Early Postoperative Application of Botulinum Toxin Type A Prevents Hypertrophic Scarring after Epicanthoplasty: A Split-Face, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial

Postoperative Scar Management Protocol for Asian Patients

BACKGROUND

Postoperative scar formation remains a morbidity for patients even with the advent of minimally invasive techniques. Furthermore, the significant difference between the Asian and Caucasian skin results in poorer postoperative scar outcomes in Asians, supporting the need for an evidence-based scar management protocol.

METHODS

Following a literature review of the PubMed and the Cochrane databases over the past 10 years, we constructed a novel postoperative scar management protocol for the Asian skin, utilized in a Singaporean tertiary healthcare institution.

RESULTS

We describe a timeline-based scar protocol from the point of skin closure to a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. We support the use of intraoperative botulinum toxin for selected high-risk individuals upon skin closure with a follow-up regimen in the postoperative setting. For recalcitrant keloids, we have described a multimodal therapy comprising elements of intralesional steroids, botulinum toxin, lasers, surgery, and radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

A consolidated postoperative scar management protocol provides the necessary guidance for improved scar outcomes in the Asian skin. There is inherent potential in expanding the protocol to include post-traumatic and burn wounds or support other skin types including the Caucasian skin.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Comprehensive Treatment of a Rare Case of Complete Primary Pachydermoperiostosis with Large Facial Keloid Scars: A Case Report and Literature Review

Introduction

Pachydermoperiostosis (PDP), or primary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy, is a rare autosomal dominant disease with primary clinical features of pachydermia (thickening of skin) and periostosis (new bone formation). Keloid scar formation is also rather obscure, and some scientists have claimed that keloid scars contain an excessive amount of fibroblasts compared with normal skin as well as a dense mass of irregularly deposited connective tissues.

Case Presentation

A 25-year-old man exhibited extensive skin folding on his face, a gyrus-like scalp, depressed nasolabial folds, and keloids. Symptoms began at 18 years of age, progressing insidiously. Additionally, he experienced clubbing of fingers and toes, joint pain, muscle soreness, and hyperhidrosis. Radiographic examinations revealed thickened bone and cystic regions. Diagnosed with complete primary PDP and facial keloid scars, he underwent skin dermabrasion, biopsies, and a comprehensive treatment involving, botulinum toxin injections, 5-fluorouracil, and a carbon dioxide lattice laser.

Conclusion

PDP presents challenges due to its unclear etiology but stabilizes over time in most cases. Comprehensive treatment strategies, including dermabrasion and a combination of intralesional therapies, are effective in managing keloids in PDP patients. This case contributes to the understanding of managing rare diseases and underscores the importance of personalized approaches to improve therapeutic outcomes in patients with complete primary PDP and concurrent keloids.

Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin-A on Face, Head, and Neck Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Botulinum toxin A (BTA) temporarily paralyzes nearby muscles to reduce tension in wound sites, inhibiting scar hyperplasia. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of BTA injection on scar formation and quality in various face, head, and neck sites. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across four electronic databases and registries to identify relevant studies. We assessed the following outcomes: visual analog scale (VAS), Vancouver scar scale (VSS), scar width, patient self-assessment scale, Stony Brook scar evaluation scales, Observer scar assessment scale, Manchester scar scale, and patient scar-assessment scale. Results: This systematic review included 20 studies encompassing 894 patients, of which, 18 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The VAS and VSS significantly improved with BTA compared to controls which significantly reduced scar width at the first and second measurement points compared to controls. Subgroup analyses revealed that BTA had better upper lip and forehead outcomes. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that scars of the face, head, and neck were improved with BTA treatment compared to controls. This highlights the need for further study, especially concentrating on the upper lip and forehead regions, where improved outcomes were identified on subgroup analysis.

Treatment and Improvement of Healing after Surgical Intervention

The development of abnormal scars has a great impact on people's well-being, and improving scarring outcomes after surgery is a field that currently lacks consensus. This review aims to identify newly researched approaches to improving the quality of surgical scars. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect was conducted between 13 May 2023 and 17 May 2023, in accordance with the recommendations of the PRISMA Statement. Study selection and analysis of methodological quality were performed in parts, independently and blindly, based on eligibility criteria. The 21 prospective, comparative, and randomized studies reviewed included 1057 subjects and studied approaches such as topical applications of creams with herbal extracts and silicone gels, growth factors, negative pressure dressings, oligonucleotides, intralesional injection of compounds such as botulinum toxin, skin closure techniques such as suturing and tissue adhesive, and laser treatments. There are recent research techniques that generate good results and are really promising to improve the results of surgical scars; however, the available evidence is extremely limited in some cases, and it is necessary to deepen its analysis to obtain reliable action protocols in each type of surgery.

