Implementing a Process to Systematically Identify and Address Poor Medication Adherence in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients

International Variability of Barriers to Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication in Adult Heart Transplant Recipients. A Secondary Data Analysis of the BRIGHT Study

Non-adherence to immunosuppressive medication among transplant patients is associated with poor clinical outcomes and higher economic costs. Barriers to immunosuppressives are a proximal determinant of non-adherence. So far, international variability of barriers to adherence in transplantation has not been studied. As part of the cross-sectional multi-country and multi-center BRIGHT study, barriers to adherence were measured in 1,382 adult heart transplant recipients of 11 countries using the 28-item self-report questionnaire "Identifying Medication Adherence Barriers" (IMAB). Barriers were ranked by their frequency of occurrence for the total sample and by country. Countries were also ranked the by recipients' total number of barriers. Intra-class correlations were calculated at country and center level. The five most frequently mentioned barriers were sleepiness (27.1%), being away from home (25.2%), forgetfulness (24.5%), interruptions to daily routine (23.6%) and being busy (22.8%), fairly consistently across countries. The participants reported on average three barriers, ranging from zero up to 22 barriers. The majority of the variability among reported barriers frequency was situated at the recipient level (94.8%). We found limited international variability in primarily person-level barriers in our study. Understanding of barriers in variable contexts guides intervention development to support adherence to the immunosuppressive regimen in real-world settings.

Implementation of a multicomponent medication adherence promotion system is associated with a decrease in late T-cell-mediated rejection

Poor immunosuppression adherence in pediatric recipients of liver transplant (LT) contributes to late T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in ~90% of cases and increases the risk of mortality. A medication adherence promotion system (MAPS) was found to reduce late rejection in pediatric recipients of kidney transplants. Using quality improvement methodology, we adapted and implemented the MAPS in our LT clinic. Our primary outcome was population-level rates of late TCMR, measured as a monthly incident rate. Three-hundred fourteen patients undergoing LT are currently cared for at our institution. One-hundred sixty-two (52%) are females with a median age of 16 years and a median age at LT of 2 years. Preimplementation, monthly rejection rates were 0.84 rejections per 100 patient-months. After iterative implementation of MAPS over 2.3 years, monthly rejection rates decreased to 0.46 rejections per 100 patient-months, a 45% decrease in late TCMR. Implementation of MAPS was associated with a sustained 45% decrease in TCMR at a single center, suggesting that quality improvement tools may help improve clinical outcomes. MAPS may be an important tool to ensure long-term allograft health. Future studies should rigorously test MAPS across a multicenter sample.

Electronic health record-enabled routine assessment of medication adherence after solid organ transplantation: the time is now

Medication nonadherence after solid organ transplantation is recognized as an important impediment to long-term graft survival. Yet, assessment of adherence is often not part of routine care. In this Personal Viewpoint, we call for the transplant community to consider implementing a systematic process to screen and assess medication adherence. We believe acceptable tools are available to support integrating adherence assessments into the electronic health record. Creating a standard assessment can be done efficiently and cost-effectively if we come together as a community. More importantly, such monitoring can improve outcomes and strengthen provider-patient relationships. We further discuss the practical challenges and potential rebuttals to our position.

The Barriers Assessment Tool-A Patient-Centered Measure of Adherence Barriers in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Assessing barriers to adherence provides helpful information to clinicians. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical utility of the Barriers Assessment Tool (BAT) using clinical data for a large, midwestern U.S. pediatric kidney transplant program.

METHODS

Focus group and clinical data were obtained during post-transplant medical visits. Qualitative and quantitative assessment methods were utilized to describe patient and caregiver feedback on the BAT, clinical utility, concordance between reporters, and the effect of interventions on subsequent assessment and electronically measured adherence.

RESULTS

Patients were willing to discuss adherence issues with their care team. There was substantial agreement between patients and caregivers at two timepoints. If a barrier was not addressed, 89.6% (43/48) of patients and 85.9% (67/78) of caregivers reported the same BAT scores from the first to second assessment. When barriers were addressed with a clinic-based intervention, 82% of caregivers reported no adherence barriers. No significant change was found for patient-reported barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized assessment of barriers to medication adherence provides actionable information to clinicians. Standardized assessment of adherence barriers may give clinicians opportunities to help patients and caregivers overcome these barriers which can decrease risk of rejection.

