Spare Roof Technique: A New Technique for Hump Removal-The Step-by-Step Guide

Partial Release of Pyriform Ligament to Prevent Deformities on Keystone Area

The dorsal hump deformity is common among Western countries based on the nasal structure of Caucasians. Dorsal preservation techniques which leads keeping the keystone area intact can bring positive outcomes such as obtaining aesthetic dorsal lines and better functional results. The positions of soft tissue in the face are supported with a combination of static and dynamic ansatomy. The static support is maintained by ligaments and their associations. Among the ligaments, the pyriform ligament takes a particular role in terms of supporting the alar base, lower lateral cartilages, and nasal tip. In the present research, it was aimed to investigate the beneficial effects of releasing pyriform ligament partially in patients who received dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. The data of the patients who had dorsal rhinoplasty operations for hump deformity were screened retrospectively. A total of 139 patients were included according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and their records were assessed (112 females and 27 males). Twelve months after surgery, the median Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation score increased from 52.5 to 91.5 points ( P <0.001). Patient satisfaction was excellent in 86.95% of the included cases according to the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation score. The present study shows a new, suitable, and easy approach for releasing the pyriform ligaments partially and as well as also were left intact. It is suggested that manipulation of the pyriform ligament during push-down and let-down procedures seems to be essential for obtaining a better nasal tip as well as narrowing the nose base and getting better functional outcomes.

Septal Advancement Flap: Preserving, Restructuring, and Reshaping the Nasal Tip Contour with a Novel Flap

Tip support and the tip's exact final position-rotation and projection-remain a main concern among rhinoplasty surgeons. The available options can be classified into two groups: septal extension graft (variations including tongue-in-groove) and columellar strut (with all its variations). There is still the possibility of nasal tip ligament(s) preservation-namely the interdomal ligament, when anchoraged cephalically to the anterior septal angle preserving the tip support. Including this panoply of solutions, the author has identified some challenges with insufficient outcome. Based on engineering concepts, a novel septal flap was developed to facilitate a preferred tip position and shape. The septal advancement flap (SAF) is a rotational-advancement flap of the superior and caudal aspects of the cartilaginous septum that enables the surgeon to create stable and accurate tip shape and position. This flap was designed following the spare roof technique B sequence, although it can be completed along with any technique of structure or preservation rhinoplasty.

The Barn Doors Greenstick Fracture-A New 3D Geometry for Common Osteotomies in Rhinoplasty: The First 50 Patients with 1-Year Follow-up

The "barn doors greenstick fracture" is a new concept that includes three contiguous greenstick fractures: one in the central compartment of the nasal dorsum (nasal bones) and two on the lateral walls of the bony nasal pyramid. The present study aimed to describe this new concept and to report the first esthetical and functional outcomes. This prospective, interventional, and longitudinal study was performed on 50 consecutive patients undergoing primary rhinoplasty by spare roof technique B. The validated Portuguese version of the Utrecht questionnaire (UQ) for outcome assessment in esthetic rhinoplasty was utilized. Each patient answered the questionnaire online before surgery and 3 and 12 months after surgery. In addition, a visual analog scale (VAS) was used to score nasal patency for both sides. The patients also answered three questions (yes or no): (1) "Do you feel any step on your nasal dorsum?" if yes: (2) "Is that step visible?" (3) "Does it bother you?"A statistically significant improvement in UQ scores postsurgery was found, demonstrating a high satisfaction index in this patient population. Additionally, the preoperative and postoperative mean functional VAS scores showed a significant and consistent improvement on both sides (right and left). Twelve months after surgery, a step at the nasal dorsum was felt by 10% of the patients, but it was visible just in 4%, which were two females with thin skin.The barn doors greenstick concept provides a new approach to achieve a real and sustainable smooth transition in the dorsal and lateral walls. The association of the two lateral greensticks and the already described subdorsal osteotomy allows a real greenstick segment in the most critical esthetic region of the bony vault-the root of the nasal pyramid.

Ferreira-Ishida Technique: Spare Roof Technique B. Step-by-Step Guide to Preserving the Bony Cap While Dehumping

SUMMARY

For V-shaped nasal bones, the authors consider that ostectomy of the dorsal keystone area can be avoided, and this has led to the development of a new preservation technique: the spare roof technique B (or Ferreira-Ishida technique), where the bony cap is preserved. It includes six main steps, as follows. Step 1, draw on the surface of the skin the desired dorsal brow-tip aesthetic lines, the pyriform aperture, the rhinion, and the amount of triangular bone that has to be taken out to allow pushing-down the bony cap, and the transversal line in the beginning of the nasal hump. Step 2, release the upper lateral cartilages from the dorsal septum ("high septal strip"). Step 3, take out the amount of dorsal septum necessary to dehump. Step 4, perform the paramedian high parallel osteotomies exactly below the marked brow-tip dorsal aesthetic lines. Then, perform the second group of lower osteotomies, until the E-point, to achieve a triangular shape of bone in each side of the bony cap. Perform the ostectomy of the mentioned triangular areas. Release the lateral keystone area. Perform partial ultrasonic ostectomy endonasally, below the nasal bones, to promote the weakening of the transverse fracture line, in the sagittal plane just above the E-point. Push-down gently the rectangular bony cap with a Luc nasal forceps (19 cm) in a greenstick fashion. Perform lateral traditional osteotomies from high to low to high to narrow the bony bridge as much as is needed. Step 5, perform a regular L-shape Cottle septoplasty (if necessary). Step 6, suture the cartilaginous middle vault (upper lateral cartilages) to the dorsal aspect of the remaining septum.

