Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks with Single-Dose Liposomal Bupivacaine in Conjunction with a Nonnarcotic Pain Regimen Help Reduce Length of Stay following Abdominally Based Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction:

ERAS-Based Anesthetic Management of Patients Undergoing Abdominal-Based Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Narrative Review

Microsurgical breast reconstruction after mastectomy is emerging as the standard of care for patients with breast cancer. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway in abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction is in its early stage of development and lacks established consensus or guidelines. In the multidisciplinary ERAS team, the anesthesia sub-team is responsible for the provision of several core elements in the ERAS pathway including anesthetic protocol optimization, perioperative fluid management and homeostasis regulation, normothermia maintenance, perioperative analgesia, and postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. Here, we summarized the state-of-the-art in anesthetic practice for the patients undergoing abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction within an ERAS framework, and also introduced the perioperative strategy for this surgical population based on the ERAS pathway in our center, aiming to improve free flap outcome and patient satisfaction, and accelerating their recovery following surgery.

Effectiveness of Liposomal Bupivacaine Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks improve pain control and reduce narcotic medication requirements in various surgical procedures. Liposomal bupivacaine may provide more sustained analgesia. This study compared pain-related outcomes between standard bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine TAP blocks after autologous breast reconstruction.

METHODS

The authors conducted a single-center, single-blinded randomized controlled trial between March of 2021 and December of 2022. Patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction in a standardized enhanced recovery after surgery pathway were randomized to receive intraoperative TAP blocks with either bupivacaine and epinephrine (control group) or liposomal bupivacaine, bupivacaine, and epinephrine (experimental group). Primary outcome was postoperative narcotic medication requirements, with secondary outcomes of pain scores, length of stay, and narcotic medication refills.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients met inclusion criteria (59 control patients and 58 experimental patients). Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, breast pathologic variables, surgery laterality, and immediate versus delayed reconstruction status were equivalent between groups. The control group had significantly higher average pain scores postoperatively (4.3 versus 3.6; P = 0.004). However, there were no significant differences in mean narcotic use (66.9 morphine milligram equivalents versus 60.2 morphine milligram equivalents; P = 0.47). Both length of stay and postoperative narcotic prescription refills were equivalent between groups (2.1 days versus 2.2 days, P = 0.55; 22% versus 17.2%, P = 0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of liposomal bupivacaine to the standard bupivacaine TAP block mixture in a standardized enhanced recovery after surgery protocol did not demonstrate a significant reduction in postoperative narcotic requirements after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction compared with standard bupivacaine alone. Patient-reported pain scores, however, were lower among liposomal bupivacaine patients after the initial 24 hours postoperatively and consistent with a longer duration of analgesia.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Multiple intramuscular ropivacaine injections to donor sites reduces pain in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Local anesthetic infiltration at the surgical site has been studied in various surgical disciplines; however, its impact on deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction has not been previously assessed. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of multiple intramuscular ropivacaine injections on donor site pain during DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

METHODS

The study included 65 patients who received local ropivacaine injections during DIEP reconstructions between March 2022 and February 2023, compared to 55 patients who underwent surgeries without ropivacaine from October 2018 to July 2020. A total of 20 cc of 0.75% ropivacaine solution was evenly administered at 20 sites along the abdominal wall muscles. The effect of intramuscular ropivacaine injection on postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) was evaluated using linear mixed-effect model. Opioid consumption and hospital days were also compared.

RESULTS

The daily median VAS score was lower in the ropivacaine group (all p-values < 0.001). When analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model, those who received ropivacaine had significantly lower VAS scores over the first 5 days postoperatively (p-value < 0.001). The rate of VAS score decline was also faster in the ropivacaine group over the first 24 h postoperative (p-value = 0.045). Although opioid consumption was comparable between the groups, those receiving ropivacaine had significantly shorter hospital stay (p-value = 0.001) and no complications related to the injections were observed.

CONCLUSION

Multiple intramuscular injections of ropivacaine to the donor site may reduce postoperative pain and shorten hospital stays, without increasing opioid consumption.

The Cost-effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocols in Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Background

The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review on the cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction. Further, we reviewed the use of liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks in abdominal autologous reconstruction.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus were used for literature review, and PRISMA guidelines were followed. Included articles had full-text available, included cost data, and involved use of TAP block. Reviews, case reports, or comparisons between immediate and delayed breast reconstruction were excluded. Included articles were reviewed for data highlighting treatment cost and associated length of stay (LOS). Cost and LOS were further stratified by treatment group (ERAS versus non-ERAS) and method of postoperative pain control (TAP versus non-TAP). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to compare the impact of the above treatments on cost and LOS.

Results

Of the 381 initial articles, 11 were included. These contained 919 patients, of whom 421 participated in an ERAS pathway. The average ICER for ERAS pathways was $1664.45 per day (range, $952.70-$2860). Average LOS of ERAS pathways was 3.12 days versus 4.57 days for non-ERAS pathways. The average ICER of TAP blocks was $909.19 (range, $89.64-$1728.73) with an average LOS of 3.70 days for TAP blocks versus 4.09 days in controls.

Conclusions

The use of ERAS pathways and postoperative pain control with liposomal bupivacaine TAP block during breast reconstruction is cost-effective. These interventions should be included in comprehensive perioperative plans aimed at positive outcomes with reduced costs.

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Liposomal to Plain Bupivacaine in the Transversus Abdominis Plane for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Pain control after autologous breast reconstruction is important for patient satisfaction and early recovery. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are commonly used as part of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for breast reconstruction. It is uncertain whether liposomal bupivacaine used in TAP blocks offers additional advantages. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine versus plain bupivacaine for patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction.

METHODS

This double-blinded randomized controlled trial studied patients undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction between June of 2019 and August of 2020. Subjects were randomly assigned liposomal or plain bupivacaine, performed using ultrasound-guided TAP block technique. All patients were managed according to an ERAS protocol. Primary outcomes were postoperative narcotic analgesia required, measured in oral morphine equivalents from postoperative days 1 to 7. Secondary outcomes included numeric pain scale score on postoperative days 1 to 7, nonnarcotic pain medication use, time to first narcotic use, return of bowel function, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled: 30 received liposomal bupivacaine and 30 received plain bupivacaine. There were no significant differences in demographics, daily oral morphine equivalent narcotic use, nonnarcotic pain medication use, time to narcotic use, numeric pain scale score, time to bowel function, or length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Liposomal bupivacaine does not confer advantages over plain bupivacaine when used in TAP blocks for abdominally based microvascular breast reconstruction in patients under ERAS protocols and multimodal approaches for pain control.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, I.

