1
|
Tinajero J, Rashid T. Urologic oncology considerations in transgender and gender diverse patients. Curr Opin Urol 2024; 34:314-322. [PMID: 38932479 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review delves into the pressing issue of urologic oncology considerations within the transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) community. With estimates suggesting that TGD individuals constitute 0.3 to 0.5% of adults worldwide, and this number steadily rising, our review examines the barriers that impede the delivery of excellent quality care, particularly in the context of cancer diagnosis and treatment. RECENT FINDINGS Recent findings highlight disparities in cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment access for TGD individuals. These challenges are compounded by a dearth of research and the failure of healthcare systems to account for gender identity and its nuances in data collection. Main themes in the literature include the impact of gender-affirming hormone therapy and surgery on cancer risk, challenges in prostate cancer screening and management, and considerations pertinent to testicular and other urological cancers in TGD patients. SUMMARY The implications for clinical practice and research are profound and emphasize the need for multidisciplinary approaches that cater to the unique healthcare needs of TGD individuals. This includes comprehensive strategies for inclusive and accurate data collection, alongside the development of evidence-based guidelines for cancer screening and management tailored specifically to this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Tinajero
- Chelsea Centre for Gender Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
| | - Tina Rashid
- Chelsea Centre for Gender Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
- Nuffield Health Parkside Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saltman AJ, Dorante MI, Jonczyk MM, Chiu M, Bene NC, Kasabwala K, Freniere BB. Outcomes of Orchiectomy for Gender-affirming Surgery: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Study. Urology 2023; 180:98-104. [PMID: 37479143 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify perioperative outcomes of transgender orchiectomy (TGO) and to broadly compare outcomes of TGO to cisgender orchiectomy (CGO) for nononcologic indications. METHODS Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2010 to 2020, a retrospective study was performed on patients with ICD-9/10 codes for gender dysphoria, testicular torsion, and testicular pain who underwent simple orchiectomy. Demographics and surgical outcomes were summarized. Welch two-sample t test and chi-square test were used for group analysis. A trend analysis was performed for temporal trends of these surgeries. RESULTS 246 patients underwent TGO and 997 patients underwent CGO (607 testicular torsion, 390 testicular pain). Overall complication rates between TGO and CGO did not differ for testicular torsion (3.7% vs 4.4%, P = .6) or testicular pain (3.7% vs 5.9%, P = .2). No differences in patient characteristics were seen within the TGO group when comparing those who experienced complications to those who didn't. From 2015 to 2020, TGO cases significantly increased by, on average, 9.5 cases per year (95% CI: 6.3-12.7, P = .001), while CGO had showed no significant temporal change. CONCLUSION Standalone TGO can be performed safely in an outpatient setting with an acceptable complication profile in medically diverse patients.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ojala K, Saarinen M, Suominen S, Schantz PMV. Preoperative breast imaging and histopathological findings in chest contouring surgery on transmen. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 85:114-119. [PMID: 37480681 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.06.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chest contouring is the most common surgical procedure transmen receive. Only a few articles discuss the importance of preoperative imaging and postoperative histopathological analysis of excised breast tissue. We studied the findings of preoperative breast imaging and the results of postoperative histopathological analysis in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from 220 patients were collected retrospectively from 2005 to 2018. Preoperative imaging modalities and their findings were recorded and classified according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. The histopathological findings in breast specimens were categorized based on the World Health Organization Classification of Breast Tumors (5th edition). RESULTS Preoperative imaging was performed in 133 (60.5%) patients. Patients in the ultrasound-only group were younger (mean age 22.8) than the other groups (mammogram (MGR) 37 years and MGR+US 35.5 years). Preoperative imaging results were normal in 131 (98.5%) patients. Two patients needed further evaluation. Histopathological results were available on 206 (93.6%) patients. The most common histopathological findings were fibrosis (67.5%), atrophy (34.3%), and chronic mastopathy (14.5%). There were no high-risk or malignant findings. CONCLUSIONS The need for further examinations based on routine preoperative imaging was low (1.5%). Therefore, more individualized patient selection for preoperative imaging is justified. There were no high-risk or malignant findings in histopathological analysis, and the occurrence of benign findings was similar to that reported in previous studies. Despite our findings, based on current knowledge, histopathological examination of excised breast tissue can still be recommended. Therefore, future studies are needed to define clear guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaisu Ojala
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and the University of Helsinki, Stenbackinkatu 11, P.O. Box 281, 00029, Finland.