Evaluation of the Risk of Hypertrophic Scarring and Keloid Following Eyelid Procedures: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Eyelid surgeries are common operations performed for both cosmetic and functional purposes. Because the periorbital region is highly visible, it is important to avoid poor scar formation in this cosmetically sensitive region. No study to date has investigated the possible existence of keloid formation following eyelid procedures.

OBJECTIVES

This study systematically reviewed the literature to identify cases of hypertrophic scar and keloid formation following cosmetic or functional (nonburn) eyelid procedures to aid surgeons when counseling patients.

METHODS

A PubMed/MEDLINE search was conducted on May 17, 2022, using appropriate search terms: "blepharoplasty," "tarsorrhaphy," "canthotomy," "ptosis repair," "epicanthoplasty," "keloid," "hypertrophic scar," and related lay terms. All eligible articles in English with no lower date limit were included for analysis. Descriptive statistics, exclusion criteria, and summarized results are reported.

RESULTS

The PubMed search yielded 107 abstracts/articles. Full-text review resulted in 34 articles included for analysis. Twenty manuscripts reported no occurrences of hypertrophic scars. Only 13 manuscripts reported patients with hypertrophic scarring, which equated to 36 patients out of 3650. One individual was identified in a series of 77 patients who developed a keloid after a tarsorrhaphy. No articles reported a keloid as an outcome of strictly cosmetic procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

This study concludes that there are no reported instances of keloid formation following cosmetic (nonburn) eyelid procedures in the existing literature. Hypertrophic scar formation is minimally reported. The absence of keloid scar formation on the eyelid is critical knowledge for surgeons when educating patients about maladaptive scarring risks following eyelid procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Triangular Resection Epicanthoplasty: A Novel Method of Minimizing Hypertrophic Scar After Medial Epicanthoplasty

Medial epicanthoplasty is a crucial component in Asian cosmetic eyelid surgery. Conventional surgical methods have mandated wide undermining for the purpose of sufficient release. However, excessive undermining may result in hypertrophic scar or webbing deformities. To minimize undesirable results, the authors are proposing a novel approach. From March 2010 to December 2017, a triangular resection epicanthoplasty was performed in 421 Asian patients. The authors' procedure consists of triangular skin resection, the release of orbicularis oculi muscle and upper half medial epicanthal tendon, and dog ear correction. No complication regarding scarring or webbing was reported. The revision was performed in 18 cases where the patients wanted additional correction. The triangular resection epicanthoplasty offers both optimal results and minimal scar with relative simplicity.

An Updated Review of Hypertrophic Scarring

Hypertrophic scarring (HTS) is an aberrant form of wound healing that is associated with excessive deposition of extracellular matrix and connective tissue at the site of injury. In this review article, we provide an overview of normal (acute) wound healing phases (hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling). We next discuss the dysregulated and/or impaired mechanisms in wound healing phases that are associated with HTS development. We next discuss the animal models of HTS and their limitations, and review the current and emerging treatments of HTS.

Microneedle delivery of botulinum toxin type A combined with hyaluronic acid for the synergetic management of multiple sternal keloids with oily skin: A retrospective clinical investigation

BACKGROUND

For the treatment of sternal keloids, corticosteroid therapy has side effects including abnormal sebum secretion and acne. Relapse of keloids is common after corticosteroid injection in patients with oily skin. To reduce side effects and keloid recurrence, we used a combination of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) and hyaluronic acid (HA) as synergetic management for multiple sternal keloids in patients with oily skin.

