction with bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) in advanced, unresectable AA.

RESULTS

Patients treated with the Atezo+Bev combination had 100% disease control rate (1 partial response, 15 stable disease) with progression-free survival (PFS) of 18.3 months and overall survival not-yet-reached with median duration of follow-up of 40 months. These survival intervals were significantly longer relative to a clinically and molecularly matched synthetic control cohort treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy designed for colorectal cancer (PFS of 4.4 months, P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

In light of recent data demonstrating a lack of efficacy of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, Atezo+Bev is a promising treatment option for patients with low-grade unresectable AA; further study is warranted.

SIGNIFICANCE

AA remains an orphan disease with limited systemic therapy options for patients who are not candidates for surgical resection. These data suggest activity from combined VEGF and PD-L1 inhibition that warrants further study.

Phase 1a dose escalation study of ivonescimab (AK112/SMT112), an anti-PD-1/VEGF-A bispecific antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Studies showed that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors could improve therapeutic efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies by transforming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) into an immunoresponsive TME. Ivonescimab is a first-in-class, humanized tetravalent bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and VEGF-A simultaneously. Here, we report the first-in-human, phase 1a study of ivonescimab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with ivonescimab 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 20 or 30 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks using a 3+3+3 dose escalation design. Dose expansion occurred at 10 and 20 mg/kg in selected tumor types. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and preliminary antitumor activity based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1.

RESULTS

Between October 2, 2019 and January 14, 2021, a total of 51 patients were enrolled and received ivonescimab. Two dose-limiting toxicities were reported at 30 mg/kg. The MTD of ivonescimab was 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Grade≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 14 patients (27.5%). The most common TRAEs of any grade were rash (29.4%), arthralgia (19.6%), hypertension (19.6%), fatigue (17.6%), diarrhea (15.7%) and pruritus (11.8%). The most common grade≥3 TRAEs were hypertension (7/51, 13.7%), alanine aminotransferase increased (3/51, 5.2%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (2/51, 3.9%) and colitis (2/51, 3.9%). Of 47 patients who had at least one postbaseline assessment, the confirmed objective response rate was 25.5% (12/47) and disease control rate was 63.8% (30/47). Among 19 patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, 5 patients (26.3%) achieved partial response (PR). Efficacy signals were also observed in patients with mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and both MMR deficient and pMMR endometrial cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Ivonescimab demonstrated manageable safety profiles and promising efficacy signals in multiple solid tumors. Exploration of alternative dosing regimens of ivonescimab monotherapy and combination therapies is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04047290.

Rationale for immune checkpoint inhibitors plus targeted therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a frequent urological malignancy characterized by a high rate of metastasis and lethality. The treatment strategy for advanced RCC has moved through multiple iterations over the past three decades. Initially, cytokine treatment was the only systemic treatment option for patients with RCC. With the development of medicine, antiangiogenic agents targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin and immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged and received several achievements in the therapeutics of advanced RCC. However, ICIs have still not brought completely satisfactory results due to drug resistance and undesirable side effects. For the past years, the interests form researchers have been attracted by the combination of ICIs and targeted therapy for advanced RCC and the angiogenesis and immunogenic tumor microenvironmental variations in RCC. Therefore, we emphasize the potential principle and the clinical progress of ICIs combined with targeted treatment of advanced RCC, and summarize the future direction.

Phase III, Randomized Study of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in Patients With EGFR- or ALK-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (ATTLAS, KCSG-LU19-04)

PURPOSE

In the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a driver mutation, the role of anti-PD-(L)1 antibody after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) remains unclear. This randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III study evaluates the efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin (ABCP ) in EGFR- or ALK-mutated NSCLC that progressed before TKI therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared the clinical efficacy of ABCP followed by maintenance therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab with pemetrexed plus carboplatin or cisplatin (PC) followed by pemetrexed maintenance. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 228 patients with activating EGFR mutation (n = 215) or ALK translocation (n = 13) were enrolled from 16 sites in the Republic of Korea and randomly assigned at 2:1 ratio to either ABCP (n = 154) or PC arm (n = 74). The median follow-up duration was 26.1 months (95% CI, 24.7 to 28.2). Objective response rates (69.5% v 41.9%, P < .001) and median PFS (8.48 v 5.62 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.86]; P = .004) were significantly better in the ABCP than PC arm. PFS benefit increased as PD-L1 expression increased, with an HR of 0.47, 0.41, and 0.24 for PD-L1 ≥1%, ≥10%, and ≥50%, respectively. Overall survival was similar between ABCP and PC arm (20.63 v 20.27 months, HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.46]; P = .975). The safety profile of the ABCP arm was comparable with that previously reported, with no additional safety signals, but higher rates of treatment-related adverse events were observed compared with the PC arm.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this study is the first randomized phase III study to demonstrate the clinical benefit of anti-PD-L1 antibody in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy in patients with EGFR- or ALK-mutated NSCLC who have progressed on relevant targeted therapy.

Complete remission in a pretreated, microsatellite-stable, KRAS-mutated colon cancer patient after treatment with sintilimab and bevacizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy: a case report and literature review

Metastatic colon cancer remains an incurable disease, and it is difficult for existing treatments to achieve the desired clinical outcome, especially for colon cancer patients who have received first-line treatment. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated durable clinical efficacy in a variety of solid tumors, their response requires an inflammatory tumor microenvironment. However, microsatellite-stable (MSS) colon cancer, which accounts for the majority of colorectal cancers, is a cold tumor that does not respond well to ICIs. Combination regimens open the door to the utility of ICIs in cold tumors. Although combination therapies have shown their advantage even for MSS colon cancer, it remains unclear whether combination therapies show their advantage in patients with pretreated metastatic colon cancer. We report a patient who has achieved complete remission and good tolerance with sintilimab plus bevacizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy after postoperative recurrence. The patient had KRAS mutation and MSS-type colon cancer, and his PD-1+CD8+ and CD3-CD19-CD14+CD16-HLA-DR were both positive. He has achieved a progression-free survival of 43 months and is still being followed up at our center. The above results suggest that this therapeutic regimen is a promising treatment modality for the management of pretreated, MSS-type and KRAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer although its application to the general public still needs to be validated in clinical trials.

Co-targeting CD47 and VEGF elicited potent anti-tumor effects in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

CD47, serving as an intrinsic immune checkpoint, has demonstrated efficacy as an anti-tumor target in hematologic malignancies. Nevertheless, the clinical relevance of CD47 in gastric cancer and its potential as a therapeutic target remains unclear.

METHODS

The expression of CD47 in clinical gastric cancer tissues was assessed using immunohistochemistry and Western blot. Patient-derived cells were obtained from gastric cancer tissues and co-cultured with macrophages derived from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Flow cytometry analyses were employed to evaluate the rate of phagocytosis. Humanized patient-derived xenografts (Hu-PDXs) models were established to assess the efficacy of anti-CD47 immunotherapy or the combination of anti-CD47 and anti-VEGF therapy in treating gastric cancer. The infiltrated immune cells in the xenograft were analyzed by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

In this study, we have substantiated the high expression of CD47 in gastric cancer tissues, establishing a strong association with unfavorable prognosis. Through the utilization of SIRPα-Fc to target CD47, we have effectively enhanced macrophage phagocytosis of PDCs in vitro and impeded the growth of Hu-PDXs. It is noteworthy that anti-CD47 immunotherapy has been observed to sustain tumor angiogenic vasculature, with a positive correlation between the expression of VEGF and CD47 in gastric cancer. Furthermore, the successful implementation of anti-angiogenic treatment has further augmented the anti-tumor efficacy of anti-CD47 therapy. In addition, the potent suppression of tumor growth, prevention of cancer recurrence after surgery, and significant prolongation of overall survival in Hu-PDX models can be achieved through the simultaneous targeting of CD47 and VEGF using the bispecific fusion protein SIRPα-VEGFR1 or by combining the two single-targeted agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preclinical studies collectively offer substantiation that CD47 holds promise as a prospective target for gastric cancer, while also highlighting the potential of anti-angiogenic therapy to enhance tumor responsiveness to anti-CD47 immunotherapy.