| | - Mirjam Saarinen
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and the University of Helsinki, Stenbackinkatu 11, P.O. Box 281, 00029, Finland
| | - Sinikka Suominen
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and the University of Helsinki, Stenbackinkatu 11, P.O. Box 281, 00029, Finland
| | - Päivi Merkkola-von Schantz
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and the University of Helsinki, Stenbackinkatu 11, P.O. Box 281, 00029, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Panichella JC, Araya S, Nannapaneni S, Robinson SG, You S, Gubara SM, Gebreyesus MT, Webster T, Patel SA, Hamidian Jahromi A. Cancer screening and management in the transgender population: Review of literature and special considerations for gender affirmation surgery. World J Clin Oncol 2023; 14:265-284. [PMID: 37583948 PMCID: PMC10424092 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v14.i7.265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Literature focused on cancer screening and management is lacking in the transgender population. AIM To action to increase contributions to the scientific literature that drives the creation of cancer screening and management protocols for transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) patients. METHODS We performed a systematic search of PubMed on January 5th, 2022, with the following terms: "TGNC", OR "transgender", OR "gender non-conforming", OR "gender nonbinary" AND "cancer screening", AND "breast cancer", AND "cervical cancer", AND "uterine cancer", AND "ovarian cancer", AND "prostate cancer", AND "testicular cancer", AND "surveillance", AND "follow-up", AND "management". 70 unique publications were used. The findings are discussed under "Screening" and "Management" categories. RESULTS Screening: Current cancer screening recommendations default to cis-gender protocols. However, long-term gender-affirming hormone therapy and loss to follow-up from the gender-specific specialties contribute to a higher risk for cancer development and possible delayed detection. The only known screening guidelines made specifically for this population are from the American College of Radiology for breast cancer. Management: Prior to undergoing Gender Affirmation Surgery (GAS), discussion should address cancer screening and management in the organs remaining in situ. Cancer treatment in this population requires consideration for chemotherapy, radiation, surgery and/or reconstruction. Modification of hormone therapy is decided on a case-by-case basis. The use of prophylactic vs aesthetic techniques in surgery is still debated. CONCLUSION When assessing transgender individuals for GAS, a discussion on the future oncologic risk of the sex-specific organs remaining in situ is essential. Cancer management in this population requires a multidisciplinary approach while the care should be highly individualized with considerations to social, medical, surgical and gender affirming surgery related specifications. Special considerations have to be made during planning for GAS as surgery will alter the anatomy and may render the organ difficult to sample for screening purposes. A discussion with the patient regarding the oncologic risk of remaining organs is imperative prior to GAS. Other special considerations to screening such as the conscious or unconscious will to unassociated with their remaining organs is also a key point to address. We currently lack high quality studies pertinent to the cancer topic in the gender affirmation literature. Further research is required to ensure more comprehensive and individualized care for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet C Panichella
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Sthefano Araya
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, United States
| | - Siddhartha Nannapaneni
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, United States
| | - Samuel G Robinson
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Susan You
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Sarah M Gubara
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Maria T Gebreyesus
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Theresa Webster
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 18045, United States
| | - Sameer A Patel
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, United States
| | - Alireza Hamidian Jahromi
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Temple University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Defreyne J, Vander Stichele C, Iwamoto SJ, T'Sjoen G. Gender-affirming hormonal therapy for transgender and gender-diverse people-A narrative review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2023; 86:102296. [PMID: 36596713 PMCID: PMC11197232 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.102296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
As the number of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people accessing gender-affirming care increases, the need for healthcare professionals (HCPs) providing gender-affirming hormonal therapy (GAHT) also increases. This chapter provides an overview of the HCPs interested in getting involved in providing GAHT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Defreyne
- Department of Endocrinology and Center for Sexology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Clara Vander Stichele
- Department of Endocrinology and Center for Sexology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Sean J Iwamoto
