Lumbar Flap versus the Gold Standard

[Hairiness and Skin Colouration after Breast Reconstruction with a Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap and Reconstruction of the Nipple-Areolar Complex]

INTRODUCTION

Although DIEP (deep inferior epigastric perforator) is the gold standard for breast reconstruction, long-term results with a view to postoperative hairiness and flap skin colouration have rarely been described in the literature.

METHODS

Patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction followed by NAC reconstruction between 2010 and 2019 were invited to our clinic for a survey and a clinical examination. A total of 781 patients were invited. The survey included the BREAST-Q and a study-specific questionnaire. The clinical examination contained specific measurements regarding postoperative hairiness and skin colouration.

RESULTS

A total of 179 patients were examined, with 203 breasts having been reconstructed. Only breasts with a visible flap skin island were taken into further evaluation. A total of 109 DIEP flap and 77 NAC reconstructions were evaluated. In the patient-reported survey, 27.5% (30 of 109) reported additional flap hairiness and 62.4% (68 of 109) reported differences in flap skin colouration compared with the surrounding skin. The clinical examination revealed a significant difference between the skin colouration of the flap compared with the surrounding skin and the skin colouration of the reconstructed NAC compared with the existing original NAC. In both cases, the reconstructions appeared significantly "lighter" (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between patients with and without hair in terms of overall satisfaction evaluated by using the BREAST-Q. Neither did the colour difference have a significant influence on patients' satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Additional breast hairiness and different skin colouration is relevant and should be communicated preoperatively.

Shifting toward total drainless approach in DIEP flap-based breast reconstruction: Evaluation of safety

With increasing interest in swift postoperative recovery, there has been a trend toward omitting drains in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap-based breast reconstruction, ideally aiming to avoid drains in the breasts and abdomen. This study evaluated our transition toward total drainless reconstruction, focusing specifically on the safety of omitting drains in the breasts. Patients who underwent breast reconstruction with DIEP flap from 2018 to 2023 were reviewed. They were divided into 3 groups: group A (with drains in the abdomen and breast), group B (drains only in the breast), and group C (total drainless). For group C, routine ultrasound examinations were performed to check for fluid accumulation. Complication profiles were compared among the groups. In total, 294 cases were included, comprising 77 in group A, 112 in group B, and 105 in group C. Chronologically, a gradual increase in the proportion of cases in group C was observed, with the complication rates remaining stable. On comparing the complication profiles of the recipient and donor sites among the 3 groups, no significant differences were found. Breast seroma, persisting 1 month postoperatively, was exclusively detected in 6 (5.7%) cases within group C, all of whom were treated with outpatient clinic-based aspiration. When restricting the analysis to group C, a greater weight of mastectomy specimen and axillary lymph node dissections exhibited an independent association with breast seroma development. Smooth transition to total drainless DIEP breast reconstruction appears safe, without significantly increasing the risks of complication.

Purse-String DIEPplasty: A Technique to Improve Aesthetic Outcome of Autologous Breast Reconstruction

The purse-string DIEPplasty technique is a method to improve aesthetic outcomes in breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flaps. Traditionally, DIEP flaps, harvested from the lower abdomen, take on a triangular shape that can lead to sub-optimal aesthetic outcomes with occasionally poor breast projection, irregular contours, or minimal upper pole fullness. The purse-string DIEPplasty technique addresses these issues by using a 0 Polydioxanone continuous purse-string suture through the Scarpa's fascia to modify the harvested flap's shape before inset, giving it a more round base and a central dome-like projection similar to an implant. This method mimics the shape of a breast implant, enhancing the flap's projection, volumetric efficiency, and overall shape, leading to a reconstructed breast with improved aesthetic qualities. This technique represents a potential advancement in reconstructive breast surgery, aiming to reduce the extent of revision procedures and improve patient satisfaction. Further research, however, is needed to validate its effectiveness over time and assess potential complications.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Contemporary Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: Abdominally Based Flaps

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the types of abdominally based flaps, their anatomy, and their drawbacks. 2. Understand important aspects of the history and physical examination of patients wishing to undergo these procedures. 3. Understand the benefits of preoperative planning and its role in avoiding complication. 4. Understand the operative steps of the procedures and tips to increase efficiency. 5. Understand the postoperative care of these patients and the role of enhanced recovery pathways.

SUMMARY

In this article, the authors review the history, current state, and future directions related to abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction. This article covers preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations intended to improve patient outcomes and prevent complications. Evidence-based findings are reported when available to comprehensively review important aspects of these procedures.