METHODS

In total, 58 patients with multiple sternal keloids who received monthly steroid injections were retrospectively included. Thirty-two patients in the intervention group received an additional injection of BTX-A/HA on the same day as the first injection of the steroid, while the remaining 26 patients were treated as the control group. At baseline and follow-up visits, sebum production and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were assessed as primary outcomes, and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score, keloid recurrence, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and patient satisfaction were assessed as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

In the control group, average sebum production and TEWL were increased to 132% and 104% of baseline, respectively, at the 24-week follow-up. In the intervention group, average sebum production and TEWL reached nadir at the 8-week follow-up and then increased to 96% and 91% of baseline, respectively, at the 24-week follow-up. Sternal keloid relapse was observed in 88.5% of the patients in the control group and none of the patients in the intervention group. The total VSS score at 24 weeks was 11.04 ± 0.14 and 8.93 ± 0.26 (p < 0.001) in the control group and intervention group, respectively, and the VAS score was 75 ± 5.10 and 19.14 ± 3.80 (p < 0.001) in the control group and intervention group, respectively. Higher patient satisfaction was reported in the intervention group.

CONCLUSIONS

Microneedle delivery of BTX-A/HA decreases sebum production while improving skin barrier function. Thus, this combined therapy can relieve the side effects of corticosteroid therapy and reduce keloid recurrence.

Efficacy of Early Application of 1540 nm Non-ablative Fractional Laser and Silicones to Improve Post-epicanthoplasty Scars

The combination of epicanthoplasty and blepharoplasty is a popular choice in Asians to acquire a pair of charming big eyes. However, the obvious scarring in the medial canthal area may result in unsatisfactory aesthetic outcomes. Recently, various laser treatments have been used to deal with scars had achieved detectable improvement, but only a few studies investigating the efficacy of lasers used in post-epicanthoplasty scarring were developed. A total of 70 participants who underwent Z-epicanthoplasty were enrolled in this prospective clinical trial and were randomly assigned to the groups of 1540nm non-ablative fractional laser (NAFL) combined with silicones treatment and silicones alone treatment. The NAFL-exposure in the treated group was additionally applied to the medial canthal area on day 21 postoperatively, compared with the participants in the control group who had only been treated with the daily usage of silicone sheets for 12 hours and silicone gels twice for 5 months after scab had fallen from the skin. Scar evolution was performed by patient and observer scar assessment Scales (POSAS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for 21 days, and 6 months postoperatively. 64 participants have completed the entire follow-up process. The scar recovery was statistically detected in treated group compared with the control group at 6-month postoperatively assessed by POSAS, especially in pliability of scars. Furthermore, the VAS evaluations showed superior satisfaction in treated group. The early treatment of NAFL combined with silicones has improved scar formation in medial canthal region after epicantholplasties efficiently.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections in Improving Facial Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) has a wide range of clinical applications, and its use in improving aesthetics is one of them. The aim of this study was to better assess the efficacy and safety of BTA in patients with facial scars.

SUMMARY

We extracted the data of the visual analog scale (VAS) score, Vancouver scar scale (VSS) score, scar width, observer scar assessment scale (OSAS), patient scar assessment scale (PSAS), and/or drug-related adverse events. Five studies provided the data of VAS score, and the results showed that the VAS score in the BTA group was significantly higher than that in the control group. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported the VSS score. A statistically significant difference exists between the BTA group and the control group. Three RCTs reported the scar width after BTA treatment. A more favorable change was found in the BTA group with scar width even without statistical significance. Data about the OSAS and PSAS scores were available in two trials. There was no significant difference in OSAS and PSAS scores between the BTA group and the control group. Only three studies recorded three slight adverse events. There were no reports of severe complications. In conclusions, this study demonstrated that BTA has the potential to improve facial scars with an acceptable safety profile.

A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis: Botulinum Toxin A Effect on Postoperative Facial Scar Prevention

BACKGROUND

Postoperative facial scarring can be a significant psychological burden for patients to carry after surgery, often resulting in prolonged mental health dysfunction. Currently, there is no established method to prevent facial scar formation; however, there are several methods to prevent facial scar hyperplasia and improve scar quality. Botulinum toxin A (BTA) has been widely used due to its properties of muscle paralysis and known success in plastic surgery and cosmetology. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of BTA in preventing postoperative facial scar hyperplasia and improving scar quality.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, web of science, and Cochrane libraries were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (published before May 2021) wherein BTA was used for the treatment of facial scars. The efficacy and safety of BTA were evaluated by the following scales: the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), and Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES); the BTA effect on scar width and complications was also assessed.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs involving 114 cases were included. Through quantitative analysis, the BTA injection group had a higher VAS score, lower VSS score, lower OSAS score, and smaller scar width. However, no significant difference was noted in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that BTA can safely improve the appearance of postoperative facial scars by significantly inhibiting scar hyperplasia and improving scar quality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Canadian Physicians' Use of Perioperative Botulinum Toxin Injections to Spastic Limbs: A Cross-sectional National Survey

Objective

To investigate the practice patterns of Canadian physicians who use perioperative botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections to improve surgical outcomes on spastic limbs.

