A Treatment Algorithm for Patients Presenting with Sagittal Craniosynostosis after the Age of 1 Year

Pediatric Cranial Vault Pathology

A wide variety of diagnoses can be approached with a common framework for diagnosis, extirpation, and reconstruction of pediatric cranial vault pathologies. Durability of reconstruction is critical for the range of pediatric patients from infancy to adolescence. Rigid reconstruction, preferably with autologous tissue when possible, promotes brain protection and satisfactory aesthetic outcome. Careful planning can allow for immediate definitive reconstruction of defects without need for further surgical intervention.

Late-Presenting Sagittal Craniosynostosis: An Update to a Standardized Treatment Protocol

BACKGROUND

The authors previously published their protocol to treat patients who present with sagittal craniosynostosis after the age of 1 year. The purpose of this article is to present a follow-up and update of this cohort to evaluate outcomes of their treatment protocol.

METHODS

Patients with isolated sagittal craniosynostosis who presented after the age of 1 year between July of 2013 and April of 2021 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age at presentation was 5.2 ± 3.4 years, and 79 patients (73.1%) were male. The indications for imaging were head shape (54.6%), headache (14.8%), trauma (9.3%), seizure (4.6%), papilledema (2.8%), and other (13.9%). Of the 108 patients, 12 (11.1%) underwent surgery following their initial consultation: five for papilledema, four for elevated intracranial pressure, two for severely scaphocephalic head shapes, and one for abnormal funduscopic findings. Two of these patients underwent additional reconstructive surgery, one for the recurrence of papilledema and headache and the other for progressive scaphocephaly. The average length of time between operations was 4.9 years. Of the 96 patients who were managed conservatively, four (4.2%) underwent surgery at an average of 1.2 ± 0.5 years later (average age, 4.4 ± 1.5 years) for brain growth restriction ( n = 2), aesthetic concerns ( n = 1), and refractory headaches ( n = 1). The average follow-up of all patients with craniofacial surgery was 2.7 ± 2.3 years (median, 2.1 years; interquartile range, 3.7 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with late-presenting sagittal craniosynostosis require surgical correction less often than younger patients, likely because of milder phenotype. Few patients in the conservative treatment arm ultimately required surgery (4%).

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

A multi-institutional survey on calvarial vault remodeling techniques for sagittal synostosis and outcomes analysis for patients treated at 12 months and older

OBJECTIVE

Surgical treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis is challenging in older patients. This study aimed to assess the effect of increasing age on open surgical technique selection and patient outcomes using the multi-institutional Synostosis Research Group (SynRG) collaboration.

METHODS

Surgeons in SynRG were surveyed for key influences on their preferred open calvarial vault remodeling techniques at various patient ages: < 6, 6-12, and > 12 months. The SynRG database was then queried for open repairs of nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis performed for patients older than 12 months of age. Perioperative measures, complications, and preoperative and postoperative cephalic indices were reviewed.

RESULTS

All surgeons preferred to treat patients at an earlier age, and most (89%) believed that less-optimal outcomes were achieved at ages older than 12 months. The modified pi procedure was the dominant technique in those younger than 12 months, while more involved open surgical techniques were performed for older patients, with a wide variety of open calvarial vault remodeling techniques used. Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria, with a mean (± SD) age at surgery of 29 ± 16 months. Eleven patients underwent parietal reshaping, 10 parietal-occipital switch, 9 clamshell craniotomy, 7 geometric parietal expansion, 6 modified pi procedure, and 1 parietal distraction. There were no readmissions, complications, or mortality within 30 days postoperatively. Patients' cephalic indices improved a mean of 6.4% ± 4.0%, with a mean postoperative cephalic index of 74.2% ± 4.9%. Differences in postoperative cephalic index (p < 0.04) and hospital length of stay (p = 0.01) were significant between technique cohorts. Post hoc Tukey-Kramer analysis identified the parietal reshaping technique as being significantly associated with a reduced hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient age is an important driver in technique selection, with surgeons selecting a more involved calvarial vault remodeling technique in older children. A variety of surgical techniques were analyzed, with the parietal reshaping technique being significantly associated with reduced length of stay; however, multiple perioperative factors may be contributory and require further analysis. When performed at high-volume centers by experienced pediatric neurosurgeons and craniofacial surgeons, open calvarial vault techniques can be a safe method for treating sagittal craniosynostosis in older children.

