Identifying Hesitation and Discomfort with Diagnosing Sepsis: Survey of a Pediatric Tertiary Care Center

Challenges and Solutions in translating sepsis guidelines into practice in resource-limited settings

Sepsis and septic shock are major contributors to the global burden of disease, with a large proportion of patients and deaths with sepsis estimated to occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There are numerous barriers to reducing the large global burden of sepsis including challenges in quantifying attributable morbidity and mortality, poverty, inadequate awareness, health inequity, under-resourced public health, and low-resilient acute health care delivery systems. Context-specific approaches to this significant problem are necessary on account of important differences in populations at-risk, the nature of infecting pathogens, and the healthcare capacity to manage sepsis in LMIC. We review these challenges and propose an outline of some solutions to tackle them which include strengthening the healthcare systems, accurate and early identification of sepsis the need for inclusive research and context-specific treatment guidelines, and advocacy. Specifically, strengthening pediatric intensive care units (PICU) services can effectively treat the life-threatening complications of common diseases, such as diarrhoea, respiratory infections, severe malaria, and dengue, thereby improving the quality of pediatric care overall without the need for expensive interventions. A thoughtful approach to developing paediatric intensive care services in LMICs begins with basic fundamentals: training healthcare providers in knowledge and skills, selecting effective equipment that is resource-appropriate, and having an enabling leadership to provide location-appropriate care. These basics, if built in sustainable manner, have the potential to permit an efficient pediatric critical care service to be established that can significantly improve sepsis and other critical care outcomes.

Impact of a Multidisciplinary Sepsis Initiative on Knowledge and Behavior in a Pediatric Center

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Objective:

Our institution performed an educational initiative targeting previously identified barriers to pediatric sepsis recognition and treatment. We hypothesized that provider knowledge, attitude, and behavior would be improved 1 year after implementation.

Methods:

This was a prospective, observational study of a multi-faceted quality initiative introduced to providers in the Emergency Department, inpatient wards, and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary care children’s hospital. Educational platforms consisted of quarterly electronic sepsis “newsletters,” brightly colored posters highlighting protocol and screening strategies displayed throughout the hospital, and low-fidelity simulation sessions (drills) led by trained staff and incorporated into daily workflows. The content was driven by feedback from a baseline needs assessment of sepsis education. One year after implementation, the needs assessment was repeated.

Results:

Over 3 months, facilitators conducted 197 drills and captured a majority of nurses (89%), pediatrics residents (96%), and respiratory therapists (62%). By 6 months, 241 sessions had been completed. Approximately 55.4% of the 442 eligible staff participated in our post-intervention survey. Overall, knowledge of diagnostic criteria for pediatric sepsis and septic shock increased from pre-intervention levels (P = 0.015). Among post-implementation respondents, drill participants outperformed their colleagues (P = 0.001). A greater percentage of post-intervention respondents indicated comfort with sepsis recognition (P < 0.001), and fewer reported hesitating to bring sepsis concerns to their care team (P < 0.01).

Conclusions:

Our findings suggest that a multidisciplinary curriculum balancing active education—through brief, targeted simulation—and general awareness—through electronic resources and a poster campaign—can improve sepsis-related knowledge, attitude, and behavior among pediatric practitioners.