1
|
Ormseth BH, Kavanagh KJ, Saffari TM, Palettas M, Janis JE. Assessing the Relationship between Obesity and Trigger Point-specific Outcomes after Headache Surgery. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2024; 12:e5629. [PMID: 38486715 PMCID: PMC10939604 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Background Trigger point deactivation surgery is a safe and effective treatment for properly selected patients experiencing migraine, with 68.3%-100% experiencing symptom improvement postoperatively. However, it is still unknown why certain patients do not respond. Obesity has been shown to be associated with worsened migraine symptoms and a decreased response to select pharmacotherapies. This study aimed to determine whether obesity may also be associated with an attenuated response to surgery. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients who had undergone trigger point deactivation surgery for migraine. Patients were split into obese and nonobese cohorts. Obesity was classified as a body mass index of 30 or higher per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. Outcomes and follow-up periods were determined with respect to individual operations. Outcomes included migraine attack frequency, intensity, duration, and the migraine headache index. Differences in demographics, operative characteristics, and operative outcomes were compared. Results A total of 62 patients were included in the study. The obese cohort comprised 31 patients who underwent 45 total operations, and the nonobese cohort comprised 31 patients who underwent 34 operations. Results from multivariable analysis showed no impact of obesity on the odds of achieving a more than 90% reduction in any individual outcome. The overall rates of improvement (≥50% reduction in any outcome) and elimination (100% reduction in all symptoms) across both cohorts were 89.9% and 65.8%, respectively. Conclusion Obese patients have outcomes comparable to a nonobese cohort after trigger point deactivation surgery for migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin H. Ormseth
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Kaitlin J. Kavanagh
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Tiam M. Saffari
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, N.J
| | - Marilly Palettas
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jeffrey E. Janis
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saffari S, Saffari TM, Janis JE. Secondary Trigger Point Deactivation Surgery for Nerve Compression Headaches: A Scoping Review. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2024; 12:e5620. [PMID: 38405132 PMCID: PMC10887444 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Background Primary trigger point deactivation surgery has been successful in reducing or eliminating nerve compression headaches between 79% and 90% of the time. The aim of this review article was to discuss the factors that contribute to index trigger point deactivation surgery failure, the importance of reevaluating trigger points following failure, and the options for secondary surgery. Methods A literature search was performed using a combination of keywords involving "chronic headache" and "nerve deactivation surgery," in databases until February 2023. Results Data of 1071 patients were evaluated and included (11 articles). The failure rate after index trigger point deactivation surgery occurs is approximately 12%, primarily due to incomplete primary trigger point deactivation. Secondary trigger points may not appear until the primary trigger is eliminated, which occurs in 17.8% of patients. Reevaluation of previously diagnosed trigger points as well as uncovered trigger points and additional preoperative testing is indicated to help determine candidacy for further surgical deactivation. To address scarring that could contribute to failure, corticosteroid injection, acellular dermal matrix, adipofascial fat, or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sleeves have been described with beneficial effects. For neuroma management, regenerative peripheral nerve interface, targeted muscle reinnervation, a combination of both, relocation nerve grafting, or nerve capping have also been described. Neurectomy can be performed when patients prefer anesthesia and/or paresthesia over current pain symptoms. Conclusion Secondary trigger point deactivation surgery is indicated when there is suspicion of incomplete deactivation, internal scarring, neuroma, or newly-diagnosed trigger points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Saffari
- From the Division of Hand and Microvascular Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Tiam M. Saffari
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jeffrey E. Janis