Improved Medication Adherence with the Use of Extended-Release Tacrolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Nonadherence to immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) leads to deterioration in health outcomes. Once-dailyextended-release tacrolimus (TAC-ER) may improve adherence when compared to twice-dailyimmediate-release tacrolimus (TAC-IR).

Methods

We conducted a randomized controlled study to evaluate medication adherence, clinical efficacy, and safety of TAC-ER in stable LTR. All patients >18 years who underwent liver transplantation before 6 months were eligible. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to continued TAC-IR or conversion to TAC-ER. The primary outcome was change in medication adherence from baseline to 9 months, assessed using BAASIS. Secondary outcomes were tacrolimus trough levels, safety, and quality of life.

Results

Thirty-one patients were consented and randomized to either of the two groups: conversion to TAC-ER (n = 15) or continued TAC-IR (n = 16). Six patients in the TAC-ER group withdrew after randomization due to apprehension about switching medication (n = 2), unwillingness to travel (n = 2), and increased liver tests after conversion (n = 2, both were acute rejections despite therapeutic tacrolimus levels and were considered unrelated to TAC-ER). We compared the results of nine patients in the TAC-ER group that completed the study with those of sixteen in the TAC-IR group. At baseline, there was no difference in tacrolimus trough levels between groups. Improved adherence was observed in the TAC-ER group as 100% of patients reported at least one period of full adherence during the study period (100% vs. 62.6%, p = 0.035). Tacrolimus trough levels and liver tests were comparable between groups throughout the study. There were no differences in eGFR, HbA1c, or QoL between the groups.

Conclusion

TAC-ER improved medication adherence while maintaining comparable trough levels, liver function, and QoL as TAC-IR in LTR.

Study of Adherence to Medication in Pediatric Liver Diseases ("SAMPLD" Study) in Indian Children

Background/objectives

Adherence to medication(s) is an essential component of holistic management in any chronic disease including in post liver transplant (LT) patients. Thus, this study aimed to assess adherence to medications in Indian pediatric liver disease patients (including post LT recipients) and to identify variables affecting its occurrence.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among pediatric (<18 years of age) subjects with Wilson disease (WD) and autoimmune liver disease (AILD) along with post LT recipients from May 2021 to October 2021. Structured tools using prevalidated questionnaires (Medication adherence measure and the Child & Adolescent Adherence to Medication Questionnaire) were used to collect data related to nonadherence prevalence (based on missed and late doses) and factors influencing the adherence.

Results

A total of 152 children were included in the study (WD 39.5%, AILD 32.9%, and post LT 27.6%). Prevalence of missed and late dose nonadherence (at a cut-off of ≥20%) was 12.5% and 16.4%, respectively. Older age (odd's ratio/O.R 1.185), stay in a rural area (O.R 5.08), and barriers like bad taste of medication (O.R 4.728) and hard to remember the medication (O.R 7.180) were independently associated with nonadherence (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Overall, nonadherence was seen in 12-16%, i.e., around one-sixth of the patients, with least nonadherence seen in post LT recipients (0-2.4%). Older age of the patient, rural place of stay and personal barriers like hard to remember/forgetfulness and bad medication taste were identified as factors independently leading to nonadherence.

Factors associated with improved patient and graft survival beyond 1 year in pediatric liver transplantation