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, and Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - G T'Sjoen
- Department of Endocrinology and Center for Sexology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gurrala RR, Kumar T, Yoo A, Mundinger GS, Womac DJ, Lau FH. The Impact of Exogenous Testosterone on Breast Cancer Risk in Transmasculine Individuals. Ann Plast Surg 2023; 90:96-105. [PMID: 36534108 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exogenous testosterone is vital to gender-affirming therapy for transmasculine individuals. Testosterone may be implicated in breast cancer (BCa) because it can activate androgen and estrogen receptors. To further explore this risk, we performed a systematic review to investigate the impact of exogenous testosterone on BCa risk in transmasculine individuals. METHODS We searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Ovid/Embase for clinical and preclinical studies assessing BCa and testosterone therapy and screened 6125 articles independently. We ascertained level of evidence using a modified tool from Cook et al (Chest. 1992;102:305S-311S) and risk of bias using a modified Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tool. RESULTS Seventy-six studies were included. Epidemiological data suggested that BCa incidence was higher in transmasculine individuals compared with cisgender men but lower compared with cisgender women. Histological studies of transmasculine breast tissue samples also demonstrated a low incidence of precancerous lesions. Interestingly, cases demonstrated that BCa occurred at a younger average age in transmasculine individuals and was predominantly hormone receptor positive. The mechanism for BCa in transmasculine individuals may be related to androgen receptor stimulation or conversion to estradiol. Serum studies reported varied estradiol levels associated with exogenous testosterone. Animal and in vitro studies demonstrated that testosterone was growth inhibitory but may induce proliferation at higher doses or with low estradiol levels. CONCLUSIONS Plastic surgeons play a critical role in providing gender-affirming care for transmasculine patients. The limited studies available suggest that this patient population has decreased risk for BCa when compared with cisgender women; however, any BCa that does occur may have different clinical presentations and underlying mechanisms compared with cisgender women and men. Overall, the limitations for clinical studies and discrepancies among preclinical studies warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Aran Yoo
- Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, LA
| | | | - Daniel J Womac
- Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, LA
| | - Frank H Lau
- Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, LA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cornejo KM, Oliva E, Crotty R, Sadow PM, Devins K, Wintner A, Wu CL. Clinicopathologic features and proposed grossing protocol of orchiectomy specimens performed for gender affirmation surgery. Hum Pathol 2022; 127:21-27. [PMID: 35660072 PMCID: PMC9489654 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Gender affirmation surgery performed for gender dysphoria is increasing to instigate changes more closely approximating gender identity. We investigated the clinicopathologic features of gender-affirming orchiectomies performed at our institution and devised a grossing protocol for these increasingly encountered specimens. We obtained 45 orchiectomies from 23 patients and reviewed clinicopathologic features. The number of sections per case was noted and reviewed to devise an optimal grossing protocol to assess pathologic findings. Twenty-three patients had bilateral orchiectomy with 1 unilateral. The average patient age was 39.4 years (range, 21-71 years); all received hormones for a mean of 66.1 months (range, 12-348 months). The average number of slides per orchiectomy was 8 slides (range, 1-11). Aspermatogenesis occurred in 32 (71%), hypospermatogenesis in 8 (18%), and normal spermatogenesis in 5 (11%) testes. Twenty-five (56%) exhibited scattered cells with nuclear cytomegaly, concerning for germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS), but OCT4 negative. Six (13%) had multinucleated stromal cells. Leydig cells were markedly reduced/absent in 38 testes (85%). Epithelial hyperplasia was identified in 15 rete testes (33%) and 24 epididymes (53%), while 18 (40%) showed periepididymal muscular hyperplasia. All findings were identified in the initial 2 slides including rete testis/epididymis, except for 3 cases, missing only focal tubular sclerosis. Despite all received treatment, only a subset showed changes of exogenous hormone therapy. The presence of nuclear cytomegaly can mimic GCNIS and may be a potential pitfall. Two sections to include rete testis/epididymis and a third of cord margin are sufficient to identify the relevant pathology and germ cell tumors overall are uncommon in orchiectomies performed for gender affirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine M Cornejo
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Esther Oliva
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Rory Crotty
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Peter M Sadow
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Kyle Devins
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Anton Wintner
