DNA Damage Repair Inhibitors-Combination Therapies

Novel imidazolone derivatives as potential dual inhibitors of checkpoint kinases 1 and 2: Design, synthesis, cytotoxicity evaluation, and mechanistic insights

Applying various drug design strategies including ring variation, substituents variation, and ring fusion, two series of 2-(alkylthio)-5-(arylidene/heteroarylidene)imidazolones and imidazo[1,2-a]thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidines were designed and prepared as dual potential Chk1 and Chk2 inhibitors. The newly synthesized hybrids were screened in NCI 60 cell line panel where the most active derivatives 4b, d-f, and 6a were further estimated for their five dose antiproliferative activity against the most sensitive tumor cells including breast MCF-7 and MDA-MB-468 and non-small cell lung cancer EKVX as well as normal WI-38 cell. Noticeably, increasing the carbon chain attached to thiol moiety at C-2 of imidazolone scaffold elevated the cytotoxic activity. Hence, compounds 4e and 4f, containing S-butyl fragment, exhibited the most antiproliferative activity against the tested cells where 4f showed extremely potent selectivity toward them. As well, compound 6a, containing imidazothienopyrimidine core, exerted significant cytotoxic activity and selectivity toward the examined cells. The mechanistic investigation of the most active cytotoxic analogs was achieved through the evaluation of their inhibitory activity against Chk1 and Chk2. Results revealed that 4f displayed potent dual inhibition of both Chk1 and Chk2 with IC50 equal 0.137 and 0.25 μM, respectively. It also promoted its antiproliferative and Chk suppression activity via EKVX cell cycle arrest at S phase through stimulating the apoptotic approach. The apoptosis induction was also emphasized by elevating the expression of Caspase-3 and Bax, that are accompanied by Bcl-2 diminution. The in silico molecular docking and ADMET profiles of the most active analogs have been carried out to evaluate their potential as significant anticancer drug candidates.

HMGB2 is a biomarker associated with poor prognosis promoting radioresistance in glioma by targeting base excision repair pathway

BACKGROUND

High mobility group box 2 (HMGB2) is considered as a biomarker of poor prognosis in various cancers.This study aims to investigate the effect and mechanism of HMGB2 in gliomas.

METHODS

With the glioma related on-line and our local hospital databases, the expression differences of HMGB2,Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and COX regression analysis were performed.The correlation analysis between the clinicopathological features and imaging parameters with the HMGB2 expression had been done. Then GSEA and PPI networks were carried out to find out the most significant pathway. The pathway inhibitor was applied to verify HMGB2's participation. CCK8,EDU assays,γ-H2AX immunofluorescence staining and colony formation assay were conducted to observe effects on glioma cells.

RESULTS

Available datasets showed that HMGB2 was highly expressed in glioma and patients with high expression of HMGB2 had poorer prognosis and molecular characteristics. Protein level evidence of western blot and immunohistochemistry from our center supported the conclusions above. Analysis on imaging features suggested that HMGB2 expression level had an inverse association with ADCmean but positively with the thickness of enhancing margin. Results from GSEA and PPI network analysis exhibited that HMGB2 was involved in base excision repair (BER) signaling pathway. Experimental evidence demonstrated that the overexpression of HMGB2 promoted the proliferation of glioma cells and enhanced the radio-resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

HMGB2 could promote glioma development and enhance the radioresistance of glioma cells, potentially related to the BER pathway, suggesting it may serve as an underlying biomarker for patients with glioma.

Enhancement of the Clastogenic Effects of Topotecan In Vivo by Tyrosyl-DNA Phosphodiesterase 1 Inhibitors

Topotecan administered intraperitoneally at single doses of 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/kg induced chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow cells of F1(CBA×C57BL/6) hybrid mice in a dose-dependent manner. A tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1) inhibitor, an usnic acid derivative OL9-116 was inactive in a dose range of 20-240 mg/kg, but enhanced the cytogenetic effect of topotecan (0.25 mg/kg) at a dose of 40 mg/kg (per os). The TDP1 inhibitor, a coumarin derivative TX-2552 (at doses of 20, 40, 80, and 160 mg/kg per os), increased the level of aberrant metaphases induced by topotecan (0.25 mg/kg) by 2.1-2.6 times, but was inactive at a dose of 10 mg/kg. The results indicate that TDP1 inhibitors enhance the clastogenic activity of topotecan in mouse bone marrow cells in vivo and are characterized by different dose profiles of the co-mutagenic effects.