Deep-VEGF: deep stacked ensemble model for prediction of vascular endothelial growth factor by concatenating gated recurrent unit with two-dimensional convolutional neural network

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is involved in the development and progression of various diseases, including cancer, diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration and arthritis. Understanding the role of VEGF in various disorders has led to the development of effective treatments, including anti-VEGF drugs, which have significantly improved therapeutic methods. Accurate VEGF identification is critical, yet experimental identification is expensive and time-consuming. This study presents Deep-VEGF, a novel computational model for VEGF prediction based on deep-stacked ensemble learning. We formulated two datasets using primary sequences. A novel feature descriptor named K-Space Tri Slicing-Bigram position-specific scoring metrix (KSTS-BPSSM) is constructed to extract numerical features from primary sequences. The model training is performed by deep learning techniques, including gated recurrent unit (GRU), generative adversarial network (GAN) and convolutional neural network (CNN). The GRU and CNN are ensembled using stacking learning approach. KSTS-BPSSM-based ensemble model secured the most accurate predictive outcomes, surpassing other competitive predictors across both training and testing datasets. This demonstrates the potential of leveraging deep learning for accurate VEGF prediction as a powerful tool to accelerate research, streamline drug discovery and uncover novel therapeutic targets. This insightful approach holds promise for expanding our knowledge of VEGF's role in health and disease.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy for non-small cell lung cancer with liver metastases

Nearly one-fifth of patients with non-small cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) will develop liver metastases (LMs), and the overall treatment strategy of LMs will directly affect the survival of patients. However, some retrospective studies have found that patients receiving chemotherapy or targeted therapy have a poorer prognosis once LMs develop. In recent years, multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTS) have shown significant improvements in outcomes for patients with advanced lung cancer following the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared to conventional chemotherapy. ICIs is safe and effective in patients with LMs, although patients with LMs are mostly underrepresented in randomised clinical trials. However, NSCLC patients with LMs have a significantly worse prognosis than those without LMs when treated with ICIs, and the mechanism by which LMs induce systemic anti-tumour immunity reduction is unknown, so the management of LMs in patients with NSCLC is a clinical challenge that requires more optimised therapies to achieve effective disease control. In this review, we summarised the mechanism of ICIs in the treatment of LMs, the clinical research and treatment progress of ICIs and their combination with other therapies in patients with LMs from NSCLC.

Distinct Progression and Efficacy of First-Line Osimertinib Treatment According to Mutation Subtypes in Metastatic NSCLC Harboring EGFR Mutations

Introduction

Osimertinib (OSI), a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the standard treatment for patients with naive EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Nevertheless, information on how the mutation subtype affects disease progression after the failure of OSI treatment is scarce.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received OSI as a first-line treatment between April 2015 and December 2021.

Results

This study included 229 patients. The objective response rate was 71%, with intracranial and extracranial response rates of 71% and 90%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 23.3 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.6-26.7), and the median overall survival was 33.7 mo (95% CI: 31.3-58.6). Multivariate analysis revealed that the EGFR exon 21 L858R point mutation (L858R) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.04-2.34, p = 0.0328) and liver metastasis (HR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.53-4.49, p = 0.0004) were significant predictors of progression-free survival in OSI treatment. The concomitant disease progression involving the central nervous system metastasis was significantly more common in patients with L858R (p = 0.048), whereas concomitant disease progression involving primary lesions was significantly more common in patients with exon 19 deletion mutation (p = 0.01). In addition, the probability of disease progression over time was higher for L858R compared with that for exon 19 deletion mutation, in patients with central nervous system metastasis (log-rank test, p = 0.027).

Conclusions

The mutation subtype had an impact not only on the clinical outcome of the first-line OSI treatment but also on progression patterns after OSI treatment in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

The Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus mFOLFOX6 in Gastric Cancer with Severe Peritoneal Metastasis

(1) Background: Nivolumab plus chemotherapy is established as a first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). While mFOLFOX6 is commonly used for AGC with severe peritoneal metastasis, the efficacy of nivolumab combined with it remains uncertain. We evaluated the outcomes of nivolumab plus mFOLFOX6 for AGC with severe peritoneal metastasis in clinical practice. (2) Methods: This multicenter retrospective study was conducted between December 2021 and June 2023. We investigated AGC patients with massive ascites or inadequate oral intake due to severe peritoneal metastasis and who received nivolumab plus mFOLFOX6. (3) Results: Among 106 patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy, 21 (19.8%) had severe peritoneal metastasis, with 14 receiving nivolumab plus mFOLFOX6. The median progression-free survival was 7.4 months (95%CI 1.9-10.1), and the median overall survival was 10.7 months (95%CI 5.3-NA), with four patients (28.5%) surviving more than 12 months. Improved ascites and oral intake were observed in 6/14 patients (42.8%) and 10/11 patients (90.9%), respectively. The major grade 3 or more adverse events included leukopenia (28.5%) and neutropenia (21.4%), with no severe immune-related adverse events reported. (4) Conclusions: The safety and moderate efficacy of nivolumab plus mFOLFOX6 were suggested even in AGC patients with severe peritoneal metastasis.

Efficacy of first-line treatment options beyond RET-TKIs in advanced RET-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: A multi-center real-world study

BACKGROUND

Although RET-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RET-TKIs) are the preferred first-line therapy for advanced RET-arranged NSCLC, most patients cannot afford them. In this population, bevacizumab, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy are the most commonly used regimens. However, the optimal scheme beyond RET-TKIs has not been defined in the first-line setting.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 86 stage IV NSCLC patients harboring RET rearrangement from six cancer centers between May 2017 and October 2022. RET-TKIs, chemotherapy, or one of the combination therapies (including immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combined with chemotherapy (I + C), bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy (B + C), ICI and bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy (I + B + C)), were used as the first-line therapeutics. The clinical outcomes and safety were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fourteen of the 86 patients received RET-TKIs, 57 received combination therapies, and 15 received chemotherapy alone. Their medium PFS (mPFS) were 16.92 months (95% CI: 5.9-27.9 months), 8.7 months (95% CI: 6.5-11.0 months), and 5.55 months (95% CI: 2.4-8.7 months) respectively. Among all the combination schemes, B + C (p = 0.007) or I + B + C (p = 0.025) gave beneficial PFS compared with chemotherapy, while I + C treatment (p = 0.169) generated comparable PFS with chemotherapy. In addition, I + B + C treatment had a numerically longer mPFS (12.21 months) compared with B + C (8.74 months) or I + C (7.89 months) schemes. In terms of safety, I + B + C treatment led to the highest frequency of hematological toxicity (50%) and vomiting (75%), but no ≥G3 adverse effect was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

I + B + C might be a preferred option beyond RET-TKIs in the first-line therapy of RET-arranged NSCLC. Combination with Bevacizumab rather than with ICIs offered favorable survival compared with chemotherapy alone.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma: A review of current clinical trials

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer with a poor prognosis due to advanced disease presentation or recurrence despite curative-intent resection. Since the approval of sorafenib in 2007, few systemic therapies offered a significant improvement in treatment outcomes. Over the last 3 years, however, rapid advancements in the field of immunotherapy have led to approval of checkpoint inhibitors in 2020 for use in advanced HCC. Since then, a few other clinical trials have shown promising results in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. The objective of this review is to summarize data from existing clinical trials evaluating the use of systemic immune checkpoint inhibitors in HCC and to follow the natural evolution of this development across the metastatic, adjuvant, and neoadjuvant landscapes.