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Chin-Lee Wu
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kelley JT, McMullen-Tabry ER, Skala SL. Reproductive Organ Pathology of Individuals Undergoing Gender-Affirming Surgery. Surg Pathol Clin 2022; 15:421-434. [PMID: 35715169 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2022.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
As gender-affirming surgeries become more routine, it is increasingly important for pathologists to recognize the expected histologic changes seen in various tissues secondary to gender-affirming hormone therapy. For example, exogenous testosterone-related squamous atrophy or transitional cell metaplasia of the cervix may be confused for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. In addition to distinguishing between benign and dysplastic/malignant features, pathologists should be mindful of the phrasing of their reports and aim to use objective, nongendered language.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin T Kelley
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Emily R McMullen-Tabry
- Department of Pathology, Grand Traverse Pathology, PLLC, 1105 6th Street, Traverse City, MI 49684, USA
| | - Stephanie L Skala
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
D'hoore L, T'Sjoen G. Gender-affirming hormone therapy: An updated literature review with an eye on the future. J Intern Med 2022; 291:574-592. [PMID: 34982475 DOI: 10.1111/joim.13441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
In line with increasing numbers of transgender (trans) and gender nonbinary people requesting hormone treatment, the body of available research is expanding. More clinical research groups are presenting data, and the numbers of participants in these studies are rising. Many previous review papers have focused on all available data, as these were scarce, but a more recent literature review is timely. Hormonal regimens have changed over time, and older data may be less relevant for today's practice. In recent literature, we have found that even though mental health problems are more prevalent in trans people compared to cisgender people, less psychological difficulties occur, and life satisfaction increases with gender-affirming hormone treatment (GAHT) for those who feel this is a necessity. With GAHT, body composition and contours change towards the affirmed sex. Studies in bone health are reassuring, but special attention is needed for adolescent and adult trans women, aiming at adequate dosage of hormonal supplementation and stimulating therapy compliance. Existing epidemiological data suggest that the use of (certain) estrogens in trans women induces an increased risk of myocardial infarction and stroke, the reason that lifestyle management can be an integral part of trans health care. The observed cancer risk in trans people does not exceed the known cancer-risk differences between men and women. Now it is time to integrate the mostly reassuring data, to leave the overly cautious approach behind, to not copy the same research questions repeatedly, and to focus on longer follow-up data with larger cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurens D'hoore
- Department of Endocrinology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Guy T'Sjoen
- Department of Endocrinology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Center for Sexology and Gender, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Parmeshwar N, Song S, Alcon A, Kim EA. The Incidence of Breast Cancer After Gender-Affirming Mastectomy in Transmen. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 88:S332-S336. [PMID: 35180758 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of breast cancer in transmale patients and their continued risk after gender-affirming mastectomy (GAM) has not been well established. Plastic surgeons who offer GAM are often one of the few medical professionals sought out by this population, placing them in a unique position to not only deliver surgical care but also improve access to preventative cancer care. METHODS We reviewed the senior author's experience with GAMs over the past 5 years for any incidence of breast cancer noted after or at time of surgery. We subsequently performed a thorough review of the literature for cases of breast cancer in transmen, to provide a comprehensive overview of screening, therapy, and postoperative surveillance practices. RESULTS We identified 2 cases of breast cancer (ages 49 and 54 years) found on routine examination of pathology specimens after GAM at our institution. Both patients had been taking hormone therapy for the past 1 year. Pathology specimen revealed low-grade estrogen receptor-/progesterone receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ in 1 patient, and estrogen receptor-/progesterone receptor-positive invasive ductal carcinoma in the other. Both patients were referred to oncology for appropriate treatment, and both elected to continue their exogenous hormone therapy for personal reasons.Review of the literature demonstrated 36 other cases of documented breast cancer in transmen. Sixty-seven percent (24) were found after GAM, and of those, 50% were incidentally found on pathology specimen. At least 50% were found to be either estrogen-, progesterone-, or androgen receptor-positive cancers. At least 17% of cases documented continued use of masculinizing hormone therapy after cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Most documented cases of breast cancer in transmen were diagnosed after gender-affirming surgery, which would suggest residual breast tissue does pose some risk for breast cancer. In addition, those diagnosed with cancer may elect to continue exogenous testosterone therapy despite potential added risks with hormone-receptor positivity. These cases highlight the need for agreement in current screening practices, surgical recommendations, and continuation of masculinizing hormone therapy.Plastic surgeons have the unique opportunity to educate these patients on appropriate breast cancer-related surveillance both before and after chest surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nisha Parmeshwar
