1
|
Tellarini A, Bascialla E, Paganini F, Fasoli V, Buttarelli F, Marra EP, Tamborini F, Corno M, Di Giovanna D, Baraziol R, Flocchini M, Curic LM, Tuttolomondo A, Calabrese S, Valdatta L. Breast reconstruction with TiLOOP® Bra: Another arrow in plastic surgeons' quiver? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 97:89-114. [PMID: 39151289 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of lower-pole sling products has made immediate breast reconstruction a feasible option in women undergoing skin-nipple sparing and skin-reducing mastectomies. To date, available data on the comparative efficacy of biological and synthetic meshes regarding postoperative complications are scattered and limited. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to screen three different databases (PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Embase) using the following keywords: "breast reconstruction" AND "TiLOOP®" OR "Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh" OR "TCPM". The perioperative and demographic characteristics of patients, complications profiles, and patient-reported outcomes were considered. RESULTS We initially identified 234 articles, of which only 41, including 3923 patients and 5042 reconstructed breasts, fully satisfied the inclusion criteria. CONCLUSION TiLOOP® Bra could be considered a safe and aesthetically valid alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices (ADMs) in non-smokers patients undergoing skin-nipple sparing and skin-reducing mastectomies and immediate reconstruction. In such populations, complications are more likely to develop in patients with extreme body mass index values. The incidence of seroma with TiLOOP® Bra is comparable to that of ADMs as it is the beneficial effect in radiated patients, where TiLOOP® Bra seems superior to implant alone reconstruction. It has a good bio-integration with host tissues and resistance to infections in patients with a weakened immune system as a consequence of oncologic perioperative treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annachiara Tellarini
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
| | - Elisa Bascialla
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Ferruccio Paganini
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Veronica Fasoli
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Francesco Buttarelli
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Eduardo Paolo Marra
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Federico Tamborini
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy; Microsurgery and Hand Surgery Unit, ASST Settelaghi Varese, Varese, Italy
| | - Martina Corno
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Danilo Di Giovanna
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Roberto Baraziol
- Department of Plastic Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Maria Flocchini
- Department of Plastic Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Laura Maria Curic
- Department of Plastic Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Sarah Calabrese
- Department of Plastic Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luigi Valdatta
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Scarabosio A, Parodi PC, Caputo G. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation of Patient's Quality of Life and Satisfaction with BREAST-Q. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024; 48:3006-3007. [PMID: 37488311 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03517-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Scarabosio
- Clinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy.
| | - Pier Camillo Parodi
- Clinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Glenda Caputo
- Clinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fusario D, Casella D. Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024; 48:13-14. [PMID: 37193889 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03370-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Fusario
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Strada delle Scotte, 4, 53100, Siena, Italy.
| | - Donato Casella
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Strada delle Scotte, 4, 53100, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Park JS, Jin US. Improvement of Shoulder Motion in Two-Stage Dual-Plane Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction followed by Radiation Therapy through Delayed Prepectoral Conversion. Arch Plast Surg 2024; 51:52-61. [PMID: 38425848 PMCID: PMC10901588 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Although prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction has recently gained popularity, dual-plane reconstruction is still a better option for patients with poor-quality mastectomy skin flaps. However, shoulder morbidity is aggravated by subpectoral reconstruction, especially in irradiated patients. This study aimed to demonstrate shoulder exercise improvement in subpectoral reconstruction by delayed prepectoral conversion with an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) inlay graft technique at the time of expander-to-implant exchange after irradiation. Methods Patients with breast cancer treated for expander-to-implant exchange after subpectoral expander insertion and subsequent radiotherapy between January 2021 and June 2022 were enrolled. An ADM inlay graft was inserted between the pectoralis major muscle and the previously inserted ADM. The ADM was sutured partially overlapping the pectoralis muscle from the medial side with the transition part, to the muscle border at the lateral side. Perioperative shoulder joint active range-of-motion (ROM) for forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation was also evaluated. Results A total of 35 patients were enrolled in the study. Active shoulder ROM significantly improved from 163 degrees preoperatively to 176 degrees postoperatively in forward flexion, 153 to 175 degrees in abduction, and 69 to 84 degrees in external rotation. There was no difference in patient satisfaction regarding the final outcome between the conventional prepectoral reconstruction group and the study group. Conclusion Shoulder exercises in irradiated patients who underwent subpectoral reconstruction were improved by delayed prepectoral conversion using an ADM inlay graft. It is recommended that subpectoral reconstruction not be ruled out due to concerns regarding muscle contracture and shoulder morbidity in radiation-planned patients with poor mastectomy skin flaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Sol Park
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ung Sik Jin
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fusario D, Sordi S, Casella D. Letter on Comparative Analysis of Sterile Freeze-Dried Versus Sterile Pre-Hydration Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023:10.1007/s00266-023-03810-4. [PMID: 38157012 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03810-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Fusario
- General Surgery Unit, Tiber Valley Hospital, AUSL Toscana Sud Est, Viale Galileo Galilei, 101, 52037, Sansepolcro, AR, Italy.