Alternatives to the Gold Standard: A Systematic Review of Profunda Artery Perforator and Lumbar Artery Perforator Flaps for Breast Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the current gold-standard autologous option. The profunda artery perforator (PAP) and lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flaps have more recently been described as alternatives for patients who are not candidates for a DIEP flap. The aim of this study was to review the survival and complication rates of PAP and LAP flaps, using the DIEP flap as a benchmark.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Papers were screened by title and abstract, and full texts reviewed by three independent blinded reviewers. Quality was assessed using MINORS criteria.

RESULTS

Sixty-three studies were included, for a total of 745 PAP, 62 stacked PAP, 187 LAP, and 23,748 DIEP flap breast reconstructions. The PAP (98.3%) had comparable success rate to DIEP (98.4%), and the stacked PAP (88.7%) and LAP (92.5%) success rate was significantly lower (P < 0.0001). The PAP and LAP groups both had a low incidence of fat necrosis. However, the revision rate for the LAP group was 16.1% whereas the PAP group was 3.3%. Donor site wound dehiscence rate was 2.9 in the LAP group and 9.1% in the PAP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Profunda artery perforator and DIEP flaps demonstrate very high rates of overall survival. The LAP flap has a lower survival rate. This review highlights the survival and complication rates of these alternative flaps, which may help clinicians in guiding autologous reconstruction technique when a DIEP flap is unavailable.

Pedicle stabilization with fibrin sealant in DIEP flap breast reconstruction

Microsurgical procedures are nowadays routinely performed worldwide in reconstructive surgery. The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap has become the gold standard in breast reconstruction due to its excellent outcomes and lower donor site morbidity. However, complications, including flap failure, still occur in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Often, according to our experience, these complications result from pedicle disorders, which can be attributed to postoperative mobilization. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of using a fibrin sealant as a method for pedicle stabilization to prevent pedicle mobilization in the postoperative period. With our technique, after the flap insetting and microsurgical anastomosis, the pedicle was stabilized by applying a fibrin sealant (TISSEEL™) around and over the entire pedicle. Our study included a homogeneous series of 70 patients who received a delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate this novel technique compared to the conventional method. In our experience, the fibrin glue allowed us to reduce the strain for correct pedicle positioning and all subsequent efforts to avoid displacements in the postoperative period. Our preliminary results suggest that this method may lead to a reduction in overall complications attributable to pedicle disorders.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Breast Reconstruction With the Transverse Myocutaneous Gracilis Flap Using the BREAST-Q and Lower Extremity Function Scale

BACKGROUND

The transverse myocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap is a viable and safe option for breast reconstruction in patients with limited abdominal tissue or other contraindications for abdominal-based flaps. Although it is one of the most common flaps employed for breast reconstruction, data on patient-reported outcomes is limited.

OBJECTIVES

The authors seek to evaluate patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcome after breast reconstruction with the TMG flap.

METHODS

All patients who underwent breast reconstruction with a TMG flap between March 2010 and October 2020 were identified. Invitation to a digital version of the BREAST-Q reconstructive module and the Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS) was sent to 105 patients. Patient demographics, complications, and surgical details were collected and retrospectively analyzed. BREAST-Q and LEFS scores were calculated and compared to the literature.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients participated in the study. Median follow-up was 5.9 years, with a mean patient age of 45.7 years. Most patients (90.2%) received treatment due to previous cancer of the breast, and 17.1% underwent immediate reconstruction. The mean score for "Satisfaction with Breast" was 66/100. Postoperative lower extremity function was high, with a median LEFS score of 78/80. A LEFS score below the median value was found to be significantly associated with active smoking (P = .049). Patients also reported high satisfaction with donor sites (8/11).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcome after breast reconstruction with TMG flaps is high and comparable to other common techniques. Lower extremity function is not impaired after flap harvest.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Predictors and Consequences of Intraoperative Anastomotic Failure in DIEP Flaps

BACKGROUND

 Successful intraoperative microvascular anastomoses are essential for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap survival. This study identifies factors associated with anastomotic failure during DIEP flap reconstruction and analyzes the impact of these anastomotic failures on postoperative patient outcomes and surgical costs.