Design

A cross-sectional national survey composed of an invitation email and an 18-item questionnaire was disseminated by a national physical medicine and rehabilitation (PMR) society to 138 physician members involved in spasticity management.

Setting

Not applicable.

Participants

Twenty-five percent of the participants (N=34) fully completed the survey.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Participants completed an online questionnaire that examined the practice patterns and surgical outcomes associated with perioperative BoNT injections.

Results

The majority (n=21; 84%) of Canadian physicians who inject BoNT perioperatively to improve outcomes of surgeries performed on spastic limbs are specialists in PMR practicing in academic settings. Most respondents (74%) used BoNT injections for perioperative treatment for patients with limb spasticity undergoing surgery. Of those surveyed, 65% of physicians used BoNT preoperatively, 21% used BoNT intraoperatively, and 24% used BoNT postoperatively.Of the physicians who performed BoNT injections preoperatively, 6% performed BoNT injections 7 to 12 weeks preoperatively, 32% performed BoNT injections 4 to 6 weeks preoperatively, 47% performed BoNT injections 2 to 3 weeks preoperatively, and 15% performed BoNT injections 0 to 1 week preoperatively. The majority of physicians (85%) responded that injecting BoNT perioperatively may improve a patient's surgical outcome and all of the participants (100%) stated that BoNT did not contribute to any perioperative complications or adverse effects. Qualitative responses emphasized that successful outcomes from the perioperative BoNT were linked to enhanced collaboration with surgeons and that more research is needed to determine the optimal timing of perioperative BoNT.

Conclusion

Canadian physicians, mostly PMR specialists, administer perioperative BoNT to improve outcomes of surgeries performed on spastic limbs. The optimal timing for perioperative BoNT was suggested to be 2 to 3 weeks before the surgery by 47% of survey respondents. All participating physicians responded that perioperative BoNT did not contribute to any known perioperative complications or adverse events. This study highlights the importance of conducting more robust research to better understand optimal timing for perioperative BoNT injection, enhancing collaboration between physicians and surgeons, and increasing awareness of perioperative BoNT when planning for surgeries on spastic limbs.

The Most Current Algorithms for the Treatment and Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids: A 2020 Update of the Algorithms Published 10 Years Ago

BACKGROUND

In 2010, this Journal published my comprehensive review of the literature on hypertrophic scars and keloids. In that article, I presented evidence-based algorithms for the prevention and treatment of these refractory pathologic scars. In the ensuing decade, substantial progress has been made in the field, including many new randomized controlled trials. To reflect this, I have updated my review.

METHODS

All studies were evaluated for methodologic quality. Baseline characteristics of patients were extracted along with the interventions and their outcomes. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and comprehensive reviews were included if available.

RESULTS

Risk factors that promote hypertrophic scar and keloid growth include local factors (tension on the wound/scar), systemic factors (e.g., hypertension), genetic factors (e.g., single-nucleotide polymorphisms), and lifestyle factors. Treatment of hypertrophic scars depends on scar contracture severity: if severe, surgery is the first choice. If not, conservative therapies are indicated. Keloid treatment depends on whether they are small and single or large and multiple. Small and single keloids can be treated radically by surgery with adjuvant therapy (e.g., radiotherapy) or multimodal conservative therapy. For large and multiple keloids, volume- and number-reducing surgery is a choice. Regardless of the treatment(s), patients should be followed up over the long term. Conservative therapies, including gel sheets, tape fixation, topical and injected external agents, oral agents, and makeup therapy, should be administered on a case-by-case basis.