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California San Francisco
| | - Siyou Song
- University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
| | - Andre Alcon
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California San Francisco
| | - Esther A Kim
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Incidence of Testicular Cancer in Transfeminine Patients following Vaginoplasty with Orchidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10:e4051. [PMID: 35450259 PMCID: PMC9015195 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Background Little is known about the prevalence of testicular cancer in the transfeminine population. Only six cases have been reported in the literature. This case series reports six additional cases of various testicular cancers found in transfeminine patients who underwent vaginoplasty with orchidectomy in our institution. Methods In our institution, all specimens are routinely sent to pathology following vaginoplasty with orchidectomy. This permitted the identification of all positive cases of testicular cancer. A chart review was conducted to retrieve patient demographics, duration of hormonotherapy, type of neoplasm, the context of its discovery, and cancer follow-up. Results A total of 2555 patients underwent vaginoplasty with orchidectomy between January 2016 and January 2021. All specimens were sent to pathology for analysis. A total of six (0.23% of patients) specimens revealed malignant lesions. Conclusions Increased societal awareness toward the transgender population encourages recourse to gender-affirming procedures. Little is known about the incidence of testicular cancer in the transfeminine population. In total, 0.23% of patients in our cohort presented with positive pathology findings indicative of testicular cancer. All cancers were found to be only locally invasive, and all patients were successfully treated. We therefore encourage routine pathology examination for all specimens following vaginoplasty with orchidectomy.
Collapse
|
12
|
Andrews AR, Kakadekar A, Greene DN, Khalifa MA, Santiago V, Schmidt RL. Histologic Findings in Surgical Pathology Specimens From Individuals Taking Masculinizing Hormone Therapy for the Purpose of Gender Transition: A Systematic Scoping Review. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 146:766-779. [PMID: 34559874 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0774-ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Transgender men and transmasculine persons experience a discordance between the female sex they were assigned at birth and their gender. They may choose to take hormone therapy and/or undergo surgery to masculinize the body. Understanding the common (and less common) histologic changes present in patients taking masculinizing hormones will empower pathologists to better serve this unique patient population. OBJECTIVE.— To summarize histologic findings in surgical pathology specimens from persons taking masculinizing hormones as a part of gender transition. DATA SOURCES.— A systematic review of the OVID Medline and PubMed databases was performed to identify all studies describing histologic findings in surgical pathology specimens from transgender men from January 1946 to January 2021. CONCLUSIONS.— Publication in this area has markedly increased in the last 2 decades. However, most of the studies identified were descriptive and case reports describing changes seen in specimens removed as a part of masculinizing surgical procedures. Benign histologic findings include stromal hyalinization and epithelial atrophy in the breast, polycystic ovarian syndrome-like changes in the ovary, and transitional cell metaplasia in the cervix. The most commonly reported neoplastic finding was adenocarcinoma of the breast, with rare cases of ovarian, endometrial, cervical, vaginal, pituitary, pancreatic, and cardiovascular neoplasia also reported. Ongoing research in this area is needed to better characterize the histologic findings in persons taking masculinizing hormones to provide a deeper understanding of the effect of these treatments on different tissues and facilitate better patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia R Andrews
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK Canada (Andrews, Kakadekar)
| | - Archan Kakadekar
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK Canada (Andrews, Kakadekar)
| | - Dina N Greene
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Laboratories, Seattle, Washington (Greene)
| | - Mahmoud A Khalifa
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Khalifa, Santiago)
| | - Victor Santiago
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Khalifa, Santiago)
| | - Robert L Schmidt
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (Schmidt)
| |
Collapse
|