A Changing Paradigm: The Brazilian Butt Lift Is Neither Brazilian Nor a Lift—Why It Needs To Be Called Safe Subcutaneous Buttock Augmentation

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Papers on Gluteal Augmentation

Background

Gluteoplasty or gluteal augmentation is a popular cosmetic procedure that is used to improve the volume, shape, and contour of the buttocks.

Objectives

This bibliometric analysis aims to characterize emerging research trends and to assess the methodological quality of the highest impact gluteoplasty research.

Methods

The 100 most-cited publications in gluteoplasty were identified on Web of Science, across all available journal years (from Inception to August 2023). Study details, including the citation count, main content focus, and outcome measures, were extracted and tabulated from each publication. Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine level of evidence (LOE) of each study was assessed.

Results

The 100 most-cited publications regarding gluteoplasty were cited by a total of 2375 publications. Citations per publication ranged from 5 to 176 (mean 23.75 ± 25.86), with the highest-cited study being authored by Simonacci, discussing autologous fat grafting (n = 176). Most publications were LOE 5 (n = 55), representative of the large number of case series and reports. The number of publications for LOE 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 1, 9, 13, and 22, respectively. The main content focus was "surgical technique" in 38 publications, followed by "outcomes" (n = 34) and "risk factors/prognosis" (n = 10). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used in 20 publications, and 33 publications reported aesthetic outcome measures.

Conclusions

This analysis demonstrates a need for improvement in research methodologies regarding gluteoplasty research. This advancement would be facilitated by robust, high-quality research through randomized control trials and multicenter studies, as well as the further development of validated PROMs for gluteoplasty.

Level of Evidence 2

Brazilian Butt Lift: An Experience Over 3000 Patients

INTRODUCTION

The Brazilian Butt Lift (BBL) is a safe technique that entails body reshaping through buttock augmentation using autologous fat transfer.

METHOD

Between 2018 and 2022, 3000 patients underwent surgery. Each procedure commenced with the patient in supine position, starting with abdominal liposuction, followed by fat transfer to hips. Subsequently, the patient was repositioned to a prone stance. Liposuction of the back and waist ensued, concluding the surgery with fat transfer to the buttocks. Stringent precautions were implemented to ensure the safety of the patient throughout the procedure.

RESULTS

Eighty-six percent of patients express satisfaction with their outcomes, while seventy percent of the transferred fat calls survive in the buttocks. One serious complication and some minor complications have been encountered and effectively managed through conservative measures.

CONCLUSION

BBL proves to be a safe and satisfactory surgery when performed by experienced surgeons who adhere to fundamental principles. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Danger Zones of the Gluteal Anatomy: Improving the Safety Profile of the Gluteal Fat Grafting

INTRODUCTION

Knowledge of the vascular anatomy is critical to performing safe gluteal surgery. To date, only the course of the main blood vessels within the muscles has been outlined. These findings are based on MRI and CTA images that do not conform to a topographically standardized and normalized probability distribution.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop a three-dimensional mapping of the gluteal zones of high vascular density in relation to anatomical landmarks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort analysis comprised all consecutive patients who underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans between January 2016 and October 2021. The location of blood vessels in the gluteal region was allometrically normalized in relation to anatomical landmarks. Moreover, the caliber and area of the blood vessels were assessed.

RESULTS

CBCT scans of 32 patients with an average age of 64 ± 12 years (range 34-87 years) were included. Fifty-three percent were female. The median [IQR] caliber of the intramuscular gluteal vessels was 1.47 [1.15-1.88] mm, significantly greater than that of the subcutaneous vessels 1.09 [0.72-1.44] mm (p < 0.001). Vascular density was higher intramuscularly, as 4.5% of the area of the muscle was occupied by blood vessels, as opposed to 0.3% in the adipose tissue.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of the CBCT scans showed a higher vascular density and larger vessels intramuscularly. We, therefore, recommend the injection of autologous fat merely to the subcutaneous plane.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Static Injection, Migration, and Equalization (SIME): A New Paradigm for Safe Ultrasound-Guided Brazilian Butt Lift: Safer, Faster, Better

BACKGROUND

Although the Brazilian butt lift (BBL) is one of the most popular procedures in body contouring, it has been associated with the risk of pulmonary fat embolism when fat graft is injected into the gluteal muscles. The subcutaneous plane has been identified as a safe site for fat graft injection, but deaths from fat embolism continue to occur because there is no mechanism to confirm consistent subcutaneous placement.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this paper was to determine if real-time intraoperative ultrasound could accurately identify the subcutaneous gluteal anatomic landmarks and permit a single surgeon to consistently target fat graft placement in the subcutaneous space.

METHODS

In total, 4150 BBLs were performed with real-time intraoperative ultrasound being used to confirm the subcutaneous position of a static cannula during fat graft injection. Serial deposits of fat graft were performed in each buttock. Ultrasound confirmed that fat graft consistently remained above the deep gluteal fascia and migrated through the deep subcutaneous space. These fat graft deposits were then equalized with a moving cannula to correct any contour deformities. Operative times were recorded and compared with BBL performed by expansion vibration lipofilling without ultrasound.