Evidence to Date: Clinical Utility of Tremelimumab in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and is associated with significant health care costs and burden. Management of HCC is guided based on the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system and includes liver transplantation, surgical resection, and liver-directed and systemic therapies. In recent years, there have been significant advancements in understanding the immunogenicity of HCC and this has led to approval of different targeted agents as well as immunotherapy for advanced HCC. Tremelimumab is a cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) blocking antibody and has recently been approved in combination with durvalumab (a programmed death-ligand 1 [PDL1] inhibitor) as first-line therapy for advanced (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage C) HCC. In this article, we review the different available systemic therapies for advanced HCC with special focus on the clinical utility of tremelimumab for the treatment of unresectable HCC.

Comparison of the profiles of first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced NSCLC lacking driver gene mutations: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

Numerous first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) were developed for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking driver gene mutations. However, this group consists of a heterogeneous patient population, for whom the optimal therapeutic choice is yet to be confirmed.

Objective

To identify the best first-line immunotherapy regimen for overall advanced NSCLC patients and different subgroups.

Design

Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods

We searched several databases to retrieve relevant literature. We performed Bayesian NMA for the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (tr-AEs) with a grade equal or more than 3 (grade ⩾ 3 tr-AEs). Subgroup analysis was conducted according to programed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels, histologic type, central nervous system (CNS) metastases and tobacco use history.

Results

For the PD-L1 non-selective patients, sintilimab plus chemotherapy (sinti-chemo) provided the best OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI):0.42-0.83]. Nivolumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (nivo-bev-chemo) was comparable to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (atezo-bev-chemo) in prolonging PFS (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.51-1.91). Atezo-bev-chemo remarkably elevated the ORR than chemotherapy (OR = 3.13, 95% CI: 1.51-6.59). Subgroup analysis showed pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (pembro-chemo) ranked first in OS in subgroups of PD-L1 < 1%, non-squamous, no CNS metastases, with or without smoking history, and ranked second in OS in subgroups of PD-L1 ⩾ 1% and PD-L1 1-49%. Cemiplimab and sugemalimab plus chemotherapy ranked first in OS and PFS for squamous subgroup, respectively. For patients with CNS metastases, nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (nivo-ipili-chemo) and camrelizumab plus chemotherapy provided the best OS and PFS, respectively.

Conclusions

Sinti-chemo and nivo-bev-chemo were two effective first-line regimens ranked first in OS and PFS for overall patients, respectively. Pembro-chemo was favorable for patients in subgroups of PD-L1 < 1%, PD-L1 ⩾ 1%, PD-L1 1-49%, non-squamous, no CNS metastases, with or without smoking history. Addition of bevacizumab consistently provided with favorable PFS results in patients of all PD-L1 levels. Cemiplimab was the best option in squamous subgroup and nivo-ipili-chemo in CNS metastases subgroup due to their advantages in OS.

Adjusting the dose of traditional drugs combined with immunotherapy: reshaping the immune microenvironment in lung cancer

Immunotherapy is currently the most promising clinical treatment for lung cancer, not only revolutionizing second-line therapy but now also approved for first-line treatment. However, its clinical efficiency is not high and not all patients benefit from it. Thus, finding the best combination strategy to expand anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based immunotherapy is now a hot research topic. The conventional use of chemotherapeutic drugs and targeted drugs inevitably leads to resistance, toxic side effects and other problems. Recent research, however, suggests that by adjusting the dosage of drugs and blocking the activation of mutational mechanisms that depend on acquired resistance, it is possible to reduce toxic side effects, activate immune cells, and reshape the immune microenvironment of lung cancer. Here, we discuss the effects of different chemotherapeutic drugs and targeted drugs on the immune microenvironment. We explore the effects of adjusting the dosing sequence and timing, and the mechanisms of such responses, and show how the effectiveness and reliability of combined immunotherapy provide improved treatment outcomes.

Hot and cold tumors: Immunological features and the therapeutic strategies

The "hotness" or "coldness" of the tumors are determined by the information of the cancer cells themselves, tumor immune characteristics, tumor microenvironment, and signaling mechanisms, which are key factors affecting cancer patients' clinical efficacy. The switch mechanism of "hotness" and "coldness" and its corresponding pathological characteristics and treatment strategies are the frontier and hot spot of tumor treatment. How to distinguish the "hotness" or "coldness" effectively and clarify the causes, microenvironment state, and characteristics are very important for the tumor response and efficacy treatments. Starting from the concept of hot and cold tumor, this review systematically summarized the molecular characteristics, influencing factors, and therapeutic strategies of "hot and cold tumors," and analyzed the immunophenotypes, the tumor microenvironment, the signaling pathways, and the molecular markers that contribute to "hot and cold tumors" in details. Different therapeutic strategies for "cold and hot tumors" based on clinical efficacy were analyzed with drug targets and proteins for "cold and hot tumors." Furthermore, this review combines the therapeutic strategies of different "hot and cold tumors" with traditional medicine and modern medicine, to provide a basis and guidance for clinical decision-making of cancer treatment.

Progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy for non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases

About 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop brain metastases (BMs) throughout the disease, and the occurrence of BMs is considered to have a fairly high mortality rate. Therefore, the management of brain metastases in NSCLC patients is a clinical challenge. Currently, multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment methods are often used to achieve effective control of intracranial disease and prolong survival. Immunotherapy (IT) is one of the core therapies for NSCLC. Single or combined IT represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) of programmed death-1(PD-1)/ programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC.ICIs has been shown to be safe and effective in patients with BMs, although patients with BMs are mostly underrepresented in randomized clinical trials. In this review, we summarized the mechanism of ICIs in the treatment of BMs, and the clinical research and treatment progress of ICIs and their combination with other therapies in patients with BMs s from NSCLC.

β2-adrenergic receptor expression in patients receiving bevacizumab therapy for metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was initially known as vascular permeability factor and identified as a driver of tumour angiogenesis. Recently, its role in supporting an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment was demonstrated, and anti-VEGF treatment combined with immune checkpoint blockade is currently investigated. Further, beta-adrenergic signalling as a modifier of cancer hallmarks like immune response, angiogenesis and metastasis gained increased attention during past years.

METHODS

Focusing on the aspect of immunosuppression in upregulated beta-adrenergic signalling, we investigated predictive markers in patients with metastatic melanoma who received bevacizumab monotherapy, a specific VEGF-A binding antibody. We explored the expression of beta-2 adrenergic receptor (β2-AR), interleukin 6-receptor (IL6-R), cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) and VEGF-A by immunohistochemistry in melanoma to assess the correlation between these proteins in melanoma cells and response to treatment.

