1
|
Ayyala HS, Assel M, Aloise J, Serafin J, Tan KS, Mehta M, Puttanniah V, McCormick P, Malhotra V, Vickers A, Matros E, Lin E. Paravertebral and erector spinae plane blocks decrease length of stay compared with local infiltration analgesia in autologous breast reconstruction. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024:rapm-2023-105031. [PMID: 38336375 PMCID: PMC11306410 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-105031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autologous breast reconstruction is associated with significant pain impeding early recovery. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of replacing surgeon-administered local infiltration with preoperative paravertebral (PVB) and erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks for latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap reconstruction. METHODS Patients who underwent mastectomy with latissimus flap reconstruction from 2018 to 2022 were included in three groups: local infiltration, PVB, and ESP blocks. Block effect on postoperative length of stay (LOS) and the association between block status and pain, opioid consumption, time to first analgesic, and postoperative antiemetic administration were assessed. RESULTS 122 patients met the inclusion criteria for this retrospective cohort study: no block (n=72), PVB (n=26), and ESP (n=24). On adjusted analysis, those who received a PVB block had a 20-hour shorter postoperative stay (95% CI 11 to 30; p<0.001); those who received ESP had a 24-hour (95% CI 15 to 34; p<0.001) shorter postoperative stay compared with the no block group, respectively. Using either block was associated with a reduction in intraoperative opioids (23 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)), 95% CI 14 to 31, p<0.001; ESP versus no block: 23 MME, 95% CI 14 to 32, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Replacing surgical infiltration with PVB and ESP blocks for autologous breast reconstruction reduces LOS. The comparable reduction in LOS suggests that ESP may be a viable alternative to PVB in patients undergoing latissimus flap breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Further research should investigate whether ESP or PVB have better patient outcomes in complex breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haripriya S Ayyala
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Melissa Assel
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joseph Aloise
- Department of Operational Excellence, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joanna Serafin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Meghana Mehta
- Digital Informatics & Technology Solutions Department, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vinay Puttanniah
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Patrick McCormick
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vivek Malhotra
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Evan Matros
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Emily Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim DH, Park JB, Kim SW, Stybayeva G, Hwang SH. Effect of Infraorbital and/or Infratrochlear Nerve Blocks on Postoperative Care in Patients with Septorhinoplasty: A Meta-Analysis. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1659. [PMID: 37763778 PMCID: PMC10535682 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59091659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Through a comprehensive meta-analysis of the pertinent literature, this study evaluated the utility and efficacy of perioperative infraorbital and/or infratrochlear nerve blocks in reducing postoperative pain and related morbidities in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. Materials and Methods: We reviewed studies retrieved from the PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to August 2023. The analysis included a selection of seven articles that compared a treatment group receiving perioperative infraorbital and/or infratrochlear nerve blocks with a control group that either received a placebo or no treatment. The evaluated outcomes covered parameters such as postoperative pain, the amount and frequency of analgesic medication administration, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, as well as the manifestation of emergence agitation. Results: The treatment group displayed a significant reduction in postoperative pain (mean difference = -1.7236 [-2.6825; -0.7646], I2 = 98.8%), as well as a significant decrease in both the amount (standardized mean difference = -2.4629 [-3.8042; -1.1216], I2 = 93.0%) and frequency (odds ratio = 0.3584 [0.1383; 0.9287], I2 = 59.7%) of analgesic medication use compared to the control. The incidence of emergence agitation (odds ratio = 0.2040 [0.0907; 0.4590], I2 = 0.0%) was notably lower in the treatment group. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (odds ratio = 0.5393 [0.1309; 2.2218], I2 = 60.4%) showed a trend towards reduction, although it was not statistically significant. While no adverse effects reaching statistical significance were reported in the analyzed studies, hematoma (proportional rate = 0.2133 [0.0905; 0.4250], I2 = 76.9%) and edema (proportional rate = 0.1935 [0.1048; 0.3296], I2 = 57.2%) after blocks appeared at rates of approximately 20%. Conclusions: Infraorbital and/or infratrochlear nerve blocks for septorhinoplasty effectively reduce postoperative pain and emergence agitation without notable adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Do Hyun Kim
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea; (D.H.K.); (S.W.K.)