CONCLUSIONS

Randomized controlled trials on pathologic scar management have increased markedly over the past decade. Although these studies suffer from various limitations, they have greatly improved hypertrophic scar and keloid management. Future high-quality trials are likely to improve the current hypertrophic scar and keloid treatment algorithms further.

Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A for postoperative scar prevention and wound healing improvement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) has shown underlying effects for wound healing improvement. New small clinical trials keep emerging every year and updated evidence-based information is warranted. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BTXA for preventing scarring.

METHODS

Four databases were searched to recruit randomized clinical trials (RCTs) which compared the surgical wounds treated with BTXA vs. those treated with placebo or blank control. The outcomes were primarily quantified by measures including the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scales (SBSES), modified SBSES (mSBSES), and scar width. Patients' satisfaction and adverse events were also reported.

RESULTS

In total, 16 RCTs involving 671 cases (510 patients) were included. The outcome showed significant superiority of BTXA in VSS (mean difference [MD] = -1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.00 to -0.65, p = 0.0001), VAS (MD = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.05-1.52, p < 0.00001), SBSES or mSBSES (MD = -0.18, 95% CI: -0.27 to -0.10, p < 0.0001), scar width (MD = -0.18, 95% CI: -0.27 to -0.10, p < 0.0001), and patients' satisfaction (risk ratio [RR] = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.06-1.49, p = 0.01). No significant difference of adverse events incidence was observed (RR = 1.46 95% CI: 0.64-3.33, p = 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin type A is effective and safe for postoperative scar prevention and wound healing improvement, especially for facial wounds of Asians. Further studies should manage to standardize the treatment algorithm, while mSBSES is recommended for scar assessment.

The Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Injections in Preventing Postoperative Scars and Improving Scar Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Scars exposed on the body surface lead to a large psychological burden on patients. However, no satisfactory scar treatments exist. Botulinum toxin type A is a neurotoxin that has been widely applied in the plastic and cosmetic surgery field. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin in scar management.

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy of botulinum toxin injections in preventing postoperative scars and improving scars quality and were published prior to Dec. 29, 2020. The outcome indicators were the visual analog scale score, Vancouver scar scale score, Stony Brook scar evaluation scales score, scar width, patient self-assessment results, and complications.

RESULTS

Seventeen randomized controlled trials with a total of 633 cases were identified in this meta-analysis. The quantitative synthesis results showed that compared with the control group, the botulinum toxin group had a significantly lower VSS score (MD = -0.97, 95%CI = -1.56 to -0.39, p = 0.001), higher VAS score (MD = 1.26, 95%CI = 1.04 to 1.47, p < 0.00001), thinner scar width (MD = -0.25, 95%CI = -0.37 to -0.12, p < 0.0001) and higher patient satisfaction (RR = 3.38 95%CI = 1.45 to 7.89, p = 0.005). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the number of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that botulinum toxin injections can significantly improve cosmetic appearance and postoperative scar quality. At the therapeutic dose, no significant complications were observed, indicating that botulinum toxin injections are safe.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Botulinum Toxin to Improve Lower Blepharoplasty Scar: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Lower blepharoplasty is a common cosmetic operation that relies on minimal postoperative scarring, but Asian patients are at higher risk than Caucasians for hypertrophic and/or widened scars. Botulinum toxin type A (BTX) injections are widely employed to alleviate dynamic facial rhytids and also can improve scar quality by reducing scar tension. The authors assessed whether simultaneous transcutaneous lower blepharoplasty and BTX injections could improve subciliary scar quality.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to assess whether simultaneous transcutaneous lower blepharoplasty and BTX injections could improve subciliary scar quality.

METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized, vehicle-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial. Between May 2015 and May 2018, 40 adults who underwent bilateral transcutaneous lower blepharoplasties were randomized to receive BTX (n = 20) or vehicle (normal saline; n = 20) injections into the lateral orbicularis oculi muscle immediately after wound closure. Vancouver Scar Scale, Visual Analogue Scale, and photographic scar width measurements at 3 reference points were recorded at the final clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients completed the trial. Vancouver Scar Scale and Visual Analogue Scale scores in the experimental and vehicle control groups were similar, but scar widths in the experimental group at all measured points were significantly narrower than in the vehicle control group (P < 0.001, P = 0.027, and P < 0.001 at each measured point, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Transcutaneous lower blepharoplasty scars in Asians can be significantly narrowed by simultaneous BTX injections without additional complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4

Treatment of Wound Healing with Sequential Therapy to Accelerate Recovery and Inhibit Scar Hyperplasia: A Case Report

Study Design/Patients and Methods

A 19-year-old male was reported to have a postoperative facial trauma suture as a result of being involved in a car accident. Red light-emitting diode (LED) therapy (20 min, 96 J/cm², 633 nm), Botulinum Toxin Type A 36 IU injection, BroadBand Light and Er:YAG laser at various stages of wound healing were applied as the sequential therapy.