RESULTS

Strong β2-AR expression in metastases was associated with clinical benefit of bevacizumab. Furthermore, expression of the latter was positively linked to expression of VEGF-A and COX2. β2-AR expression in melanoma metastasis appears to distinguish a subgroup of patients that might benefit from anti-VEGF treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our results strengthen further exploration of anti-VEGF therapy in combination with immune checkpoint blockade in clinical studies and the investigation of β2-AR as predictive marker.

Strategies to synergize PD-1/PD-L1 targeted cancer immunotherapies to enhance antitumor responses in ovarian cancer

Anti-programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies have developed rapidly but exhibited modest activity in ovarian cancer (OC), achieving a clinical response rate ranging from 5.9% to 19%. Current evidence indicate that the establishment of an integrated cancer-immunity cycle is a prerequisite for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Any impairment in this cycle, including lack of cancer antigens release, impaired antigen-presenting, decreased T cell priming and activation, less T cells that are trafficked or infiltrated in tumor microenvironment (TME), and low tumor recognition and killings, will lead to decreased infiltrated cytotoxic T cells to tumor bed and treatment failure. Therefore, combinatorial strategies aiming to modify cancer-immunity cycle and reprogram tumor immune microenvironment are of great interest. By far, various strategies have been studied to enhance responsiveness to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in OC. Platinum-based chemotherapy increases neoantigens release; poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) improve the function of antigen-presenting cells and promote the trafficking of T cells into tumors; epigenetic drugs help to complete the immune cycle by affecting multiple steps; immunotherapies like anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies reactivate T cells, and other treatment strategies like radiotherapy helps to increase the expression of tumor antigens. In this review, we will summarize the preclinical studies by analyzing their contribution in modifying the cancer immunity cycle and remodeling tumor environment, and we will also summarize recent progress in clinical trials and discuss some perspectives to improve these treatment strategies.

Combined immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: How to maximize immune checkpoint blockade synergic anti-tumor effect

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent form of liver cancer and has an increasing incidence worldwide. The management of HCC still has many restrictions, despite the fact that there are now numerous treatment options, including liver transplantation/resection, locoregional treatments (LRT), and systemic medication. As a turning point in the history of cancer treatment, the discovery of the immune checkpoints and the development of their inhibitors provide new hope for HCC patients. However, limited objective response rate and insignificant overall survival improvement are still urgent problems to be solved for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Combination therapies are considered a solution for improving the effectiveness and response rate of ICIs, and several forms of combination treatments are currently being actively researched. In this review, we summarize the mainstream combination strategies, explain their theoretical basis, introduce several important and ongoing clinical trials, and suggest some potential future paths in this area at the conclusion of the review. AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS: Not applicable.

The relationship between the efficacy of thermal ablation and inflammatory response and immune status in early hepatocellular carcinoma and the progress of postoperative adjuvant therapy

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly heterogeneous disease. Thermal ablation has the advantages of being equivalent to surgical resection, minimally invasive, low cost and significantly reducing hospital stay. Therefore, it is recommended as one of the first-line radical treatment for early HCC. However, with the deepening of research on early HCC, more and more studies have found that not all patients with early HCC can obtain similar efficacy after radical thermal ablation, which may be related to the heterogeneity of HCC. Previous studies have shown that inflammation and immunity play an extremely important role in the prognostic heterogeneity of patients with HCC. Therefore, the inflammatory response and immune status of patients may be closely related to the efficacy of early HCC after curative thermal ablation. This article elaborates the mechanism of high inflammatory response and poor immune status in the poor prognosis after radical thermal ablation of early HCC, and clarifies the population who may benefit from adjuvant therapy after radical thermal ablation in patients with early HCC, which provides a new idea for the precise adjuvant treatment after radical ablation of early HCC in the future.

Nanotechnological strategies to increase the oxygen content of the tumor

Hypoxia is a negative prognostic indicator of solid tumors, which not only changes the survival state of tumors and increases their invasiveness but also remarkably reduces the sensitivity of tumors to treatments such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy. Thus, developing therapeutic strategies to alleviate tumor hypoxia has recently been considered an extremely valuable target in oncology. In this review, nanotechnological strategies to elevate oxygen levels in tumor therapy in recent years are summarized, including (I) improving the hypoxic tumor microenvironment, (II) oxygen delivery to hypoxic tumors, and (III) oxygen generation in hypoxic tumors. Finally, the challenges and prospects of these nanotechnological strategies for alleviating tumor hypoxia are presented.

Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With High Tumor Mutation Burden: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Importance

Antiangiogenic drug combinations with anti-programmed cell death 1 protein and anti-programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents are a novel treatment option for lung cancer. However, survival remains limited, and the activity of these combinations for tumors with high tumor mutation burden (TMB) is unknown.

Objective

To assess the clinical benefits and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for patients with high-TMB advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial (Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in First-Line NSCLC Patients [TELMA]) included treatment-naive patients aged 18 years or older with confirmed stage IIIB-IV nonsquamous NSCLC with TMB of 10 or more mutations/megabase and no EGFR, ALK, STK11, MDM2, or ROS1 alterations. From May 2019 through January 2021, patients were assessed at 13 sites in Spain, with follow-up until February 28, 2022.

Interventions

Participants were given atezolizumab, 1200 mg, plus bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Treatment was continued until documented disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, patient withdrawal, investigator decision, or death.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, version 1.1 criteria); PFS was defined as the time from enrollment to disease progression or death. Adverse events were monitored according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.

Results

A total of 307 patients were assessed for trial eligibility, of whom 266 were ineligible for enrollment. Of the 41 patients enrolled, 3 did not fulfill all inclusion criteria and were excluded. The remaining 38 patients (28 [73.7%] male; mean [SD] age, 63.7 [8.3] years) constituted the per-protocol population. The 12-month PFS rate was 51.3% (95% CI, 34.2%-66.0%), which met the primary end point. The 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 72.0% (95% CI, 54.1%-83.9%). The median PFS was 13.0 months (95% CI, 7.9-18.0 months), and the median OS was not reached. Of the 38 patients, 16 (42.1%) achieved an objective response and 30 (78.9%) achieved disease control. The median time to response was 2.8 months (IQR, 2.8-3.58 months), with a median duration of response of 11.7 months (range, 3.57-22.4 months; the response was ongoing at cutoff). Of 16 responses, 8 (50.0%) were ongoing. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2. For atezolizumab, the most common adverse events were fatigue (6 [15.8%]) and pruritus (6 [15.8%]). For bevacizumab, they were hypertension (10 [26.3%]) and proteinuria (4 [10.5%]). Drug discontinuation occurred in 2 patients receiving atezolizumab (5.3%) and 3 patients receiving bevacizumab (7.9%). PD-L1 levels were not associated with response, PFS, or OS.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that atezolizumab with bevacizumab is a potential treatment for high-TMB nonsquamous NSCLC.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03836066.

Current Landscape and Potential Challenges of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Microsatellite Stable Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent cancer and the second most common cause of cancer-related death in Europe. High microsatellite instability (MSI-H) due to a deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) system can be found in 5% of metastatic CRC (mCRC) and has been established as a biomarker of response to immunotherapy in these tumors. Therefore, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in mCRC with these characteristics were evaluated with results showing remarkable response rates and durations of response. The majority of mCRC cases have high levels of DNA mismatch repair proteins (pMMR) with consequent microsatellite stability or low instability (MSS or MSI-low), associated with an inherent resistance to ICIs. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the possible approaches to overcome the mechanisms of resistance and evaluates potential biomarkers to establish the role of ICIs in pMMR/MSS/MSI-L (MSS) mCRC.