Moving the needle: a narrative review of enhanced recovery protocols in breast reconstruction

Background and Objective

After a relatively late introduction to the literature in 2015, enhanced recovery protocols for breast reconstruction have flourished into a wealth of reports. Many have since described unique methodologies making improved offerings with superior outcomes attainable. This is a particularly interesting procedure for the study of enhanced recovery as it encompasses two dissident approaches. Compared to implant-based reconstruction, autologous free-flap reconstruction has demonstrated superiority in a range of long-term metrics at the expense of historically increased peri-operative morbidity. This narrative review collates reports of recovery protocols for both approaches and examines methodologies surrounding the key pieces of a comprehensive pathway.

Methods

All primary clinical reports specifically describing enhanced recovery protocols for implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction through 2022 were identified by systematic review of PubMed and Embase libraries. Twenty-five reports meeting criteria were identified, with ten additional reports included for narrative purpose. Included studies were examined for facets of innovation from the pre-hospital setting through outpatient follow-up. Notable findings were described in the context of a comprehensive framework with attention paid to clinical and basic scientific background. Considerations for implementation were additionally discussed.

Key Content and Findings

Of 35 included studies, 29 regarded autologous reconstruction with majority focus on reduction of peri-operative opioid requirements and length of stay. Six regarded implant-based reconstruction with most discussing pathways towards ambulatory procedures. Eighty percent of included studies were published after the 2017 consensus guidelines with many described innovations to this baseline. Pathways included considerations for pre-hospital, pre-operative, intra-operative, inpatient, and outpatient settings. Implant-based studies demonstrated that safe ambulatory care is accessible. Autologous studies demonstrated a trend towards discharge before post-operative day three and peri-operative opioid requirements equivalent to those of implant-based reconstructions.

Conclusions

Study of enhanced recovery after breast reconstruction has inspired paradigm shift and pushed limits previously not thought to be attainable. These protocols should encompass a longitudinal care pathway with optimization through patient-centered approaches and multidisciplinary collaboration. This framework should represent standard of care and will serve to expand availability of all methods of breast reconstruction.

Survey of Surgeon-reported Postoperative Protocols for Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap in Breast Reconstruction

Background

The use of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps is a well-established breast reconstruction technique.

Methods

A 29-question survey was e-mailed to 3186 active American Society of Plastic Surgeons members, aiming to describe postoperative monitoring practice patterns among surgeons performing DIEP flaps.

Results

From 255 responses (8%), 79% performing DIEP surgery were analyzed. Among them, 34.8% practiced for more than 20 years, 34.3% for 10-20 years, and 30.9% for less than 10 years. Initial 24-hour post-DIEP monitoring: intensive care unit (39%) and floor (36%). Flap monitoring: external Doppler (71%), tissue oximetry (41%), and implantable Doppler (32%). Postoperative analgesia: acetaminophen (74%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (69%), neuromodulators (52%), and opioids (4.4%) were administered on a scheduled basis. On postoperative day 1, 61% halt intravenous fluids, 67% allow ambulation, 70% remove Foley catheter, and 71% start diet. Most surgeons discharged patients from the hospital on postoperative day 3+. Regardless of experience, patients were commonly discharged on day 3. Half of the surgeons are in academic/nonacademic settings and discharge on/after day 3.

Conclusions

This study reveals significant heterogeneity among the practice patterns of DIEP surgeons. In light of these findings, it is recommended that a task force be convened to establish standardized monitoring protocols for DIEP flaps. Such protocols have the potential to reduce both the length of hospital stays and overall care costs all while ensuring optimal pain management and vigilant flap monitoring.

Significant Reduction in Length of Stay in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction With Implementation of Multimodal ERAS Protocol

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) implementation achieves earlier recovery, reduced hospital length of stay (LOS) and improved outcomes in patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flaps. We sought to review our ERAS protocols and their impact on our patients' LOS compared with the literature.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of a single surgeon's experience from 2017 to 2021 of patients undergoing DIEP free-flap breast reconstruction with LOS as the primary outcome. Complication rates and patient demographics are described as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one patients underwent DIEP free-flap breast reconstruction. After adapting ERAS protocols, there has been a 0.98 [SD, 0.17; confidence interval [CI], -1.3 to -0.64; P < 0.001) day decrease in length of stay comparing pre-ERAS to post-ERAS implementation. Length of stay has routinely decreased from an average discharge on day 4.17 (SD, 1.1; range, 3-8 days) in 2017 to discharge on day 2.91 (SD, 1.1; range, 1-5 days) in 2021. Seventy-five percent of patients in 2021 were hospitalized for 3 or fewer days compared with 75% of patients in 2017 hospitalized for 4 or more days. One patient experienced a flap failure. Our study supports successful discharge on postoperative days 2-3 compared with postoperative days 3-4 in the current literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of our ERAS protocol for DIEP free-flap breast reconstruction has resulted in a shorter LOS compared with contemporary literature. The ERAS protocols can be efficiently adopted in microsurgical DIEP breast reconstruction to achieve a shorter LOS without jeopardizing patient outcomes.

A Prospective Cohort Study Re-examining Tissue Oximetry Monitoring in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The goal of inpatient monitoring after microsurgical breast reconstruction is to detect vascular compromise before flap loss. Near-infrared tissue oximetry (NITO) is commonly used for this purpose, but recent reports challenge its specificity and utility in current practice. Fifteen years after Keller published his initial study using this technology at our institution, we re-evaluate the role and limitations of this popular monitoring device.

METHODS

A 1-year prospective study was performed for patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction and monitored postoperatively using NITO. Alerts were evaluated, and clinical endpoints relating to an unplanned return to the operating room or flap loss were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients reconstructed with 225 flaps were included within the study. There were no cases of flap loss at the time of discharge. There were 71 alerts relating to a drop in oximetry saturation. Of these, 68 (95.8%) were deemed to be of no significance. In 3 cases (positive predictive value of 4.2%), the alert was significant, and there were concerning clinical signs apparent at that point. A sensor in an inframammary fold position was associated with nearly twice the average number of alerts as compared with areolar or periareolar positions ( P = 0.01). In 4 patients (3.4%), a breast hematoma required operative evacuation, and these cases were detected by nursing clinical examination.

CONCLUSIONS

The monitoring of free flaps after breast reconstruction through tissue oximetry shows a poor positive predictive value for flap compromise and requires clinical corroboration of alerts but missed no pedicle-related adverse events. With a high sensitivity for pedicle-related issues, NITO may be helpful postoperatively, but the exact timeframe for use must be weighed at the institutional level.

Financial Implications of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Surgical advancements in breast reconstruction have allowed a shift toward optimizing patient-reported outcomes and efficiency measures. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol has been instrumental in improving outcomes, but the effect of these protocols on health care spending has not been examined. This study aims to assess the effect of ERAS protocols on the length of hospital stay and costs associated with microsurgical breast reconstruction.

