National Trends in Pediatric Facial Fractures: The Impact of Health Care Policy

Health Disparities Research in Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

Health disparities contribute significantly to disease, health outcomes, and access to care. Little is known about the state of health disparities in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS). This scoping review aims to synthesize the existing disparities research in FPRS and guide future disparities-related efforts.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

We conducted a scoping review in adherence with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Our search included all years through March 03, 2023. All peer-reviewed primary literature of any design related to disparities in FPRS was eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

Of the 12283 unique abstracts identified, 215 studies underwent full-text review, and 108 remained for final review. The most frequently examined topics were cleft lip and palate (40.7%), facial trauma (29.6%), and gender affirmation (9.3%). There was limited coverage of other areas. Consideration of race/ethnicity (68.5%), socioeconomic status (65.7%), and gender/sex (40.7%) were most common. Social capital (0%), religion, occupation, and features of relationships were least discussed (0.01% each). The majority of studies were published after 2018 (59.2%) and were of nonprospective designs (95.4%). Most studies focused on disparity detection (80.6%) and few focused on understanding (13.9%) or reducing disparities (0.06%).

CONCLUSION

This study captures the existing literature on health disparities in FPRS. Studies are concentrated in a few areas of FPRS and are primarily in the detecting phase of public health research. Our review highlights several gaps and opportunities for future disparities-related focus.

Epidemiology and Etiology of Facial Injuries in Children

Pediatric Trauma results in over 8 million emergency department visits and 11,000 deaths annually. Unintentional injuries continue to be the leader in morbidity and mortality in pediatric and adolescent populations in the United States. More than 10% of all visits to pediatric emergency rooms (ER) present with craniofacial injuries. The most common etiologies for facial injuries in children and adolescence are motor vehicle accidents, assault, accidental injuries, sports injuries, nonaccidental injuries (eg, child abuse) and penetrating injuries. In the United States, head trauma secondary to abuse is the leading cause of mortality among non-accidental trauma in this population.

The Affordable Care Act and its Effects on Trauma Care Access, Short- and Long-term Outcomes and Financial Impact: A Review Article

Objective

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the current evidence regarding the impact of the ACA on trauma outcomes and the financial impact on trauma patients and trauma systems.

Background

Traumatic injuries are the leading cause of death and disability between the ages of 1 to 47 years. Uninsured status has been associated with worse outcomes and higher financial strain. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was signed into law with the aim of increasing health insurance coverage. Despite improvements in insured status, it is unclear how the ACA has affected trauma.

Methods

We conducted a literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed studies investigating the impact of the ACA on trauma published between January 2017 and April 2021.

Results

Our search identified 20 studies that evaluated the impact of ACA implementation on trauma. The evidence suggests ACA implementation has been associated with increased postacute care access but not significant changes in trauma mortality. ACA implementation has been associated with a decreased likelihood of catastrophic health expenditures for trauma patients. ACA was also associated with an increase in overall reimbursement and amount billed for trauma visits, but a decrease in Medicaid reimbursement.

Conclusions

Some improvements on the financial impact of ACA implementation on trauma patients and trauma systems have been shown, but studies are limited by methods of calculating costs and by inconsistent pre-/post-ACA timeframes. Further studies on cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis will need to be conducted to definitively determine the impact of ACA on trauma.