A Review of Validated Quality-of-Life Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Pediatric Plastic Surgery:

Patient experience or patient satisfaction? A systematic review of child- and family-reported experience measures in pediatric surgery

PURPOSE

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are increasingly recognized as important health care quality indicators. PREMs measure patients' perception of the care they have received, differing from satisfaction ratings, which measure their expectations. The use of PREMs in pediatric surgery is limited, prompting this systematic review to assess their characteristics and identify areas for improvement.

METHODS

A search was conducted in eight databases from inception until January 12, 2022, to identify PREMs used with pediatric surgical patients, with no language restrictions. We focused on studies of patient experience but also included studies that assessed satisfaction and sampled experience domains. The quality of the included studies was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

Following title and abstract screening of 2633 studies, 51 were included for full-text review, of which 22 were subsequently excluded because they measured only patient satisfaction rather than experience, and 14 were excluded for a range of other reasons. Out of the 15 included studies, questionnaires used in 12 studies were proxy-reported by parents and in 3 by both parents and children; none focused only on the child. Most instruments were developed in-house for each specific study, without patients' involvement in the process, and were not validated.

CONCLUSIONS

Although PROMs are increasingly used in pediatric surgery, PREMs are not yet in use, being typically substituted by satisfaction surveys. Significant efforts are needed to develop and implement PREMs in pediatric surgical care, in order to effectively capture children's and families' voices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric surgery - A systematic review

PURPOSE

With improved long-term survival rates, measuring the quality of surgical care has gradually shifted from clinical morbidity and mortality to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Since the use of PROMs in pediatric surgery is still limited, we undertook a study to identify current PROMs, assess their characteristics, and identify gaps and areas for improvement.

METHODS

A search was conducted in eight databases from their inception until May 2021 to identify PROMs that have been used in pediatric surgical patients. PRISMA standards were followed, and screening was completed by two independent reviewers. The quality of the included studies was appraised using the AXIS and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

Of 8282 studies screened, 101 articles met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies (99%) were cross-sectional. We identified 85 different PROMs among the studies, 53 being disease-specific and the rest generic. The PedsQL™ was the most frequently used tool (42 studies). Almost half of the instruments (41 studies) were not validated, and 28% were developed ad hoc for each specific study. Significantly, all PROMs encountered were standardized (consisting of pre-determined domains), with no individualized tools currently in use. The overall quality of the included studies was good.

CONCLUSIONS

PROMs are increasingly used in pediatric surgery. Disease-specific PROMs predominate the field, yet validated and especially individualized PROMs are notably absent. Future efforts are needed to develop robust tools that reflect individual patient and family needs, preferences, and values, with the aim of furthering family-centered pediatric surgical care.

Core Outcome Set for Reporting Outcomes of Interventions for Velopharyngeal Dysfunction: Final Results of the COS-VPD Initiative

OBJECTIVE

To date, the recording of outcomes of interventions for velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) has not been standardized. This makes a comparison of results between studies challenging. The aim of this study was to develop a core outcome set (COS) for reporting outcomes in studies examining the management of VPD.

DESIGN

A two-round Delphi consensus process was used to develop the COS.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS

The expert Delphi panel comprised patients and caregivers of patients with VPD, surgeons and speech and language therapists specializing in cleft palate, and researchers with expertise in VPD.

INTERVENTIONS

A long list of outcomes was derived from the published literature. In each round of a Delphi survey, participants were asked to score outcomes using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations scale of 1 to 9, with 1 to 3 labeled "not important," 4 to 6 labeled "important but not critical," and 7 to 9 labeled "critical."

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Consensus criteria were specified a priori. Outcomes with a rating of 75% or more of the panel rating 7 to 9 and 25% or fewer rating 1 to 3 were included in the COS.

RESULTS

A total of 31 core outcomes were identified from the Delphi process. This list was condensed to combine topic areas to produce a final COS of 10 outcomes, including both processes of care and patient-reported outcomes that should be considered for reporting in future studies of VPD.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the COS-VPD will facilitate consistency of outcomes data collection and comparison of results across studies.

