Toward the Next Generation of High-Grade Glioma Clinical Trials in the Era of Precision Medicine

Inaugural Results of the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy: A Phase II Platform Trial for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Using Bayesian Adaptive Randomization

PURPOSE

The Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) is a phase II platform trial that uses response adaptive randomization and genomic profiling to efficiently identify novel therapies for phase III testing. Three initial experimental arms (abemaciclib [a cyclin-dependent kinase [CDK]4/6 inhibitor], neratinib [an epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR]/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 inhibitor], and CC-115 [a deoxyribonucleic acid-dependent protein kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor]) were simultaneously evaluated against a common control arm. We report the results for each arm and examine the feasibility and conduct of the adaptive platform design.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase-unmethylated glioblastoma were eligible if they had tumor genotyping to identify prespecified biomarker subpopulations of dominant glioblastoma signaling pathways (EGFR, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and CDK). Initial random assignment was 1:1:1:1 between control (radiation therapy and temozolomide) and the experimental arms. Subsequent Bayesian adaptive randomization was incorporated on the basis of biomarker-specific progression-free survival (PFS) data. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and one-sided P values are reported. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02977780).

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-seven patients were treated (71 control; 73 abemaciclib; 81 neratinib; 12 CC-115) in years 2017-2021. Abemaciclib and neratinib were well tolerated, but CC-115 was associated with ≥ grade 3 treatment-related toxicity in 58% of patients. PFS was significantly longer with abemaciclib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.06; one-sided P = .046) and neratinib (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.02; one-sided P = .033) relative to the control arm but there was no PFS benefit with CC-115 (one-sided P = .523). None of the experimental therapies demonstrated a significant OS benefit (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

The INSIGhT design enabled efficient simultaneous testing of three experimental agents using a shared control arm and adaptive randomization. Two investigational arms had superior PFS compared with the control arm, but none demonstrated an OS benefit. The INSIGhT design may promote improved and more efficient therapeutic discovery in glioblastoma. New arms have been added to the trial.

The HNF4A-CHPF pathway promotes proliferation and invasion through interactions with MAD1L1 in glioma

Chondroitin polymerizing factor (CHPF) is an important glycosyltransferases that participates in the biosynthesis of chondroitin sulfate (CS). Our previous study showed that silencing CHPF expression inhibited glioma cell proliferation in vitro, but the molecular mechanisms by which CHPF contributes to development of glioma have not been characterized. In this study, we found that CHPF was up-regulated in glioma tissues and was positively correlated with malignant clinical pathological characteristics of patients with glioma. Silencing CHPF expression inhibited proliferation, colony formation, migration, and cell cycle of glioma cells. Moreover, silencing CHPF suppressed glioma malignance in vivo. Immunoprecipitation, co-immunoprecipitation, GST pulldown, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays were used to verify the interaction between CHPF and Mitotic arrest deficient 1-like 1 (MAD1L1). In addition, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-PCR analysis showed that HNF4A bound to the CHPF promoter region, which indicated that the transcription factor hepatocyte nuclear factor 4A (HNF4A) could regulate the expression of CHPF in glioma cells.

Prediction of Glioma Grade by Tumor Heterogeneity Radiomic Analysis Based on Multiparametric MRI

Predicting glioma grade plays a pivotal role in treatment and prognosis. However, several current methods for grading depend on the characteristics of the whole tumor. Predicting grade by analyzing tumor subregions has not been thoroughly investigated, which aims to improve the prediction performance. To predict glioma grade via analysis of tumor heterogeneity with features extracted from tumor subregions, it is mainly divided into four magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, including T2-weighted (T2), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), pre-gadolinium T1-weighted (T1), and post-gadolinium T1-weighted methods. This study included the data of 97 patients with glioblastomas and 42 patients with low-grade gliomas before surgery. Three subregions, including enhanced tumor (ET), non-enhanced tumor, and peritumoral edema, were obtained based on segmentation labels generated by the GLISTRBoost algorithm. One hundred radiomic features were extracted from each subregion. Feature selection was performed using the cross-validated recursive feature elimination with a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm. SVM classifiers with grid search were established to predict glioma grade based on unparametric and multiparametric MRI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of the classifiers, and the performance of the subregions was compared with the results of the whole tumor. In uniparametric analysis, the features from the ET subregion yielded a higher AUC value of 0.8697, 0.8474, and 0.8474 than those of the whole tumor of FLAIR, T1, and T2. In multiparametric analysis, the ET subregion achieved the best performance (AUC = 0.8755), which was higher than the uniparametric results. Radiomic features from the tumor subregion can potentially be used as clinical markers to improve the predictive accuracy of glioma grades.

Novel Clinical Trial Designs in Neuro-Oncology

Scientific and technologic advances have led to a boon of candidate therapeutics for patients with malignancies of the central nervous system. The path from drug development to clinical use has generally followed a regimented order of sequential clinical trial phases. The recent increase in novel therapies, however, has strained the regulatory process and unearthed limitations of the current system, including significant cost, prolonged development time, and difficulties in testing therapies for rarer tumors. Novel clinical trial designs have emerged to increase efficiencies in clinical trial conduct to better evaluate and bring impactful drugs to patients in a timely manner. In order to better capture meaningful benefits for brain tumor patients, new endpoints to complement or replace traditional endpoints are also an increasingly important consideration. This review will explore the current challenges in the current clinical trial landscape and discuss novel clinical trial concepts, including consideration of limitations and risks of novel trial designs, within the context of neuro-oncology.