| | - Jun-Beom Park
- Department of Periodontics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea;
| | - Sung Won Kim
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea; (D.H.K.); (S.W.K.)
| | - Gulnaz Stybayeva
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Se Hwan Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Elsayed M, Alosaimy RA, Ali NY, Alshareef MA, Althqafi AH, Rajab MK, Assalem AS, Khiyami AJ. Nerve Block for Septorhinoplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study of Postoperative Complications in 24 Hours. Cureus 2020; 12:e6961. [PMID: 32190509 PMCID: PMC7067574 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Septorhinoplasty is a surgical procedure that provides functional improvements and esthetic adjustments to the appearance of the nose. Pain is a common postoperative complication, and pain management is known to decrease postoperative complications and total cost. Local anesthetics can cost-effectively decrease postoperative pain scores and reduce analgesic requirements. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of bilateral facial nerve blocks given with general anesthesia on pain scores and the use of postoperative analgesia. The secondary objective was to compare the vital signs stability between a group given bilateral facial nerve blocks with general anesthesia and a group given general anesthesia only. We conducted a retrospective observational study among 40 patients who were divided into two groups, each containing 20 patients. The patients in the nerve block (NB) group received general anesthesia and bilateral facial blocks of the infraorbital and infratrochlear nerves via 5 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine with 5 ml of diluted adrenaline 1:100,000. Patients in the Control group received general anesthesia only. Both groups received the same local injection of a mixture of 5 ml of 1% lidocaine and 5 ml of 1:100,000 epinephrine at the surgical site, along with the standard general anesthesia. A numerical rating scale, the visual analog scale (VAS), was used to evaluate postoperative pain at 15, 30, and 45 minutes postoperatively, and the stability of the vital signs was also assessed. The results showed that using bilateral infraorbital and infratrochlear nerve block injection with 0.25% levobupivacaine for patients who underwent septorhinoplasty under general anesthesia provided greater stability of vital signs but had no effect on the pain score or analgesia need. Further assessment should be performed in a larger number of patients to either confirm or refute these results. Additional studies could be conducted in several hospitals within the Kingdom to determine how broadly applicable nerve blockade is in reducing pain sensation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Elsayed
- Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, SAU
| | - Razan A Alosaimy
- Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, SAU
| | - Nujod Y Ali
- Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, SAU
| | | | - Ahmed H Althqafi
- Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, King Fahad General Hospital, Jeddah, SAU
| | - Mohannad K Rajab
- Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, King Fahad General Hospital, Jeddah, SAU
| | - Abdullah S Assalem
- Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Armed Force Hospital, Ministry of Defense, Taif, SAU
| | - Ahmed J Khiyami
- Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, SAU
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Choi H, Jung SH, Hong JM, Joo YH, Kim Y, Hong SH. Effects of Bilateral Infraorbital and Infratrochlear Nerve Block on Emergence Agitation after Septorhinoplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8060769. [PMID: 31151239 PMCID: PMC6616642 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8060769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Revised: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Emergence agitation is common after septorhinoplasty, and postoperative pain is the main risk factor for this condition. Infraorbital and infratrochlear nerve block have been reported to facilitate pain management in patients after nasal procedures. The effect of peripheral nerve block on the incidence of emergence agitation has not been evaluated. Sixty-six patients that were scheduled for septorhinoplasty were assigned to receive bilateral infraorbital and infratrochlear nerve block with either 8 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine (Block group) or isotonic saline (Sham Block group). The incidence of emergence agitation was evaluated using the Riker sedation-agitation scale. Analgesic consumption, hemodynamic parameters, postoperative pain scores, adverse events, and patient satisfaction with analgesia were evaluated. The incidence of emergence agitation was lower in the Block group than in the Sham Block group (6 (20.0%) versus 20 (62.5%), p = 0.002). The mean intraoperative remifentanil consumption was lower in the Block group than in the Sham Block group (0.074 ± 0.014 μg/kg/min. versus 0.093 ± 0.019 μg/kg/min., respectively, p < 0.0001), as was the proportion of patients that needed postoperative tramadol administration and median postoperative pain score at 0–2 h after surgery (9 (30.0%) versus 21 (65.6%), p = 0.011; 3.0 (2.0–4.0) versus 4.0 (3.0–4.0), p < 0.0001, respectively). Hemodynamic parameters and the incidence of adverse events were similar between the two groups. The median patient satisfaction score with respect to analgesia was higher in the Block group than in the Sham Block group (3.5 (3.0–4.0) versus 3.0 (3.0–4.0), respectively, p = 0.034). The preoperative bilateral infraorbital and infratrochlear nerve block decreased the incidence of emergence agitation after septorhinoplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoon Choi
- Deparment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea.