Combining local regional therapy and systemic therapy: Expected changes in the treatment landscape of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Improvements in early screening, new diagnostic techniques, and surgical treatment have led to continuous downward trends in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) morbidity and mortality rates. However, high recurrence and refractory cancer after hepatectomy remain important factors affecting the long-term prognosis of HCC. The clinical characteristics and prognosis of recurrent HCC are heterogeneous, and guidelines on treatment strategies for recurrent HCC are lacking. Therapies such as surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation, and transhepatic arterial chemoembolization are effective for tumors confined to the liver, and targeted therapy is a very important treatment for unresectable recurrent HCC with systemic metastasis. With the deepening of the understanding of the immune microenvironment of HCC, blocking immune checkpoints to enhance the antitumor immune response has become a new direction for the treatment of HCC. In addition, improvements in the tumor immune microenvironment caused by local treatment may provide an opportunity to improve the therapeutic effect of HCC treatment. Ongoing and future clinical trial data of combined therapy may develop the new treatment scheme for recurrent HCC. This paper reviews the pattern of recurrent HCC and the characteristics of the immune microenvironment, demonstrates the basis for combining local treatment and systemic treatment, and reports current evidence to better understand current progress and future approaches in the treatment of recurrent HCC.

A novel anti-PD-L1/IL-15 immunocytokine overcomes resistance to PD-L1 blockade and elicits potent antitumor immunity

Despite the demonstrated immense potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors in various types of cancers, only a minority of patients respond to these therapies. Immunocytokines designed to deliver an immune-activating cytokine directly to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and block the immune checkpoint simultaneously may provide a strategic advantage over the combination of two single agents. To increase the response rate to checkpoint blockade, in this study, we developed a novel immunocytokine (LH01) composed of the antibody against programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) fused to interleukin (IL)-15 receptor alpha-sushi domain/IL-15 complex. We demonstrate that LH01 efficiently binds mouse or human PD-L1 and maintains IL-15 stimulatory activity. In syngeneic mouse models, LH01 showed improved antitumor efficacy and safety versus anti-PD-L1 plus LH02 (Fc-sushi-IL15) combination and overcame resistance to anti-PD-L1 treatment. Mechanistically, the dual anti-immunosuppressive function of LH01 activated both the innate and adaptive immune responses and induced a favorable and immunostimulatory TME. Furthermore, combination therapy with LH01 and bevacizumab exerts synergistic antitumor effects in an HT29 colorectal xenograft model. Collectively, our results provide supporting evidence that fusion of anti-PD-L1 and IL-15 might be a potent strategy to treat patients with cold tumors or resistance to checkpoint blockade.

The role of immunotherapy in microsatellites stable metastatic colorectal cancer: state of the art and future perspectives

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, despite several advances has been achieved in last decades. Few prognostic and predictive biomarkers guide therapeutic choice in metastatic CRC (mCRC), among which DNA mismatch repair deficiency and/or microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI) holds a crucial role. Tumors characterized by dMMR/MSI benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, most of the mCRC patients (around 95%) are microsatellite stable (MSS), thereby intrinsically resistant to immunotherapy. This represents a clear unmet need for more effective treatments in this population of patients. In this review, we aim to analyze immune-resistance mechanisms and therapeutic strategies to overcome them, such as combinations of immunotherapy and chemotherapy, radiotherapy or target therapies specifically in MSS mCRC. We also explored both available and potential biomarkers that may better select MSS mCRC patients for immunotherapy. Lastly, we provide a brief overview on future perspectives in this field, such as the gut microbiome and its potential role as immunomodulator.

Efficacy and safety of a triple combination of atezolizumab, bevacizumab plus GEMOX for advanced biliary tract cancer: a multicenter, single-arm, retrospective study

Background

Anti-programmed cell death ligand 1/vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition, coupled with chemotherapy, may potentiate antitumor immunity leading to enhanced clinical benefit, but it has not been investigated in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC).

Objectives

We investigated the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, and gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in advanced BTC and explore the potential biomarkers related to the response.

Design

Multicenter, single-arm, retrospective study.

Methods

Advanced BTC patients, who received a triple combination therapy at three medical centers between 18 March 2020 and 1 September 2021, were included. Treatment response was evaluated via mRECIST and RECIST v1.1. Endpoints included the overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The whole exome sequencing of pathological tissues was conducted for bioinformatic analysis.

Results

In all, 30 patients were enrolled. The best ORR was 76.7% and the DCR was 90.0%. The median PFS was 12.0 months, and the median OS was not reached. During the treatment, 10.0% (3/30) of patients suffered from ⩾grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Furthermore, fever (73.3%), neutropenia (63.3%), increased aspartate transaminase and alanine aminotransferase levels (50.0% and 43.3%, respectively) are the most common TRAEs. Bioinformatics analysis revealed patients with altered ALS2CL had a higher ORR.

Conclusion

The triple combination of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, and GEMOX may be efficacious and safe for patients with advanced BTC. ALS2CL may be a potential predictive biomarker for the efficacy of triple combination therapy.

Dual immune checkpoint inhibitors or combined with anti-VEGF agents in advanced, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy did not show superiority of survival over standard therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The combination immunotherapy including dual immune checkpoint inhibitors or combined with anti-VEGF agents have become a trend, but not fully evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate and compare distinct combination immunotherapy on efficacy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from inception to January 31, 2022. The primary endpoints were overall objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), six-month progression-free survival rate (PFSR6m) and one-year overall survival rate (OSR1y).

RESULTS

11 studies with 16 independent cohorts and 3342 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with first-line sorafenib, combination immunotherapy resulted in a significant improvement in ORR (RR, 2.74; 95%CI, 1.55-4.85; p = 0.0006), PFS (HR, 0.57; 95%CI, 0.49-0.65; p<0.0001) and OS (HR, 0.65; 95%CI, 0.52-0.82; p = 0.0002). Based on RECIST 1.1, the pooled ORR, PFSR6m and OSR1y for combination immunotherapy were 24.6% (95%CI: 20.3%-29.6%), 42.0% (95%CI: 34.2%-50.3%) and 61.8% (95%CI: 57.7%-65.7%), respectively. In distinct combination regimens, PD-1/L1 inhibitors plus anti-VEGF agents showed a significant superiority of clinical benefit than PD-1/L1 inhibitors plus CTLA-4 inhibitors (ORR: 25.2% vs 23.4%, p = 0.033; PFSR6m: 47.4% vs 23.2%, p<0.001; OSR1y: 65.1% vs 55.0%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study was the first meta-analysis to demonstrate the better survival benefit and tolerable toxicity of combination immunotherapy than standard therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Compared with PD-1/L1 inhibitors plus CTLA-4 inhibitors, the regimens of PD-1/L1 inhibitors plus anti-VEGF agents may be associated with a significantly better clinical benefit. The difference in long-term survival and response population between two distinct combination regimens required further exploration.