| | - Silvia Sordi
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Alla Gruccia Hospital, AUSL Toscana Sud Est, Montevarchi, AR, Italy
| | - Donato Casella
- Department of Breast Cancer Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Scarabosio A, Contessi Negrini F, Pisano G, Beorchia Y, Castriotta L, De Francesco F, Riccio M, Parodi PC, Zingaretti N. Prepectoral Direct-To-Implant One-Stage Reconstruction With ADMs: Safety and Outcome in "Thin Patients". Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:e507-e514. [PMID: 37735018 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prepectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) represents a safe, fast, and successful option in breast reconstruction in a selected cohort of patients. Nowadays, this procedure is considered challenging in thin. Meanwhile, his cohort has not been accurately analyzed yet. METHODS A single institution retrospective cohort study was performed between January 2019 and March 2023 in all women who underwent mastectomy. Biometrical and clinical data were recorded. Also, surgical technique, operating room (OR) time, mastectomy weights, implant choice, and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) types were properly noted. Postoperative complications represented the main topic: these were classified into early and late ones based on onset time. At least 12-month follow-up was required. A comparison between thin and ideal body mass index (BMI) populations was performed. RESULTS Early complications did not seem to differ between the 2 groups with 37.8% and 38.9% of women having at least 1 early complication in thin and ideal-weight women, respectively (P = .919). In univariable regression analysis, compared with women with a BMI of 22.1 to 25.0, women with a BMI ≤ 22.0 were associated with an increased risk of late complications of 2.84 (1.13-7.14). Specifically, thin women appeared to have a 3-fold increased risk (OR = 2.97, 95% CI 1.08-8.18) of ripples/wrinkles compared with women with ideal weight. CONCLUSIONS Prepectoral reconstruction with ADM in thin patients may be considered as safe as in standard BMI patients. Rippling may be more frequent, but, whenever needed, easy to correct with a few sessions of lipo-grafts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Scarabosio
- Clinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Filippo Contessi Negrini
- Clinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Gaetano Pisano
- Clinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Yvonne Beorchia
- Institute of Hygiene and Evaluative Epidemiology, Friuli Centrale University Health Authority, Udine, Italy
| | - Luigi Castriotta
- Institute of Hygiene and Evaluative Epidemiology, Friuli Centrale University Health Authority, Udine, Italy
| | - Francesco De Francesco
- Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, AOU "Ospedali Riuniti", Ancona, Italy; Accademia del Lipofilling, Research and Training Center in Regenerative Surgery, Jesi, Italy
| | - Michele Riccio
- Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, AOU "Ospedali Riuniti", Ancona, Italy; Accademia del Lipofilling, Research and Training Center in Regenerative Surgery, Jesi, Italy
| | - Pier Camillo Parodi
- Clinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy; Accademia del Lipofilling, Research and Training Center in Regenerative Surgery, Jesi, Italy.