| | - Seung Ho Jung
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea.
| | - Jin Myung Hong
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Dream Medical Group, 848, Nonhyeon-ro, Gannam-gu, Seoul 06022, Korea.
| | - Young Ho Joo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Korea University, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea.
| | - Youme Kim
- Deparment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea.
| | - Sang Hyun Hong
- Deparment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Afonso AM, Newman MI, Seeley N, Hutchins J, Smith KL, Mena G, Selber JC, Saint-Cyr MH, Gadsden JC. Multimodal Analgesia in Breast Surgical Procedures: Technical and Pharmacological Considerations for Liposomal Bupivacaine Use. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2017; 5:e1480. [PMID: 29062649 PMCID: PMC5640354 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000001480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/12/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery is a multidisciplinary perioperative clinical pathway that uses evidence-based interventions to improve the patient experience as well as increase satisfaction, reduce costs, mitigate the surgical stress response, accelerate functional recovery, and decrease perioperative complications. One of the most important elements of enhanced recovery pathways is multimodal pain management. Herein, aspects relating to multimodal analgesia following breast surgical procedures are discussed with the understanding that treatment decisions should be individualized and guided by sound clinical judgment. A review of liposomal bupivacaine, a prolonged-release formulation of bupivacaine, in the management of postoperative pain following breast surgical procedures is presented, and technical guidance regarding optimal administration of liposomal bupivacaine is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anoushka M. Afonso
- From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, N.Y.; Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Fla.; Department of Anesthesiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Newnan, Ga.; Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.; Charlotte Plastic Surgery, Charlotte, N.C.; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Tex.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C
| | - Martin I. Newman
- From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, N.Y.; Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Fla.; Department of Anesthesiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Newnan, Ga.; Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.; Charlotte Plastic Surgery, Charlotte, N.C.; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Tex.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C
| | - Neil Seeley
- From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, N.Y.; Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Fla.; Department of Anesthesiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Newnan, Ga.; Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.; Charlotte Plastic Surgery, Charlotte, N.C.; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Tex.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C
| | - Jacob Hutchins
- From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, N.Y.; Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Fla.; Department of Anesthesiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Newnan, Ga.; Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.; Charlotte Plastic Surgery, Charlotte, N.C.; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Tex.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C
| | - Kevin L. Smith
- From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, N.Y.; Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Fla.; Department of Anesthesiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Newnan, Ga.; Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.; Charlotte Plastic Surgery, Charlotte, N.C.; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Tex.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C
| | - Gabriel Mena
- From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, N.Y.; Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Fla.; Department of Anesthesiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Newnan, Ga.; Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.; Charlotte Plastic Surgery, Charlotte, N.C.; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Tex.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C
| | - Jesse C. Selber
- From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, N.Y.; Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Fla.; Department of Anesthesiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Newnan, Ga.; Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.; Charlotte Plastic Surgery, Charlotte, N.C.; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Tex.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C
| | - Michel H. Saint-Cyr
- From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, N.Y.; Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Fla.; Department of Anesthesiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Newnan, Ga.; Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.; Charlotte Plastic Surgery, Charlotte, N.C.; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Tex.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C
| | - Jeffrey C. Gadsden
- From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, N.Y.; Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Fla.; Department of Anesthesiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Newnan, Ga.; Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.; Charlotte Plastic Surgery, Charlotte, N.C.; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Tex.; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Tex.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C
| |
Collapse
|