Comparison of Chemotherapy Plus Pembrolizumab vs. Chemotherapy Alone in EGFR-Mutant Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION

Platinum doublet chemotherapy is the standard of care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation who had disease progression after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). We aimed to assess immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of sensitive EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who progressed after EGFR-TKIs and received platinum doublet chemotherapy plus immunotherapy between 2015 and 2021. Efficacy outcomes, including overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival, were assessed and compared with those of patients who had received platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Of the total 869 patients, 82 treated with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy and 82 with only chemotherapy were selected. The median progression-free survival in patients administered pembrolizumab was significantly longer than those not administered pembrolizumab (6.7 months; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.0-8.5 vs. 4.2 months; 95% CI 3.3-5.0, hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.89, P = .0076). Improved median overall survival was also observed in patients receiving pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (26.7 [95% CI 22.6-30.8] vs. 13.4 months [95% CI 10.4-16.4], HR, 0.49 [95% CI 0.31-0.75], P = .0052). In addition, the overall response rate was higher in patients treated with than patients treated without pembrolizumab (34.1% and 20.7%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The combination of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy is associated with improved efficacy and survival in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC after TKI resistance, but these findings need to be confirmed in further prospective studies.

A Phase II Trial of Atezolizumab Plus Carboplatin Plus Pemetrexed Plus Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Patients with Stage IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium (BTCRC)- LUN 17-139

INTRODUCTION

LUN17-139 evaluated the safety and efficacy of Atezolizumab (A) plus Carboplatin (C) plus Pemetrexed (Pem) plus Bevacizumab (B) (ACBPem) in treatment naïve patients with stage IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (Ns-NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter, single-arm phase II trial, all patients received A (1200-mg, D1) + C (AUC 5, D1) + Pem (500-mg/m2, D1) + B (15-mg/kg D1) q3 week x4. If no PD (progressive disease), patients received maintenance ABPem until PD or intolerable side effects. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The positive PFS result was considered as PFS>6m (historical control). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) defined by complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD) ≥ 2 months, overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled from November 2018 to October 2020. The study was closed early due to 3 patient deaths, possibly related to treatment. Median age 64 (range 38-83); Men/Women 20/10; PD-L1 TPS < 1%/1-49%/ ≥ 50% (8/15/7). The median follow-up was 20.3 months ( 1-28.1). ORR 42.9% (95% CI, 24.5-62.8%), DCR 96.4% (95% CI, 81.7-99.9%). The median PFS and OS were 11.3m (5.5-14.9,P > .05) and 22.4m (22.4-NR), respectively. Four patients had G4 toxicity (anemia, febrile-neutropenia, severe neutropenia, sepsis), and 3 patients had G5 toxicity (thromboembolism, sepsis, colonic perforation).

CONCLUSION

ABCPem was associated with increased PFS compared to historical controls but this difference did not meet the statistical significance. Three on-treatment deaths and 5 thromboembolic events prompted early closure.

The Interplay between Anti-Angiogenics and Immunotherapy in Colorectal Cancer

Simple Summary

Colorectal cancer is a frequent and lethal neoplasm. The tumor often creates new vessels to grow and spread—a process called ‘angiogenesis’. Therefore, drugs blocking angiogenesis are effective against this malignancy. On the other side, immune checkpoint inhibitors, which unleash the immune system to fight against tumors, have limited efficacy in patients carrying instability of DNA regions called microsatellites. However, there is an interaction between angiogenic factors and the immune system. This gives a chance to combine anti-angiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors to improve the efficacy of treating this malignancy.

Abstract

Angiogenesis, a hallmark of cancer, plays a fundamental role in colorectal cancer (CRC). Anti-angiogenic drugs and chemotherapy represent a standard of care for treating metastatic disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the therapeutic algorithm of many solid tumors. However, the efficacy of ICIs is limited to mCRC patients carrying microsatellite instability (MSI-H), which represent approximately 3–5% of mCRC. Emerging evidence suggests that anti-angiogenic drugs could exhibit immunomodulatory properties. Thus, there is a strong rationale for combining anti-angiogenics and ICIs to improve efficacy in the metastatic setting. Our review summarizes the pre-clinical and clinical evidence regarding the combination of anti-angiogenics and ICIs in mCRC to deepen the possible application in daily clinical practice.

Current Molecular Combination Therapies Used for the Treatment of Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of death for women worldwide. While monotherapy (single agent) treatments have been used for many years, they are not always effective, and many patients relapse after initial treatment. Moreover, in some patients the response to therapy becomes weaker, or resistance to monotherapy develops over time. This is especially problematic for metastatic breast cancer or triple-negative breast cancer. Recently, combination therapies (in which two or more drugs are used to target two or more pathways) have emerged as promising new treatment options. Combination therapies are often more effective than monotherapies and demonstrate lower levels of toxicity during long-term treatment. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of current combination therapies, including molecular-targeted therapy, hormone therapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy. We also describe the molecular basis of breast cancer and the various treatment options for different breast cancer subtypes. While combination therapies are promising, we also discuss some of the challenges. Despite these challenges, the use of innovative combination therapy holds great promise compared with traditional monotherapies. In addition, the use of multidisciplinary technologies (such as nanotechnology and computer technology) has the potential to optimize combination therapies even further.

Immunosuppressive effects of vascular endothelial growth factor (Review)

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) serves a critical role in vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, tumor, inflammatory angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Since 2004, bevacizumab (Avastin), a humanized anti-VEGFA monoclonal antibody, has been approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung, breast, kidney and ovarian cancer in combination with standard chemotherapy. VEGF has been demonstrated to be important in the clinic as a therapeutic target in the anti-angiogenic approach to cancer therapy. The targeting of VEGF, together with immunotherapy, has been reported to be able to reverse the immunosuppressive effects of VEGF. A positive correlation between VEGF expression and the reduced survival rates of patients with cancer has also been demonstrated. Furthermore, increased VEGF expression can lead to immune suppression via the inhibition of dendritic cell maturation, the reduction of T-cell tumor infiltration and the promotion of inhibitory cell types in the tumor microenvironment.

Anti-Angiogenic Therapy in ALK Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

The management of advanced lung cancer has been transformed with the identification of targetable oncogenic driver alterations. This includes anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements. ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are established first-line treatment options in advanced ALK rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with several next-generation ALK TKIs (alectinib, brigatinib, ensartinib and lorlatinib) demonstrating survival benefit compared with the first-generation ALK TKI crizotinib. Still, despite high objective response rates and durable progression-free survival, drug resistance inevitably ensues, and treatment options beyond ALK TKI are predominantly limited to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Anti-angiogenic therapy targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway has shown efficacy in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC without a driver alteration, and with EGFR TKI in advanced EGFR mutated NSCLC. The role for anti-angiogenic therapy in ALK rearranged NSCLC, however, remains to be elucidated. This review will discuss the pre-clinical rationale, clinical trial evidence to date, and future directions to evaluate anti-angiogenic therapy in ALK rearranged NSCLC.

Immunotherapy in Ovarian Cancer

Despite advances in surgery and chemotherapy, ovarian cancer remains one of the most lethal malignancies. Hence, the implementation of novel treatment approaches is required to improve the outcomes of the disease. Immunotherapy has been proven to be effective in many tumors and has already been incorporated into clinical practice. In this review, we describe key strategies in immunotherapy of ovarian cancer and summarize data from clinical studies assessing immunological prospects which could improve ovarian cancer treatment approaches in the future. The most notable current strategies include checkpoint blockade agents, the use of vaccines, adoptive cell transfer, as well as various combinations of these methods. While several of these options are promising, large controlled randomized studies are still needed to implement new immunotherapeutic options into clinical practice.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-special immunity and immunotherapy

Alterations in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene play a key role in the development of various human tumors, and targeted therapy has transformed the treatment paradigm for these oncogene-driven tumors. However, primary or acquired resistance remains a challenge. ALK gene variants (such as gene rearrangements and mutations) also play a key role in the tumor immune microenvironment. Immunotherapy targeting the ALK gene has potential clinical applications. Here, we review the results of recent studies on the immunological relevance of ALK-altered tumors, which provides important insights into the development of tumor immunotherapies targeting this large class of tumors.

Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in the Hypoxic Tumor Microenvironment

Simple Summary

Cancers have regions of low oxygen concentration where hypoxia-related signaling pathways are activated. The hypoxic tumor microenvironment has been widely accepted as a hallmark of cancer and shown to be a critical factor in the crosstalk between cancer and stromal cells. Fibroblasts are one of the most abundant cellular components in the tumor stroma and are also significantly affected by oxygen deprivation. In this case, we discuss the molecular and cellular mechanisms that regulate fibroblasts under hypoxic conditions and their effect on cancer development and progression. Unraveling these regulatory mechanisms could be exploited in developing potential fibroblast-specific therapeutics for cancer.

Abstract

Solid cancers are composed of malignant cells and their surrounding matrix components. Hypoxia plays a critical role in shaping the tumor microenvironment that contributes to cancer progression and treatment failure. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are one of the most prominent components of the tumor microenvironment. CAFs are highly sensitive to hypoxia and participates in the crosstalk with cancer cells. Hypoxic CAFs modulate several mechanisms that induce cancer malignancy, such as extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, immune evasion, metabolic reprogramming, angiogenesis, metastasis, and drug resistance. Key signaling molecules regulating CAFs in hypoxia include transforming growth factor (TGF-β) and hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs). In this article, we summarize the mechanisms underlying the hypoxic regulation of CAFs and how hypoxic CAFs affect cancer development and progression. We also discuss the potential therapeutic strategies focused on targeting CAFs in the hypoxic tumor microenvironment.

Targeting the tumor biophysical microenvironment to reduce resistance to immunotherapy

Immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors has evolved into a new pillar of cancer treatment in clinics, but dealing with treatment resistance (either primary or acquired) is a major challenge. The tumor microenvironment (TME) has a substantial impact on the pathological behaviors and treatment response of many cancers. The biophysical clues in TME have recently been considered as important characteristics of cancer. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that biophysical cues in TME play important roles in each step of the cascade of cancer immunotherapy that synergistically contribute to immunotherapy resistance. In this review, we summarize five main biophysical cues in TME that affect resistance to immunotherapy: extracellular matrix (ECM) structure, ECM stiffness, tumor interstitial fluid pressure (IFP), solid stress, and vascular shear stress. First, the biophysical factors involved in anti-tumor immunity and therapeutic antibody delivery processes are reviewed. Then, the causes of these five biophysical cues and how they contribute to immunotherapy resistance are discussed. Finally, the latest treatment strategies that aim to improve immunotherapy efficacy by targeting these biophysical cues are shared. This review highlights the biophysical cues that lead to immunotherapy resistance, also supplements their importance in related technologies for studying TME biophysical cues in vitro and therapeutic strategies targeting biophysical cues to improve the effects of immunotherapy.

Addressing CPI resistance in NSCLC: targeting TAM receptors to modulate the tumor microenvironment and future prospects

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for the majority of cases. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), including those targeting programmed cell death protein-1 and its ligand (PD-1/PD-L1), have revolutionized the treatment landscape for various cancers. Notably, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based regimens now form the standard first-line therapy for metastatic NSCLC, substantially improving patients' overall survival. Despite the progress made using CPI-based therapies in advanced NSCLC, most patients experience disease progression after an initial response due to resistance. Given the currently limited therapeutic options available for second-line and beyond settings in NSCLC, new treatment approaches are needed to improve long-term survival in these patients. Thus, CPI resistance is an emerging concept in cancer treatment and an active area of clinical research.Among the key mechanisms of CPI resistance is the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Effective CPI therapy is based on shifting immune responses against cancer cells, therefore, manipulating the immunosuppressive TME comprises an important strategy to combat CPI resistance. Several aspects of the TME can contribute to treatment resistance in NSCLC, including through the activation of Tyro3, Axl, MerTK (TAM) receptors which are essential pleiotropic regulators of immune homeostasis. Their roles include negatively modulating the immune response, therefore ectopic expression of TAM receptors in the context of cancer can contribute to the immunosuppressive, protumorigenic TME. Furthermore, TAM receptors represent important candidates to simultaneously target both tumor cells and immune cells in the TME. Clinical development of TAM receptor inhibitors (TAM RIs) is increasingly focused on their ability to rescue the antitumor immune response, thereby shifting the immunosuppressive TME to an immunostimulatory TME. There is a strong biological rationale for combining TAM RIs with a CPI to overcome resistance and improve long-term clinical responses in NSCLC. Combinatorial clinical trials of TAM RIs with CPIs are underway with encouraging preliminary results. This review outlines the key mechanisms of CPI resistance, including the role of the immunosuppressive TME, and discusses the rationale for targeting TAM receptors as a novel, promising therapeutic strategy to overcome CPI resistance in NSCLC.

Osimertinib Improves the Immune Microenvironment of Lung Cancer by Downregulating PD-L1 Expression of Vascular Endothelial Cells and Enhances the Antitumor Effect of Bevacizumab

Objective

To investigate the effect and mechanism of osimertinib combined with bevacizumab on lung cancer through cell and transplanted tumor animal experiments and to provide theoretical basis for further clinical trials.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of PD-L1 in tumor vessels of nonmetastatic lung adenocarcinoma and metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. At the same time, the expression of CD8 and FoxP3 in tumor tissue was detected. qRT-PCR was used to detect the effect of osimertinib on PD-L1 expression in HUVECs. The expression levels of p-Akt and p-ERK in HUVECs treated with osimertinib were analyzed by Western blot. AKT was blocked by AKT specific inhibitor Ly294002 to analyze the expression of PD-L1 in HUVECs. An animal model of transplanted tumor was constructed to analyze whether osimertinib could enhance the antitumor effect of bevacizumab.

Results

PD-L1 was highly expressed in vascular endothelial cells of metastatic lung cancer. FoxP3 was highly expressed in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma, while CD8 expression was low. Osimertinib inhibits PD-L1 expression in endothelial cells. Mechanism studies have shown that osimertinib inhibits PD-L1 expression in endothelial cells through the AKT/ERK pathway. Osimertinib inhibited endothelial cell PD-L1 expression, increased CD8⁺T cell infiltration, inhibited tumor growth, and enhanced the tumor effect of bevacizumab.

Conclusion

Osimertinib can significantly increase the killing ability of bevacizumab against tumor. Osimertinib can improve the tumor microenvironment and enhance the antitumor effect of bevacizumab by reducing the expression of PD-L1 in tumor blood vessels.

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus bevacizumab, paclitaxel for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: Primary results and biomarker data from a phase 2 trial (WJOG9917B)

BACKGROUND

Preclinical models revealed potential synergistic effects of programmed cell death-1 inhibitors and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies. Therefore, we investigated the use of nivolumab, bevacizumab, and paclitaxel triple therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

This phase 2, multicentre, single-arm study (NEWBEAT) investigated the safety and efficacy of first-line nivolumab, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer, regardless of programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression. The primary end-point was objective response rate. Key secondary end-points included progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicities. A biomarker study evaluated tumour programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression and serum VEGF-A levels.

