Comparison of pain and psychosocial correlates among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White youth with chronic pain

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Prescribing of Pain Medication in US Primary Care Settings, 1999-2019: Where Are We Now?

BACKGROUND

Policy initiatives have attempted to reduce healthcare inequalities in the USA, but evidence on whether these initiatives have reduced racial and ethnic disparities in pain treatment in primary care is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether racial and ethnic disparities in medication prescribed for pain in primary care settings have diminished over a 21-year period from 1999 to 2019.

DESIGN

An annual, representative cross-sectional probability sample of visits to US primary care physicians, taken from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

PATIENTS

Pain-related visits to primary care physicians.

MAIN MEASURES

Prescriptions for opioid and non-opioid analgesics.

KEY RESULTS

Of 599,293 (16%) sampled visits, 94,422 were pain-related, representing a population-weighted estimate of 143 million visits made annually to primary care physicians for pain. Relative risk analysis controlling for insurance, pain type, and other potential confounds showed no difference in pain medication prescribed between Black and White patients (p = .121). However, White patients were 1.61 (95% CI 1.32-1.97) and Black patients 1.57 (95% CI 1.26-1.95) times more likely to be prescribed opioids than a more underrepresented group consisting of Asian, Native-Hawaiian/Pacific-Islander, and American-Indian/Alaska-Natives (ps < .001). Non-Hispanic/Latino patients were 1.32 (95% CI 1.18-1.45) times more likely to receive opioids for pain than Hispanic/Latino patients (p < .001). Penalized cubic spline regression found no substantive narrowing of disparities over time.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that additional intervention strategies, or better implementation of existing strategies, are needed to eliminate ethnic and racial disparities in pain treatment towards the goal of equitable healthcare.

Pain Catastrophizing: How Far Have We Come

The perception of pain is strongly influenced by various social, emotional, and cognitive factors. A psychological variable which has consistently been shown to exert its influence on pain is a cognitive process referred to as pain catastrophizing. Numerous studies have found it to be a strong predictor of pain intensity and disability across different clinical populations. It signifies a maladaptive response to pain marked by an exaggerated negative assessment, magnification of symptoms related to pain, and, in general, a tendency to experience marked pain-related worry, as well as experiencing feelings of helplessness when it comes to dealing with pain. Pain catastrophizing has been correlated to many adverse pain-related outcomes, including poor treatment response, unsatisfactory quality of life, and high disability related to both acute and chronic pain. Furthermore, there has been consistent evidence in support of a correlation between pain catastrophizing and mental health disorders, such as anxiety and depression. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge regarding pain catastrophizing, with special emphasis on its clinical significance, and emerging treatment modalities which target it.

Investigating the association between knee osteoarthritis symptoms with pain catastrophizing domains between Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a chronic disease accompanied by debilitating symptoms including pain, stiffness, and limited physical functionality, which have been shown to be associated with pain catastrophizing. Previous studies have revealed racial discrepancies in pain catastrophizing, notably between Hispanics and non-Hispanics while pointing to potential health disparities. Using a conceptual model, this study aimed to investigate racial differences in associations between KOA symptoms with specific pain catastrophizing domains (rumination, magnification, and helplessness). Patients with KOA (n = 253; 147 Hispanics, 106 non-Hispanic Whites) completed a survey that included measures of knee symptoms, pain catastrophizing, and demographic variables. Structural equation modeling revealed that among Hispanics, each pain catastrophizing domain (rumination, magnification, and helplessness) was associated with at least two symptomatic experiences, including pain severity and difficulty in physical function. Specifically, pain severity was associated with (a) rumination: β = 0.48, p < 0.001, (b) magnification: β = 0.31, p = 0.003; and (c) helplessness: β = 0.39, p < 0.001). Additionally, a lower score in physical function was associated with higher magnification (β = 0.26, p = 0.01), and helplessness (β = 0.25, p = 0.01). Among non-Hispanic White patients, pain severity was further associated with two domains of pain catastrophizing, including rumination (β = 0.39, p < 0.001) and helplessness (β = 0.35, p = 0.01). In addition, association pathways for demographic variables revealed that older Hispanics experienced greater challenges with higher pain severity (β = 0.26, p = 0.01) and greater difficulty with physical function (β = 0.31, p < 0.001) while Hispanics females experienced higher pain (β = 0.19, p = 0.03). These findings highlight the importance of designing tailored interventions that consider key demographic factors such as age, and gender, to improve physical function that might alleviate pain catastrophizing among Hispanics with KOA.

Household Food Insufficiency and Chronic Pain among Children in the US: A National Study

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of pediatric chronic pain by household food sufficiency status and examine whether food insufficiency would be associated with greater risk for chronic pain. We analyzed data from the 2019-2020 National Survey of Children's Health of 48,410 children (6-17 years) in the United States. Across the sample, 26.1% (95% CI: 25.2-27.0) experienced mild food insufficiency and 5.1% (95% CI: 4.6-5.7) moderate/severe food insufficiency. The prevalence of chronic pain was higher among children with mild (13.7%) and moderate/severe food insufficiency (20.6%) relative to children in food-sufficient households (6.7%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for a priori covariates (individual: age, sex, race/ethnicity, anxiety, depression, other health conditions, adverse childhood events; household: poverty, parent education, physical and mental health; community: region of residence), multivariable logistic regression revealed that children with mild food insufficiency had 1.6 times greater odds of having chronic pain (95% CI: 1.4-1.9, p < 0.0001) and those with moderate/severe food insufficiency, 1.9 higher odds (95% CI: 1.4-2.7, p < 0.0001) relative to food-sufficient children. The dose-response relationship between food insufficiency and childhood chronic pain highlights the importance of further research to identify underlying mechanisms and evaluate the impact of food insufficiency on the onset and persistence of chronic pain across the lifespan.