Mechanical Loading Improves Engineered Tendon Formation with Muscle-Derived Cells: An In Vivo Analysis

Loaded open-kinetic-chain exercises stretch the anterior cruciate ligament more than closed-kinetic-chain exercises: In-vivo assessment of anterior cruciate ligament length change

BACKGROUND

Usage of open-kinetic-chain (OKC) or closed-kinetic-chain (CKC) exercises during rehabilitation planning after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been debated for decades. However, the ACL elongation pattern during different rehabilitation exercises at different loadings remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the effects of OKC and CKC exercises on the length of ACL anteromedial bundle (AMB) and posterolateral bundle (PLB) to provide biomechanical support for making rehabilitation schedules.

DESIGN

Laboratory Descriptive Study.

METHOD

Eighteen healthy volunteers were asked to perform two OKC motions, including non-weight-bearing and 10 kg loaded seated knee extension (OKC-0, OKC-10), as well as two CKC motions, including box squat (BS) and deep single-legged lunge (Lunge). Techniques of 2D-to-3D image registration and 3D ligament simulation were used to quantify length changes of ACL.

RESULTS

The motion which led to the least and most ACL elongation were OKC-0 and OKC-10, respectively. The AMB and PLB were significantly longer in OKC-10 than those in OKC-0 during 0-60° and 0-55° of knee flexion (p < 0.01). Compared with reference length, the AMB and PLB were stretched during 0-30° and 0-10° respectively during OKC-10. During CKC exercises, the AMB and PLB were also stretched from 0 to 25°and 0-5°, respectively. Additionally, no significant difference was found in the length change of ACL bundles between BS and lunge.

CONCLUSIONS

OKC-0 may be safe for the rehabilitation program after ACL reconstruction, and loaded exercises shall be applied when restricted with >30° in early-stage rehabilitation.

Synergistic effects of myogenic cells and fibroblasts on the promotion of engineered tendon regeneration with muscle derived cells

AIMS

Tendon development requires the coordinated interaction of muscles and tendons. Muscle-derived cells (MDCs), a mixed cell population containing both myogenic and fibroblastic cell subsets, have been found to be ideal seed cells for tendon regeneration. However, the necessity of these cell types for tendon regeneration has not yet been tested. In this study, we aim to explore the possible synergistic effects of myogenic cells and fibroblasts in engineered tendon regeneration.

METHODS

MDCs were separated into rapidly adhering cell (RAC; fibroblasts) and slowly adhering cell (SAC; myogenic cells) populations. Myogenic- and tenogenic-related molecules were analyzed by immunofluorescent staining, RT-PCR and real-time PCR. The proliferative abilities of MDCs, RACs and SACs were also evaluated. Cell-scaffold constructs were implanted into nude mice, and subsequently evaluated for their histologic, ultrastructure, gene expression, and biomechanical characteristics.

RESULTS

MDCs have better proliferative activity than RAC and SAC population. RACs could express higher levels of tenogenic-related molecules tenomodulin (TNMD) and scleraxis (SCX) than SACs. Whereas SACs only expressed myogenic-related molecules MyoD. In contrast to the tendons engineered using RACs and SACs, the tendons engineered using MDCs exhibited a relatively more mature and well-organized tissue structure and ultrastructure as well as better mechanical properties.

CONCLUSIONS

Fibroblasts in muscle may be the primary cell population involved in tendon regeneration and that myogenic cells are an important component of the niche and control the fibroblast activity during tendon regeneration. The synergistic effects between fibroblasts and myogenic cells significantly contribute to efficient and effective regeneration of engineered tendons.

The Application of Mechanical Stimulations in Tendon Tissue Engineering

Tendon injury is the most common disease in the musculoskeletal system. The current treatment methods have many limitations, such as poor therapeutic effects, functional loss of donor site, and immune rejection. Tendon tissue engineering provides a new treatment strategy for tendon repair and regeneration. In this review, we made a retrospective analysis of applying mechanical stimulation in tendon tissue engineering, and its potential as a direction of development for future clinical treatment strategies. For this purpose, the following topics are discussed; (1) the context of tendon tissue engineering and mechanical stimulation; (2) the applications of various mechanical stimulations in tendon tissue engineering, as well as their inherent mechanisms; (3) the application of magnetic force and the synergy of mechanical and biochemical stimulation. With this, we aim at clarifying some of the main questions that currently exist in the field of tendon tissue engineering and consequently gain new knowledge that may help in the development of future clinical application of tissue engineering in tendon injury.