1
|
Bolesta S, Burry L, Perreault MM, Gélinas C, Smith KE, Eadie R, Carini FC, Saltarelli K, Mitchell J, Harpel J, Stewart R, Riker RR, Fraser GL, Erstad BL. International Analgesia and Sedation Weaning and Withdrawal Practices in Critically Ill Adults: The Adult Iatrogenic Withdrawal Study in the ICU. Crit Care Med 2023; 51:1502-1514. [PMID: 37283558 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS) associated with opioid and sedative use for medical purposes has a reported high prevalence and associated morbidity. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, utilization, and characteristics of opioid and sedative weaning and IWS policies/protocols in the adult ICU population. DESIGN International, multicenter, observational, point prevalence study. SETTING Adult ICUs. PATIENTS All patients aged 18 years and older in the ICU on the date of data collection who received parenteral opioids or sedatives in the previous 24 hours. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS ICUs selected 1 day for data collection between June 1 and September 30, 2021. Patient demographic data, opioid and sedative medication use, and weaning and IWS assessment data were collected for the previous 24 hours. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients weaned from opioids and sedatives using an institutional policy/protocol on the data collection day. There were 2,402 patients in 229 ICUs from 11 countries screened for opioid and sedative use; 1,506 (63%) patients received parenteral opioids, and/or sedatives in the previous 24 hours. There were 90 (39%) ICUs with a weaning policy/protocol which was used in 176 (12%) patients, and 23 (10%) ICUs with an IWS policy/protocol which was used in 9 (0.6%) patients. The weaning policy/protocol for 47 (52%) ICUs did not define when to initiate weaning, and the policy/protocol for 24 (27%) ICUs did not specify the degree of weaning. A weaning policy/protocol was used in 34% (176/521) and IWS policy/protocol in 9% (9/97) of patients admitted to an ICU with such a policy/protocol. Among 485 patients eligible for weaning policy/protocol utilization based on duration of opioid/sedative use initiation criterion within individual ICU policies/protocols 176 (36%) had it used, and among 54 patients on opioids and/or sedatives ≥ 72 hours, 9 (17%) had an IWS policy/protocol used by the data collection day. CONCLUSIONS This international observational study found that a small proportion of ICUs use policies/protocols for opioid and sedative weaning or IWS, and even when these policies/protocols are in place, they are implemented in a small percentage of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Bolesta
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Nesbitt School of Pharmacy, Wilkes University, Wilkes-Barre, PA
| | - Lisa Burry
- Departments of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sinai Health System, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marc M Perreault
- Department of Pharmacy, McGill University Health Center and Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Céline Gélinas
- Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, and Centre for Nursing Research/Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital-CIUSSS West-Central-Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Rebekah Eadie
- Critical Care/Pharmacy, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, United Kingdom
| | - Federico C Carini
- MS-ICU, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Jamie Harpel
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Nesbitt School of Pharmacy, Wilkes University, Wilkes-Barre, PA
| | - Ryan Stewart
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Nesbitt School of Pharmacy, Wilkes University, Wilkes-Barre, PA
| | - Richard R Riker
- Department of Critical Care/Pulmonary Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME
| | | | - Brian L Erstad
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Israel S, Perazzo S, Lee M, Samson R, Safari-Ferra P, Badh R, Abera S, Soghier L. Improving Documentation of Pain Reassessment after Pain Management Interventions in the NICU. Pediatr Qual Saf 2023; 8:e688. [PMID: 37780605 PMCID: PMC10538901 DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Neonates exposed to painful procedures require pain assessment and reassessment using nonverbal scales. Nurses perform initial assessments routinely, but reassessment is variable. The goal was to increase pain reassessments in neonates with a previous score of 4 or higher within 60 minutes from 50% to 75% within 12 months. Methods After identifying key drivers, we tested several interventions using the IHI's Model for Improvement. The outcome measure was the rate of reassessments within 1 hour after scoring ≥4 on the Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale (N-PASS). Duration of time between scoring and intervention was documented. Interventions included electronic health record (EHR) changes, direct communication with bedside nurses through text messages and emails, in-person education, and a yearly competency module. The process measure was the number of messages/emails to staff. Sedation scores were the balancing measure. Results Baseline compliance was 50% with significant variability. A centerline shift occurred after the first intervention. After the first four interventions in the following 3 months, a 29% total increase occurred. Overall time-lapse between reassessments decreased from 102 to 90 minutes. Overall sedation scores decreased from -2.5 during the baseline to -1.7 during the sustain period. The goal of 75% pain reassessments was achieved and sustained for two years. Conclusions Automated tools such as the trigger report provided data that increased noncompliance visibility. Real-time and personalized reminders and education improved awareness and set the tone for culture change. Electronic health record reminders for reassessments and standardized annual education helped in sustaining change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smitha Israel
