Chen L, Mercan E, Massenburg BB, Hopper RA, Susarla SM, Lee A, Ellenbogen RG, Birgfeld CB. Comparison of Morphometric Outcomes following Open Posterior Expansion versus Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy for Sagittal Synostosis.
Plast Reconstr Surg 2024;
153:1095-1106. [PMID:
37199432 DOI:
10.1097/prs.0000000000010679]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Open middle and posterior cranial vault expansion (OPVE) or endoscopic (ES) strip craniectomy are two surgical techniques for normalization of head shape in isolated sagittal synostosis. This study aims to compare 2-year cranial morphometrics after these two approaches.
METHODS
The authors performed morphometric analysis on preoperative [time (T) 0], immediately postoperative (T1), and 2-year (T2) postoperative computed tomographic scans of patients who underwent OPVE or ES before 4 months of age. Perioperative data and morphometrics were compared between the two groups and age-matched controls.
RESULTS
Nineteen patients were included in the ES cohort, 19 age-matched patients were included in the OPVE cohort, and 57 were included as controls. Median surgery time and blood transfusion volume were less for the ES approach (118 minutes and 0 cc, respectively) compared with OPVE (204 minutes and 250 cc, respectively). Anthropometric measurements after OPVE were closer in normal controls at T1 compared with ES, but the skull shapes were comparable at T2. In the midsagittal plane, anterior vault was higher after OPVE at T2 compared with both ES and controls, but the posterior length was shorter and closer to controls than in the ES cohort. Cranial volumes were like controls for both cohorts at T2. There was no difference in complication rate.
CONCLUSIONS
Both OPVE and ES techniques result in normalization of cranial shape in patients with isolated sagittal synostosis after 2 years with minimal morphometric differences. Family decision-making between the two approaches should be based on age at presentation, avoidance of blood transfusion, scar pattern, and availability of helmet molding and not on expected outcome.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic, III.
Collapse