| | - Nicola Zingaretti
- Clinic of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Department of Medical Area (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy; Accademia del Lipofilling, Research and Training Center in Regenerative Surgery, Jesi, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Asaad M, Hassan AM, Morris N, Kumar S, Liu J, Butler CE, Selber JC. Impact of Obesity on Outcomes of Prepectoral vs Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 2023; 43:NP774-NP786. [PMID: 37265099 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjad175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of obesity on outcomes of prepectoral vs subpectoral implant-based reconstruction (IBR) is not well-established. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to assess the surgical and patient-reported outcomes of prepectoral vs subpectoral IBR. The authors hypothesized that obese patients would have similar outcomes regardless of device plane. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of obese patients who underwent 2-stage IBR from January 2017 to December 2019. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of any breast-related complication; the secondary endpoint was device explantation. RESULTS The authors identified a total of 284 reconstructions (184 prepectoral, 100 subpectoral) in 209 patients. Subpectoral reconstruction demonstrated higher rates of overall complications (50% vs 37%, P = .047) and device explantation (25% vs 12.5%, P = .008) than prepectoral reconstruction. In multivariable regression, subpectoral reconstruction was associated with higher risk of infection (hazard ratio [HR], 1.65; P = .022) and device explantation (HR, 1.97; P = .034). Subgroup analyses demonstrated significantly higher rates of complications and explantation in the subpectoral group in those with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 and BMI ≥40. The authors found no significant differences in mean scores for satisfaction with the breast (41.57 ± 13.19 vs 45.50 ± 11.91, P = .469), psychosocial well-being (39.43 ± 11.23 vs 39.30 ± 12.49, P = .915), and sexual well-being (17.17 ± 7.83 vs 17.0 ± 9.03, P = .931) between subpectoral and prepectoral reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS Prepectoral reconstruction was associated with significantly decreased overall complications, infections, and device explantation in obese patients compared with subpectoral reconstruction. Prepectoral reconstruction provides superior outcomes to subpectoral reconstruction with comparable patient-reported outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
|
8
|
Pagliara D, Schiavone L, Garganese G, Bove S, Montella RA, Costantini M, Rinaldi PM, Bottosso S, Grieco F, Rubino C, Salgarello M, Ribuffo D. Predicting Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis: A Systematic Review of Preoperative and Intraoperative Assessment Techniques. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:249-254. [PMID: 36725477 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Mastectomy skin-flap necrosis (MSFN) is one of the most feared complications of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IIBR). Traditionally, mastectomy skin-flap viability was based only on surgeons' clinical experience. Even though numerous studies have already addressed the patients' risk factors for MSFN, few works have focused on assessing quality of breast envelope. This review investigates mastectomy's flap viability-assessment methods, both preoperative (PMFA) and intraoperative (IMFA), to predict MSFN and its sequalae. Between June and November 2022, we conducted a systematic review of Pubmed/MEDLINE and Cochrane electronic databases. Only English studies regarding PMFA and IMFA applied to IIBR were selected. The use of digital mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and a combination of several methods before surgery was shown to be advantageous by several authors. Indocyanine performed better than other IMFA, however both thermal imaging and spectroscopy demonstrated novel and promising results. Anyway, the best prediction comes when preoperative and intraoperative values are combined. Particularly in prepectoral reconstruction, when mastectomy flaps are essential to determine a successful breast reconstruction, surgeons' clinical judgment is insufficient in assessing the risk of MSFN. Preoperative and intraoperative assessment techniques play an emerging key role in MSFN prediction. However, although there are several approaches to back up the surgeon's processing choice, there is still a dearth of pertinent literature on the subject, and more research is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Pagliara
- Gynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy.
