A Comparative Study of the Aesthetic Outcome of Two Techniques for Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip Repair:

Commissuroplasty for macrostomia: surgical technique and long-term aesthetic and functional results assessment

BACKGROUND

Macrostomia or lateral cleft lip is a rare congenital deformity. In this article we describe a surgical technique of macrostomia repair developed. The objective of this article is to assess the results of our surgical technique and to validate a method for macrostomia surgical result evaluation.

METHODS

We included retrospectively patients with unilateral and bilateral macrostomia, operated from 1995 to 2014 in our department. First part of the study was a satisfaction questionnaire completed by patients. The second part was subjective evaluation of frontal photography (closed mouth, wide open and smiling) by surgeons and lay people with a questionnaire. Both group completed a second questionnaire within one to six months.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients answered the questionnaire. The satisfaction for all patients were considered as very good for 38.9% (n = 7) of patients and good for 44.4% (n = 8). 21 patients were photographed, 5 isolated macrostomia, 13 macrostomia with minor facial asymmetry and 3 with a major asymmetry. Surgeons evaluated the result as very good for isolated macrostomia and good for syndromic macrostomia. Layperson evaluated the result as good in isolated macrostomia and macrostomia with minor facial asymmetry and average with major facial asymmetry. P < 0.0001. The evolution of the results between medical and non-medical assessors in our two questionnaires, were non-significant.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we propose a new methodology to assess commissuroplasty surgical results, with a 3 type of evaluator: patients, surgeons and laypeople. We present a simple surgical technique, that allows good results in syndromic and isolated macrostomia.

Revisiting straight-line repair in unilateral complete cleft lip: a comparison with rotation-advancement repair

Rotation-advancement repair (RAR) has been the most widely used technique for unilateral cleft lip repair. We recently used a straight-line repair with medial orbicularis muscle lengthening (SLR-ml) technique, based on the hypothesis that it could minimize the postoperative scar appearance without causing s short-lip deformity when muscle reorientation is performed correctly. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on unilateral complete cleft lip patients who underwent cheiloplasty between 2009 and 2017. Two cheiloplasty techniques were compared: RAR and SLR-ml. Outcomes were evaluated by assessing follow-up photographs using three methods: (1) glance impression on a five-point scale, (2) Manchester Scar Scale, and (3) indirect anthropometry. Seventy-one patients were analysed: 41 in the RAR group (28 male, 13 female) and 30 in the SLR-ml group (15 male, 15 female). The glance impression (P=0.506) and Manchester Scar Scale (P=0.347) scores did not differ between the groups. According to the symmetry ratio (cleft side value/non-cleft side value), vertical lip height (P=0.804), horizontal lip length (P=0.881), and Cupid's bow width (P=0.122) did not differ significantly between the groups. The preoperative lip height discrepancy was not correlated with the postoperative vertical lip height. The SLR-ml method can be regarded as a successful tool for symmetric repair of unilateral cleft lip.