Normocephalic sagittal craniosynostosis in young children is common and unrecognized

OBJECTIVE

Sagittal craniosynostosis (SC) is usually diagnosed during early childhood by the presence of scaphocephaly. Recently, our group found 3.3% of children under 5 years of age with normocephalic sagittal craniosynostosis (NSC) using computed tomography (CT) scans. This paper aims to validate our preliminary findings using a larger cohort of patients, and analyze factors associated with incidental NSC.

METHODS

A retrospective review of head CT scans in patients aged 0 to 71 months who presented to the emergency department of our tertiary care institution between 2008 and 2020 was completed. Patients with syndromes associated with craniosynostosis (CS), history of hydrocephalus, or other brain/cranial abnormalities were excluded. Two craniofacial surgeons reviewed the CT scans to evaluate the presence and extent of CS. Demographic information, gestational age, past medical and family history, medications, and chief complaint were recorded as covariates, and differences between patients with and without CS were analyzed. Furthermore, comparison of the prevalence of CS across age groups was studied. Additional analysis exploring association between independent covariates and the presence of CS was performed in two sub-cohorts: patients ≤ 24 months of age and patients > 24 months of age.

RESULTS

A total of 870 scans were reviewed. SC was observed in 41 patients (4.71% - 25 complete, 16 incomplete), all with a normal cranial index (width/length > 0.7). The prevalence of SC increased up to 36 months of age, then plateaued through 72 months of age. Patients under 2 years of age with family history of neurodevelopmental disease had 49.32 (95% CI [4.28, 567.2]) times higher odds of developing CS. Sub-cohort of patients above 24 months of age showed no variable independently predicted developing CS.

CONCLUSION

NSC in young children is common. While the impact of this condition is unknown, the correlation with family history of neurodevelopmental disease is concerning.

Morphologic Differences in Sagittal Synostosis with Age before Surgery

BACKGROUND

It is important to determine whether sagittal synostosis-associated scaphocephaly is static in the presurgical period, or whether there are morphologic differences with time to include in surgical decision-making. The authors' purpose was to perform cross-sectional analysis of cranial morphology before any surgical intervention in children with sagittal synostosis younger than 9 months compared to matched controls.

METHODS

The authors performed morphometric analysis on computed tomographic scans from 111 untreated isolated sagittal synostosis patients younger than 9 months and 37 age-matched normal controls. The authors divided the patients into three age groups and performed statistical comparison between sagittal synostosis and controls for each group.

RESULTS

Sagittal synostosis cephalic indices were stable and lower in patients than in controls across groups. Total cranial volume was equivalent, but sagittal synostosis patients had a greater posterior volume than controls at all ages and a smaller middle fossa volume at older ages. Pterional width was greater in sagittal synostosis patients than in controls for each age group. Frontal bossing vectors were most severe in the youngest age groups and least in the older group. Occipital protuberance was consistent across the age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Upper parietal narrowing and occipital protuberance were the consistent deformities across age groups, with the most parietal constriction seen in older patients. Frontal bossing was not consistent and was more severe in the younger patients. The authors did not detect significant pterional constriction, and the appearance of constriction is relative to adjacent morphology and not absolute.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

The Clinical Significance of Clinocephaly in Late-Presentation Sagittal Craniosynostosis

The diagnosis of late-presentation sagittal suture craniosynostosis (SCS) can be challenging, especially in the setting of subtle physical exam findings. The clinical significance of clinocephaly-a retro-coronal concavity along the midvault-in this context remains unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictive value of clinocephaly in identifying late-presentation SCS.

A retrospective chart review of all patients >1 year old presenting to the craniofacial clinic with a concern for SCS was performed. The presence or absence of SCS in the setting of clinocephaly was recorded following diagnostic imaging. Student's t test, Chi Square test, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to determine predictors for SCS.