Small molecule agents for triple negative breast cancer: Current status and future prospects

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer with poor prognosis. The number of cases increased by 2.26 million in 2020, making it the most commonly diagnosed cancer type in the world. TNBCs lack hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), which limits treatment options. Currently, paclitaxel-based drugs combined with other chemotherapeutics remain the main treatment for TNBC. There is currently no consensus on the best therapeutic regimen for TNBC. However, there have been successful clinical trials exploring large-molecule monoclonal antibodies, small-molecule targeted drugs, and novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). Although monoclonal antibodies have produced clinical success, their large molecular weight can limit therapeutic benefits. It is worth noting that in the past 30 years, the FDA has approved small molecule drugs for HER2-positive breast cancers. The lack of effective targets and the occurrence of drug resistance pose significant challenges in the treatment of TNBC. To improve the prognosis of TNBC, it is crucial to search for effective targets and to overcome drug resistance. This review examines the clinical efficacy, adverse effects, resistance mechanisms, and potential solutions of targeted small molecule drugs in both monotherapies and combination therapies. New therapeutic targets, including nuclear export protein 1 (XPO1) and hedgehog (Hh), are emerging as potential options for researchers and become integrated into clinical trials for TNBC. Additionally, there is growing interest in the potential of targeted protein degradation chimeras (PROTACs), degraders of rogue proteins, as a future therapy direction. This review provides potentially valuable insights with clinical implications.

New horizons in lung cancer management through ATR/CHK1 pathway modulation

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Molecular profiling has contributed to a new classification of lung cancer, driving advancements in research and therapy. The ataxia telangiectasia and rad3/checkpoint kinase 1 (ATR/CHK1) pathway plays a crucial role in maintaining genomic stability, and its activation has been linked to the development of lung cancer, drug resistance and poor prognosis. Clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrated promising results in targeting this pathway. ATR and CHK1 are proteins that collaborate to repair DNA damage caused by radiation or chemotherapy. ATR/CHK1 inhibitors are currently under investigation in preclinical and clinical trials. This article explores the ATR/CHK1 pathway and its potential for treating lung cancer.

The dynamic process of covalent and non-covalent PARylation in the maintenance of genome integrity: a focus on PARP inhibitors

Poly(ADP-ribosylation) (PARylation) by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) is a highly regulated process that consists of the covalent addition of polymers of ADP-ribose (PAR) through post-translational modifications of substrate proteins or non-covalent interactions with PAR via PAR binding domains and motifs, thereby reprogramming their functions. This modification is particularly known for its central role in the maintenance of genomic stability. However, how genomic integrity is controlled by an intricate interplay of covalent PARylation and non-covalent PAR binding remains largely unknown. Of importance, PARylation has caught recent attention for providing a mechanistic basis of synthetic lethality involving PARP inhibitors (PARPi), most notably in homologous recombination (HR)-deficient breast and ovarian tumors. The molecular mechanisms responsible for the anti-cancer effect of PARPi are thought to implicate both catalytic inhibition and trapping of PARP enzymes on DNA. However, the relative contribution of each on tumor-specific cytotoxicity is still unclear. It is paramount to understand these PAR-dependent mechanisms, given that resistance to PARPi is a challenge in the clinic. Deciphering the complex interplay between covalent PARylation and non-covalent PAR binding and defining how PARP trapping and non-trapping events contribute to PARPi anti-tumour activity is essential for developing improved therapeutic strategies. With this perspective, we review the current understanding of PARylation biology in the context of the DNA damage response (DDR) and the mechanisms underlying PARPi activity and resistance.

