Prolonged time of after-sensation after experimental pain stimuli despite efficient conditioned pain modulation in patients with chronic neuropathic pain after traumatic nerve injuries in upper extremity

Increased risk of persistent neuropathic pain after traumatic nerve injury and surgery for carriers of a human leukocyte antigen haplotype

ABSTRACT

It is not known why some patients develop persistent pain after nerve trauma while others do not. Among multiple risk factors for the development of persistent posttrauma and postsurgical pain, a neuropathic mechanism due to iatrogenic nerve lesion has been proposed as the major cause of these conditions. Because there is some evidence that the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system plays a role in persistent postsurgical pain, this study aimed to identify the genetic risk factors, specifically among HLA loci, associated with chronic neuropathic pain after traumatic nerve injuries and surgery in the upper extremities. Blood samples were taken to investigate the contribution of HLA alleles (ie, HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DQB1, and HLA-DPB1) in a group of patients with persistent neuropathic pain (n = 70) and a group of patients with neuropathy without pain (n = 61). All subjects had intraoperatively verified nerve damage in the upper extremity. They underwent bedside clinical neurological examination to identify the neuropathic pain component according to the present grading system of neuropathic pain. Statistical analyses on the allele and haplotype were conducted using the BIGDAWG package. We found that the HLA haplotype A*02:01-B*15:01-C*03:04-DRB1*04:01-DQB1*03:02 was associated with an increased risk of developing persistent neuropathic pain in the upper extremity (OR = 9.31 [95% CI 1.28-406.45], P < 0.05). No significant associations were found on an allele level when correcting for multiple testing. Further studies are needed to investigate whether this association is on a haplotypic level or if certain alleles may be causing the association.

Pain mechanisms in the transgender individual: a review

Specific Aim

Provide an overview of the literature addressing major areas pertinent to pain in transgender persons and to identify areas of primary relevance for future research.

Methods

A team of scholars that have previously published on different areas of related research met periodically though zoom conferencing between April 2021 and February 2023 to discuss relevant literature with the goal of providing an overview on the incidence, phenotype, and mechanisms of pain in transgender patients. Review sections were written after gathering information from systematic literature searches of published or publicly available electronic literature to be compiled for publication as part of a topical series on gender and pain in the Frontiers in Pain Research.

Results

While transgender individuals represent a significant and increasingly visible component of the population, many researchers and clinicians are not well informed about the diversity in gender identity, physiology, hormonal status, and gender-affirming medical procedures utilized by transgender and other gender diverse patients. Transgender and cisgender people present with many of the same medical concerns, but research and treatment of these medical needs must reflect an appreciation of how differences in sex, gender, gender-affirming medical procedures, and minoritized status impact pain.

Conclusions

While significant advances have occurred in our appreciation of pain, the review indicates the need to support more targeted research on treatment and prevention of pain in transgender individuals. This is particularly relevant both for gender-affirming medical interventions and related medical care. Of particular importance is the need for large long-term follow-up studies to ascertain best practices for such procedures. A multi-disciplinary approach with personalized interventions is of particular importance to move forward.

Association between systemic inflammation and experimental pain sensitivity in subjects with pain and painless neuropathy after traumatic nerve injuries

OBJECTIVES

Peripheral neuropathies that occur secondary to nerve injuries may be painful or painless, and including a low-grade inflammation and pro-inflammatory cytokines associated with both regeneration and damage of peripheral nerve cells and fibers. Currently, there are no validated methods that can distinguished between neuropathic pain and painless neuropathy. The aim of this study was to search for proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory proteins associated with pain and experimental pain sensitivity in subjects with surgeon-verified nerve injuries in the upper extremities.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-one subjects [69 with neuropathic pain, NP; 62 with painless neuropathy, nP] underwent a conditioned pain modulation (CPM) test that included a cold pressor task (CPT) conducted with the non-injured hand submerged in cold water (4 °C) until pain was intolerable. CPM was assessed by pain ratings to pressure stimuli before and after applying the CPT. Efficient CPM effect was defined as the ability of the individual's CS to inhibit at least 29% of pain (eCPM). The subjects were assigned to one of two subgroups: pain sensitive (PS) and pain tolerant (PT) after the time they could tolerate their hand in cold water (PS<40 s and PT=60 s) . Plasma samples were analyzed for 92 proteins incorporated in the inflammation panel using multiplex Protein Extension Array Technology (PEA). Differentially expressed proteins were investigated using both univariate and multivariate analysis (principal component analysis-PCA and orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis-OPLS-DA).

RESULTS

Significant differences in all protein levels were found between PS and PT subgroups (CV-ANOVA p<0.001), but not between NP and nP groups (p=0.09) or between inefficient CPM (iCPM) and eCPM (p=0.53) subgroups. Several top proteins associated with NP could be detected using multivariate regression analysis such as stromelysin 2 (MMPs), interleukin-2 receptor subunit beta (IL2RB), chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 3 (CXCL3), fibroblast growth factor 5 (FGF5), chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 28 (CCL28), CCL25, CCL11, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), interleukin 4 (IL4), IL13. After adjusting for multiple testing, none of these proteins correlated significantly with pain. Higher levels of CCL20 (p=0.049) and CUB domain-containing protein (CDCP-1; p=0.047) were found to correlate significantly with cold pain sensitivity. CDCP-1 was highly associated with both PS and iCPM (p=0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant alterations in systemic proteins were found comparing subjects with neuropathic pain and painless neuropathy. An expression of predominant proinflammatory proteins was associated with experimental cold pain sensitivity in both subjects with pain and painless neuropathy. One these proteins, CDC-1 acted as "molecular fingerprint" overlapping both CPM and CPT. This observation might have implications for the study of pain in general and should be addressed in more detail in future experiments.

Sex-related differences in experimental pain sensitivity in subjects with painful or painless neuropathy after surgical repair of traumatic nerve injuries

Higher pain intensities at all experimental stimuli but a tendency to faster recovery after cold conditioning stimuli were seen in women with neuropathy in comparison with men.

Introduction:

Sex-related influences represent a contributor to greater pain sensitivity and have a higher prevalence of many chronic pain conditions, including neuropathic pain (NP), among women.

Objectives:

The aim was to analyze how differences in ongoing pain, experimental pain intensity, and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) relate to sex in subjects with neuropathy after traumatic nerve injuries.

Methods:

Endogenous pain modulation was compared between male (n = 77) and female (n = 55) subjects and between subjects with NP (female = 31, male = 39) and pain-free subjects with posttraumatic neuropathy (female = 24, male = 38). Conditioned pain modulation was assessed by pain ratings to pressure stimuli before and after a noxious conditioning stimulus (CS) conducted with one arm submerged in cold water (4°C) for 1 minute. Time of recovery (Time off) of pain intensity from peak VAS_maxc after CS was recorded and compared between male and female patients.

Results:

Greater ongoing pain intensity was found among female patients compared with male patients and more experimental pain after pressure and cold induced pain. Summing all groups together, women had 0.8 times higher odds (20%) of recovering sooner than men after CS (95% CI = 0.65–2.9). No differences in CPM, time off, and psychosocial variables were seen between female and male patients (P < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Our hypothesis for sex differences in endogenous pain modulation was only supported by a shorter after-sensation time after cold CS in female patients. No sex differences in the magnitude of CPM effect were identified. Increased pain intensity for experimental pain, in both neuropathic pain and neuropathy without pain, was found in female patients.