Lu Y, Yang R, Zhu J. [Research progress of chronic wound debridement].
ZHONGGUO XIU FU CHONG JIAN WAI KE ZA ZHI = ZHONGGUO XIUFU CHONGJIAN WAIKE ZAZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF REPARATIVE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 2018;
32:1096-1101. [PMID:
30238742 PMCID:
PMC8429985 DOI:
10.7507/1002-1892.201801126]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 05/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Objective
To review the research progress of chronic wound debridement.
Methods
The recent related literature concerning the mechanisms, advantages, limitations, and indications of the technologies of chronic wound debridement was extensively consulted, reviewed, and summarized.
Results
Debridement is essential for chronic wound healing, which includes autolytic debridement, enzymatic debridement, biodebridement, mechanical debridement, sharp/surgical debridement, ultrasound debridement, hydrosurgery debridement, and coblation debridement. Each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages.
Conclusion
There are many types of technologies of chronic wound debridement, which can be chosen according to clinical conditions. It is showed there are more significant advantages associated with the technique of coblation debridement relatively, which also has greater potential. Further study is needed to improve its efficacy.
Collapse