METHODS

In 2018, the authors implemented an ERAS protocol for patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction that included perioperative procedures involving patient education and care. Subjects included patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction at the authors' institution between 2016 and 2019. Data were gathered from the electronic medical record and the hospital system's finance department, and patients were divided into pre-ERAS and ERAS cohorts. A 2-sample t test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 269 patients with no statistically significant differences in demographic data between the cohorts. The average length of hospitalization was 3.46 days for the pre-ERAS group and 2.45 days for the ERAS group ( P = 0.000). In a linear regression, the ERAS protocol predicted a 1.04-day decrease in the length of stay ( P = 0.000). Overall, total direct cost decreased by 7.5% with the ERAS protocol.

CONCLUSION

The rising cost of health care presents a challenge for providers to reduce the cost burden placed on our health system while providing the highest-quality care. This study demonstrates that the use of standardized ERAS protocols can achieve this 2-fold goal.

Transversus abdominus plane blocks do not reduce rates of postoperative prolonged opioid use following abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction: a nationwide longitudinal analysis

Background

The transversus abdominus plane (TAP) block reduces postoperative donor site pain in patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction with an abdominally based flap. This study aimed to determine the effect of TAP blocks on rates of conversion to chronic opioid use.

Methods

The Clinformatics Data Mart was queried from 2003 to 2019, extracting adult encounters for abdominally based free and pedicled flaps based on common procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Patients were excluded if they had filled a narcotic prescription 1 year to 30 days prior to surgery. The exposure variable-TAP block-was identified by CPT codes. Outcomes were evaluated using morphine milligram equivalents (MME) from prescriptions filled between 30 days prior to and 30 days after surgery. Chronic opioid use (COU) was defined as receiving 4 unique prescriptions or a 60-day supply between 30 and 180 days after surgery.

Results

Of the 4091 patients, (mean age 51.2 ± 9.0 years), 181 (4.4%) had a TAP block placed. Perioperative MMEs/day, postoperative COU, and length of stay did not differ in patients who received a TAP block (p = 0.142; p = 0.271). Significant predictors of risk of conversion to COU included younger age, pedicled abdominal flap, Elixhauser comorbidity index score > 3, filling a psychiatric medication prescription, and filling a benzodiazepine prescription.

Conclusions

In patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction with abdominally based flap reconstruction, TAP blocks do not decrease perioperative MME/day, conversion to chronic opioid use, or length of stay. These data suggest that intraoperative TAP block placement may be a low-yield opioid-reduction strategy.Level of evidence: Level III, risk/prognostic study.

Enhanced Recovery Pathway Reduces Hospital Stay and Opioid Use in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Center, Private Practice Experience

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine benefits of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway implementation in free flap breast reconstruction related to postoperative narcotic use and health care resource utilization.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction from November of 2015 to April of 2018 was performed before and after implementation of the ERAS protocol.

RESULTS

Four hundred nine patients met inclusion criteria. The pre-ERAS group comprised 205 patients, and 204 patients were managed through the ERAS pathway. Mean age, laterality, timing of reconstruction, and number of previous abdominal surgical procedures were similar ( p > 0.05) between groups. Mean operative time between both groups (450.1 ± 92.7 minutes versus 440.7 ± 93.5 minutes) and complications were similar ( p > 0.05). Mean intraoperative (58.9 ± 32.5 versus 31.7 ± 23.4) and postoperative (129.5 ± 80.1 versus 90 ± 93.9) morphine milligram equivalents used were significantly ( p < 0.001) higher in the pre-ERAS group. Mean length of stay was significantly ( p < 0.001) longer in the pre-ERAS group (4.5 ± 0.8 days versus 3.2 ± 0.6 days). Bivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated that operative time was positively associated with total narcotic requirements ( p < 0.001) and length of stay ( p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS pathways in microsurgical breast reconstruction promote reduction in intraoperative and postoperative narcotic utilization with concomitant decrease in hospital length of stay. In this study, patients managed through ERAS pathways required 46 percent less intraoperative and 31 percent less postoperative narcotics and had a 29 percent reduction in hospital length of stay.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Nerve Blocks in Breast Plastic Surgery: Outcomes, Complications, and Comparative Efficacy

BACKGROUND

As plastic surgeons continue to evaluate the utility of nonopioid analgesic alternatives, nerve block use in breast plastic surgery remains limited and unstandardized, with no syntheses of the available evidence to guide consensus on optimal approach.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to evaluate the role of pectoralis nerve blocks, paravertebral nerve blocks, transversus abdominus plane blocks, and intercostal nerve blocks in flap-based breast reconstruction, prosthetic-based reconstruction, and aesthetic breast plastic surgery, independently.

RESULTS

Thirty-one articles reporting on a total of 2820 patients were included in the final analysis; 1500 patients (53 percent) received nerve blocks, and 1320 (47 percent) served as controls. Outcomes and complications were stratified according to procedures performed, blocks employed, techniques of administration, and anesthetic agents used. Overall, statistically significant reductions in opioid consumption were reported in 91 percent of studies evaluated, postoperative pain in 68 percent, postanesthesia care unit stay in 67 percent, postoperative nausea and vomiting in 53 percent, and duration of hospitalization in 50 percent. Nerve blocks did not significantly alter surgery and/or anesthesia time in 83 percent of studies assessed, whereas the overall, pooled complication rate was 1.6 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

Transversus abdominus plane blocks provided excellent outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction, whereas both paravertebral nerve blocks and pectoralis nerve blocks demonstrated notable efficacy and versatility in an array of reconstructive and aesthetic procedures. Ultrasound guidance may minimize block-related complications, whereas the efficacy of adjunctive postoperative infusions was proven to be limited. As newer anesthetic agents and adjuvants continue to emerge, nerve blocks are set to represent essential components of the multimodal analgesic approach in breast plastic surgery.

Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to a Local Analgesic Cocktail for Transversus Abdominis Plane-Blocks in Abdominally-Based Microvascular Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) blocks can improve pain control and decrease opioid usage within an ERAS protocol, in patients undergoing abdominally-based autologous breast reconstruction. The author has transitioned to using a local analgesic cocktail in place of liposomal bupivacaine for TAP blocks. The purpose of this study is to compare post-operative opioid use in patients who received the different TAP blocks.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing abdominally-based autologous breast reconstruction between November 2015 and December 2019 was performed. The study group received Bupivacaine, Ketorolac, Dexmedetomidine, and Dexamethasone, and the control group received Liposomal Bupivacaine +/- Bupivacaine, Ketorolac, or Dexmedetomidine, as a TAP block. The primary outcome of interest was post-operative opioid use and pain scores.