METHODS

 A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients undergoing DIEP flap reconstruction at two high-volume tertiary care centers from January 2017 to December 2020. Patient demographics, intraoperative management, anastomotic technique, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Data were analyzed using Student's t-tests, Chi-square analysis, and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

 Of the 270 patients included in our study (mean age 52, majority Caucasian [74.5%]), intraoperative anastomotic failure occurred in 26 (9.6%) patients. Increased number of circulating nurses increased risk of anastomotic failure (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence Interval [CI] 1.00-1.03, p <0.05). Presence of a junior resident also increased risk of anastomotic failure (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.01-6.34, p <0.05). Increased surgeon years in practice was associated with decreased failures (OR 0.12, CI 0.02-0.60, p <0.05). Intraoperative anastomotic failure increased the odds of postoperative hematoma (OR 8.85, CI 1.35-59.1, p <0.05) and was associated with longer operating room times (bilateral DIEP: 2.25 hours longer, p <0.05), longer hospital stays (2.2 days longer, p <0.05), and higher total operating room cost ($28,529.50 vs. $37,272.80, p <0.05).

CONCLUSION

 Intraoperative anastomotic failures during DIEP flap reconstruction are associated with longer, more expensive cases and increased rates of postoperative complications. Presence of increased numbers of circulators and junior residents was associated with increased risk of anastomotic failure. Future research is necessary to develop practice guidelines for optimizing patient and surgical factors for intraoperative anastomotic success.

"Spin" in Observational Studies in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is widely used in autologous breast reconstruction. However, the technique relies heavily on nonrandomized observational research, which has been found to have high risk of bias. "Spin" can be used to inappropriately present study findings to exaggerate benefits or minimize harms. The primary objective was to assess the prevalence of spin in nonrandomized observational studies on DIEP reconstruction. The secondary objectives were to determine the prevalence of each spin category and strategy.

Methods

MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from January 1, 2015, to November 15, 2022. Spin was assessed in abstracts and full-texts of included studies according to criteria proposed by Lazarus et al.

Results

There were 77 studies included for review. The overall prevalence of spin was 87.0%. Studies used a median of two spin strategies (interquartile range: 1-3). The most common strategies identified were causal language or claims (n = 41/77, 53.2%), inadequate extrapolation to larger population, intervention, or outcome (n = 27/77, 35.1%), inadequate implication for clinical practice (n = 25/77, 32.5%), use of linguistic spin (n = 22/77, 28.6%), and no consideration of the limitations (n = 21/77, 27.3%). There were no significant associations between selected study characteristics and the presence of spin.

Conclusions

The prevalence of spin is high in nonrandomized observational studies on DIEP reconstruction. Causal language or claims are the most common strategy. Investigators, reviewers, and readers should familiarize themselves with spin strategies to avoid misinterpretation of research in DIEP reconstruction.

Lumbar Artery Perforator Flaps in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

The lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap should be considered for autologous breast reconstruction when a patient's abdomen is unavailable as a donor site. The LAP flap can be harvested with dimensions and volume of distribution that facilitate the restoration of a naturally shaped breast with a sloping upper pole and maximal projection in the lower one-third. Harvest of LAP flaps lifts the buttocks and narrows the waist and, consequently, aesthetic improvement in body contour is generally achieved with these procedures. Although technically challenging, the LAP flap is a valuable tool in the practice of autologous breast reconstruction.

[Satisfaction and quality of life after DIEP-flap breast reconstruction]

Satisfaction and quality of life of patients who have undergone DIEP-flap breast reconstruction have been assessed by many authors in many countries using standardized tools. However, some simple and practical information is often not found in these studies. The aim of our work was to carry out a practical satisfaction survey of patients reconstructed by DIEP flap in our center. Our cohort was made up of 207 patients who underwent DIEP-flap breast reconstruction in Marseille between January 2014 and December 2020. A letter containing our original satisfaction survey was sent to all the patients in our sample. We received 104 responses, which were statistically analyzed using the flat sorting method. Nine-two percent of patients were globally satisfied with the result of their breast reconstruction. A large majority of patients are in favor of the idea of performing their reconstruction again using a DIEP flap. Fifty-five percent of participants were "not bothered at all" by their abdomen after their surgery. The DIEP flap is a versatile technique that allows surgeons to offer it in multiple breast reconstruction situations and to obtain a high degree of patient satisfaction.

Lumbar Artery Perforator Flaps: A Systematic Review of Free Tissue Transfers and Anatomical Characteristics

BACKGROUND

The lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap has gained popularity as a versatile flap in reconstructive surgery; however, few studies have analyzed salient characteristics of this flap. We set out to provide a comprehensive appraisal of free tissue transfers of LAP flaps with specific attention to anatomic features and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, we identified clinical, radiographic, and cadaveric studies of LAP flaps and assessed outcomes, complications, and anatomic parameters, such as pedicle length, diameter, location, and course.

