The Roles of Podoplanin-Positive/Podoplanin-Negative Cells from Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Lymphatic Regeneration

No Clinical Efficacy of Adipose-Derived Regenerative Cells and Lipotransfer in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a debilitating sequela affecting up to 1 in 3 breast cancer survivors. Treatments are palliative and do not address the underlying lymphatic injury. Recent preclinical and nonrandomized studies have shown promising results using adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) and lipotransfer in alleviating BCRL through regeneration of lymphatic tissue. However, no randomized controlled trial has been performed in an attempt to eliminate a placebo effect.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included patients with no-option, persistent disabling unilateral BCRL. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either autologous ADRCs (4.20×10 7 ± 1.75×10 7 cells) and 30-cc lipotransfer or placebo (saline) to the axilla. The primary outcome was a change in BCRL volume 1 year after treatment. Secondary outcomes included changes in quality of life, indocyanine green lymphangiography stage, bioimpedance, and safety.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were included, of whom 39 were allocated to ADRCs and lipotransfer treatment and 41 to placebo treatment. Baseline characteristics were similar in the groups. One year after treatment, no objective improvements were observed in the treatment or placebo groups. In contrast, significant subjective improvements were noted for both the treatment and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial failed to confirm a benefit of ADRCs and lipotransfer in the treatment of BCRL. These nonconfirmatory results suggest that ADRC and lipotransfer should not be recommended for alleviating BCRL. However, the authors cannot exclude that repeated treatments or higher doses of ADRCs or lipotransfer could yield a clinical effect.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, I.

Engineering ADSCs by manipulating YAP for lymphedema treatment in a mouse tail model

Secondary lymphedema is a chronic disease associated with deformity of limbs and dysfunction; however, conventional therapies are not curative. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) based therapy is a promising way, but a single transplantation of ADSCs has limited efficacy. In this study, ADSCs were engineered in vitro and then transplanted into the site of lymphedema. Yes-associated protein (YAP), a crucial regulator of Hippo pathway, plays an important role in regulating stem cell functions. We examined the YAP expression in a mouse tail lymphedema model, and found that transplanted ADSCs exhibited high expression level of YAP and a large number of YAP positive cells existed in lymphedema environment. In vitro, the downregulation of YAP in ADSCs resulted in higher expression levels of genes related to lymphangiogenesis such as Lyve-1, VEGFR-3 and Prox-1. In vivo, YAP-engineered ADSCs generated abundant VEGFR-3-positive lymphatic vessels and significantly improved subcutaneous fibrosis. These results indicated that the transplantation of pre-engineered ADSCs by manipulating YAP is a promising strategy for lymphatic reconstruction.

Clinical outcome is unlinked to injection of adipose-derived regenerative cells in the axilla of breast cancer-related lymphedema patients

BACKGROUND

Injection of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) combined with lipotransfer has been suggested to alleviate symptoms in diseases including breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). We recently performed a randomized controlled trial injecting lipoaspirate with ADRCs into the axilla of BCRL patients, and here we aimed in the intervention group to define in an unbiased fashion whether ADRC injection was linked to the clinical outcome.

METHODS

39 BCRL patients received lipotransfer assisted with autologous ADRCs (4.20 × 107 ± 1.75 × 107 cells) whereas 41 BCRL patients were included for placebo treatment. At 12 month follow-up, we assessed quality of life, lymphangiography, and bioimpedance enclosing 59 outcome parameters. Multifactorial analysis of clinical outcomes was used to define responders and non-responders to the intervention, and collected ADRCs from these patient groups were analyzed by single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq).

RESULTS

Unbiased multifactorial analysis ranked and defined the clinical outcomes (Sf36 physical change, L-Dex Lymph Change, ICG mdanderson change) with the highest effect on BCRL patients. The 10 patients with the highest- and lowest effect (five responders and five non-responders) were included in the study. No difference between non-responders and responders were observed for injected ADRC number/size/viability (p > 0.05). In scRNAseq, we did not find any major difference (p > 0.05) between groups in ADRC composition regarding adipose derived stem cells, endothelial-, smooth muscle-, T-, B-, mast cells as well as macrophages, which was verified by flow cytometry. Differential subcluster gene expression between groups were for 92.5% of genes, including those encoding secretory proteins, below the threshold of 1.5, and thus neglible. Together this suggested that the ADRC phenotype was indistinguishable between BCRL responders and non-responders to the intervention.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the ADRC injection and ADRC phenotype or heterogeneity have no effect on the clinical outcomes on BCRL, and ADRC assisted lipotranfer for BCRL should therefore not be considered currently.

