Nasolabial Revisions in Unilateral Incomplete Cleft Lip: One Surgeon's 28-Year Experience

From Bedside to Bench and Back: Advancing Our Understanding of the Pathophysiology of Cleft Palate and Implications for the Future

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive understanding of the pathophysiology of cleft palate (CP) and future perspectives.

DESIGN

Literature review.

SETTING

Setting varied across studies by level of care and geographical locations.

INTERVENTIONS

No interventions were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Primary outcome measures were to summarize our current understanding of palatogenesis in humans and animal models, the pathophysiology of CP, and potential future treatment modalities.

RESULTS

Animal research has provided considerable insight into the pathophysiology, molecular and cellular mechanisms of CP that have allowed for the development of novel treatment strategies. However, much work has yet to be done to connect our mouse model investigations and discoveries to CP in humans. The success of innovative strategies for tissue regeneration in mice provides promise for an exciting new avenue for improved and more targeted management of cleft care with precision medicine in patients. However, significant barriers to clinical translation remain. Among the most notable challenges include the differences in some aspects of palatogenesis and tissue repair between mice and humans, suggesting that potential therapies that have worked in animal models may not provide similar benefits to humans.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased translation of pathophysiological and tissue regeneration studies to clinical trials will bridge a wide gap in knowledge between animal models and human disease. By enhancing interaction between basic scientists and clinicians, and employing our animal model findings of disease mechanisms in concert with what we glean in the clinic, we can generate a more targeted and improved treatment algorithm for patients with CP.

Longitudinal Morphological Changes in the Mucosal Free Margin After Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair

Weakness of the mucosal free margin is common in secondary cleft lip deformities. However, the incidence is rarely reported after a long-term follow-up. We evaluated the evolution of patient mucosal free margin after primary repair and until the end of growth.

Blinded retrospective study (photography and chart reviews).

Tertiary care hospital; private practice.

Forty-eight patients with unilateral cleft lip with or without cleft palate who underwent primary nasolabial repair between 1996 and 2004 were followed up until their end of growth marked at 18 and 16 years of age for male and female patients, respectively.

Primary nasolabial repair using a straight-line closure without a triangular flap on the vermilion was performed; if needed, a revision surgery was performed at 5 years of age (85%).

The contour of the mucosal free margin was classified into nodular, smooth, and recessed types at 1, 5, and 10 years and at the end of growth.

At 1 year of age, the nodular type was more common (58%). However, the recessed type was more common (75%) at the end of growth. The mucosal free margin continued to change after 10 years of age. At the end of growth, half of the patients with incomplete cleft experienced center weakness, and the others had cleft-side weaknesses.

Patients with incomplete clefts showed favorable results at early ages. However, two-thirds of the patients with complete and incomplete clefts showed focal weakness at the end of growth.

Lessons Learned from a Single Institution's Eight Years of Experience with Early Cleft Lip Repair

Background and Objectives: The traditional approach in managing wide cleft lip deformities involves presurgical nasoalveolar molding (NAM) therapy followed by surgical cleft lip repair between three and six months of age. This institution has implemented an early cleft lip repair (ECLR) protocol where infants undergo primary cleft lip repair between two and five weeks of age without NAM. This study aims to present this institution's ECLR repair protocol over the past eight years from 188 consecutive patients with unilateral or bilateral CL/P deformity. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review was conducted at Children's Hospital Los Angeles evaluating patients who underwent ECLR before three months of age and were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II from 2015-2022. Anthropometric analysis was performed, and pre- and postoperative photographs were evaluated to assess nasal and lip symmetry. Results: The average age at cleft lip repair after correcting for gestational age was 1.0 ± 0.5 months. Mean operative and anesthetic times were 120.3 ± 33.0 min and 189.4 ± 35.4, respectively. Only 2.1% (4/188) of patients had postoperative complications. Lip revision rates were 11.4% (20/175) and 15.4% (2/13) for unilateral and bilateral repairs, respectively, most of which were minor in severity (16/22, 72.7%). Postoperative anthropometric measurements demonstrated significant improvements in nasal and lip symmetry (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates the safety and efficacy of ECLR in correcting all unilateral cleft lip and nasal deformities of patients who were ASA classes I or II. At this institution, ECLR has minimized the need for NAM, which is now reserved for patients with bilateral cleft lip, late presentation, or comorbidities that preclude them from early repair. ECLR serves as a valuable option for patients with a wide range of cleft severity while reducing the burden of care.

Long-Term Outcome of Primary Rhinoplasty with Overcorrection in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip: Avoiding Intermediate Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists regarding the timing or technique of rhinoplasty for correction of the unilateral cleft lip nose deformity, with few studies examining the long-term effects of a single technique. This study appraised the long-term outcomes of primary rhinoplasty using the Tajima technique for overcorrection in a cohort of patients with unilateral cleft lip nose deformity after attaining skeletal maturity.

METHODS

Consecutive nonsyndromic patients with unilateral cleft lip nose deformity ( n = 103) who underwent primary rhinoplasty with overcorrection by a single surgeon between 2000 and 2005 were reviewed. Patients with unilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity who underwent primary rhinoplasty (but with no overcorrection) ( n = 30) and noncleft individuals ( n = 27) were recruited for comparison. Outcomes were assessed through FACE-Q scales evaluating satisfaction with appearance of nose and nostrils (two scales) and computer-based objective photogrammetric analysis of nasal symmetry (nostril height, nostril width, nostril area, alar height, and alar width parameters).

RESULTS

Significant differences (all P < 0.001) were observed between the Tajima and non-Tajima groups for all but one photogrammetric nasal parameter (nostril area), with the Tajima group demonstrating closer mean values to the noncleft group. The Tajima and noncleft groups demonstrated no significant difference (all P > 0.05) for scores of FACE-Q nose and nostrils scales.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that the patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty with overcorrection had improved results with no necessity for intermediate rhinoplasty, emphasizing that the procedure is an effective approach to correct the unilateral cleft nose deformity.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Growth patterns of the nasolabial region following unilateral cleft lip primary repair

Surgical correction is the optimal way of repairing a congenital cleft lip. Patients with this condition often undergo initial surgical treatment at an early age and achieve an acceptable outcome. However, their levels of satisfaction will decrease in later stages of life as facial growth and development will inevitably cause changes in long-term outcomes, especially in the nasolabial region. Therefore, it is important for surgeons to understand nasolabial development after primary treatment and tailor their surgical techniques appropriately. This review focuses on the growth patterns of the nasolabial region after primary repair, so as to provide references for operative strategy.