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Faizo E, Fallata A, Mirza I, Koshak AK, Bucklain YT, Alharbi R, Tasji A, Tasji T, Kabbarah A. The Efficacy of Trigger Site Surgery in the Elimination of Chronic Migraine Headache: An Update in the Rate of Success and Failure. Cureus 2024; 16:e54504. [PMID: 38516471 PMCID: PMC10955441 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Migraine headache (MH) is a prevalent neurovascular disorder that affects approximately 15% of the global population. They are more common in women and typically affect young and middle-aged individuals. Chronic MH is characterized by headaches occurring on ≥15 days per month for over three months. While only 5% of MHs are refractory, about 20%-50% do not respond to pharmacologic treatments. As a result, surgical interventions have emerged as an alternative method to eliminate MH since 2000 AD. These surgical treatments primarily target the peripheral mechanisms of MH, focusing on common trigger sites. Migraine surgery involves neurolysis of sensory branches of trigeminal and occipital nerves that supply the face and back of the head. Numerous clinical studies conducted between 2000 and 2021 have extensively described surgical interventions and their prognostic outcomes. After surgery, up to 80% of patients reported complete elimination of headaches, while 20%-35% experienced no relief. The failure to achieve complete elimination of MH can be attributed to various factors. The most common reason for a partial clinical response is the failure to identify all trigger sites or inadequate surgery on the trigger sites. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of current surgical interventions for MH at different trigger sites, including recent updates, success and failure rates, and potential causes of failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eyad Faizo
- Department of Surgery, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, SAU
| | - Ahmad Fallata
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, SAU
| | - Iman Mirza
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, SAU
| | - Ahmed K Koshak
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, SAU
| | | | - Reema Alharbi
- Faculty of Medicine, Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences, Jeddah, SAU
| | - Abdulrahman Tasji
- Department of Medicine, Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences, Jeddah, SAU
| | - Taha Tasji
- Department of Medicine, Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences, Jeddah, SAU
| | - Ahmed Kabbarah
- Faculty of Medicine, Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences, Jeddah, SAU
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gomez-Rexrode AE, Kennedy SH, Brown DL. Unmasked Neuropathic Pain After Neurectomy: A Case Series and Review of the Literature. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2023; 11:e5221. [PMID: 37650094 PMCID: PMC10465095 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Localization of neuropathic pain to a specific peripheral nerve origin relies on patient history, physical examination, and nerve blocks. Neurectomy of the involved nerve(s) can successfully alleviate patients' pain. However, a subset of patients postoperatively describe persistent pain, but say that the pain "moved" to a new location (eg, from the dorsum of the foot to the lateral foot). This may be viewed as a treatment failure by the patient and surgeon alike. Further investigation, however, may localize the new pain to an additional, separate peripheral nerve injury, which was previously unrecognized by both parties. The mechanism involved is that of pain masking and unmasking. Successful treatment of the more prominent pain stimulus allows for recognition of a second, less-offending peripheral nerve injury. As the field of surgical treatment of chronic peripheral neuropathic pain advances, it is important to identify and define specific nuances of diagnosis and treatment via neurectomy. The term "diffuse noxious inhibitory control," used to describe the pain-inhibits-pain pathway, may help explain the phenomenon of masking, whereby one pain generator is more prominent and shields another site from recognition and subsequent diagnosis. In this context, unmasked pain should be considered as a potential source of surgical treatment failure. We present a series of patients who, following improvement in the initial location of their pain, reported pain in a distinctly new peripheral nerve distribution, leading to reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah H. Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - David L. Brown
- From the University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich
- Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Henriques S, Almeida A, Peres H, Costa-Ferreira A. Current Evidence in Migraine Surgery: A Systematic Review. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 89:113-120. [PMID: 34611094 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine headache is a widespread neurovascular disorder with an enormous social and economic impact. A subgroup of patients cannot be managed with pharmacological therapy. Although surgical decompression of extracranial sensory nerves has been proposed as a valid alternative treatment option, the medical community remains reluctant to accept it. MATERIALS AND METHODS This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. An electronic search was performed in September 2020 on PubMed, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases for original articles reporting outcomes on migraine surgery. RESULTS The search strategy revealed a total of 922 studies, of which 52 were included in the review. Significant improvement was reported in 58.3% to 100% and complete elimination in 8.3% to 86.8% of patients across studies. No major complications were reported. DISCUSSION This systematic review demonstrates that migraine surgery is an effective and safe procedure, with a positive impact in patients' quality of life and a reduction in long-term costs. CONCLUSION There is considerable scientific evidence suggesting extracranial migraine surgery is an effective and safe procedure. This surgery should be considered in properly selected migraineurs refractory to medical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Henriques