75 patients met inclusion criteria. 32 patients (42.7%, 6% female) were diagnosed with SCS. No difference in age between patients with and without SCS was detected. Stratification of patients by age (1-2, 2-4, and >4 years) revealed a higher rate of SCS in younger patients (P = 0.04). The cephalic index (C.I.) of those with sagittal synostosis was significantly smaller but within the normal range, indicating a more scaphocephalic shape (P = 0.003). Logistic regression analysis revealed that C.I. was a strong predictor for SCS (P = 0.003). Of those with SCS, a mix of complete and partial fusion of the sagittal suture was appreciated.

This study found that 42.7% of patients with clinocephaly had SCS. C.I. was the only predictor for SCS and unique suture fusion patterns were identified in those with SCS. This study suggests that clinocephaly should be considered a core component of the exam and work-up for SCS. Future studies aimed at evaluating the positive predictive value of this exam finding and identifying risk factors associated with late-presentation SCS are underway.

Premature Fusion of the Sagittal Suture as an Incidental Radiographic Finding in Young Children

BACKGROUND

Craniosynostosis typically develops prenatally and creates characteristic changes in craniofacial form. Nevertheless, postnatal forms of craniosynostosis have been described. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of incidentally identified, but temporally premature, cranial suture fusion in normocephalic children.

METHODS

Computed tomographic scans obtained from children aged 1 to 5 years evaluated in the authors' emergency department between 2005 and 2016 were reviewed for evidence of craniosynostosis. Patients with prior ventriculoperitoneal shunt, brain or cranial abnormality, or known syndromes were excluded. The presence of craniosynostosis and cranial index was assessed by a panel of three craniofacial surgeons and one pediatric neurosurgeon. Demographic information, fusion type, reason for the computed tomographic scan, and medical history were recorded as covariates. Cranial shape and intracranial volume were calculated using previously validated automated system.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 2.4 ± 1.3 years. Eleven patients (3.3 percent) were found to have a complete (n = 9) or partial (n = 2) fusion of the sagittal suture. All patients had a normal cranial index (0.80; range, 0.72 to 0.87) and a grossly normal head shape. Only two fusions (18.2 percent) were documented by the radiologist. Cranial shape analysis performed in five of the 11 patients showed subtle phenotypic changes along the scaphocephaly spectrum in four patients, with a normal shape in the remaining case.

CONCLUSIONS

Sagittal fusion is present in 3.3 percent of otherwise phenotypically normal children aged 1 to 5 years. The clinical significance of this result is unclear, but routine screening of affected patients is paramount.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, IV.

Spring-Assisted Surgery for Treatment of Sagittal Craniosynostosis

ABSTRACT

Craniosynostosis (CSS), the premature fusion of calvarial sutures, most commonly involves the sagittal suture. Cranial vault remodeling (CVR) is a traditional method of CSS correction. Minimally invasive methods are becoming widely accepted, including spring-assisted surgery (SAS). The equipment required for SAS is minimal therefore adaptable to resource challenged health systems. This paper outlines the experience of SAS in Moldova.A retrospective study was performed for patients treated with SAS for sagittal CSS from 2011 to 2018 in Moldova. Perioperative data were recorded including age, length of surgery, blood loss, volume transfused and length of stay. Four patients had pre- and post-operative computed tomography (CT) scans which were used to calculate changes in cephalic index, normative cephalic index, and intracranial volume.Thirteen patients underwent SAS. Diagnoses were made clinically and confirmed with CT. Mean age at surgery was 4.0 months, and length of surgery 62.7 minutes. All but one patient received a blood transfusion, as is standard of practice in Moldova. The mean length of post-operative recovery in ICU was 30.9 hours. No complications required surgical revision. Springs were removed after 4 to 5 months. All patients had a subjective improvement in scaphocephaly. Based on the available CT scans, an increase in cephalic index (7.3%), normative cephalic index (11.8%), and intracranial volume (38.1%) was observed. One patient underwent SAS at 11 months and required cranioplasty for asymmetry at the time of spring removal.SAS is a safe and cost-effective method of CSS correction that can be utilized in countries with limited health system resources.