| | - Laurenza Schiavone
- Department of Surgery "P.Valdoni", Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| | - Giorgia Garganese
- Gynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Sonia Bove
- Gynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Rino Aldo Montella
- Radiology Unit, Mater Olbia Hospital, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Melania Costantini
- Radiology Unit, Mater Olbia Hospital, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Bottosso
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Trieste, Ospedale di Cattinara, ASUGI, Trieste, Italy
| | - Federica Grieco
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari University Hospital Trust, Sassari, Italy
| | - Corrado Rubino
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari University Hospital Trust, Sassari, Italy
| | - Marzia Salgarello
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Diego Ribuffo
- Department of Surgery "P.Valdoni", Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Acea-Nebril B, García-Novoa A, Cereijo-Garea C, Conde Iglesias C, Bouzón Alejandro A, Díaz Carballada C. Safety and Quality of Life in Women with Immediate Reconstruction with Polyurethane Implants after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Outcomes from The Preq-20 Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041113. [PMID: 36831457 PMCID: PMC9954288 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Various studies have evaluated the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on the complications of breast cancer surgery, most of which were retrospective and did not assess the variables related to postoperative risk factors. The aim of this study is to analyse the safety and satisfaction of women included in the PreQ-20 trial who underwent NAC and who underwent mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with prepectoral polyurethane implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS The patients included in the study belong to the prospective study PreQ-20. The study group consisted of patients who underwent immediate reconstruction after primary systemic therapy. The control groups consisted of patients with immediate reconstruction and adjuvant chemotherapy (control group 1) and patients with an infiltrating carcinoma or in situ ductal carcinoma who did not require chemotherapy (control group 2). RESULTS The study included 157 women, 58 (36.9%) of whom underwent primary systemic therapy. The indication for genetic study was significantly greater for the study group (87.9%) than for control groups 1 (49.1%) or 2 (30.4%). Seventy-two (45.9%) of the patients underwent bilateral mastectomy (BM), a procedure that was performed significantly more frequently in the study group (69%) than in control groups 1 (30.2%) or 2 (34.8%). The incidence rate for BM after complete pathologic response was 78%. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of complications between the groups. Implant loss was significantly more frequent in control group 1 (13.2%) than in the study group (3.4%) and control group 2 (2.2%). CONCLUSIONS Mastectomy with prepectoral polyurethane implant reconstruction in patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy presented a similar incidence of complications compared with patients who underwent primary surgery. There is a high rate of BM in women with NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benigno Acea-Nebril
- Breast Unit, Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Complex A Coruña, 15006 A Coruña, Spain
| | - Alejandra García-Novoa
- Breast Unit, Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Complex A Coruña, 15006 A Coruña, Spain
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-674089387
| | | | - Carmen Conde Iglesias
- Breast Unit, Ginecology Service, University Hospital Complex A Coruña, 15006 A Coruña, Spain
| | - Alberto Bouzón Alejandro
- Breast Unit, Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Complex A Coruña, 15006 A Coruña, Spain
| | - Carlota Díaz Carballada
- Breast Unit, Ginecology Service, University Hospital Complex A Coruña, 15006 A Coruña, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Casella D, Fusario D, Cassetti D, Pesce AL, De Luca A, Guerra M, Cuomo R, Ribuffo D, Neri A, Marcasciano M. Controlateral Symmetrisation in SRM for Breast Cancer: Now or Then? Immediate versus Delayed Symmetrisation in a Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:9391-9400. [PMID: 36547151 PMCID: PMC9777212 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29120737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The timing of contralateral symmetrisation in patients with large and ptotic breasts undergoing a unilateral skin-reducing mastectomy (SRM) is one of the most debated topics in the reconstructive field. There is no evidence to support the advantage of immediate or delayed symmetrisation to help surgeons with this decision. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and aesthetic outcomes of immediate symmetrisation. Methods: A randomised observational study was conducted on patients who underwent an SRM for unilateral breast cancer. Based on a simple randomisation list, patients were divided into two groups: a delayed symmetrisation group versus an immediate symmetrisation group. The postoperative complications, BREAST-Q outcomes and reoperations were compared. Results: Out of a total of 84 patients undergoing an SRM between January 2018 and January 2021, 42 patients underwent immediate symmetrisation and 42 patients had delayed symmetrisation. Three implant losses (7.2%) were observed and we reported three wound dehiscences; one of these was in a contralateral breast reconstruction in the immediate symmetrisation group. The BREAST-Q patient-reported outcome measures recorded better aesthetic outcomes and a high patient satisfaction for the immediate symmetrisation group. Conclusions: Simultaneous controlateral symmetrisation is a good alternative to achieve better satisfaction and quality of life for patients; from a surgical point of view, it does not excessively impact on the second time of reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donato Casella