RESULTS

A total of 104 women met inclusion criteria: 36 in Group A (pre-ERAS, pre-TAP), 38 in Group B (ERAS, TAP with liposomal bupivacaine), and 30 in Group C (ERAS, TAP with local anesthetic cocktail). Total and average daily OME consumption were significantly less for Group C in the inpatient phase (Group A: 633, B: 240, C: 135; p<0.0001) (Group A: 137, B: 56, C: 29; p<0.0001). Patients in Group C were prescribed significantly less outpatient OMEs (Group A: 79, B: 74, C: 52; p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

TAP blocks are a significant component of an ERAS protocol for abdominally-based breast reconstruction. Liposomal bupivacaine is a popular option for TAP blocks. Our results demonstrate that a local anesthetic cocktail, composed of economical and readily available medications, can provide excellent patient pain control and decrease post-operative opioid use.

The Role of Maximal Locoregional Block in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has become the standard of care in microsurgical breast reconstruction. The current literature provides overwhelming evidence of the benefit of ERAS pathways in improving quality of recovery, decreasing length of hospital stay, and minimizing the amount of postoperative narcotic use in these patients. However, there are limited data on the role of using maximal locoregional anesthetic blocks targeting both the abdomen and chest as an integral part of an ERAS protocol in abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of implementing a comprehensive ERAS protocol with and without maximal locoregional nerve blocks to determine any added benefit of these blocks to the standard ERAS pathway.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients who underwent abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction in the period between July 2017 and February 2020 were included in this retrospective institutional review board-approved study. The goal was to compare patients who received combined abdominal and thoracic wall locoregional blocks as part of their ERAS pathway (study group) with those who had only transversus abdominis plane blocks. The primary end points were total hospital length of stay, overall opioids consumption, and overall postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The use of supplemental thoracic wall block resulted in a shorter hospital length of stay in the study group of 3.2 days compared with 4.2 days for the control group (P < 0.01). Postoperative total morphine equivalent consumption was lower at 38 mg in the study group compared with 51 mg in the control group (P < 0.01). Complications occurred in 6 cases (15%) in the control group versus one minor complication in the thoracic block group. There was no difference between the 2 groups in demographics, comorbidities, and type of reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

The maximal locoregional nerve block including a complete chest wall block confers added benefits to the standard ERAS protocol in microvascular breast reconstruction.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Two Regional Pain Management Modalities in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

At our institution, multimodal opiate-sparing pain management is the cornerstone of our enhanced recovery program for autologous breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes and pain control metrics following implementation of an enhanced recovery program with two different regional analgesia approaches.

Factors influencing postoperative abdominal pain in DIEP flap breast reconstruction

Background

Identification of a subgroup of patients with severe postoperative pain is important for adequate pain management for enhanced, fast recovery after deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to identify factors influencing postoperative abdominal pain in patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction using DIEP free flaps from October 2018 to July 2020 were included in this study. Visual analog scale (VAS)-guided postoperative pain scores were documented every 3 hours until 48 hours postoperatively. Factors affecting patient-reported pain scores were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model. Independent variables included patient characteristics, history of previous open abdominal surgery, and operative factors including the flap size, flap weight, use of a unipedicled or bipedicled flap, number of perforators, timing of reconstruction, and use of a catheter-based subcutaneous plane block in the abdomen. A catheter was placed above the rectus fascia during closure, and analgesics were continuously infused during the 48 hours using an ON-Q Pain Relief System (I-Flow Co., Lake Forest, CA, USA).

Results

Fifty-five patients were included in the analysis. In the linear mixed effect model using multiple clinical variables, the harvested flap weight was significantly associated with the degree of pain (β coefficient =0.157, P=0.008). The pain degrees significantly decreased according to postoperative days (β coefficient =-0.649, P<0.001). The flap type (unipedicle or bipedicle), number of perforators, timing of reconstruction, and history of previous abdominal surgery did not influence pain degrees. The use of subcutaneous plane block did not affect the degree of pain or dose of analgesics used.

Conclusions

A larger flap weight is associated with an increased degree of pain in patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstructions. Vigorous pain management might be necessary when a large flap is elevated.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol With Ultrasound-Guided Regional Blocks in Outpatient Plastic Surgery Patients Leads to Decreased Opioid Prescriptions and Consumption

BACKGROUND

Opioids are a mainstay of pain management. To limit the use of opioids, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols implement multimodal approaches to treat postoperative pain.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this paper was to be the first to assess the efficacy of an ERAS protocol for plastic surgery outpatients that includes ultrasound-guided, surgeon-led regional blocks.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing outpatient plastic surgery on an ERAS protocol was performed. These patients were compared to a well-matched group not on an ERAS protocol (pre-ERAS). Endpoints included the amounts of opioid, antinausea, and antispasmodic medication prescribed. ERAS patients were given a postoperative questionnaire to assess both pain levels (0-10) and opioid consumption. ERAS patients anticipated to have higher levels of pain received ultrasound-guided anesthetic blocks.

RESULTS

There were 157 patients in the pre-ERAS group and 202 patients in the ERAS group. Patients in the pre-ERAS group were prescribed more opioid (332.3 vs 100.3 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/patient; P < 0.001), antinausea (664 vs 16.3 mg of promethazine/patient; P < 0.001), and antispasmodic (401.3 vs 31.2 mg of cyclobenzaprine/patient; P < 0.001) medication. Patients on the ERAS protocol consumed an average total of 22.7 MME/patient postoperatively. Average pain scores in this group peaked at 5.32 on postoperative day 1 and then decreased significantly daily.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an ERAS protocol for plastic surgery outpatients with utilization of ultrasound-guided regional anesthetic blocks is feasible and efficacious. The ability to significantly decrease prescribed opioids in this unique patient population is noteworthy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

A Critical Examination of Length of Stay in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aims to use the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify factors associated with extended postoperative length of stay after breast reconstruction with free tissue transfer.

METHODS

Consecutive cases of breast reconstruction with free tissue transfer were retrieved from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005 to 2017) database using CPT code 19364. Extended length of stay (dependent variable) was defined as greater than 5 days.

RESULTS

Nine thousand six hundred eighty-six cases were analyzed; extended length of stay was noted in 34 percent. On regression, patient factors independently associated with extended length of stay were body mass index (OR, 1.5; 95 percent CI, 1.2 to 1.9; p < 0.001), diabetes (OR, 1.3; 95 percent CI, 1.1 to 1.6; p = 0.003), and malignancy history (OR, 1.9; 95 percent CI, 1.22 to 3.02; p = 0.005). Operation time greater than 500 minutes (OR, 3; 95 percent CI, 2.73 to 3.28; p < 0.001) and immediate postmastectomy reconstruction (OR, 1.7; 95 percent CI, 1.16 to 2.48; p < 0.001) conferred risk for extended length of stay. Bilateral free tissue transfer was not significant. Operations performed in 2017 were at lower risk (OR, 0.2; 95 percent CI, 0.06 to 0.81; p = 0.02) for extended length of stay. Reoperation is more likely following operative transfusion and bilateral free tissue transfers, but less likely following concurrent alloplasty. Given a known operation time (minutes), postoperative length of stay (days) can be calculated using the following equation: length of stay = 2.559 + 0.003 × operation time.