RESULTS

A total of 254 articles were initially reviewed, of which 18 met the final inclusion criteria. Ten studies were primarily concerned with anatomic characteristics, and most clinical studies related to breast reconstruction. The operative durations varied between 4.8 and 9.2 hours. Partial and total flap losses were estimated at 2.6% and 7.6%, respectively. Acute revision rates ranged from 16% to 24% related to hematoma, arterial thrombus, and venous thrombus. Donor-site seromas were frequently encountered in breast reconstruction with an incidence of 17% to 78%.

CONCLUSIONS

The LAP flap has demonstrated favorable outcomes in various reconstructive scenarios. The caudal perforators generally offer more pedicle length, greater pedicle diameter, and septocutaneous course and may be better suited for flap design. For breast reconstruction, the LAP flap is a useful alternative to abdominal-based flaps, and special attention should be given to optimizing pedicle length using interposition grafts and methods that minimize seroma formation at the donor site.

A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Complications Related to Breast Reconstruction Using Different Skin Flaps After Breast Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

As the incidence of breast cancer rises, the number of mastectomy surgeries surges, so does the importance of postoperative breast reconstruction. The implementation of autologous flap restoration methods is becoming prevalent, although which is the best flap remains controversial. As a result, we performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare the eight most common flap in the reconstruction processor of breast cancer surgery. Our findings may help surgeons decide which skin flaps to use for breast reconstruction.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library for relevant literature. For our Bayesian network meta-analysis, we scrutinized 37 papers and evaluated the postoperative complications of eight commonly used breast reconstruction procedures. We also registered this study on PROSPERO, with the number CRD42021251989.

RESULTS

A total of 21,184 patients were included in this Bayesian network meta-analysis from 37 different studies. The results demonstrate that TRAM flaps are more prone to complications such as hernias in the abdominal wall and blood flow problems. Hematoma and seroma are more likely to follow LDP flaps. Combining LDP flaps with a prosthetic or autologous adipose tissue does not enhance the risk of postoperative problems appreciably. Fat liquefaction are relatively common in DIEP.

CONCLUSIONS

After breast reconstruction, several skin flaps can be employed as clinical choices. TRAM flaps are not recommended for patients with a weak abdominal wall structure, although LDP flaps or SIEA flaps can be considered instead. We do not advocate LDP flaps for patients who have had breast surgery because of the higher risk of hematoma or seroma, but DIEP flaps or LAP flaps can be utilized instead. We do not propose DIEP flaps for individuals who are at a higher risk of postoperative fat liquefaction, but LDP flaps or SIEA flaps can be used instead. However, this Bayesian network meta-analysis has limitations, and further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm its findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Truncal-based perforator flaps for autologous breast reconstruction: A review of 975 flaps and their clinical application

BACKGROUND

When autologous breast reconstruction is desired and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is inadequate or unavailable, other perforator flaps in the truncal region should not be disregarded. This study aimed to review all truncal-based perforator flaps used for autologous breast reconstruction to identify clinical indications and outcomes of alternate perforator flaps.

METHODS

From 2013 to 2018, patients undergoing truncal-based perforator flap breast reconstruction were reviewed and data recorded for; indications, pre-operative and intra-operative treatment decisions, flap failures, take-backs, and revisions. Compared to the gold standard of the DIEP flap, alternate truncal-based flaps were evaluated for their reconstructive merit and application.

RESULTS

A total of 975 perforator flaps were harvested circumferentially around the lower trunk. As an alternative or adjunct to the DIEP flap (n = 633, 65%), perforator flaps were harvested based on the superficial inferior epigastric, the deep and superficial circumflex iliac arteries, the intercostal, and lumbar arteries (n = 342, 35%). Overlapping vascular territories facilitate the safe harvest of these alternate flaps with 0.8% of flaps requiring take back (n = 8) and 0.2% flap failure rate (n = 2). There was no difference in peri-operative outcomes between anterior abdominal and alternate truncal-based flaps (p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Circumferential harvest of alternate truncal flaps is an appropriate option for autologous reconstruction with comparable peri-operative and long-term outcomes as compared to flaps from the anterior abdomen.

Donor Site Morbidity after Lumbar Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 The lumbar artery perforator flap is a second-choice flap in autologous breast reconstruction whenever a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is not possible. Ideal candidates are pear-shaped women who do not have enough bulk on the abdomen or thighs. Patient-reported "satisfaction with breasts" is excellent but we were curious about the donor site morbidity.