- From the Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Porto University
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Efficacy and Safety of Migraine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes and Complication Rates. Ann Surg 2022; 275:e315-e323. [PMID: 35007230 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objectives of this study are to assess the efficacy and safety of peripheral nerve surgery for migraine headaches and to bibliometrically analyze all anatomical studies relevant to migraine surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Migraines rank as the second leading cause of disability worldwide. Despite the availability of conservative management options, individuals suffer from refractive migraines which are associated with poor quality of life. Migraine surgery, defined as the peripheral nerve decompression/trigger site deactivation, is a relatively novel treatment strategy for refractory migraines. METHODS EMBASE and the National Library of Medicine (PubMed) were systematically searched for relevant articles according to the PRISMA guidelines. Data was extracted from studies which met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analyses were performed to assess complication rates. Meta-analyses were run using the random effects model for overall effects and within subgroup fixed-effect models were used. RESULTS A total of 68 studies (38 clinical, 30 anatomical) were included in this review. There was a significant overall reduction in migraine intensity (P < 0.001, SE = 0.22, I2 = 97.9), frequency (P < 0.001, SE = 0.17, I2 = 97.7), duration (P < 0.001, SE = 0.15, I2 = 97), and migraine headache index (MHI, P < 0.001, SE = 0.19, I2 = 97.2) at follow-up. A total of 35 studies reported on migraine improvement (range: 68.3%-100% of participants) and migraine elimination (range: 8.3%-86.5% of participants). 32.1% of participants in the clinical studies reported complications for which the most commonly reported complications being paresthesia and numbness, which was mostly transient, (12.11%) and itching (4.89%). CONCLUSION This study demonstrates improved migraine outcomes and an overall decrease in MHI as well as strong evidence for the safety profile and complication rate of migraine surgery.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Identify patients who are candidates for headache surgery. 2. Counsel the patient preoperatively with regard to success rates, recovery, and complications. 3. Develop a surgical plan for primary and secondary nerve decompression. 4. Understand the surgical anatomy at all trigger sites. 5. Select appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, and CPT codes. SUMMARY Headache surgery encompasses release of extracranial peripheral sensory nerves at seven sites. Keys to successful surgery include correct patient selection, detailed patient counseling, and meticulous surgical technique. This article is a practical step-by-step guide, from preoperative assessment to surgery and postoperative recovery. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, and CPT codes, in addition to complications and salvage procedures, are discussed. Intraoperative photographs, videos, and screening questionnaires are provided.
Collapse
|
8
|
The Evolution of Migraine Surgery: Two Decades of Continual Research. My Current Thoughts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147:1414-1419. [PMID: 34019513 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000007979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY A mere serendipitous finding has culminated in a life-changing development for patients and a colossally fulfilling field for many surgeons. The surgical treatment of migraine headaches has been embraced by many plastic surgeons after numerous investigations ensuring that the risks are minimal and the rewards inestimable. Seldom has a plastic surgery procedure been the subject of such scrutiny. Through retrospective, prospective pilot, prospective randomized, prospective randomized with sham surgery, and 5-year follow-up studies, the safety, efficacy, and longevity of the given operation have been confirmed. Although the first decade of this journey was focused on investigating effectiveness and risk profile, the second decade was largely devoted to improving results, reducing invasiveness, and shortening recovery. Multiple publications in peer-reviewed journals over the past 20 years, several independent studies from reputable surgeons at recognized centers, and over 40 studies from the author's center have established the surgical treatment of headaches as a standard practice.