CONCLUSIONS

This study characterizes the risks for extended length of stay after free tissue transfer breast reconstruction using a prospective multicenter national database. The result of this study can be used to risk-stratify patients during surgical planning to optimize perioperative decision-making.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Clinical Effectiveness of Liposomal Bupivacaine Administered by Infiltration or Peripheral Nerve Block to Treat Postoperative Pain

The authors provide a comprehensive summary of all randomized, controlled trials (n = 76) involving the clinical administration of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel; Pacira Pharmaceuticals, USA) to control postoperative pain that are currently published. When infiltrated surgically and compared with unencapsulated bupivacaine or ropivacaine, only 11% of trials (4 of 36) reported a clinically relevant and statistically significant improvement in the primary outcome favoring liposomal bupivacaine. Ninety-two percent of trials (11 of 12) suggested a peripheral nerve block with unencapsulated bupivacaine provides superior analgesia to infiltrated liposomal bupivacaine. Results were mixed for the 16 trials comparing liposomal and unencapsulated bupivacaine, both within peripheral nerve blocks. Overall, of the trials deemed at high risk for bias, 84% (16 of 19) reported statistically significant differences for their primary outcome measure(s) compared with only 14% (4 of 28) of those with a low risk of bias. The preponderance of evidence fails to support the routine use of liposomal bupivacaine over standard local anesthetics.

Practical Review of Abdominal and Breast Regional Analgesia for Plastic Surgeons: Evidence and Techniques

Regional analgesia has been increasing in popularity due to its opioid- sparing analgesic effects and utility in multimodal analgesia strategies. Several regional techniques have been used in plastic surgery; however, there is a lack of consensus on the indications and the comparative efficacy of these blocks. The goal of this review is to provide evidence-based recommendations on the most relevant types of interfascial plane blocks for abdominal and breast surgery. A systematic search of the PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify the evidence associated with the different interfascial plane blocks used in plastic surgery. The search included all studies from inception to March 2020. A total of 126 studies were included and used in the synthesis of the information presented in this review. There is strong evidence for using the transversus abdominis plane blocks in both abdominoplasties as well as abdominally-based microvascular breast reconstruction as evidenced by a significant reduction in post-operative pain and opioid consumption. Pectoralis (I and II), serratus anterior, and erector spinae plane blocks all provide good pain control in breast surgeries. Finally, the serratus anterior plane block can be used as primary block or an adjunct to the pectoralis blocks for a wider analgesia coverage of the breast. All the reviewed blocks are safe and easy to administer. Interfascial plane blocks are effective and safe modalities used to reduce pain and opioid consumption after abdominal and breast plastic surgery.

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine vs. Regular Anesthetics for Pain Control After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Transverse abdominal plane (TAP) blocks are used to provide pain relief after abdominopelvic surgeries. The role of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for TAP blocks is unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to synthesize evidence on the efficacy of LB vs. regular anesthetics in improving outcomes of TAP block. Methods: PubMed, Science Direct, Embase, Springer, and CENTRAL databases were searched up to July 24, 2020. Studies comparing LB with any regular anesthetic for TAP block for any surgical procedure and reporting total analgesic consumption (TAC) or pain scores were included. Results: Seven studies including five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were reviewed. LB was compared with regular bupivacaine (RB) in all studies. A descriptive analysis was conducted for TAC due to heterogeneity in data presentation. There were variations in the outcomes of studies reporting TAC. Meta-analysis of pain scores indicated statistically significant reduction of pain with the use of LB at 12 h (MD: -0.89 95% CI: -1.44, -0.34 I2 = 0% p = 0.01), 24 h (MD: -0.64 95% CI: -1.21, -0.06 I2 = 0% p = 0.03), 48 h (MD: -0.40 95% CI: -0.77, 0.04 I2 = 0% p = 0.03) but not at 72 h (MD: -0.37 95% CI: -1.31, 0.56 I2 = 57% p = 0.43). Pooled analysis indicated no difference in the duration of hospital stay between LB and RB (MD: -0.18 95% CI: -0.49, 0.14 I2 = 61% p = 0.27). LB significantly reduced the number of days to first ambulation postsurgery (MD: -0.28 95% CI: -0.50, -0.06 I2 = 0% p = 0.01). Conclusions: Current evidence on the role of LB for providing prolonged analgesia with TAP blocks is unclear. Conflicting results have been reported for TAC. LB may result in a small reduction in pain scores up to 48 h but not at 72 h. Further, high-quality homogenous RCTs are needed to establish high-quality evidence.

Perioperative Blocks for Decreasing Postoperative Narcotics in Breast Reconstruction

CONTEXT

High rates of mortality and chemical dependence occur following the overuse of narcotic medications, and the prescription of these medications has become a central discussion in health care. Efforts to curtail opioid prescribing include Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines, which describe local anesthesia techniques to decrease or eliminate the need for opioids when used in a comprehensive protocol. Here, we review effective perioperative blocks for the decreased use of opioid medications post-breast reconstruction surgery.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive review was conducted using keywords narcotics, opioid, surgery, breast reconstruction, pain pump, nerve block, regional anesthesia, and analgesia. Papers that described a local anesthetic option for breast reconstruction for decreasing postoperative narcotic consumption, written in English, were included.

RESULTS

A total of 52 papers were included in this review. Local anesthetic options included single-shot nerve blocks, nerve block catheters, and local and regional anesthesia. Most papers reported equal or even superior pain control with decreased nausea and vomiting, length of hospital stay, and other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Though opioid medications are currently the gold standard medication for pain management following surgery, strategies to decrease the dose or number of opioids prescribed may lead to better patient outcomes. The use of a local anesthetic technique has been shown to reduce narcotic use and improve patients' pain scores after breast reconstruction surgery.

Early Discontinuation of Breast Free Flap Monitoring: A Strategy Driven by National Data

BACKGROUND

Multiple single-institution studies have revealed that breast free flap compromise usually occurs within the first 48 postoperative hours. However, national studies analyzing the rates and timing of breast free flap compromise are lacking. This study aimed to fill this gap in knowledge to better guide postoperative monitoring.