Results

Since the correction was promptly apparent and acceptable, the treatment proved secure and efficacious for repairing wound healing.

Conclusion

Clinically sequential therapy has demonstrated marked improvement in our case. Scar sequential therapy may offer a new strategy for wound healing recovery.

Botulinum toxin type a intralesional monotherapy for treating human hypertrophic scar in a dose-dependent manner: In an animal model

BACKGROUND

The effect of Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) in treating or preventing a hypertrophic scar (HS) had been reported in clinical studies. However, the dose-effect relationship remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To study the dose-effect relationship of BTX-A intralesional monotherapy treating human HS.

METHODS

Six HS tissues were collected from six patients. Each tissue was segmented into 24 specimens and split into four groups: negative control (group A), 0.5U BTX-A (group B), 1U BTX-A (group C), and 2U BTX-A (group D). Six nude mice, each was prepared by implanting four specimens (one from each group) into the back for a total of 24 specimens. The process mentioned above were repeated six times. A re-entry operation was performed to obtain the specimens after 8 weeks. The weight of HS, the expression of decorin and TGF-β₁, the proliferation, and migration ability of hypertrophic scar fibroblasts (HSFBs) were compared among groups.

RESULTS

The weight of HS, the expression of decorin and TGF-β₁, the proliferation, and migration ability of HSFBs showed significant differences in groups C and D as compared to group A; there has been no statistical significance in group B.

CONCLUSION

BTX-A showed significant therapeutic efficacy when compared with the negative control group in a dose-dependent manner. BTX-A can reduce the weight of HS, upregulate the expression of decorin, downregulate the expression of TGF-β₁, and inhibit HSFBs proliferation and migration ability. This study indicates that BTX-A intralesional monotherapy treating HS should reach a threshold dose to achieve an effective treatment, and a high dose of BTX-A is more effective than a low dose.

Perioperative Botulinum Toxin Injections to Enhance Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Spasticity: Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Case Reports

Spasticity causes an array of disabilities, which in turn may lead to the need for surgical intervention. Spasticity itself may also negatively affect surgical outcomes. This report reviews the potential benefit of perioperative (before, during, or after surgery) botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections for 3 patients with spasticity due to spinal cord injury, stroke, or multiple sclerosis. We discuss perioperative BoNT in 3 time periods: preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. The cases demonstrate the use of perioperative BoNT in decreasing pain, improving wound healing, and improving surgical outcomes. We conclude by discussing the potential use of perioperative BoNT for surgical interventions in patients with spasticity and the need for further high-quality research in this field.

Alternative Clinical Indications of Botulinum Toxin

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) is a powerful neurotoxin that inhibits acetylcholine release from presynaptic vesicles. The potency and safety profile of BoNTA grant the toxin vast therapeutic potential. It has been used off-label for a variety of dermatologic conditions. This review aims to analyze published literature regarding the benefits and risks of the off-label use of BoNTA beyond facial lines, including eccrine hidrocystomas, enlarged pores, keloids and hypertrophic scars, hidradenitis suppurativa, hyperhidrosis, masseter muscle hypertrophy, and salivary gland hypertrophy, among others. A MEDLINE search from January 2000 to December 2019 was conducted on the off-label uses of botulinum toxin in dermatology.

Botulinum toxin type A attenuates hypertrophic scar formation via the inhibition of TGF-β1/Smad and ERK pathways

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic scar is a common complication in would healing process, and how to effectively prevent and treat it has been a hot and difficult research issue. Previous studies have showed that botulinum toxin type A (BTA) has effects on the prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scar, but little is known about the specific mechanisms.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the potential mechanisms of BTA on the inhibition of hypertrophic scar formation.