RESULTS

Real-time intraoperative ultrasound allowed for the visual confirmation of consistent subcutaneous fat graft deposition and the targeting of fat graft into specific gluteal subcutaneous compartments.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-time intraoperative ultrasound allows the surgeon to confirm a subcutaneous-only fat graft injection, target specific gluteal subcutaneous compartments, and take advantage of the unique architecture of the deep subcutaneous space to create gluteal projection and correct contour deformities.

Static Injection, Migration, and Equalization: A New Paradigm for Safe Ultrasound-Guided BBL: Safer, Faster, Better

Static injection, migration, and equalization allows for always subcutaneous-targeted fat grafting to either the deep or the superficial subcutaneous spaces.

Comparing the safety profiles of implants and autologous fat grafting in gluteal augmentation: A systematic review

Gluteal augmentation has become a popular esthetic procedure since its inception. The main methods are augmentation using implants or autologous fat grafting, which is the harvesting and grafting of patients' own fat tissue. The last review comparing the safety of these methods was written 7 years ago, which warrants the writing of a new one. PubMed, Cochrane, and Medline were searched for studies focusing on the methods of gluteal augmentation listed previously. Five search terms were used and 15 studies fulfilled the criteria. The data were cataloged according to the method described and outcomes compared. Seven articles focused on gluteal implants and another seven assessed autologous fat grafting, whereas one detailed both. The most common complications in 524 implant procedures were wound dehiscence (9.16%), excessive implant palpability (5.92%), and seroma (3.82%), with an overall complication rate of 25%. The most common complications in 1788 gluteal fat augmentation procedures were seroma (6.9%), infection (3.0%), and transient sciatic paresthesia (1.0%), with an overall complication rate of 13%. Several articles listed satisfaction figures, but these were not assessed because this article was not powered to assess this outcome. Overall, gluteal augmentation using autologous fat grafting leads to fewer postoperative complications than implants and allows greater contouring of the buttocks and the surrounding areas. However, it can also be a far more dangerous procedure if certain recommendations are not followed.

Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Simulation of Gluteal Augmentation: A Helpful Tool in Preoperative Outcome Simulation?

BACKGROUND

While the buttock region is considered an esthetic hallmark, the Brazilian butt lift (BBL) remains controversially discussed in the plastic surgery community. This is due to its contentious safety profile. Thus, informed consent and patient education play a key role in preoperative planning. To this end, we aimed to program an easy-to-use, widely accessible, and low-budget algorithm that produces reliable outcome simulations.

METHODS

The conditional generative adversarial network (GAN) was trained using pre- and postoperative images from 1628 BBL patients. To validate outcome simulation, 25 GAN-generated images were assessed deploying 67 Amazon Mechanical Turk Workers (Mturks).

RESULTS

Mturks could not differentiate between GAN-generated and real patient images in approximately 49.4% of all trials.

CONCLUSION

This study presents a free-to-use, widely accessible, and reliable algorithm to visualize potential surgical outcomes that could potentially be applied in other fields of plastic surgery.

Practice Advisory on Gluteal Fat Grafting

On January 31, 2018, The Multi-Society Task Force for Safety in Gluteal Fat Grafting released a Practice Advisory regarding gluteal fat grafting. The Task Force was assembled in the wake of several highly publicized patient deaths involving Brazilian Butt Lift ("BBL") and produced a second practice advisory in August 2019. In 2021 the ASAPS President commissioned a Working Group on BBL Patient Safety, charging the Group to address new guidelines affecting safety and welfare of BBL patients. The "Practice Advisory on Gluteal Fat Grafting" is the first advisory developed since the Working Group was formed. In addition to surgical technique as a major cause of fatal complications of BBL, the Working Group focused on micro-economic trends of operative time and regional BBL pricing and considered fatigue and distraction in formulating the current guidelines. In Florida the majority of BBL deaths occur at the end of the week. Such a non-normalized distribution most likely represents the result of fatigue and/or distraction, which has been linked to surgical mortality in multiple published communications. In addition, mortality is likely due to uncertainty or lack of documentation as to the correct plane of fat injection. Therefore, the newest and most compelling recommendations from these guidelines include the use of ultrasound-guided documentation of cannula placement prior to and during fat injection, and the limitation of 3 BBL cases as a maximum amount of total operative cases per day. The authors thank members of the Task Force for the insights they brought to this process.

Safety Comparison of Abdominoplasty and Brazilian Butt Lift: What the Literature Tells Us

BACKGROUND

Although abdominoplasty is a mainstay of the plastic surgeon, the safety of the Brazilian butt lift (BBL) has been questioned, effectively being prohibited in some countries. The central rationale for the safety concern over the BBL stems from a publication stating a mortality rate of one in 3000. The question remains: What is the real safety of these procedures?

METHODS

Focusing on mortality, literature searches were performed for BBL and for abdominoplasty. The 2017 Aesthetic Surgery Education and Research Foundation survey data and publication were examined and analyzed. Additional data from the American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgical Facilities were obtained independently.