METHODS

All women undergoing breast free flap reconstruction from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2012 to 2016 database were analyzed to determine the rates and timing of free flap take-back. Take-backs were stratified by postoperative day through the first month. Multivariable modified Poisson regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictors of free flap take-back.

RESULTS

A total of 6792 breast free flap patients were analyzed. Multivariable analysis revealed that body mass index of 40 kg/m or higher, hypertension, American Society of Anesthesiologists class of 3 or higher, steroid use, and smoking were independent predictors of take-back (p < 0.05). Take-back occurred at the highest rate during postoperative day 1, dropped significantly by postoperative day 2 (p < 0.001), and remained consistently low after postoperative day 2 (<0.6 percent daily). The identified risk factors significantly increased the likelihood of take-back on postoperative day 1 (p < 0.05), with a trend noted on postoperative day 2 (p = 0.06). Fewer than 0.4 percent of patients (n = 27) underwent take-back on postoperative day 2 without having risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first national study specifically analyzing rates, timing, and independent predictors of breast free flap take-back. The data support discontinuing breast free flap monitoring by the end of postoperative day 1 for patients without risk factors, given the very low rate of take-back for such patients during postoperative day 2 (≤0.4 percent).

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Comparative Effectiveness of Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The abdomen is the most common donor site in autologous microvascular free flap breast reconstruction and contributes significantly to postoperative pain, resulting in increased opioid use, length of stay, and hospital costs. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have demonstrated multiple clinical benefits, but these protocols are widely heterogeneous. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks have been reported to improve pain control and may be a key driver of the benefits seen with ERAS pathways.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting TAP blocks for abdominally based breast reconstruction were performed. Studies were extracted from 6 public databases before February 2019 and pooled in accordance with the PROSPERO registry. Total opioid use, postoperative pain, length of stay, hospital cost, and complications were analyzed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 420 studies, ultimately narrowed to 12 studies representing 1107 total patients. Total hospital length of stay (mean difference, -1.00 days; P < 0.00001; I = 81%) and opioid requirement (mean difference, -133.80 mg of oral morphine equivalent; P < 0.00001; I = 97%) were decreased for patients receiving TAP blocks. Transversus abdominis plane blocks were not associated with any significant differences in postoperative complications (P = 0.66), hospital cost (P = 0.22), and postoperative pain (P = 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Optimizing postoperative pain management after abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction is invaluable for patient recovery. Transversus abdominis plane blocks are associated with a reduction in length of stay and opioid use, representing a safe and reasonable strategy for decreasing postoperative pain.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocols Decrease Outpatient Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Abdominally Based Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have known benefits in the inpatient setting, but little is known about their impact in the subsequent outpatient setting. On discharge, multimodal analgesia has been discontinued, nerve blocks and pain pumps have worn off, and patients enter a substantially different physical environment, potentially resulting in a rebound effect. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of ERAS protocol implementation on outpatient opioid use and recovery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction before and after ERAS implementation were reviewed retrospectively. Ohio state law mandates that no more than 7 days of opioids may be prescribed at a time, with the details of all prescriptions recorded in a statewide reporting system, from which opioid use was determined.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 46 (44 percent) were in the pre-ERAS group and 59 (56 percent) were in the ERAS group. Total outpatient morphine milligram equivalents used in the ERAS group were less than in the pre-ERAS group (337.5 morphine milligram equivalents versus 668.8 morphine milligram equivalents, respectively; p =0.016). This difference was specifically significant at postoperative week 1 (p =0.044), with gradual convergence over subsequent weeks. Although opioid use was significantly less in the ERAS group, pain scores in the ERAS group were comparable to those in the pre-ERAS group.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of ERAS protocols appear to extend into the outpatient setting, further supporting their use to facilitate recovery, and highlighting their potential role in helping to address the prescription opioid abuse problem.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Basics and Best Practices of Multimodal Pain Management for the Plastic Surgeon

Pain management is a central focus for the plastic surgeon’s perioperative planning, and it no longer represents a postoperative afterthought. Protocols that rely on opioid-only pain therapy are outdated and discouraged, as they do not achieve optimal pain relief, increase postoperative morbidity, and contribute to the growing opioid epidemic. A multimodal approach to pain management using non-opioid analgesic techniques is an integral component of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Careful perioperative planning for optimal pain management must be achieved in multidisciplinary collaboration with the perioperative care team including anesthesiology. This allows pain management interventions to occur at 3 critical opportunities—preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative settings.

Safety of Postoperative Opioid Alternatives in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review

With the growing opioid epidemic, plastic surgeons are being encouraged to transition away from reliance on postoperative opioids. However, many plastic surgeons hesitate to use nonopioid analgesics such as nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and local anesthetic blocks because of concerns about their safety, particularly bleeding. The goal of this systematic review is to assess the validity of risks associated with nonopioid analgesic alternatives. A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed and MEDLINE databases was conducted regarding the safety of opioid alternatives in plastic surgery. Inclusion and exclusion criteria yielded 34 relevant articles. A systematic review was performed because of the variation between study indications, interventions, and complications. Thirty-four articles were reviewed that analyzed the safety of ibuprofen, ketorolac, celecoxib, intravenous acetaminophen, ketamine, gabapentin, liposomal bupivacaine, and local and continuous nerve blocks after plastic surgery procedures. There were no articles that showed statistically significant bleeding associated with ibuprofen, celecoxib, or ketorolac. Similarly, acetaminophen administered intravenously, ketamine, gabapentin, and liposomal bupivacaine did not have any significant increased risk of adverse events. Nerve and infusion blocks have a low risk of pneumothorax. Limitations of this study include small sample sizes, different dosing and control groups, and more than one medication being studied. Larger studies of nonopioid analgesics would therefore be valuable and may strengthen the conclusions of this review. As a preliminary investigation, this review showed that several opioid alternatives have a potential role in postoperative analgesia. Plastic surgeons have the responsibility to lead the reduction of postoperative opioid use by further developing multimodal analgesia.

Reducing the pain: A cost-effectiveness analysis of transversus abdominis plane block using liposomal bupivacaine for outpatient laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

Background

Transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine has been studied as an effective method of reducing the need for postoperative opioids and increasing same-day discharge rates. However, less is known about the cost-effectiveness of this strategy relative to opioids alone for hernia repair. We performed an economic evaluation of these strategies using a computer simulation model.

Methods

A decision tree was constructed to determine cost-effectiveness as measured by incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per quality-adjusted life-year. Base-case costs, quality-adjusted life-year values, and probabilities were derived from published studies and Medicare fee schedules. For input parameters for which we could not find values in the published literature, we used expert opinion. A 1-month time horizon was selected to focus on the immediate postoperative period. Finally, we performed 1-way, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Results

The liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block was a dominant strategy yielding a $456.75 decrease in cost and an 0.1 increase in quality-adjusted life-years relative to opioids alone. In 1-way sensitivity analysis of cost incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, values were most sensitive to variations in the amount saved by same-day discharge and the cost of bupivacaine. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, transversus abdominis plane strategy was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/quality-adjusted life-year in 94.5% of iterations and at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year in 97.1% of iterations.