Collapse
|
9
|
Peripheral Occipital Nerve Decompression Surgery in Migraine Headache. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2020; 8:e3019. [PMID: 33173659 PMCID: PMC7647655 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Migraine headache in the occipital region is characterized by a recurrent pain of moderate to severe intensity. However, the diagnosis can be difficult because of the multitude of symptoms overlapping with similar disorders and a pathophysiology that is not well-understood. For this reason, the medical management is often complex and ineffective.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lucia Mangialardi M, Baldelli I, Salgarello M, Raposio E. Decompression Surgery for Frontal Migraine Headache. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2020; 8:e3084. [PMID: 33173664 PMCID: PMC7647648 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine headache (MH) is one of the most common diseases worldwide and pharmaceutical treatment is considered the gold standard. Nevertheless, one-third of patients suffering from migraine headaches are unresponsive to medical management and meet the criteria for "refractory migraines" classification. Surgical treatment of MH might represent a supplementary alternative for this category of patients when pharmaceutical treatment does not allow for satisfactory results. The goal of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the literature regarding surgical treatment for site I migraine management. METHODS A literature search using PubMed, Medline, Cochrane and Google Scholar database according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines was conducted using the following MeSH terms: "frontal neuralgia," "frontal trigger site treatment," "frontal migraine surgery" and "frontal headache surgery" (period: 2000 -2020; last search on 12 March 2020). RESULTS Eighteen studies published between 2000 and 2019, with a total of 628 patients, were considered eligible. Between 68% and 93% of patients obtained satisfactory postoperative results. Complete migraine elimination rate ranged from 28.3% to 59%, and significant improvement (>50% reduction) rates varied from 26.5% to 60%. CONCLUSIONS Our systematic review of the literature suggests that frontal trigger site nerve decompression could possibly be an effective strategy to treat migraine refractory patients, providing significant improvement of symptoms in a considerable percentage of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Lucia Mangialardi
- Istituto di Clinica Chirurgica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore e Unità di Chirurgia Plastica, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Baldelli
- Clinica di Chirurgia Plastica e Ricostruttiva, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino e Sezione di Chirurgia Plastica, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate – DISC, Università degli Studi di Genova, L.go R. Benzi 10, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Marzia Salgarello
- Istituto di Clinica Chirurgica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore e Unità di Chirurgia Plastica, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Raposio
- Clinica di Chirurgia Plastica e Ricostruttiva, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino e Sezione di Chirurgia Plastica, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate – DISC, Università degli Studi di Genova, L.go R. Benzi 10, 16132 Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Simonacci F, Lago G, Bertozzi N, Raposio E. Surgical deactivation of occipital migraine trigger site. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2020. [DOI: 10.23736/s0394-9508.19.05027-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
12
|
Raposio E, Simonacci F. Frontal Trigger Site Deactivation for Migraine Surgical Therapy. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2020; 8:e2813. [PMID: 32440458 PMCID: PMC7209873 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000002813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization ranked migraine as the 19th worldwide disease causing disability. Recent insights into the pathogenesis of migraine headache substantiate a neuronal hyperexcitability and inflammation involving compressed peripheral craniofacial nerves, and these trigger points can be eliminated by surgery. In this study, we report our experience with minimally invasive surgical procedures for frontal migraine headache treatment. METHODS From June 2011 to May 2019, we performed 70 frontal migraine decompression surgeries of both supratrochlear and supraorbital nerves (65 bilateral and 5 unilateral) by an endoscopic or transpalpebral approach. In 24 patients (34.2%), frontal migraine emerges as a secondary trigger point following primary occipital and/or temporal migraine surgery. RESULTS After a mean follow-up of 24 months (range, 3-97 months), patients with frontal trigger site migraine reported a 94% positive response to surgery (32% complete relief and 62% significant improvement); 6% had no change in their symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Based on our experience, the operation has not caused any serious complication or side effects, and surgical decompression of supraorbital and supratrochlear nerves might be recommended to patients who suffer from a moderate to severe chronic frontal migraine not responding to conventional therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Raposio
- From the Plastic Surgery Division, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics – DISC, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Simonacci
- From the Plastic Surgery Division, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics – DISC, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Trigger Site Inactivation for the Surgical Therapy of Occipital Migraine and Tension-type Headache: Our Experience and Review of the Literature. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2020; 7:e2507. [PMID: 31942299 PMCID: PMC6908332 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000002507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Literature from the last decade has shown a correlation between resection of the occipital muscles and vessels and relief from migraine and tension-type headaches.
Collapse
|
14
|
The Cutting Edge of Headache Surgery: A Systematic Review on the Value of Extracranial Surgery in the Treatment of Chronic Headache. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144:1431-1448. [PMID: 31764666 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000006270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a debilitating neurologic condition, with a large socioeconomic impact. There is a subgroup of patients that does not adequately respond to pharmacologic management and may have underlying neuralgia. Surgical decompression of extracranial sensory nerves has been proposed as an alternative therapy. The aim of this article is to review the evidence for the surgical treatment of neuralgias. METHODS A systematic review was conducted to study the efficacy of decompression of extracranial sensory nerves as a treatment for neuralgia. Clinical studies were included that studied patients, aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with any definition of headache and were treated with extracranial nerve decompression surgery. Outcome parameters included intensity (on a 10-point scale), duration (in days), and frequency (of headaches per month). RESULTS Thirty-eight articles were found describing extracranial nerve decompression in patients with headaches. Postoperative decrease in headache intensity ranged from 2 to 8.2, reduction of duration ranged from 0.04 to 1.04 days, and reduction in frequency ranged between 4 and 14.8 headaches per month. Total elimination of symptoms was achieved in 8.3 to 83 percent of cases. A detailed summary of the outcome of single-site decompression is described. Statistical pooling and therefore meta-analysis was not possible, because of articles having the same surgeon and an overlapping patient database. CONCLUSIONS Nerve decompression surgery is an effective way of treating headaches in a specific population of patients with neuralgia. Although a meta-analysis of the current data was not possible, the extracranial decompression of peripheral head and neck sensory nerves has a high success rate.