Progenitor Cell Sources for 3D Bioprinting of Lymphatic Vessels and Potential Clinical Application

The lymphatic system maintains tissue fluid homeostasis and it is involved in the transport of nutrients and immunosurveillance. It also plays a pivotal role in both pathological and regenerative processes. Lymphatic development in the embryo occurs by polarization and proliferation of lymphatic endothelial cells from the lymph sacs, that is, lymphangiogenesis. Alternatively, lymphvasculogenesis further contributes to the formation of lymphatic vessels. In adult tissues, lymphatic formation rarely occurs under physiological conditions, being restricted to pathological processes. In lymphvasculogenesis, progenitor cells seem to be a source of lymphatic vessels. Indeed, mesenchymal stem cells, adipose stem cells, endothelial progenitor cells, and colony-forming endothelial cells are able to promote lymphatic regeneration by different mechanisms, such as direct differentiation and paracrine effects. In this review, we summarize what is known on the diverse stem/progenitor cell niches available for the lymphatic system, emphasizing the potential that these cells hold for lymphatic tissue engineering through 3D bioprinting and their translation to clinical application.

Combining RNAscope, Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Digital Image Analysis to Assess Podoplanin (PDPN) Protein and PDPN_mRNA Expression on Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Normal Human Placenta Tissues

The expression and function of podoplanin (PDPN) in the normal human placenta has been debated in placental evaluation. This study emphasizes the importance of a multimodal approach of PDPN expression in normal human placentas. A complete examination is performed using immunohistochemistry, RNAscope and automated Digital Image examination (DIA) interpretation. QuPath DIA-based analysis automatically generated the stromal and histological scores of PDPN expression for immunohistochemistry and RNAscope stains. The umbilical cord's isolated fibroblasts and luminal structures expressed PDPN protein and PDPN_mRNA. RNAscope detected PDPN_mRNA upregulation in syncytial placental knots trophoblastic cells, but immunohistochemistry did not certify this at the protein level. The study found a significant correlation between the IHC and RNAscope H-Score (p = 0.033) and Allred Score (p = 0.05). A successful multimodal strategy for PDPN assessment in human placentas confirmed PDPN expression heterogeneity in the full-term human normal placenta and umbilical cord at the protein and mRNA level. In placental syncytial knots trophoblastic cells, PDPN showed mRNA overexpression, suggesting a potential role in placenta maturation.

Surgical lymphedema models in the mice hindlimb-A systematic review and quality assessment

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema constitutes a major unsolved problem in plastic surgery. To identify novel lymphedema treatments, preclinical studies are vital. The surgical mouse lymphedema model is popular and cost-effective; nonetheless, a synthesis and overview of the literature with evidence-based guidelines is needed. The aim of this review was to perform a systematic review to establish best practice and support future high-quality animal studies exploring lymphedema treatments.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, searching four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) from inception-September 2022. The Animals in Research Reporting In Vivo Experiments 2.0 (ARRIVE 2.0) guidelines were used to evaluate reporting quality. Studies claiming to surgically induce lymphedema in the hindlimb of mice were included.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies were included. Four main models were used. (1) Irradiation+surgery. (2) A variation of the surgery used by (1) + irradiation. (3) Surgery only (SPDF-model). (4) Surgery only (PLND-model). Remaining studies used other techniques. The most common measurement modality was the caliper. Mean quality coefficient was 0.57. Eighteen studies (49%) successfully induced sustained lymphedema. Combination of methods seemed to yield the best results, with an overrepresentation of irradiation, the removal of two lymph nodes, and the disruption of both the deep and superficial lymph vessels in the 18 studies.

CONCLUSION

Surgical mouse hindlimb lymphedema models are challenged by two related problems: (1) retaining lymphedema for an extended period, that is, establishing a (chronic) lymphedema model (2) distinguishing lymphedema from post-operative edema. Most studies failed to induce lymphedema and used error-prone measurements. We provide an overview of studies claiming to induce lymphedema and advocate improved research via five evidence-based recommendations to use: (1) a proven lymphedema model; (2) sufficient follow-up time, (3) validated measurement methods; (4) ARRIVE-guidelines; (5) contralateral hindlimb as control.