The Caucasian Hump: Radiologic Study of the Osteocartilaginous Vault versus Surface Anatomy. Clinical Implications in Structured and Preservation Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

The relation between the osteocartilaginous nasal vault and nasal hump characteristics has not been fully investigated.

METHODS

Measurements were collected from computed tomographic nasal scans in the midsagittal plane in adult Caucasian patients seeking rhinoplasty because of nasal hump from January of 2015 to December of 2018. Measurements were compared to those of sex- and age-matched patients not seeking rhinoplasty (control group). Patients with other significant nasal deformities were excluded. The correlations between nasal hump length, height, and osteocartilaginous nasal vault measurements were assessed. Distances from the beginning of the nasal hump to the kyphion and ethmoidal points were measured as well. The location of the nasal hump apex in relation to the keystone area structures was detailed.

RESULTS

The study included 134 Caucasian patients, with 67 presenting nasal hump. The mean patient age was 32.9 years and 69.6 percent were female patients. Nasal hump measured a mean 17 ± 2.7 mm in length and 1.8 mm (range, 1.1 to 3.8 mm) in height. Nasal hump length correlated with nose length and nasal bone length. Nasal hump height correlated with nose length and the angle over the kyphion. In 97 percent of patients, the nasal hump began caudal to the ethmoidal point, and in all patients, the kyphion was underneath the nasal hump. The nasal hump is not a symmetric structure and, in all patients, its apex was situated above the septal cartilage.

CONCLUSIONS

The nasal hump characteristics are mainly attributable to the septal cartilage, and this should be the cornerstone of any dorsal hump reduction strategy. The caudal aspect of the nasal bones contributes to the nasal hump, whereas the posterior ethmoidal plate rarely does.

Minimally invasive techniques in rhinoplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To present criteria of minimally invasive surgery, which include minimal and hidden incision lines, reduced injury to tissue and application of endoscopic techniques, when feasible; to analyze techniques in rhinoplasty for their minimally invasive character - in light of recent publications; and to discuss the techniques that best meet the criteria of minimally invasive surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

The nose consists of about 60 percent soft tissue and 40 percent skeletal elements. Surgery causes injury to both tissue types through various mechanisms, including mechanical traction, separation, incision, heat, desiccation, and others. Multiple aspects including extent of approach and degree of tissue undermining determine the minimally invasive character of techniques and maneuvers in rhinoplasty.

SUMMARY

A single incision endonasal approach, the subperichondrial and subperiosteal septal plane, the supraperichondrial plane over the cartilaginous dorsum, the subperiosteal plane over the bony dorsum, limited dorsal undermining with endoscopic visualization when feasible, conventional straight lateral osteotomy or percutaneous curved lateral osteotomy; percutaneous transverse osteotomy; conventional straight paramedian osteotomy; piezo and drill paramedian ostectomy; dorsal uncapping osteotomy; conventional rasp gross dorsal contouring; piezo or drill fine dorsal contouring; (cartilaginous) middle vault 'let down'; and minimal access subperiosteal turbinate bone resection were found to best fulfil the criteria of minimally invasive surgery. A classification system for the degree of minimally invasiveness of rhinoplasty techniques is proposed as a basis for discussion.

Middle Vault Changes After Humpectomy by Spare Roof Technique Versus Component Dorsal Hump Reduction

Objectives: To compare the effect of two different humpectomy techniques in the internal nasal valve (INV) angle in human anatomic specimens. Methods: Seven human anatomic specimens (14 heminoses) were included. A strip of subdorsal septal cartilage was removed and, in each nose, the right side of the middle roof lied intact over and was sutured to the septal cartilage (spare roof technique [SRT]), whereas in the left side the upper lateral cartilage was folded and sutured to the septal cartilage (component dorsal hump reduction [CDHR]). The INV angle was measured pre- and postoperatively. Results: Mean age of the specimens was 69.86 (60-80) years. Five were female. CDHR resulted in a mean change of +1.71 ± 3.12° (p = 0.197), +0.62 ± 6.89° (p = 0.817) and +6.97 ± 6.84° (p = 0.036) after resection of 2, 4, and 6 mm of septal cartilage, respectively. SRT resulted in a mean change of +1.27 ± 2.37° (p = 0.207), +6.89 ± 1.19° (p < 0.001), and +12.55 ± 1.79° (p < 0.001) after resection of 2, 4, and 6 mm of septal cartilage, respectively. In SRT, the amount of septal cartilage resection presented a significant correlation with change in INV angle (r = 0.813, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this human anatomic study, SRT significantly increased INV angle.