METHODS

 We performed a retrospective study of all lumbar flap breast reconstructions performed between 2010 and 2019. Patients were invited by e-mail and telephone to take part in a BREAST-Q survey.

RESULTS

 One hundred fifty-four flaps were performed in 110 patients. Sixty-three patients filled out the BREAST-Q questionnaire. The most frequently observed donor site complications are seroma (35.1%), dehiscence (8.4%), and hematoma (3.2%). Correction of the donor site scar was performed in 31.8% of patients, lipofilling of the donor flank in 5.2%, and liposuction of the contralateral flank in 18.3% of patients. Body mass index (BMI) was the only significant risk factor for donor site complications. Patient-reported "satisfaction with donor site appearance" was good but significantly lower for primary reconstructions compared with secondary and tertiary procedures. Flap weight significantly influences patient-reported "physical wellbeing of the donor site." Ninety-seven percent of patients would recommend the surgery to someone in a similar position and would do it all over.

CONCLUSION

 The lumbar artery perforator flap is a good alternative for breast reconstruction in selected patients. The donor site issues consist mainly of seromas, prolonged discomfort, and a scar that might be noticeable to others, but patient-reported satisfaction is very high.

Lessons Learned from 30 Years of Transverse Myocutaneous Gracilis Flap Breast Reconstruction: Historical Appraisal and Review of the Present Literature and 300 Cases

BACKGROUND

Happy 30th birthday to the transverse myocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap. Since 1991 the TMG flap has been used to reconstruct a wide variety of defects and became a workhorse flap and reliable alternative to the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap in many breast reconstruction services worldwide. This manuscript sheds light on the history and success of the TMG flap by critically reviewing the present literature and a series of 300 patients receiving a breast reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present literature and history of the TMG flap was reviewed and a retrospective double center cohort study of 300 free TMG free flaps for autologous breast reconstruction was conducted. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and post-operative complications were recorded and compared with literature findings.

RESULTS

Mean flap weight was 320 g. Mean pedicle length was 70 mm. Complications included 19 (6.3%) flap loss. 10 patients (3.3%) had postoperative cellulitis and 28 (9.3%) wound healing disturbance of the donor site.

CONCLUSION

Recipient and donor site complications were comparable to other free flaps used for breast reconstruction. A low BMI or the lack of an abdominal based donor site do not represent a limitation for breast reconstruction and can be overcome using the TMG flap.

An extended superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap transfer for a relatively-small breast reconstruction after total mastectomy

Superficial circumflex iliac artery (SCIA) perforator (SCIP) flap has been applied in various reconstructions. Unlike traditional groin flap, SCIP flap has a longer pedicle and can be used as a chimeric flap for complex reconstruction. By utilizing both the superficial and the deep branches of the SCIA, a SCIP flap can be raised as an extended large bulky flap. Although there are many articles reporting usefulness of SCIP flap, there is no case reporting a large SCIP flap transfer for breast reconstruction after total mastectomy. We applied a free extended SCIP flap for a case of post-total-mastectomy breast reconstruction. A 51-year-old female who had undergone total mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy was referred for autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Physical exam revealed that the iliac and lower abdominal regions were suitable for a donor site. As the patient desired to preserve a similar donor site for possible future contralateral breast reconstruction, the iliac region was selected as a donor site. A 23 × 15 cm SCIP flap was elevated based on the superficial and the deep branches of the SCIA, and was transferred to the recipient site. The SCIA and concomitant vein were anastomosed to the lateral thoracic artery and vein in an end-to-end fashion. Postoperative course was uneventful. The reconstructed breast shape and texture were similar to the contralateral breast with no donor site complication, and the patient was very satisfied with functionally and esthetically pleasing results. Extended SCIP flap may be an option for relatively-small breast reconstruction.

The Conjoined TUGPAP Flap for Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Illustrative Anatomy

Background:

Although abdominally based flaps continue to be the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction, alternative donor sites are necessary when the abdominal region is unavailable or inadequate for flap harvest. In this case, thigh-based flaps, such as the profunda artery perforator (PAP), transverse upper gracilis (TUG), or newly described TUGPAP, are thought to be reliable with low morbidity and satisfactory cosmesis. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of breast reconstruction with PAP, TUG, or TUGPAP, and present anatomy and surgical techniques through illustrative examples.

Methods:

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Articles were included if they used a PAP, TUG, or TUGPAP flap for oncologic, traumatic, or congenital breast reconstruction in patients 18 years or older.