Update on poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors resistance in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common reproductive system tumors. The incidence of ovarian cancer in China is on the rise. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (PARPi) is a DNA repair enzyme associated with DNA damage repair. PARPi takes PARP as a target to kill tumor cells, especially for tumors with homologous recombination (HR) dysfunction. Currently, PARPi has been widely used in clinical practice, mainly for the maintenance of advanced ovarian epithelial cancer. The intrinsic or acquired drug resistance of PARPi has gradually become an important clinical problem with the wide application of PARPi. This review summarizes the mechanisms of PARPi resistance and the current progress on PARPi-based combination strategies.

Circ_002363 is regulated by the RNA binding protein BCAS2 and inhibits neodymium oxide nanoparticle-induced DNA damage by non-homologous end-joining repair

Neodymium oxide nanoparticles (NPs-Nd₂O₃) are increasingly being used in industry and biomedicine, causing adverse health effects such as lung disease. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms controlling these adverse consequences are unknown at present. In this study, a human bronchial epithelial cell line (16HBE) was exposed to increasing concentrations of NPs-Nd₂O₃, and Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with NPs-Nd₂O₃ by intratracheal instillation. We found that NPs-Nd₂O₃ exposure induced DNA damage and down-regulated levels of circular RNA (circRNA) circ_002363 in 16HBE cells as well as in rat lung tissue. We also observed that circ_002363 levels in the serum of workers employed in the production of NPs-Nd₂O₃ diminished as the work time progressed, suggesting that circ_002363 may be a potential biomarker of lung injury. Functional experiments showed that circ_002363 significantly inhibited DNA damage induced by NPs-Nd₂O_3. RNA pull-down and western blot assays found that circ_002363 interacted with proteins PARP1/Ku70/Ku80/Rad50, which are critical participants in non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) DNA repair. Moreover, we found that formation of circ_002363 was regulated by the RNA binding protein Breast Carcinoma Amplified Sequence 2 (BCAS2). The BCAS2 protein affected circ_002363 expression through interaction with Pre-DNA2, the host gene of circ_002363, in NPs-Nd₂O_3-exposed 16HBE cells. In conclusion, our findings show first that circ_002363, which is regulated by BCAS2, acts as regulator of DNA damage via the NHEJ pathway. These results enhance our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms controlling the actions of circular RNAs and highlight the relationship between genetics and epigenetics in the development of diseases following exposure to environmental chemicals.

Targeting Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Ovarian Cancer with PARP Inhibitors: Synthetic Lethal Strategies That Impact Overall Survival

Simple Summary

Synthetic lethality approaches to cancer therapy involves combining events to cause cancer cell death. Using this strategy, major advances have occurred in the treatment of women with ovarian cancer who have defects in the Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) pathway. When the HRR pathway is defective, due to mutations or epigenetic changes in genes such as BRCA1 or BRCA2, cells can no longer accurately repair double strand breaks (DSBs). Capitalising on this weakness, pharmacological inhibition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) that function to repair single strand breaks (SSBs) leads to synthetic lethality in cells with defective HRR. PARP inhibitors (PARPis) including olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib are approved for the clinical management of women with ovarian cancer. Understanding and overcoming issues of acquired resistance to PARPis, extending these strategies to benefit more patients and combining PARPis with other drugs, including immunotherapies, are of high priority in the field today.

Abstract

The advent of molecular targeted therapies has made a significant impact on survival of women with ovarian cancer who have defects in homologous recombination repair (HRR). High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common histological subtype of ovarian cancer, with over 50% displaying defective HRR. Poly ADP ribose polymerases (PARPs) are a family of enzymes that catalyse the transfer of ADP-ribose to target proteins, functioning in fundamental cellular processes including transcription, chromatin remodelling and DNA repair. In cells with deficient HRR, PARP inhibitors (PARPis) cause synthetic lethality leading to cell death. Despite the major advances that PARPis have heralded for women with ovarian cancer, questions and challenges remain, including: can the benefits of PARPis be brought to a wider range of women with ovarian cancer; can other drugs in clinical use function in a similar way or with greater efficacy than currently clinically approved PARPis; what can we learn from long-term responders to PARPis; can PARPis sensitise ovarian cancer cells to immunotherapy; and can synthetic lethal strategies be employed more broadly to develop new therapies for women with ovarian cancer. We examine these, and other, questions with focus on improving outcomes for women with ovarian cancer.