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of Breast Cancer Surgery, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Daniele Fusario
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Dario Cassetti
- Unit of General Surgery, USL Toscana Sud-Est, Valdarno Hospital Santa Maria alla Gruccia, 52025 Arezzo, Italy
| | - Anna Lisa Pesce
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | | | - Maristella Guerra
- Unit of Plastica Surgery, Polo Ospedaliero Santo Spirito ASL/RME, 00193 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Cuomo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Diego Ribuffo
- Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Neri
- Unit of Breast Surgery, USL Toscana Sud-Est, San Donato Hospital, 52100 Arezzo, Italy
| | - Marco Marcasciano
- Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Catanzaro “Magna Graecia”, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
“Hook Shape” Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Prepectoral Implant Reconstruction: Technique, Results and Outcomes from a Preliminary Case Series. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022; 47:546-556. [PMID: 36280606 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-022-03115-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is a surgical procedure increasingly performed for breast cancer or risk reduction surgeries. The site of skin incision seems to affect not only cosmesis but also technical ease in operating and vascular viability of the nipple. We present a series of patients who underwent a modified vertical surgical approach for NSM, which resulted to be safe, reliable, and with good esthetic results. MATERIALS AND METHODS From December 2016 to February 2019, 27 "Hook Shape" incision NSMs were performed. All patients underwent an immediate subcutaneous muscle-sparing reconstruction with tissue expander covered by a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh, followed by a second surgical step with expander substitution and lipofilling on the definitive implant when indicated. Preoperative and postoperative BREAST-Q patient-reported outcomes measure was performed in all cases. RESULTS Postoperative morbidity was evaluated: One patient developed seroma and another presented a systemic infection that resolved with intravenous infusion of antibiotics. One patient experienced vertical wound dehiscence, recovered after conservative treatment and without implant exposure. No implant loss was observed. Nipple-areola complex necrosis or ischemia rate was 0%. The BREAST-Q outcomes reported significant increases in the overall satisfaction with breast (p < 0.05), psychosocial well-being (p < 0.05), and sexual well-being (p < 0.05) sections. Scores in the physical impact of surgery section appeared to decline from preoperative to postoperative evaluations, with no statistically significant results. CONCLUSION The mastectomy incision pattern can burden the surgical challenge, impact vascular viability of the nipple and significantly affect the aesthetic outcomes in breast reconstruction. We report our experience with an alternative approach for NSM, which appears a safe, practical, and reproducible method for patients with small- to medium-sized breasts and little/medium ptosis (grade I or II). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Collapse
|
12
|
Chinta S, Koh DJ, Sobti N, Packowski K, Rosado N, Austen W, Jimenez RB, Specht M, Liao EC. Cost analysis of pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Sci Rep 2022; 12:17512. [PMID: 36266370 PMCID: PMC9582390 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21675-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
With improvement in mastectomy skin flap viability and increasing recognition of animation deformity following sub-pectoral implant placement, there has been a transition toward pre-pectoral breast reconstruction. While studies have explored the cost effectiveness of implant-based breast reconstruction, few investigations have evaluated cost with respect to pre-pectoral versus sub-pectoral breast reconstruction. A retrospective review of 548 patients who underwent mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction was performed from 2017 to 2020. The demographic and surgical characteristics of the pre-pectoral and sub-pectoral cohorts were well matched, except for reconstructive staging, as patients who underwent pre-pectoral reconstruction were more likely to undergo single-stage instead of two-stage reconstruction. Comparison of institutional cost ratios by reconstructive technique revealed that the sub-pectoral approach was more costly (1.70 ± 0.44 vs 1.58 ± 0.31, p < 0.01). However, further stratification by laterality and reconstructive staging failed to demonstrate difference in cost by reconstructive technique. These results were confirmed by multivariable linear regression, which did not reveal reconstructive technique to be an independent variable for cost. This study suggests that pre-pectoral breast reconstruction is a cost-effective alternative to sub-pectoral breast reconstruction and may confer cost benefit, as it is more strongly associated with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Chinta
- grid.189504.10000 0004 1936 7558Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA USA
| | - Daniel J. Koh
- grid.189504.10000 0004 1936 7558Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA USA
| | - Nikhil Sobti
- grid.40263.330000 0004 1936 9094Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI USA
| | - Kathryn Packowski
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, WACC 435, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Nikki Rosado
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, WACC 435, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - William Austen
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, WACC 435, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Rachel B. Jimenez
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Division of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Michelle Specht