With advances in surgical techniques, medical management, and more equitable allocation systems, children who receive a liver transplantation (LT) today can expect remarkable outcomes early after LT. However, beyond 1 year after transplant, attrition rates have not improved. We reviewed two separate eras (Era 1: January 1995-June 2004 vs. Era 2: July 2004-March 2018) of the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation registry to explore the evolution and associated factors contributing to late graft loss (LGL) and late mortality (LM). The fraction of long-term pediatric LT recipients surviving after 1 year with their first graft significantly improved (81.5% in Era 1 vs. 85.7% in Era 2; p < 0.0001). This improvement occurred despite significant changes in patient selection toward higher risk populations (p < 0.001) and without notable improvement in perioperative complications such as hepatic artery thrombosis (p = 0.24) and early posttransplant reoperation (p = 0.94) that have historically contributed to poor late-allograft outcomes. Improved outcomes were associated with changes in patient characteristics and perioperative practices, which subsequently impacted both early post-LT complications as well as other sequalae known to contribute to adverse events in long-term pediatric LT recipients. In conclusion, despite significant changes in patient selection toward higher risk populations, and without notable improvement in several perioperative complications known to contribute to poor late-allograft outcomes, significant improvements in LGL and a trend toward improvement in LM was seen in a more contemporary cohort of children receiving an LT.

Center Variability in Acute Rejection and Biliary Complications After Pediatric Liver Transplantation

Transplant center performance and practice variation for pediatric post-liver transplantation (LT) outcomes other than survival are understudied. This was a retrospective cohort study of pediatric LT recipients who received transplants between January 1, 2006, and May 31, 2017, using United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data that were merged with the Pediatric Health Information System database. Center effects for the acute rejection rate at 1 year after LT (AR1) using UNOS coding and the biliary complication rate at 1 year after LT (BC1) using inpatient billing claims data were estimated by center-specific rescaled odds ratios that accounted for potential differences in recipient and donor characteristics. There were 2216 pediatric LT recipients at 24 freestanding children's hospitals in the United States during the study period. The median unadjusted center rate of AR1 was 36.92% (interquartile range [IQR], 22.36%-44.52%), whereas that of BC1 was 32.29% (IQR, 26.14%-40.44%). Accounting for recipient case mix and donor factors, 5/24 centers performed better than expected with regard to AR1, whereas 3/24 centers performed worse than expected. There was less heterogeneity across the center effects for BC1 than for AR1. There was no relationship observed between the center effects for AR1 or BC1 and center volume. Beyond recipient and allograft factors, differences in transplant center management are an important driver of center AR1 performance, and less so of BC1 performance. Further research is needed to identify the sources of variability so as to implement the most effective solutions to broadly enhance outcomes for pediatric LT recipients.

Development and testing of a framework for defining a strategy to address medication adherence during patient encounters in community pharmacies

Background

Counseling patients on medication adherence could be ameliorated in pharmacy practice. There is a lack of simple and practical strategies to address medication adherence with patients in daily practice. The goal was to develop and test a framework that allows pharmacy teams to define and apply a strategy to address medication adherence in community pharmacies.

Methods

A framework based on the principles of social marketing was developed. It consisted of 3 items: the target patient (“Who”), the target plan (“How”), and the target goal (“How many”). To test the framework, each participating pharmacy team developed their strategy by defining the 3 items and applied them during one pilot day. A master student observed the encounters between patients and pharmacy team members and used a structured checklist to document the patient's characteristics, counseling content, and strategy use. Pharmacy teams answered a feedback questionnaire at the end of the pilot day.

Results

Ten pharmacy teams were included. During a brainstorming session that lasted on average 31 ± 8 min, unique strategies comprised 18 different target patients and 20 different target plans. The planned target goal was a mean of 31 patients (range: 1 to “all”). A total of 325 encounters were observed, of which 208 patients (64%) corresponded to the predefined target patients. Medication adherence was addressed with 73 patients (22.5%), and adherence counseling was performed with 50 patients (15%). The pharmacy teams accepted the framework and judged it feasible and adaptable to their needs.

Conclusion

The proposed framework represents a simple tool that enables pharmacy teams to develop a strategy for addressing medication adherence in community pharmacies. Its adoption by pharmacy teams occurred without additional training and its integration into daily practice without difficulties. A further study is now needed to investigate if pharmacy teams can successfully engage patients in discussion on medication adherence and ultimately propose targeted adherence interventions.

•

A 3-item framework to address medication adherence in pharmacies was introduced.

•

The three framework was well received by the pharmacy teams.

•

The adoption of the 3-item framework by the pharmacy teams was simple and quick.

•

The teams chose target patient not according to known factors for poor adherence

•

Patients reacted mainly positively when asked about medication adherence