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. This article is a practical and technical guide for plastic surgeons interested in or practicing migraine surgery. It discusses the goals of migraine surgery including selection of appropriate candidates (screening form contained), pertinent anatomy, and surgical techniques with text summary, intraoperative photographs, and videos. In addition, pearls and pitfalls, the most common complications, and current procedural terminology (CPT) coding are detailed.
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Therapeutic Role of Fat Injection in the Treatment of Recalcitrant Migraine Headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143:877-885. [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000005353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
19
|
Efficacy of Surgical Treatment of Migraine Headaches Involving the Auriculotemporal Nerve (Site V). Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143:557-563. [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000005261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
20
|
Wormald JCR, Luck J, Athwal B, Muelhberger T, Mosahebi A. Surgical intervention for chronic migraine headache: A systematic review. JPRAS Open 2019; 20:1-18. [PMID: 32158867 PMCID: PMC7061614 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2019.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 01/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
A focus on sound systematic review methodology to present an unbiased and scientific assessment of the body of knowledge for migraine surgery. Comprehensive search strategy included a range of study types to capture all relevant reports of primary clinical research, enabling a global evaluation of the topic. A descriptive analysis allowing an overview of the likely effect of a variety of surgical interventions, with a snapshot of the rates of recurrence and adverse events. Formalised assessment of methodological quality using the GRADE approach identifies specific flaws affecting the reliability of migraine surgery research to date. Limited by a paucity of methodological quality in included studies, heterogeneous interventions, inconsistent outcome reporting and variability in baseline data, intervention data and outcome data.
Aims Migraine is a global phenomenon, affecting more than 10% of the world's population. It is characterized by unilateral headache that may be accompanied by vomiting, nausea, photophobia and phonophobia. Some patients with chronic migraine respond to extra-cranial botulinum toxin type A injection, although the benefits observed are temporary. The rationale for surgical trigger site deactivation is to achieve lasting symptomatic improvement or permanent relief from migraine. Methods We performed a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of clinical studies evaluating surgical intervention for migraine by searching Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to June 2017. Studies were independently screened by two authors. Data were extracted on study characteristics, migraine outcomes, adverse events and recurrence. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The review protocol was prospectively registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42017068577). Results The search strategy identified 789 articles; of them, 18 studies (4 RCTs and 14 case series) were eligible for analysis. Surgical interventions were heterogeneous and variably involved peripheral nerve decompression by myectomy or foraminotomy, nerve excision, artery resection and/or nasal surgery. All studies reported significant reductions in migraine intensity, frequency, duration and composite headache scores following surgery. Study heterogeneity precluded formal meta-analysis. Where reported, adverse event rates varied markedly between studies. The quality of included studies was consistently low or very low. Conclusion There is insufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of any specific surgical intervention for chronic migraine, especially with regard to permanent relief; however, all included studies report improvements in key outcomes following migraine surgery. A definitive, well-powered RCT with objective surgical and patient-reported outcome measures and robust adverse event reporting is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C R Wormald
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2DJ, United Kingdom.,Department of Plastic Surgery, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire HP21 8AL, United Kingdom
| | - J Luck
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, United Kingdom.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - B Athwal
- Department of Neurology, Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
| | - T Muelhberger
- Migraine Surgery Centre, Harley Street, London W1G 9PF, United Kingdom
| | - A Mosahebi
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, United Kingdom.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Discussion: Botulinum Toxin versus Placebo: A Meta-Analysis of Prophylactic Treatment for Migraine. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 143:251-253. [PMID: 30589801 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000005116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
22
|
Surgical Therapy of Temporal Triggered Migraine Headache. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2018; 6:e1980. [PMID: 30656098 PMCID: PMC6326627 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000001980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background The auriculotemporal and zygomaticotemporal nerves are the 2 primary trigger points in the temporal area of migraine headache. Different surgical approaches are described in literature, either open or endoscopic ones. Methods We described and delineated the currently adopted strategies to treat temporal trigger points in migraine headache. Furthermore, we reported our personal experience in the field. Results Regardless of the type of approach, outcomes observed were similar and ranged from 89% to 67% elimination / >50% reduction rates. All procedures are minimally invasive and only minor complications are reported, with an incidence ranging from 1% to 5%. Conclusions Just like upper limb compressive neuropathies, migraine headache is believed to be caused by chronic compression of peripheral nerves (ie, the terminal branches of trigeminal nerve) caused by surrounding structures (eg, muscles, vessels, and fascial bands) the removal of which eventually results in improvement or elimination of migraine attacks. Particular attention should be paid to the close nerve/artery relationship often described in anatomical studies and clinical reports.