RESULTS

Between February 2018 and October 2018, 57 patients were enrolled. An objective response rate was seen in 39/56 patients (70%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.9-81.2%), meeting the primary end-point. The objective response rate was 74% in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer versus 59% in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 14.0 (95% CI 11.0-16.3) and 32.5 (95% CI 26.0-not evaluable) months, respectively (median follow-up: 29.5 months). Grade 3/4 adverse drug reactions occurred in 33 of 57 patients (58%). There were no grade 5 adverse events. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 43 of 57 patients (75%), with grade 3/4 events in eight patients (14%). Biomarker analysis showed that tumour programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression was not correlated with the efficacy of triple therapy. Efficacy outcomes were similar between the serum VEGF-high and VEGF-low groups.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line nivolumab, bevacizumab, and paclitaxel therapy showed promising efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Clinical efficacy of osimertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with distant metastasis

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib-the third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-has been widely used as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Osimertinib demonstrated central nervous system activity in patients with brain metastasis; however, its efficacy against other distant metastatic organs, including bone and liver, remains unclear. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical efficacy of osimertinib in these patients in comparison to other EGFR-TKIs.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients with advanced NSCLC receiving gefitinib/erlotinib (n = 183), afatinib (n = 55), or osimertinib (n = 150) at five medical institutions were retrospectively assessed for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and best overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

In univariate and multivariate analyses, most distant metastases, including the brain and bone, were unrelated to the therapeutic efficacy of osimertinib, although liver metastasis and L858R mutation were independently associated with shorter PFS. PFS and OS in patients with liver metastases were significantly shorter than those in patients without liver metastases (PFS: 7.4 vs. 19.7 months, OS: 12.1 months vs. not reached, respectively). Osimertinib provided significantly longer PFS in patients with brain or bone metastasis and exon 19 deletion than the other EGFR-TKIs. The PFS of patients with liver metastases was not significantly different among the three EGFR-TKI groups. Furthermore, the ORR of osimertinib in patients with liver metastases was significantly attenuated, and the effectiveness was similar to 1^st- or 2^nd -generation EGFR-TKIs.

CONCLUSION

Osimertinib provided better clinical benefits than 1^st- and 2^nd-generation EGFR-TKIs for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, particularly those with brain or bone metastases and exon 19 deletion; however, its efficacy against liver metastasis was remarkably attenuated. New therapeutic developments for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with liver metastases are needed.

Successful Treatment of Metastatic Gallbladder Carcinoma with PD-L1 Expression by the Combination of PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Bevacizumab with Chemotherapy: A Case Report

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common type of biliary tract cancer. The GBC is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, which limits surgical intervention due to its aggressive nature, and as a consequence of its insensitivity to chemotherapy, more effective treatments are required. In GBC, the efficacy of chemotherapy combined with anti-PD-L1/VEGF inhibition remains to be clarified. The present case report describes successful treatment by toripalimab in combination with bevacizumab and gemcitabine in a patient with metastatic GBC and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) =30. After six courses of therapy, a partial response was observed in the patient’s clinical condition. So far, her PFS has exceeded 15 months. To the best of our knowledge, there was no other case where toripalimab plus bevacizumab were used in combination with gemcitabine as an effective treatment strategy for GBC. The remarkable response is likely to be related to the positive expression of PD-L1. Further, VEGF inhibition in combination with chemotherapy may result in improved clinical outcomes due to increased antitumor immunity. Chemotherapy regimens combined with anti-PD-L1/VEGF inhibition are promising therapies for GBC. Further well-designed prospective clinical trials are needed in order to confirm the efficacy and safety of the three-drug regimen.

Atezolizumab plus carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel versus carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel as treatments for Chinese, treatment-naïve, stage IV, non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer patients: A retrospective analysis

The IMpower trials reported significant effects of atezolizumab-containing chemotherapies on Caucasian patients. Chinese patients differ from their Western counterparts in terms of driver mutations, etiologies, and regimen tolerance. In China, atezolizumab-containing chemotherapies are not cost-effective. Atezolizumab addition triggers grade >3 adverse events. Here, we evaluated the effectiveness and the safety profile of atezolizumab plus carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel compared to carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel in treatment-naïve Chinese patients with confirmed stage IV, non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer. All patients completed six cycles of 1200 mg of atezolizumab/3 weeks plus 6 mg/ml/min area-under-the-curve carboplatin/3 weeks plus 100 mg/m² nab-paclitaxel/week (n = 115; ACN cohort) or 6 mg/ml/min area-under-the-curve carboplatin/3 weeks plus 100 mg/m² nab-paclitaxel/week (n = 130; CNP cohort). The progression-free survival (12.98 ± 2.57 months vs. 10.89 ± 2.18 months, p < .0001) and overall survival (38.04 ± 19.8 months vs. 33.59 ± 87 months, p = .012) of patients in the ACN cohort were higher than those of patients in the CNP cohort after 48 weeks of follow-up. A total of 97 (84%) patients in the ACN cohort and 94 (72%) in the CNP cohort developed grade ≥3 adverse events (p = .030). A total of 84 (73%) patients from the ACN cohort and 107 (82%) from the CNP cohort died during 48 weeks of follow-up (p = .091). The addition of atezolizumab to carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel enhanced progression-free and overall survival but increased the risk of grade ≥3 adverse events in Chinese, treatment-naïve, stage IV, non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer patients who completed treatment (Level of Evidence: III; Technical Efficacy Stage: 4).

Safety and Efficacy of Sintilimab and Anlotinib as First Line Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (KEEP-G04): A Single-Arm Phase 2 Study

Purpose

Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors may offer a first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this phase 2 trial [registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04052152)], we investigated the safety and efficacy of first-line anti-PD-1 antibody sintilimab plus antiangiogenic TKI anlotinib for advanced HCC.

Methods and Materials

Pathologically-proven advanced HCC patients received sintilimab (200 mg) on day 1 and anlotinib (12 mg) once daily on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks, with a safety run-in for the first six participants to assess dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The primary endpoints were safety and objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1.

Results

Twenty advanced HCC patients were enrolled. No DLTs occurred in the safety run-in. All patients had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 8 (40.0%) patients, the most common being decreased platelet count (10.0%) and increased γ-glutamyl transferase (10.0%). No grade 4/5 TRAEs occurred. Five (25%) patients developed immune-related AEs. The ORR was 35.0% (95%CI 15.4%-59.2%) per RECIST v1.1 and 55.0% (95%CI 31.5%-76.9%) per modified RECIST. At data cutoff (March 31, 2021), the median progression-free survival was 12.2 months (95%CI, 3.8 to not reached). The median PFS was significantly longer in patients with lower LDH levels (not reached [NR], 95% CI, 8.7 to NR vs. higher LDH levels 5.2 months, 95% CI 3.4 to NR; P=0.020) and a CONUT score ≤2 (NR, 95% CI 5.1 to NR vs. CONUT score >2 6.2 months, 95% CI 1.8 to NR; P=0.020). Furthermore, patients showing tumor response had a significantly higher median proportion of CD16⁺CD56⁺ NK cells than patients who had stable or progressive disease (21.6% vs. 14.6%; P=0.026).

Conclusion

Sintilimab plus anlotinib showed promising clinical activities with manageable toxicity as first-line treatment of advanced HCC.