Osteoprotegerin deficiency results in disruption of posterofrontal suture closure in mice: implications in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis

The Intertwined Evolution and Development of Sutures and Cranial Morphology

Phenotypic variation across mammals is extensive and reflects their ecological diversification into a remarkable range of habitats on every continent and in every ocean. The skull performs many functions to enable each species to thrive within its unique ecological niche, from prey acquisition, feeding, sensory capture (supporting vision and hearing) to brain protection. Diversity of skull function is reflected by its complex and highly variable morphology. Cranial morphology can be quantified using geometric morphometric techniques to offer invaluable insights into evolutionary patterns, ecomorphology, development, taxonomy, and phylogenetics. Therefore, the skull is one of the best suited skeletal elements for developmental and evolutionary analyses. In contrast, less attention is dedicated to the fibrous sutural joints separating the cranial bones. Throughout postnatal craniofacial development, sutures function as sites of bone growth, accommodating expansion of a growing brain. As growth frontiers, cranial sutures are actively responsible for the size and shape of the cranial bones, with overall skull shape being altered by changes to both the level and time period of activity of a given cranial suture. In keeping with this, pathological premature closure of sutures postnatally causes profound misshaping of the skull (craniosynostosis). Beyond this crucial role, sutures also function postnatally to provide locomotive shock absorption, allow joint mobility during feeding, and, in later postnatal stages, suture fusion acts to protect the developed brain. All these sutural functions have a clear impact on overall cranial function, development and morphology, and highlight the importance that patterns of suture development have in shaping the diversity of cranial morphology across taxa. Here we focus on the mammalian cranial system and review the intrinsic relationship between suture development and morphology and cranial shape from an evolutionary developmental biology perspective, with a view to understanding the influence of sutures on evolutionary diversity. Future work integrating suture development into a comparative evolutionary framework will be instrumental to understanding how developmental mechanisms shaping sutures ultimately influence evolutionary diversity.

Differential Responsiveness to BMP9 between Patent and Fused Suture Progenitor Cells from Craniosynostosis Patients

BACKGROUND

Several studies have verified that bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) may be involved in the development of craniosynostosis; little attention has been focused on the role of BMP9 in cranial suture biology. The authors investigated the role of BMP9 in suture progenitor cells.

METHODS

The authors isolated and cultured prematurely fused and internal control patent suture progenitor cells from patients with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Overexpression of BMP9 was mediated by adenoviral vectors. Osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation-related markers were evaluated by staining techniques and touchdown quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis. In vivo analysis of BMP9-induced suture progenitor cell osteogenesis was performed in an ectopic bone formation model.

RESULTS

The authors demonstrated that the prematurely fused sutures have a higher endogenous expression of the osteogenic differentiation-related genes than patent sutures, whereas the same pattern of gene expression exists between fused and patent suture progenitor cells. Importantly, both patent and fused suture progenitor cells undergo osteogenic differentiation and express multiple lineage regulators and NELL-1 on BMP9 stimulation, whereas fused suture progenitor cells have a higher basal osteogenic potential than patent suture progenitor cells. BMP9 regulates the expression of osteoclast differentiation-related genes in suture progenitor cells. Forced BMP9 expression enhances the mineralization and maturity of ectopic bone formation of suture progenitor cells implanted in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' findings suggest that fused suture progenitor cells have elevated osteogenic potential. BMP9 could regulate the expression of multiple osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation-related genes, and NELL-1, in both suture progenitor cells, indicating that BMP9 may play a role in craniosynostosis.

BMP-IHH-mediated interplay between mesenchymal stem cells and osteoclasts supports calvarial bone homeostasis and repair

Calvarial bones are connected by fibrous sutures. These sutures provide a niche environment that includes mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), osteoblasts, and osteoclasts, which help maintain calvarial bone homeostasis and repair. Abnormal function of osteogenic cells or diminished MSCs within the cranial suture can lead to skull defects, such as craniosynostosis. Despite the important function of each of these cell types within the cranial suture, we have limited knowledge about the role that crosstalk between them may play in regulating calvarial bone homeostasis and injury repair. Here we show that suture MSCs give rise to osteoprogenitors that show active bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signalling and depend on BMP-mediated Indian hedgehog (IHH) signalling to balance osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis activity. IHH signalling and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (RANKL) may function synergistically to promote the differentiation and resorption activity of osteoclasts. Loss of Bmpr1a in MSCs leads to downregulation of hedgehog (Hh) signalling and diminished cranial sutures. Significantly, activation of Hh signalling partially restores suture morphology in Bmpr1a mutant mice, suggesting the functional importance of BMP-mediated Hh signalling in regulating suture tissue homeostasis. Furthermore, there is an increased number of CD200+ cells in Bmpr1a mutant mice, which may also contribute to the inhibited osteoclast activity in the sutures of mutant mice. Finally, suture MSCs require BMP-mediated Hh signalling during the repair of calvarial bone defects after injury. Collectively, our studies reveal the molecular and cellular mechanisms governing cell–cell interactions within the cranial suture that regulate calvarial bone homeostasis and repair.

Understanding the signaling mechanisms regulating cells in cranial sutures could help develop strategies for repairing skull defects or fractures. Little is known about how osteoblasts, osteoclasts and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in cranial sutures regulate the homeostasis and repair of skull bones. Yang Chai at the University of Southern California, United States, and colleagues show that preventing the expression of bone morphogenetic protein receptor type IA (Bmpr1a) in MSCs leads to defective cranial sutures in which osteogenic activity is increased and osteoclast activity is reduced. Stimulating the Hedgehog signaling pathway not only partially rescued the defective sutures but also promoted skull bone healing after injury in Bmpr1a mutant mice, highlighting the importance of BMP-mediated Hedgehog signaling for balancing skull bone formation and resorption.

Whole-Proteome Analysis of Human Craniosynostotic Tissue Suggests a Link between Inflammatory Signaling and Osteoclast Activation in Human Cranial Suture Patency

BACKGROUND

The pathophysiology of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis remains poorly understood. The authors seek to understand the cause of this condition with a specific focus on how osteoclasts may contribute to craniosynostosis. Here, the authors characterize proteins differentially expressed in patent and fused cranial sutures by comparing their respective proteomes.

METHODS

Fused and patent suture samples were obtained from craniosynostotic patients undergoing surgery at a single academic medical center. Extracted protein from samples was interrogated using mass spectrometry. Differential protein expression was determined using maximum likelihood-based G-test with a q-value cutoffs of 0.5 after correction for multiple hypothesis testing. Immunolocalization of lead protein candidates was performed to validate proteomic findings. In addition, quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of corresponding gene expression of proteins of interest was performed.

RESULTS

Proteins differentially expressed in patent versus fused sutures included collagen 6A1 (Col6A1), fibromodulin, periostin, aggrecan, adipocyte enhancer-binding protein 1, and osteomodulin (OMD). Maximum likelihood-based G-test suggested that Col6A1, fibromodulin, and adipocyte enhancer-binding protein 1 are highly expressed in patent sutures compared with fused sutures, whereas OMD is up-regulated in fused sutures compared with patent sutures. These results were corroborated by immunohistochemistry. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction data point to an inverse relationship in proteins of interest to RNA transcript levels, in prematurely fused and patent sutures that potentially describes a feedback loop mechanism.

CONCLUSIONS

Proteome analysis validated by immunohistochemistry may provide insight into the mechanism of cranial suture patency and disease from an osteoclast perspective. The authors results suggest a role of inflammatory mediators in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Col6A1 may aid in the regulation of suture patency, and OMD may be involved in premature fusion. Additional validation studies are required.