Modeling lymphangiogenesis: Pairing in vitro and in vivo metrics

Lymphangiogenesis is the mechanism by which the lymphatic system develops and expands new vessels facilitating fluid drainage and immune cell trafficking. Models to study lymphangiogenesis are necessary for a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and to identify or test new therapeutic agents that target lymphangiogenesis. Across the lymphatic literature, multiple models have been developed to study lymphangiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, lymphangiogenesis can be modeled with varying complexity, from monolayers to hydrogels to explants, with common metrics for characterizing proliferation, migration, and sprouting of lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) and vessels. In comparison, in vivo models of lymphangiogenesis often use genetically modified zebrafish and mice, with in situ mouse models in the ear, cornea, hind leg, and tail. In vivo metrics, such as activation of LECs, number of new lymphatic vessels, and sprouting, mirror those most used in vitro, with the addition of lymphatic vessel hyperplasia and drainage. The impacts of lymphangiogenesis vary by context of tissue and pathology. Therapeutic targeting of lymphangiogenesis can have paradoxical effects depending on the pathology including lymphedema, cancer, organ transplant, and inflammation. In this review, we describe and compare lymphangiogenic outcomes and metrics between in vitro and in vivo studies, specifically reviewing only those publications in which both testing formats are used. We find that in vitro studies correlate well with in vivo in wound healing and development, but not in the reproductive tract or the complex tumor microenvironment. Considerations for improving in vitro models are to increase complexity with perfusable microfluidic devices, co-cultures with tissue-specific support cells, the inclusion of fluid flow, and pairing in vitro models of differing complexities. We believe that these changes would strengthen the correlation between in vitro and in vivo outcomes, giving more insight into lymphangiogenesis in healthy and pathological states.

Current Advancements in Animal Models of Postsurgical Lymphedema: A Systematic Review

Significance: Secondary lymphedema is a debilitating disease caused by lymphatic dysfunction characterized by chronic swelling, dysregulated inflammation, disfigurement, and compromised wound healing. Since there is no effective cure, animal model systems that support basic science research into the mechanisms of secondary lymphedema are critical to advancing the field. Recent Advances: Over the last decade, lymphatic research has led to the improvement of existing animal lymphedema models and the establishment of new models. Although an ideal model does not exist, it is important to consider the strengths and limitations of currently available options. In a systematic review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we present recent developments in the field of animal lymphedema models and provide a concise comparison of ease, cost, reliability, and clinical translatability. Critical Issues: The incidence of secondary lymphedema is increasing, and there is no gold standard of treatment or cure for secondary lymphedema. Future Directions: As we iterate and create animal models that more closely characterize human lymphedema, we can achieve a deeper understanding of the pathophysiology and potentially develop effective therapeutics for patients.

Emerging Anti-Inflammatory Pharmacotherapy and Cell-Based Therapy for Lymphedema

Secondary lymphedema is a common complication of lymph node dissection or radiation therapy for cancer treatment. Conventional therapies such as compression sleeve therapy, complete decongestive physiotherapy, and surgical therapies decrease edema; however, they are not curative because they cannot modulate the pathophysiology of lymphedema. Recent advances reveal that the activation and accumulation of CD4+ T cells are key in the development of lymphedema. Based on this pathophysiology, the efficacy of pharmacotherapy (tacrolimus, anti-IL-4/IL-13 antibody, or fingolimod) and cell-based therapy for lymphedema has been demonstrated in animal models and pilot studies. In addition, mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have attracted attention as candidates for cell-based lymphedema therapy because they improve symptoms and decrease edema volume in the long term with no serious adverse effects in pilot studies. Furthermore, MSC transplantation promotes functional lymphatic regeneration and improves the microenvironment in animal models. In this review, we focus on inflammatory cells involved in the pathogenesis of lymphedema and discuss the efficacy and challenges of pharmacotherapy and cell-based therapies for lymphedema.

In Vitro Induction of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells to Lymphatic Endothelial Cells

Lymphedema is a progressive and irreversible disease due to the lymphatic system disorder. Conservative and surgical therapies are either ineffective or impractical. Currently, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-based therapies seem to be the most promising treatment for lymphedema. The MSCs promote lymphangiogenesis through the paracrine approach or by directly differentiating into lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) under the induction of growth factors. Human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) have been suggested to play important roles in tissue regeneration, making it an attractive candidate for the lymphedema treatment. In this study, to evaluate the potential role of hDPSCs in the clinical application for lymphedema treatment, we induced the hDPSCs with vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) and investigated the lymphangiogenic differentiation potential of hDPSCs in vitro. We found that under the VEGF-C induction, hDPSCs demonstrated upregulated LECs specific markers, promoted cell proliferation and migration, and increased tube formation, all of which contributed to their differentiation into LECs in vitro.

Adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments promote lymphangiogenesis in a murine lymphedema model

Chronic lymphedema after cancer treatment is common and there is still no cure for this disease. We herein investigated the lymphangiogenic capacity of adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments (MVF), which contain stem cells and lymphatic vessel fragments. Secondary lymphedema was induced in the hindlimbs of C57BL/6J mice. Green fluorescence protein (GFP)+ MVF were isolated from transgenic C57BL/6Tg (CAG-EGFP)1Osb/J mice, suspended in collagen hydrogel, and injected in the lymphadenectomy defect of wild-type animals. This crossover model allowed the detection of MVF-derived blood and lymphatic vessels after transplantation. The MVF group was compared with animals receiving collagen hydrogel only or a sham intervention. Lymphangiogenic effects were analyzed using volumetry, magnetic resonance (MR) lymphography, histology, and immunohistochemistry. MVF injection resulted in reduced hindlimb volumes when compared to non-treated controls. MR lymphography revealed lymphatic regeneration with reduced dermal backflow after MVF treatment. Finally, MVF transplantation promoted popliteal angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis associated with a significantly increased microvessel and lymphatic vessel density. These findings indicate that MVF transplantation represents a promising approach to induce therapeutic lymphangiogenesis.

Cell therapy as a treatment of secondary lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Lymphedema, the accumulation of interstitial fluid caused by poor lymphatic drainage, is a progressive and permanent disease with no curative treatment. Several studies have evaluated cell-based therapies in secondary lymphedema, but no meta-analysis has been performed to assess their efficacy.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available preclinical and clinical studies, with assessment of their quality and risk of bias.

Results

A total of 20 articles using diverse cell types were selected for analysis, including six clinical trials and 14 pre-clinical studies in three species. The meta-analysis showed a positive effect of cell-based therapies on relevant disease outcomes (quantification of edema, density of lymphatic capillaries, evaluation of the lymphatic flow, and tissue fibrosis). No significant publication bias was observed.

Conclusion

Cell-based therapies have the potential to improve secondary lymphedema. The underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Due to relevant heterogeneity between studies, further randomized controlled and blinded studies are required to substantiate the use of these novel therapies in clinical practice.

Cancer-Associated Fibroblast Heterogeneity: A Factor That Cannot Be Ignored in Immune Microenvironment Remodeling

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are important, highly heterogeneous components of the tumor extracellular matrix that have different origins and express a diverse set of biomarkers. Different subtypes of CAFs participate in the immune regulation of the tumor microenvironment (TME). In addition to their role in supporting stromal cells, CAFs have multiple immunosuppressive functions, via membrane and secretory patterns, against anti-tumor immunity. The inhibition of CAFs function and anti-TME therapy targeting CAFs provides new adjuvant means for immunotherapy. In this review, we outline the emerging understanding of CAFs with a particular emphasis on their origin and heterogeneity, different mechanisms of their regulation, as well as their direct or indirect effect on immune cells that leads to immunosuppression.

Tissue Engineering Strategies for Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Tissue engineering has witnessed remarkable advancement in various fields of medicine and has the potential of revolutionizing the management of lymphedema. Combining approaches of biotechnology with the evolving understanding of lymphangiogenesis may offer promising treatment modalities for patients suffering from lymphedema. The strategies to lymphatic vessels tissue engineer can be grouped into four main categories: Delivery of chemokines, cytokines, and other growth factors to induce lymphangiogenesis; cell-based approach using lymphatic endothelial cells or stem-cells; scaffold-based tissue engineering; or a combination of these. This review will summarize the current approach to cancer-related lymphedema and advances in lymphatic tissue engineering strategies and the challenges facing the regeneration of lymphatic vasculature, particularly in an oncologic setting.

Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Promote Intussusceptive Lymphangiogenesis by Restricting Dermal Fibrosis in Irradiated Tissue of Mice

Currently, there is no definitive treatment for lymphatic disorders. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) have been reported to promote lymphatic regeneration in lymphedema models, but the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects remain unclear. Here, we tested the therapeutic effects of ADSC transplantation on lymphedema using a secondary lymphedema mouse model. The model was established in C57BL/6J mice by x-irradiation and surgical removal of the lymphatic system in situ. The number of lymphatic vessels with anti-lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (LYVE-1) immunoreactivity increased significantly in mice subjected to transplantation of 7.5 × 10⁵ ADSCs. X-irradiation suppressed lymphatic vessel dilation, which ADSC transplantation could mitigate. Proliferative cell nuclear antigen staining showed increased lymphatic endothelial cell (LEC) and extracellular matrix proliferation. Picrosirius red staining revealed normal collagen fiber orientation in the dermal tissue after ADSC transplantation. These therapeutic effects were not related to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C expression. Scanning electron microscopy revealed structures similar to the intraluminal pillar during intussusceptive angiogenesis on the inside of dilated lymphatic vessels. We predicted that intussusceptive lymphangiogenesis occurred in lymphedema. Our findings indicate that ADSC transplantation contributes to lymphedema reduction by promoting LEC proliferation, improving fibrosis and dilation capacity of lymphatic vessels, and increasing the number of lymphatic vessels via intussusceptive lymphangiogenesis.