120 Years of Dorsal Preservation in Rhinoplasty

Dorsal preservation techniques in rhinoplasty are experiencing a renaissance in recent years. New techniques and modifications to existing techniques are being described at an intensifying pace. Dorsal preservation, however, is not a new concept and was first described over 120 years ago. It is timely that we conduct a review of the key techniques and concepts of dorsal preservation in rhinoplasty that had been published over the past 120 years, at a moment in which we consider as a revival of this school of thought.

Spare Roof Technique Versus Component Dorsal Hump Reduction: A Randomized Prospective Study in 250 Primary Rhinoplasties, Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Most Caucasian aesthetic rhinoplasty patients complain about having a noticeable hump in profile view. Taking the integrity of the middle vault into consideration, there are 2 ways to dehump a nose: the structured technique and the preservation technique.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the aesthetic and functional outcomes of 2 reduction rhinoplasty techniques.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, randomized, interventional, and longitudinal study on 250 patients randomly divided into 2 groups: the component dorsal hump reduction group (CDRg) (n = 125) and the spare roof technique group (SRTg) (n = 125). We utilized the Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty. Patients answered the questionnaire before the surgery, and at 3 and 12 months after surgery. In addition, we utilized a visual analog scale (VAS) to score nasal patency for each side.

RESULTS

Analyses of the preoperative and postoperative aesthetic VAS scores showed a significant improvement in both groups, from 3.66 to 7.00 (at 3 months) to 7.35 (at 12 months) in the CDRg, and from 3.81 to 8.14 (at 3 months) to 8.45 (at 12 months) in the SRTg. Analyses of postoperative means of aesthetic VAS scores showed a significant improvement in both groups over time. However, aesthetic improvement was higher in the SRTg than in the CDRg at both 3 (P < 0.001) and 12 months (P < 0.001) postsurgery. Analyses of the mean functional VAS scores showed a significant improvement with both techniques, with a better result for the SRTg.

CONCLUSIONS

The SRT is a reliable technique that can help deliver consistently better aesthetic and functional results than CDR for reduction rhinoplasty in Caucasian patients with a dorsal hump.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Shaved Cartilage Gel Versus Diced Cartilage on Final Dorsal Camouflage: Prospective Study of 200 Patients

Importance: Diced cartilage (DC) is a reported technique that has been used for dorsal camouflage after reduction rhinoplasty. Nevertheless, there are certain issues regarding its use on nasal dorsum, especially its variable resorption rate and risk of graft distortion or migration, especially in thin-skinned patients. Recently, regenerative medicine protocols have been used to overcome drawbacks of methods based on DC. Thus, cartilage embedded in platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) has been described as a promising and reliable alternative to existing procedures. Objective: To compare long-term aesthetic outcomes of two different techniques for dorsal camouflage: DC versus shaved cartilage plus platelet-rich fibrin (SC+PRF)-shaved cartilage gel. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a prospective, interventional, and longitudinal study at an academic tertiary medical center. Participants were 200 consecutive patients undergoing primary reduction rhinoplasty by spare roof technique (SRT) or component dorsal reduction (CDR). Materials and Methods: The inclusion criteria were primary rhinoplasty, in Caucasian patients with dorsal hump, and camouflage of the dorsum by DC or SC+PRF. Exclusion criteria were ≤18 years of age, revision rhinoplasty and reconstructive rhinoplasty for neoplasic or severe traumatic nasal deformities. The "Utrecht Questionnaire for outcome assessment in aesthetic rhinoplasty" was used. Patients answered it before and after surgery (3 and 12 months after). Results: The study population included 200 patients divided into two groups considering the type of dorsal camouflage: DC (n = 132) and shaved cartilage gel (n = 68). The mean age at the time of surgery was 35.44 years (standard deviation ±9.78) and the study population included 130 females (65.0%) and 70 males (35.0%). Regarding aesthetic outcomes, analyses of postoperative means showed a significant improvement, in both groups, over time. However, self-assessment, based on the visual analogue scale (VAS), at 12 months postsurgery, was higher for patients with SC+PRF than with DC (p = 0.004). Twelve months after surgery, patients with thin skin had better aesthetic outcome with SC+PRF than with DC (p = 0.001). For both reduction rhinoplasty techniques, aesthetic outcomes, based on the VAS at 12 months after surgery, were significantly better for patients with SC+PRF (SRT: p = 0.016; CDR: p = 0.004). For both rhinoplasty approaches, either open or closed, aesthetic outcomes, based on the VAS at 12 months after surgery, were significantly better for patients with SC+PRF (closed approach: p = 0.046; open approach: p = 0.017). Conclusions: SC+PRF provides better long-term aesthetic outcomes, not only for thin-skinned patients, but also for patients who had undergone rhinoplasty by a structured or preservation technique, or by an open or closed approach, for dorsal hump reduction.