Integrative review and evaluation of quality of life related instruments in pediatric urology

INTRODUCTION

While most paediatric urologists consider patients' quality of life (QOL) important, few actually measure this outcome. Our goal was to assess instruments used in the pediatric urology QOL literature, specifically looking at whether they captured QOL.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles with a self-described primary outcome of measuring QOL. All validated QOL instruments in the papers were analyzed by QOL instrument content experts. Instruments were classified as focusing on: Functioning or QOL (Table). The term Functioning focuses on performing activities. QOL captures person's perceptions about their position in life, informed by circumstances, functioning and conditions. QOL instruments were further subdivided into generic QOL, health-related QOL (HRQOL) and disease-specific HRQOL. Only direct patient self-reported QOL instruments were then assessed, since they are the most clinically useful, reliably assessing patients' own perception of their QOL.

RESULTS

Forty-three publications met inclusion criteria (published 1999-2019). Most common conditions included urinary incontinence (16, 37.2%) and kidney transplantation (12, 27.9%). Overall, 22 unique instruments purporting to measure QOL were identified. Looking at the concepts measured by each instrument, nine instruments (40.9%) assessed Functioning. Nine instruments (40.9%) measured a combination of Functioning and QOL. Only the remaining 4 instruments (18.2%) assessed strictly QOL. The 13 instruments assessing any QOL focused on generic QOL (n = 4), HRQOL (n = 3) and disease-specific HRQOL (n = 6). Of the subset of four instruments assessing strictly QOL, and not Functioning, all had patient self-reported versions available: two generic QOL instruments (KINDL, KIDSCREEN), one generic HRQOL (DISABKIDS), and one disease-specific HRQOL (QUALAS). Thirteen of 43 studies (30.2%) employed more than one instrument. Thirty-eight studies (88.4%) used an instrument measuring Functioning, with 19 (44.1%) measuring only Functioning, not QOL at all. Twenty-four studies (55.8%) used an instrument measuring actual QOL, although 17 (39.5%) used a combined Functioning/QOL instrument. Only nine (20.9%) used a strictly QOL instrument (strictly HRQOL instruments: 4.7%).

DISCUSSION

We present encouraging evidence of sustained interest in QOL research in pediatric urology and identify areas needing improvement. Selecting appropriate QOL tools requires a working knowledge of their various underlying meanings and purposes. Whether it adequately assess QOL must be considered. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of instruments and a practical approach to QOL instrument selection.

CONCLUSION

Much of pediatric urology is grounded in improving QOL. Unfortunately, most studies published to date focus on Functioning, rather than young people's perception-based QOL. Future QOL studies should ideally employ validated instruments capturing patient-reported QOL.

A nomogram based on a patient-reported outcomes measure: predicting the risk of readmission for patients with chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life, as evaluated by a patient-reported outcomes measure (PROM), is an important prognostic marker in patients with chronic heart failure. This study aimed to use PROM to establish an effective readmission nomogram for chronic heart failure.

METHODS

Using a PROM as a measurement tool, we conducted a readmission nomogram for chronic heart failure on a prospective observational study comprising of 454 patients with chronic heart failure hospitalized between May 2017 to January 2020. A Concordance index and calibration curve were used to evaluate the discriminative ability and predictive accuracy of the nomogram. A bootstrap resampling method was used for internal validation of results.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period in the study was 372 days. After a final COX regression analysis, the gender, income, health care, appetite-sleep, anxiety, depression, paranoia, support, and independence were identified and included in the nomogram. The nomogram showed moderate discrimination, with a concordance index of 0.737 (95% CI 0.673-0.800). The calibration curves for the probability of readmission for patients with chronic heart failure showed high consistency between the probability, as predicted, and the actual probability.

CONCLUSIONS

This model offers a platform to assess the risk of readmission for different populations with CHF and can assist clinicians with personalized treatment recommendations.