METHODS

Hypertrophic scar-derived human fibroblasts were cultured and then treated with transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and various concentrations of BTA. Cell proliferation and viability were measured by CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay and trypan blue staining, respectively. The total amount of collagen was examined using Sirius red staining. Collagen I and Collagen III in the culture supernatant were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis were performed to detect the transcription and translation levels.

RESULTS

Our results revealed that BTA decreased the proliferation of hypertrophic scar-derived human fibroblasts. The mRNA and protein expression levels of alpha-smooth muscle actin, collagen I, and collagen III induced by TGF-β1 were inhibited by BTA in a dose-dependent manner. BTA also inhibited the phosphorylation of Smad2/3 and ERK.

CONCLUSION

BTA decreased the proliferation of fibroblasts and prevented overdeposition of ECM through the inhibition of the TGF-β1/Smad and ERK pathways. The findings of this study provide new scientific reference for the prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scar.

Botulinum toxin type A as a novel method of preventing cleft lip scar hypertrophy-A literature review

BACKGROUND

Cleft lip is a congenital development defect. Primary cleft lip repair leads to cleft scar formation. The resulting scar often undergoes hypertrophy, which negatively affects the facial esthetics, function, and patient's mental health. One of the methods used in scar therapy described in recent years is botulinum toxin injections The aim of this work is to present current knowledge about the impact of botulinum toxin A on cleft lip scar appearance and its effect on scar hypertrophy.

METHODS

The literature search was conducted in the English language via the PubMed and Google Scholar databases.

RESULTS

The results show injections seem to be a promising method in cleft lip scar management. However, future studies, especially randomized controlled trials, are necessary to assess the effect of BoNT-A compared with placebo and to determine the optimal dosages and injection schemes for BoNT-A treatment in cleft lip patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Preventing Postoperative Scars and Improving the Cosmetic Appearance of Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Scars with poor cosmesis that develop after wound healing may affect normal life.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) in preventing postoperative hypertrophic scars or keloids.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases from their inception date up to February 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of BTXA in preventing hypertrophic scars or keloids. The primary outcome measures included the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, scar width, patient satisfaction, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs involving 497 cases (372 patients) were included. The meta-analysis showed significant differences in the VAS score (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.55, P < .00001), VSS score (WMD = -1.02, 95% CI = -1.72 to -0.32, P = .004), scar width (WMD = -0.18, 95% CI = -0.29 to -0.08, P = .0008), and patient satisfaction (relative risk = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.06-1.49, P = .01). Four studies reported trivial adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that BTXA was more effective than the control treatment in preventing postoperative scars and improving the cosmetic appearance of facial scars for East Asians, and no serious adverse events were found during the follow-up period. However, there was insufficient evidence to support the use of BTXA for the prevention of scars in patients from other ethnic groups and regions or scars in non-facial areas.

A Four-Step Technique for Creating Individual Double-Eyelid Crease Shapes: A Free-Style Design

BACKGROUND

Double-eyelid blepharoplasty is the most frequently performed aesthetic surgery in the Asian population. However, the epicanthal fold has been a conundrum limiting the outcomes of Asian blepharoplasty. Furthermore, with the blending of Western and Asian cultures, patients have individual standards of beauty for the upper eyelids. Here, we developed a four-step technique to form infold or outfold double-eyelid creases to satisfy individual patient requirements.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who simultaneously underwent double-eyelid blepharoplasty and epicanthoplasty using this four-step technique from January of 2017 to January of 2019 were reviewed. The results were grouped by preoperative patient requirements for eyelid crease shapes. The rate of meeting patient expectations in each group was evaluated by two independent observers. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were collected, complications were identified, and postoperative results were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 285 consecutive patients were included in this study, with a mean follow-up period of 9 months. Of the 285 patients, 207 requested infold eyelid creases, and 190 (92 percent) procedures met patient expectations; and 78 patients requested outfold eyelid creases, and 69 (87 percent) procedures met patient expectations. A high rate of satisfaction with the final eyelid crease shape and resulting scarring was noted in both patient groups. The revision rate was 3 percent. No severe complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

The four-step technique is a simple, flexible, and effective method for creating infold or outfold double-eyelid creases according to individual patient requirements and should be considered a routine method for patients who request double eyelids.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.