- From the Division of Neonatology at Children's National Hospital
| | - Sofia Perazzo
- From the Division of Neonatology at Children's National Hospital
- The Department of Pediatrics at the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences
| | - Morgan Lee
- The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Children's National Hospital
| | - Rachel Samson
- The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Children's National Hospital
| | - Parissa Safari-Ferra
- The Quality Improvement and Safety Department at Children's National Hospital
- Center of Pediatric Informatics at Children's National Hospital
| | - Ranjodh Badh
- The Quality Improvement and Safety Department at Children's National Hospital
| | - Solomon Abera
- The Quality Improvement and Safety Department at Children's National Hospital
| | - Lamia Soghier
- From the Division of Neonatology at Children's National Hospital
- The Department of Pediatrics at the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bektas G, Soderborg T, Slater C, Agarwal J, Racioppi M, Hogan T, Werler MM, Wachman EM. The Neonatal Withdrawal Assessment Tool (NWAT): pilot inter-rater reliability and content validity. J Perinatol 2023; 43:930-935. [PMID: 36914798 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-023-01641-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is no validated tool to assess iatrogenic opioid withdrawal in preterm infants in the newborn intensive care unit (NICU). STUDY DESIGN The Neonatal Withdrawal Assessment Tool (NWAT) was developed to address this gap in clinical practice. In this pilot study, the NWAT was assessed for inter-rater reliability (IRR) and content validity. RESULT Fifty-one NICU providers scored two standardized simulated cases, then 20 paired provider assessments were completed on 5 preterm infants. The overall IRR was 95.6% on the simulated cases, and 98.8% on the 5 pilot infants. A provider survey assessed for content validity; all of the provider participants strongly agreed/agreed that the NWAT adequately measures withdrawal in critically ill infants. CONCLUSION The NWAT demonstrated high IRR and content validity for assessment of iatrogenic opioid withdrawal in preterm infants in this pilot study. Further studies in a larger more diverse patient population are needed before wider adoption into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonca Bektas
- Boston Combined Residency Program in Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Taylor Soderborg
- Boston Combined Residency Program in Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cheryl Slater
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joel Agarwal
- Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Trystan Hogan
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Martha M Werler
- Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elisha M Wachman
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pulmonary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Replaces Bedside Imaging in Diagnosing Pneumonia in Infants. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:7232638. [PMID: 36164449 PMCID: PMC9509219 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7232638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Neonatal Bronchopulmonary Bedside Photography (NBBP) evaluates the consumption of lung magnetic resonance imaging as a replacement for bedside imaging in diagnosing infant pneumonia. In premature baby respiratory support, Neonatal Bronchopulmonary (NB) is one of the most dangerous consequences of accurate diagnosis that impact health alternatives once steroids are administered. Infants may experience eating issues and vomit if their condition is bad enough; lower birth weight, younger gestational age, and extensive breathing tube damage are the most frequently established risk factors as a component of a neonatal habitat. This paper introduces the Intelligent Medical Care (IMC) for Neonatal Bronchopulmonary Bedside Photography (NBBP), which enhances various preventive efforts such as prenatal steroid therapy. Because of many prenatal and postnatal variables, growth hormone and diet nutrients influence alveolar and vascular development. For the future prevention of NB, it is more likely that a combination of different therapies working on diverse causal pathways would be beneficial. This research in NBBP-IMC technology that enhances prenatal care medicines are the most excellent and effective treatments for all these neonates throughout the decades. As a result, premature babies at risk for NB may benefit from the findings of this research, which experts anticipate can inspire further studies in the area. The purpose of this paper is to emphasize the work performed to improve respiratory outcomes for babies at risk of NB and to place this work in perspective with relevant research currently being conducted simultaneously.
Collapse
|