Conclusion

The use of liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block resulted in cost savings and improved quality-adjusted life-years in base-case analyses and was cost-effective at conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds in the majority of iterations in probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

•

A decision tree was constructed to determine cost-effectiveness as measured by incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).

•

The liposomal bupivacaine TAP block was a dominant strategy yielding a $456.75 decrease in cost and an 0.1 increase in QALYs relative to opioids alone.

•

In 1-way sensitivity analysis of cost, ICER values were most sensitive to variations in the amount saved by SDD and the cost of bupivacaine.

•

In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, TAP strategy was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY in 94.5% of iterations and pay threshold of $100,000/QALY in 97.1% of iterations.

Ultrasound and Plastic Surgery: Clinical Applications of the Newest Technology

BACKGROUND

Color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) has not been routinely used in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Barriers to use have included large, cumbersome equipment, low-definition images, cost, and availability. In addition, programs in plastic surgery have not included training with ultrasound (US); thus, many current-day practitioners are unfamiliar with and reluctant to use this technology. Nevertheless, recent studies have demonstrated the utility of US in surgical planning. With the miniaturization, clearer imaging, and decreased costs of the latest US technology, previous barriers to use have largely been eliminated.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients scheduled for either reconstructive or aesthetic surgery were evaluated preoperatively and/or intraoperatively by a single surgeon with the linear 12-4 probe of a Philips Lumify CDUS device (Philips, Reedsville, Penn). For patients undergoing flap reconstruction, potential donor sites were imaged in order to locate the largest perforator. For patients undergoing abdominal procedures, intraoperative visualization of the abdominal muscular layers was used for the delivery of anesthesia during transversus abdominis plane block. Lastly, the superficial fascial system (SFS) was subjectively evaluated in all preoperative patients.

RESULTS

For flap reconstruction, 11 patients were preoperatively examined with CDUS in order to locate the largest perforators prior to perforator flap reconstruction. Flaps studied included the deep inferior epigastric perforator, anterolateral thigh, tensor fascia lata, thoracodorsal artery perforator, superior gluteal artery perforator, and the gracilis musculocutaneous. Color Doppler ultrasound findings were confirmed intraoperatively for all cases (100%). In 2 (18.2%) of 11 cases, CDUS identified perforators not detected by computed tomography angiography. Twenty-five patients undergoing either abdominoplasty or deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction had successful intraoperative visualization of the abdominal wall muscular layers, thus allowing administration of transversus abdominis plane blocks by the operating surgeon. Twenty patients undergoing body contouring surgery had preoperative visualization of the SFS. The SFS was found to be varied not only among different patients but also within individual patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The newest, miniaturized CDUS technology has a variety of applications that may improve patient outcomes and experience in plastic surgery. Our observations require further investigation to quantify the perceived benefits of this new technology.

A Simplified Cost-Utility Analysis of Inpatient Flap Monitoring after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction and Implications for Hospital Length of Stay

BACKGROUND

The number of free flap take-backs and successful salvages following microsurgical breast reconstruction decreases as time from surgery increases. As a result, the cost of extended inpatient monitoring to achieve a successful flap salvage rises rapidly with each postoperative day. This study introduces a simplified cost-utility model of inpatient flap monitoring and identifies when cost-utility exceeds the thresholds established for other medical treatments.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed of patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction to identify flap take-back and salvage rates by postoperative day. The number of patients and flaps that needed to be kept on an inpatient basis each day for monitoring to salvage a single failing flap was determined. Quality-of-life measures and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for inpatient flap monitoring following microsurgical breast reconstruction were calculated and plotted against a $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year threshold.

RESULTS

A total of 1813 patients (2847 flaps) were included. Overall flap take-back and salvage rates were 2.4 percent and 52.3 percent, respectively. Of the flaps taken back, the daily take-back and salvage rates were 56.8 and 60.0 percent (postoperative day 0 to 1), 13.6 and 83.3 percent (postoperative day 2), 11.4 and 40.0 percent (postoperative day 3), 9.1 and 25.0 percent (postoperative day 4), and 9.1 and 0.0 percent (>postoperative day 4), respectively. To salvage a single failing flap each day, the number of flaps that needed to be monitored were 121 (postoperative day 0 to 1), 363 (postoperative day 2), 907 (postoperative day 3), 1813 (postoperative day 4), and innumerable for days beyond postoperative day 4. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of inpatient flap monitoring begins to exceed a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year by postoperative day 2.

CONCLUSION

The health care cost associated with inpatient flap monitoring following microsurgical breast reconstruction begins to rise rapidly after postoperative day 2.

Safe anesthesia for office-based plastic surgery: Proceedings from the PRS Korea 2018 meeting in Seoul, Korea

There has been an exponential increase in plastic surgery cases over the last 20 years, surging from 2.8 million to 17.5 million cases per year. Seventy-two percent of these cases are being performed in the office-based or ambulatory setting. There are certain advantages to performing aesthetic procedures in the office, but several widely publicized fatalities and malpractice claims has put the spotlight on patient safety and the lack of uniform regulation of office-based practices. While 33 states currently have legislation for office-based surgery and anesthesia, 17 states have no mandate to report patient deaths or adverse outcomes. The literature on office-base surgery and anesthesia has demonstrated significant improvements in patient safety over the last 20 years. In the following review of the proceedings from the PRS Korea 2018 meeting, we discuss several key concepts regarding safe anesthesia for officebased cosmetic surgery. These include the safe delivery of oxygen, appropriate local anesthetic usage and the avoidance of local anesthetic toxicity, the implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery protocols, multimodal analgesic techniques with less reliance on narcotic pain medications, the use of surgical safety checklists, and incorporating “the patient” into the surgical decision-making process through decision aids.

Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: Analysis of Pain, Narcotic Consumption, Length of Stay, and Cost

BACKGROUND

Transversus abdominis plane blocks are increasingly being used in microvascular breast reconstruction. The implications of these blocks on specific reconstructive, patient, and institutional outcomes remain to be fully elucidated.