Occult Scaphocephaly: A Forme Fruste Phenotype of Sagittal Craniosynostosis

INTRODUCTION

Latent cranial suture fusions may present with mild or absent phenotypic changes that make the clinical diagnosis challenging. Recent reports describe patients with sagittal synostosis and a normal cranial index (CI), a condition termed normocephalic sagittal craniosynostosis (NSC). The goal of this study is to evaluate the shape and intracranial volume (ICV) in a cohort of NSC patients using quantitative cranial shape analysis (CSA).

METHODS

We identified 19 patients (7.5 ± 2.28 years) between 2011 and 2016, who presented to our hospital with NSC. Cranial index and CSA were measured from the computed tomography image. Cranial shape analysis calculates the distances between the patient's cranial shape and its closest normal shape. Intracranial volume was measured and compared to an established age-matched normative database.

RESULTS

Cranial index revealed 15 (78.9%) patients within the mesocephalic range and 4 patients (21.1%) in the brachycephalic range. Detailed CSA identified 15 (78.9%) patients with subtle phenotypic changes along the scaphocephalic spectrum (ie, subtle anterior and posterior elongation with inter-parietal narrowing) and 1 patient (5.3%) with isolated overdevelopment on the posterior part of the right parietal bone. Three patients (15.8%) had a CSA close to normal. Mean ICV was 1410.5 ± 192.77cc; most patients (78.9%) fell within ±2 standard deviations.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative CSA revealed that most of the patients with NSC had cranial shape abnormalities, consistent with a forme fruste scaphocephaly that could not be otherwise recognized by clinical observation or CI. Given these findings, we propose the term occult scaphocephaly to describe this condition. The associated incidence of intracranial hypertension is unknown.

The role of ICP overnight monitoring (ONM) in children with suspected craniostenosis

PURPOSE

Secondary craniostenosis is a relevant problem pediatric neurosurgeons are confronted with and poses challenges regarding reliable diagnosis of raised ICP, especially in case of absent or questionable papilledema. How to identify children with elevated ICP is still controversial and diagnostics vary. We report on our experience with computerized ICP ONM in relation to imaging derived parameters.

METHODS

Thirty-four children with primary or secondary craniostenosis and clinical suspicion of raised ICP were investigated. We compared clinical signs, history, and radiographic assessment with the results of computerized ICP ONM. Differences were significant at a p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Baseline ICP was significantly higher in patients with combined suture synostosis, who also had a higher rate of questionable papilledema. Children with narrowed external CSF spaces in MRI had significantly higher ICP levels during REM sleep. Mean RAP was significantly elevated in patients with multi-suture synostosis, indicating poor intracranial compensatory reserve. Syndromal craniostenosis was associated with elevated ICP, RAP was significantly lower, and skull X-rays showed more impressions (copper beaten skull). RAP increased with more severe impressions only to decline in most severe abnormalities, indicating exhaustion of cerebrovascular reserve at an upper ICP breakpoint of 23.9 mmHg. Headaches correlated to lower ICP and were not associated with more severe X-ray abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

Narrowed external CSF spaces in MRI seem to be associated to elevated ICP. Skull X-rays can help to identify patients at risk for chronically elevated ICP. Severe X-ray changes correlate with exhausted cerebrovascular reserve as indicated by RAP decline. Only ICP monitoring clearly identifies raised ICP and low brain compliance. Thus, in cases with ambiguous imaging, ONM constitutes an effective tool to acquire objective data for identification of surgical candidates.

Anterior Unilateral Plagiocephaly in Patient with Alagille Syndrome: Case Report

BACKGROUND

The polymalformative syndromes and craniofacial anomalies association is a well-known phenomenon in patients with Crouzon, Pfeiffer, Apert, or Muenke disease. Recently, other less frequent pathologies, such as Alagille syndrome, have shown an association with alterations in the development of cranial sutures, resulting in serious cosmetic defects and neurologic disorders.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We report an exceptional case of a 30-month-old girl, a nephroblastoma survivor diagnosed with Alagille syndrome, who was referred to our department with progressive anterior plagiocephaly and premature left coronal suture closure associated with a large compensating right bossing. Despite the patient's age, we offered aggressive surgical treatment performing a new forehead harvested from the skull vertex with orbital rim reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Alagille syndrome is a complex multisystem pathology with a poor craniosynostosis association and only 3 cases have been described in the literature.