Pediatric Skull Fracture Characteristics Associated with the Development of Leptomeningeal Cysts in Young Children after Trauma: A Single Institution's Experience

Follow up of infants with skull fractures by neurosurgeons due to the risk of growing fractures; is it needed?

INTRODUCTION

Growing skull fractures are a rare complication of paediatric skull fractures. Despite its rarity, a large proportion of resources go towards detecting this complication. This study aims to identify the factors associated with growing skull fracture development to determine which children require follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-centre retrospective study examining the referral data from all patients under one years old referred with head trauma between 2013 and 2023 (n = 246). Of these patients 189 sustained skull fractures, with two requiring surgery for a growing skull fracture. Referral data for all head injuries between 2008 and 2013 was unavailable but surgical records were accessed for the only case of a child who developed a growing skull fracture in this time period. Each fracture was analysed using the commuted tomography (CT) head for its characteristics, including fracture splay distance and fracture elevation/depression.

RESULTS

A total of 190 cases were reviewed, which showed a male to female ratio of 1.6:1. The majority of patients presented prior to one month of age and the most common mechanism of injury was a fall (80%). The most common fracture sustained was a linear fracture (87.4%). Of all fractures, the most common bone affected was the parietal bone (88.4%). Of those who developed a growing skull fracture, there was a significant difference in both the fracture splay distance (p < .05) and fracture elevation/depression distance (p < .05). All three patients who had growing skull fractures had a fracture splay distance above 5 mm at presentation and an elevation/depression of over 4 mm. 32% of children (n = 61) who had fractures had follow-up, with only nine having a fracture diastasis over 4mm.

CONCLUSION

Resources and investigations should focus on children with fracture displacement over 4mm and/or elevation/depression distance of over 3mm, as they are at significantly greater risk of growing skull fracture development.

Bone flap binding and transposition: a method for bone reconstruction in cranial burst fractures and early-stage growing skull fractures

PURPOSE

To introduce a method of cranial bone reconstruction for cranial burst fractures and early-stage growing skull fractures, named bone flap binding and transposition.

METHODS

Cranial burst fractures, severe head injuries predominantly observed in infants, are characterized by widely diastatic skull fractures coupled with acute extracranial cerebral herniation beneath an intact scalp through ruptured dura mater. These injuries can develop into growing skull fractures. This study included two cases to illustrate the procedure, with a particular focus on the bone steps in managing these conditions. The medical history, clinical presentation, surgical procedures, and postoperative follow-up were retrospectively studied. The details of the surgical procedure were described.

RESULTS

The method of bone reconstruction, named bone flap binding and transposition, was applied after the lacerated dural repair. Two bone pieces were combined to eliminate the diastatic bone defect and then fixed by an absorbable cranial fixation clip and bound by sutures. The combined bone flap was repositioned into the bone window, completely covering the area of the original dural laceration. Subsequently, the bone defect was transferred to the area of normal dura. The postoperative courses for the two infants were uneventful. Follow-up CT scans revealed new bone formation at the previous bone defect and no progressive growing skull fracture. The major cranial defects had disappeared, leaving only small residual defects at the corners of the skull bone window, which required further recovery and did not affect the solidity of the skull.

CONCLUSION

Bone flap binding and transposition provide a straightforward, cost-effective, and reliable method for cranial bone reconstruction of cranial burst fractures and early-stage growing skull fractures. This method has taken full advantage of the small infant's dura osteogenic potential without the need for artificial or metallic bone repair materials. The effectiveness of the method needs further validation with more cases in the future.

A retrospective study comprising 228 cases of pediatric scalp and skull lesions

BACKGROUND

Most neurosurgery presentations in children present with a mass that may be scalp and skull lesions, including neoplastic and congenital malformed structural lesions, respectively. Clinicians should make early diagnoses and identify cases requiring surgical intervention promptly to help achieve a better prognosis.

METHOD

This study retrospectively reviewed studies on children's scalp and skull lesions within a pediatric medical center's department of neurosurgery. The detailed clinical information and pathological types of these cases were scrutinized.

RESULT

A total of 228 children's scalp and skull lesions with clinical information and identified histopathology types were summarized. The most common scalp and skull lesions were benign dermoid cysts; malignant types were rare but can occur in children.

CONCLUSION

Based on the combined clinical symptoms and image information, children's scalp and skull lesions should be diagnosed early. Malignant scalp and skull lesions/other special cases should be treated seriously.

Growing skull fracture in a child with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Growing skull fracture (GSF) is a rare complication of head trauma in the pediatric population, commonly observed in children younger than 3 years.

DISCUSSION

In this report, the authors describe a case of a 3-year-old male child, with clinical features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), who developed a GSF in frontal bone after a crib fall, treated with duraplasty and cranioplasty with autologous craft. Here, pertinent literature was reviewed with an emphasis on surgical techniques, and correlation with the mentioned syndrome.

CONCLUSION

This is the first case of GSF in association with EDS in the literature. The relevance of the case described concerns the rarity of the condition itself, the atypical presentation, and the intraoperative findings, which showed the important fragility of the dura mater, probably due to EDS. Therefore, this syndrome, besides having influenced the pathogenesis, was also a challenging factor in the surgical treatment.

Protocolized management of isolated linear skull fractures at a level 1 pediatric trauma center

OBJECTIVE

Isolated linear skull fractures without intracranial findings rarely require urgent neurosurgical intervention. A multidisciplinary fracture management protocol based on antiemetic usage was implemented at our American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 pediatric trauma center on July 1, 2019. This study evaluated protocol safety and efficacy.

METHODS

Children younger than 18 years with an ICD-10 code for linear skull fracture without acute intracranial abnormality on head CT were compared before and after protocol implementation. The preprotocol cohort was defined as children who presented between July 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017; the postprotocol cohort was defined as those who presented between July 1, 2019, and July 1, 2020.

RESULTS

The preprotocol and postprotocol cohorts included 162 and 82 children, respectively. Overall, 57% were male, and the median (interquartile range) age was 9.1 (4.8-25.0) months. The cohorts did not differ significantly in terms of sex (p = 0.1) or age (p = 0.8). Falls were the most common mechanism of injury (193 patients [79%]). After protocol implementation, there was a relative increase in patients who fell from a height > 3 feet (10% to 29%, p < 0.001) and those with no reported injury mechanism (12% to 16%, p < 0.001). The neurosurgery department was consulted for 86% and 44% of preprotocol and postprotocol cases, respectively (p < 0.001). Trauma consultations and consultations for abusive head trauma did not significantly change (p = 0.2 and p = 0.1, respectively). Admission rate significantly decreased (52% to 38%, p = 0.04), and the 72-hour emergency department revisit rate trended down but was not statistically significant (2.8/year to 1/year, p = 0.2). No deaths occurred, and no inpatient neurosurgical procedures were performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Protocolization of isolated linear skull fracture management is safe and feasible at a high-volume level 1 pediatric trauma center. Neurosurgical consultation can be prioritized for select patients. Further investigation into criteria for admission, need for interfacility transfers, and healthcare costs is warranted.