Collapse
|
23
|
Amirlak B, Chung MH, Pezeshk RA, Sanniec K. Accessory Nerves of the Forehead. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141:1252-1259. [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000004320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
24
|
Shipkov H, Grozdev I. Injection Patterns of Onabotulinumtoxin A in Migraine Headache. Headache 2018; 58:148-150. [PMID: 29292512 DOI: 10.1111/head.13205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2017] [Accepted: 07/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hristo Shipkov
- From the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Croix Rousse Hospital, Lyon, France.,Department of Plastic Surgery, St George University Hospital, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Ivan Grozdev
- Department of Neurology, Kaspela Hospital, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
In-Depth Review of Symptoms, Triggers, and Treatment of Occipital Migraine Headaches (Site IV). Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139:1333e-1342e. [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000003395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
26
|
Anatomical Regional Targeted (ART) BOTOX Injection Technique: A Novel Paradigm for Migraines and Chronic Headaches. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2017; 4:e1194. [PMID: 28293532 PMCID: PMC5222677 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000001194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2016] [Accepted: 11/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Migraine headaches are a debilitating disease that causes significant socioeconomic problems. One of the speculated etiologies of the generation of migraines is peripheral nerve irritation at different trigger points. The use of Onabotulinum toxin A (BOTOX), although initially a novel approach, has now been determined to be a valid treatment for chronic headaches and migraines as described in the Phase III Research Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy trials that prompted the approval by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of chronic migraines. The injection paradigm established by this trial was one of a broad injection pattern across large muscle groups that did not always correspond to the anatomical locations of nerves. The senior author developed the Anatomical Regional Targeted BOTOX injection paradigm as an alternative to the current injection model. This technique targets both the anatomical location of nerves known to have causal effects with migraines and the region where the pain localizes, to provide relief across a wide distribution of the peripheral nerve. This article serves as a guide to the Anatomical Regional Targeted injection technique, which, to our knowledge, is the first comprehensive BOTOX injection paradigm described in the literature for treatment of migraines that targets nerves and nerve areas rather than purely muscle groups. This technique is based on the most up-to-date anatomical and scientific studies and large-volume migraine surgery experience.
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
The senior author (BG) introduced the modern concept of migraine surgery in 2000. Since then, over 40 articles have been published by eight centers across the US, Europe, and Asia, describing positive outcomes after surgery in 68-95% of cases. Surgeons, neurologists, and patients are increasingly interested in this new treatment method. However, the majority of publications on this topic are found in surgical literature, with few articles presented in neurology journals. This review is an introduction to migraine surgery for neurologists from a surgeons view. It discusses the surgical treatment of migraine headaches based on the discoveries made and articles published by the senior author. It outlines the current history of migraine surgery, presents evidence supporting its effectiveness, and tries to dispel claims that what we are seeing is a placebo effect. It further describes detection of trigger sites and outlines surgical techniques of peripheral nerve decompression. We hope that this review will generate a positive discussion between surgeons and neurologists and lead to more interdisciplinary collaboration for the benefit of the patients in the future.
Collapse
|
28
|
Seyed Forootan NS, Lee M, Guyuron B. Migraine headache trigger site prevalence analysis of 2590 sites in 1010 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70:152-158. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2015] [Revised: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 11/08/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|