RESULTS

Abdominoplasty and BBL appear to have similar safety based on mortality; however, the nature of their mortalities is different. Although most abdominoplasty deaths are secondary to deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism-inherent circulatory thrombotic abnormality-BBL mortality is associated with iatrogenic pulmonary fat embolism. BBL mortality rates from more recent surveys on BBL safety demonstrate a mortality of one in 15,000.

CONCLUSIONS

Although deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism will always remain an abdominoplasty risk, intraoperative BBL pulmonary fat embolism has the potential to be reduced dramatically with a better understanding of dynamic anatomy, surgical instrumentation, and technique. The authors are now presented with a better lens with which to view a more accurate safety profile of BBL surgery, including its place among other commonly performed aesthetic procedures.

Perception of Risk Among Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons

BACKGROUND

With continuous innovation in plastic surgery, new procedures are constantly being introduced. A number of these procedures are generally safe but have the potential for rare yet serious complications. Many surgeons steer clear of these procedures due to safety concerns.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this paper was to survey the membership of The Aesthetic Society to elicit perception of risk of several novel or less mainstream procedures.

METHODS

A 24-item survey was sent out to members of The Aesthetic Society. The survey focused on surgeon experience and attitude towards 3 procedures: filler rhinoplasty, gluteal augmentation with fat grafting, and submandibular gland excision.

RESULTS

In total, 189 completed surveys were returned. Of the responders, 50%, 49%, and 89% of surgeons said they do not perform filler rhinoplasty, gluteal augmentation with fat grafting, or submandibular gland excision in their practices, respectively. The majority of those who do not perform the procedures selected "danger to the patient" as the primary concern for each of the 3 procedures. Surgeons overwhelmingly reported not learning these procedures in training. Additionally, surgeons perceive the risks of more common procedures such as abdominoplasty and breast augmentation-mastopexy to be significantly lower and more acceptable than those of the studied procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

When comparing the perceived complication rates with data published in the literature, particularly when looking at rates of serious or life-threatening complications, plastic surgeons overestimate the risks of procedures with which they are less familiar. This perception of risk, accompanied by the lack of exposure to novel techniques in training, may contribute to surgeons avoiding these procedures.

Personal Strategy to Avoid Fat Embolism During Fat Grafting: Brisk Withdrawal of Cannula While Injection

INTRODUCTION

Complications of fat grafting by means of injection may lead to unwanted passage of substrate into vessel lumens resulting in catastrophic complications. Likewise, a similar trend of complications is observed with non-autologous fillers regardless of an almost generalized use of blunt cannulas, the latter being implicated in the majority of serious vascular complications of hyaluronic acid injection. This report is the product of investigation to review all cases that underwent an original technique of fat injection: "The smart fat injection" during the cannula's brisk withdrawal technique. The aim of this research was to document the safety of this technique by searching if fat embolism had occurred and if yes, its incidence in this group of fat injection surgeries.

METHOD

This retrospective review included 3039 patients who underwent the smart fat injection at the facial or corporeal level between 2001 and 2019. The study focused on the search for complications linked to fat yet also cruorical embolism, as the latter may resemble the clinical symptoms of fat embolism.

RESULTS

The assessment of the 3039 patients who underwent the smart fat injection during cannula's brisk withdrawal, resulted in none presenting clinically detectable fat or a cruorical embolism.

CONCLUSION

This report documents the safety of the smart fat injection developed over a period of 22 years. It further explains the rationale of the technique for avoiding fat embolism while simultaneously enhancing fat take. This technique should not be implemented without appropriate in vitro training.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Current perceptions of 'Brazilian butt lift' (BBL) surgery in the UK: A BAAPS-led survey of BAAPS members

BACKGROUND

The BAAPS advice against Brazilian butt lift (BBL) surgery in the UK was set in October 2018. A Delphi study conducted by BAAPS highlighted the importance of defining current practice and perceptions amongst UK surgeons, as this is currently unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate BAAPS members' current practice and perceptions around BBL surgery to ensure patient safety and propose better recommendations.

METHODS

A BAAPS-commissioned survey was emailed to all BAAPS members through an on-line link. The survey collected quantitative and qualitative information in several domains.

RESULTS

This survey received a 44% response rate. Of 102 respondents, 32 surgeons undertook BBL surgery before the BAAPS advice to halt it. There was a wide variation in actual fat volumes injected, and in perceptions of what constituted a small or large volume. Virtually all respondents (96.9%) performed only subcutaneous fat injections. There were differences in fat harvest techniques. The majority (66.7%) felt that BAAPS should maintain its recommendation against undertaking BBL surgery until further data became available. Nearly a quarter of 102 respondents (20.6%) had been treated for BBL complications, the majority as a result of surgical tourism.

CONCLUSIONS

The survey provides member-reported perception and experience with regard to BBL surgery in the UK. The demand for BBL surgery and its provision should be reassessed in the UK. This information will be analysed with further national and international data to better define and shape the scope of the safety of BBL surgery in the UK. BAAPS will use such data towards the production of future guidance and support for surgeons and patients.