Results:

Forty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. Seven hundred five patients underwent 906 breast reconstructions with 1037 flaps (755 TUG, 230 PAP, and 52 TUGPAP). Mean patient age was 45.9 years. The mean flap weight for TUG, PAP, and TUGPAP flaps were 323.4, 346.9, and 437.0 g, respectively. The most common recipient vessel was the internal mammary artery in 821 flaps. The overall flap survival rate was 97.2% (1008/1037). TUG flaps had a significantly higher recipient and donor complication rate compared with both PAP (recipient: 18.1% versus 7.8%, P = 0.0001; donor: 25.8% versus 7.0%, P < 0.00001) and TUGPAP flaps (recipient: 18.1% versus 2.0%, P < 0.001; donor: 25.8% versus 7.7%, P < 0.01).

Conclusion:

The TUGPAP flap is a safe and effective alternative for autologous breast reconstruction when the abdominal donor site is unavailable.

Management of patients with BRCA mutation from the point of view of a breast surgeon

Germ-line mutation in BRCA (BReast CAncer gene) 1 or BRCA2 are found in 3–4% of all women with breast cancer. These patients have a significant increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. They are often younger when diagnosed with the mutation, and the possible breast cancer they get is often aggressive with inferior outcome. There are risk reducing strategies, and the most powerful strategy is risk reducing surgery, both risk reducing bilateral mastectomy (RRM) and risk reducing bilateral salpino-oophorectomy (PBSO). This review is meant to address breast surgery in patients with germline BRCA mutation. The guidelines and techniques applied is under continuous change and it is important for the clinicians to be well informed to provide the patient with the information needed for them to make an informed decision on what risk strategy to choose.

•

Patients with germ-line mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have a significant increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.

•

There are different risk reducing strategies and the most powerful strategy is risk-reducing surgery, both risk reducing bilateral mastectomy and risk reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

•

Guidelines and techniques for the risk reducing surgery of the breast are under continuous change and improvement.

•

Breast conserving therapy is not associated with worse survival and is a good option for a BRCA mutation carrier diagnosed with breast cancer. Risk-reducing mastectomy can be performed in a later setting.

•

The management of BRCA mutation carriers, both affected and unaffected, should be performed in a multidisciplinary team. Physicians need to be systematically educated and updated on the most recent literature.

Perception of Breast Reconstruction among 10,299 Indian Women

Background

Less than 1% of women undergo breast reconstruction after mastectomy in India. To understand if the perception of breast reconstruction among Indian women is a contributing factor, a survey of 10,299 women was done.

Method In total

10,299 women answered questions from a questionnaire with the help of social workers (10,005) and using the Surveymonkey App (294).

Results An estimated

48.8% of women were aware of breast reconstruction. Around 77.5% felt that women would feel depressed after mastectomy, and 76.5% said they would prefer breast reconstruction. Irrespective of age and financial status, most women preferred breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Autologous reconstruction (79.6%) was preferred to implant reconstruction (20.4%). An estimated 71.3% liked the idea of a DIEP flap. When explained that DIEP flap may take 6-8 hours of surgery and cost about US $3500, only 48.8% would go for a DIEP flap. For early breast cancers, women preferred breast conservation surgery (65.7%) to mastectomy and breast reconstruction (34.3%). Women felt that the best way to increase awareness of breast reconstruction would be by social media (47.8%) followed by word of mouth (16.4%), television (13.4%), newspapers (11.7%), and magazines (10.6%).

Conclusions

Although the breast reconstruction rates are very low, women preferred breast reconstruction to mastectomy alone regardless of age and financial status. The surgical teams should devise strategies to assure woman that they can achieve reliable reconstruction at an affordable cost. Increasing experience and reduction of operation time would make autologous breast reconstruction affordable. This strategy could apply to most developing economies.

Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Low Body Mass Index Patients: Strategies for Maximizing Skin Envelope and Breast Volume

Pure autologous breast reconstruction in thin patients creates challenges. This review highlights techniques to optimize the scarce donor tissue available, approaches to reconstruction, and microsurgical techniques. A systematic approach to maximize breast volume and the skin envelope in patients who underwent pure autologous breast reconstruction by a single senior surgeon is presented with a clinical case series. Included in the study were 125 patients (217) with autologous breast reconstructions. Although DIEP flaps were the commonest flap used overall (79%), within in the low body mass index (<22) group, there was a greater use of Latissimus (32%), and thigh-based flaps (>50%).