METHODS

Patients undergoing abdominally based microvascular breast reconstruction from 2015 to 2017 were reviewed. Length of stay, complications, narcotic consumption, donor-site pain, and hospital expenses were compared between patients who did and did not receive transversus abdominis plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine. Outcomes were subsequently compared in patients with elevated body mass index.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (43.9 percent) received blocks [27 (54.0 percent) under ultrasound guidance] and 64 patients (56.1 percent) did not. Patients with the blocks had significantly decreased oral and total narcotic consumption (p = 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) and significantly less donor-site pain (3.3 versus 4.3; p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in hospital expenses between the two cohorts ($21,531.53 versus $22,050.15 per patient; p = 0.5659). Patients with a body mass index of 25 kg/m(2) or greater who received a block had a significantly decreased length of stay (3.8 days versus 4.4 days; p = 0.0345) and decreased narcotic consumption and postoperative pain compared with patients without blocks. Patients with a body mass index less than 25 kg/m(2) did not have a significant difference in postoperative pain, narcotic consumption, or length of stay between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Transversus abdominis plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine significantly reduce oral and total postoperative narcotic consumption and donor-site pain in all patients after abdominally based microvascular breast reconstruction without increasing hospital expenses. The blocks also significantly decrease length of stay in patients with a body mass index greater than or equal to 25 kg/m(2).

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

The Timing of Chemoprophylaxis in Autologous Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction are at high risk of perioperative venous thromboembolic events. The efficacy of chemoprophylaxis in decreasing venous thromboembolic events is well established, but the timing of chemoprophylaxis remains controversial. The authors compare the incidence of bleeding following preoperative versus postoperative initiation of chemoprophylaxis in microvascular breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed from August of 2010 to July of 2016. Initiation of chemoprophylaxis changed from postoperative to preoperative in 2013, dividing subjects into two groups. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and complications were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 196 patients (311 flaps) were included in the study. A total of 105 patients (166 flaps) received preoperative enoxaparin (40 mg) and 91 patients (145 flaps) received postoperative chemoprophylaxis. A total of five patients required hematoma evacuation (2.6 percent). Of these, one hematoma (1 percent) occurred in the preoperative chemoprophylaxis group. Seven patients received blood transfusions: three in the preoperative group and four in the postoperative group (2.9 percent versus 4.4 percent; p = 0.419). There was a total of one flap failure, and there were no documented venous thromboembolic events in any of the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that preoperative chemoprophylaxis can be used safely in patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction. The higher rate of bleeding in the postoperative group may be related to the onset of action of enoxaparin of 4 to 6 hours, which allows for intraoperative hemostasis in the preoperative group and possibly potentiating postoperative oozing when administered postoperatively.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

The Expanding Role of Diagnostic Ultrasound in Plastic Surgery

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

Ultrasound in plastic surgery is quickly finding new applications. Ultrasound surveillance may replace ineffective individual risk stratification and chemoprophylaxis for deep venous thromboses. Abdominal penetration can be a catastrophic complication of liposuction. Preoperative screening for fascial defects may reduce risk. Limiting buttock fat injections to the subcutaneous plane is critical for patient safety, but it is difficult to know one’s injection plane.

Methods:

The author’s use of diagnostic ultrasound was evaluated from May 2017 to May 2018. Ultrasound scans were used routinely to detect deep venous thromboses. Patients undergoing abdominal liposuction and/or abdominoplasty were scanned for possible hernias. Other common applications included the evaluation of breast implants, breast masses, and seroma management. The device was used in surgery in 3 patients to assess the plane of buttock fat injection.

Results:

One thousand ultrasound scans were performed during the 1-year study period. A distal deep venous thrombosis was detected in 2 patients. In both cases, the thrombosis resolved within 1 month, confirmed by follow-up ultrasound scans. A lateral (tangential) fat injection method was shown to safely deposit fat above the gluteus maximus fascia.

Conclusions:

Ultrasound scans are highly accurate, noninvasive, and well-tolerated by patients. Some of these applications are likely to improve patient safety. Early detection of deep venous thromboses is possible. Unnecessary anticoagulation may be avoided. Subclinical abdominal defects may be detected. Ultrasound may be used in the office to evaluate breast implants, masses, and seromas. In surgery, this device confirms the level of buttock fat injection.

Paravertebral blocks and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in breast reconstructive surgery: patient selection and perspectives

The management of postoperative pain is of critical importance for women undergoing breast reconstruction after surgical treatment for breast cancer. Mitigating postoperative pain can improve health-related quality of life, reduce health care resource utilization and costs, and minimize perioperative opiate use. Multimodal analgesia pain management strategies with nonopioid analgesics have improved the value of surgical care in patients undergoing various operations but have only recently been reported in reconstructive breast surgery. Regional anesthesia techniques, with paravertebral blocks (PVBs) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been increasingly utilized in opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia protocols for women undergoing breast reconstruction. The objectives of this review are to 1) comprehensively review regional anesthesia techniques in breast reconstruction, 2) outline important components of ERAS protocols in breast reconstruction, and 3) provide evidence-based recommendations regarding each intervention included in these protocols. The authors searched across six databases to identify relevant articles. For each perioperative intervention included in the ERAS protocols, the literature was exhaustively reviewed and evidence-based recommendations were generated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system methodology. This study provides a comprehensive evidence-based review of interventions to optimize perioperative care and postoperative pain control in breast reconstruction. Incorporating evidence-based interventions into future ERAS protocols is essential to ensure high value care in breast reconstruction.

Examining Length of Hospital Stay after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation in a Case-Control Study

Background:

While possessing numerous benefits, microsurgical breast reconstruction is associated with longer operative times and post-operative hospital length of stay compared to implant-based reconstruction. We therefore evaluate factors associated with increased length of stay (LOS) after microsurgical breast reconstruction with a case-control study design.

Methods:

All patients undergoing immediate or delayed abdominally-based microsurgical breast reconstruction over a two-year time period were identified. Risk factors associated with LOS greater than or equal to 5 days were identified.

Results:

A total of 116 patients undergoing immediate or delayed abdominally-based microsurgical breast reconstruction were identified. Of these, 86 (74.1%) had a LOS of 4 days or less (mean: 3.70 days) while 30 (25.9%) had a LOS of 5 days or greater (mean: 5.50 days).

With regards to patient demographics and intra-operative factors, patients with a LOS of 5 days or greater were significantly more likely to have diabetes mellitus (p < 0.0001), undergo bilateral reconstruction (p = 0.0003) and total mastectomy (p < 0.0001), and have a longer operative time (p < 0.0001) while significantly less likely to undergo post-operative radiation (p = 0.0421). Notably, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of follow-up time, or time since breast reconstruction (p = 0.0600).

With regards to reconstructive complications, patients with LOS of 5 days of greater were significantly more likely to experience abdominal donor site abscess (p < 0.0001), breast hematoma (p = 0.0186), and return to the operating room for flap compromise (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions:

Multiple patient-specific, intra-operative, and post-operative outcomes factors are associated with increased length of stay with immediate and delayed microsurgical breast reconstruction.