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Eric C. Liao
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, WACC 435, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Scardina L, Di Leone A, Biondi E, Carnassale B, Sanchez AM, D’Archi S, Franco A, Moschella F, Magno S, Terribile D, Gentile D, Fabi A, D’Angelo A, Barone Adesi L, Visconti G, Salgarello M, Masetti R, Franceschini G. Prepectoral vs. Submuscular Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Our Early Experience. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12091533. [PMID: 36143318 PMCID: PMC9504024 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Conservative mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction (IPBR) is an oncologically accepted technique that offers improved esthetic results and patient quality of life. Traditionally, implants have been placed in a submuscular (SM) plane beneath the pectoralis major muscle (PMM). Recently, prepectoral (PP) placement of the prosthesis has been increasingly used in order to avoid morbidities related to manipulation of the PMM. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of SM vs. PP IPBR after conservative mastectomy in patients with histologically proven breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed two cohorts of patients that underwent mastectomy with IPBR after NAC in our institution from January 2018 to December 2021. Conservative mastectomy was performed in 146 of the 400 patients that underwent NAC during the study period. Patients were divided into two groups based on the positioning of implants: 56 SM versus 90 PP. Results: The two cohorts were similar for age (mean age 42 and 44 years in the SM and PP group respectively) and follow-up (33 and 20 months, respectively). Mean operative time was 56 min shorter in the PP group (300 and 244 min in the SM and PP group). No significant differences were observed in overall major complication rates. Implant loss was observed in 1.78% of patients (1/56) in the SM group and 1.11% of patients (1/90) in PP group. No differences were observed between the two groups in local or regional recurrence. Conclusions: Our preliminary experience, which represents one of the largest series of patients undergoing PP-IPBR after NAC at a single institution documented in the literature, seems to confirm that PP-IPBR after NAC is a safe, reliable and effective alternative to traditional SM-IPBR with excellent esthetic and oncological outcomes; it is easy to perform, reduces operative time and minimizes complications related to manipulation of PPM. However, this promising results need to be confirmed in prospective trials with longer follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Scardina
- Breast Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: or
| | - Alba Di Leone
- Breast Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Ersilia Biondi
- Breast Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Beatrice Carnassale
- Breast Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Alejandro Martin Sanchez
- Breast Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Sabatino D’Archi
- Breast Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Franco
- Breast Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Moschella
- Breast Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Magno
- Breast Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Terribile
- Breast Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Damiano Gentile
- Breast Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Fabi
- Precision Medicine Breast Unit, Scientific Directorate, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Anna D’Angelo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Division of Breast Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Liliana Barone Adesi
- Breast Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Visconti
- Breast Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Marzia Salgarello
- Breast Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Masetti
- Breast Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Franceschini
- Breast Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Klinger F, Lisa A, Testori A, Vaccari S, Bandi V, Lorenzano V, Klinger M, Tinterri C, Vinci V. Immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: A single center comparison between different procedures. Front Surg 2022; 9:935410. [PMID: 35923444 PMCID: PMC9339688 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.935410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe increased incidence of conservative mastectomy operations (nipple- and skin- sparing) has increased the frequency of immediate breast reconstructions (IBR). In order to guarantee patients the best possible aesthetic outcome, the least chance of complications and moreover, the least postoperative pain, the technique with prepectoral prosthetic pocket was recently reconsidered with the use of ADM. This is the first study using Fortiva® in prepectoral breast reconstruction, and it compares the outcomes of three different patient populations (undergoing retromuscular, prepectoral and prepectoral reconstruction with ADM). The authors suggest that prepectoral breast reconstruction with ADM may bring benefits compared to the current standard technique (retromuscular) as well as compared to the prepectoral reconstruction without ADM.MethodsRetrospective data analysis of patients who underwent mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction with silicone implants (DTI), performed by a team of breast surgeons and plastic surgeons. Logistic factor regressions were performed in order to investigate the effects of the three different intervention techniques on the incidence of complications. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the differences in the occurrence of each complication. Mann Whitney test was used to compare the averages of referred pain. A p value <0.05 was considered significant.ResultsA total of 67 patients underwent DTI reconstruction, of which 43 with retromuscular prosthesis, 13 prepectoral and 11 prepectoral with ADM. We found a significantly lower incidence of surgical complications with ADM, exclusively in comparison with retromuscular reconstruction (p = 0.028). It emerges prepectoral reconstruction with ADM involves significantly less visibility of the implant than both the prepectoral surgery without ADM (p = 0.013) and the retromuscular technique (p = 0.029). Finally, postoperative pain referred at twelfth month is significantly less relevant in the group with prepectoral prosthesis and ADM, both in the group with retromuscular (p < 0.001) and prepectoral without ADM (p = 0.001).ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction with ADM is a safe and reliable technique, able to exceed some type of limits imposed by prepectoral reconstruction. Moreover, it provides benefits if compared to the current standard technique. In the future, this technique could also be added to it, after a proper selection of patients in pre- and intraoperative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Klinger
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Lisa
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Testori
- Thoracic Surgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Vaccari
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Bandi
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Valerio Lorenzano
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Klinger
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Corrado Tinterri
- Breast Surgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeriano Vinci
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: Valeriano Vinci
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
An Ounce of Prediction is Worth a Pound of Cure: Risk Calculators in Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10:e4324. [PMID: 35702532 PMCID: PMC9187190 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Preoperative risk calculators provide individualized risk assessment and stratification for surgical patients. Recently, several general surgery–derived models have been applied to the plastic surgery patient population, and several plastic surgery–specific calculators have been developed. In this scoping review, the authors aimed to identify and critically appraise risk calculators implemented in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
Collapse
|
16
|
Ludwig K, Wexelman B, Chen S, Cheng G, DeSnyder S, Golesorkhi N, Greenup R, James T, Lee B, Pockaj B, Vuong B, Fluharty S, Fuentes E, Rao R. Home Recovery After Mastectomy: Review of Literature and Strategies for Implementation American Society of Breast Surgeons Working Group. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5799-5808. [PMID: 35503389 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11799-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practices regarding recovery after mastectomy vary significantly, including overnight stay versus discharge same day. Expanded use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) algorithms and the recent COVID pandemic have led to increased number of patients who undergo home recovery after mastectomy (HRAM). METHODS The Patient Safety Quality Committee of the American Society of Breast Surgeons created a multispecialty working group to review the literature evaluating HRAM after mastectomy with and without implant-based reconstruction. A literature review was performed regarding this topic; the group then developed guidance for patient selection and tools for implementation. RESULTS Multiple, retrospective series have reported that patients discharged day of mastectomy have similar risk of complications compared with those kept overnight, including risk of hematoma (0-5.1%). Multimodal strategies that improve nausea and analgesia improve likelihood of HRAM. Patients who undergo surgery in ambulatory surgery centers and by high-volume breast surgeons are more likely to be discharged day of surgery. When evaluating unplanned return to care, the only significant factors are African American race and increased comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS Review of current literature demonstrates that HRAM is a safe option in appropriate patients. Choice of method of recovery should consider patient factors, such as comorbidities and social situation, and requires input from the multidisciplinary team. Preoperative education regarding pain management, drain care, and after-hour access to medical care are crucial components to a successful program. Additional investigation is needed as these programs become more prevalent to assess quality measures such as unplanned return to care, complications, and patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kandice Ludwig
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | | | | | - Gloria Cheng
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ted James
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Brooke Vuong
- Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
de Vita R, Villanucci A, Buccheri EM, Pozzi M. Extended Clinical Experience with Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Prepectoral Polyurethane Implant Positioning (BRAND4P method). Clin Breast Cancer 2022; 22:e623-e628. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
18
|
Outcome Assessment According to the Thickness and Direction of the Acellular Dermal Matrix after Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:8101009. [PMID: 34825003 PMCID: PMC8610697 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8101009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The acellular dermal matrix plays an important role in reinforcing thin mastectomy skin and repositioning the implant in prosthetic breast reconstruction. As the concept of prepectoral plane has become widespread, the role of the acellular dermal matrix has become increasingly important. However, evidences and standards for appropriate thickness and direction during placement remain insufficient. This study is aimed at testing the assumption that differences in the acellular dermal matrix thickness and orientation during placement may affect surgical outcomes including the incidence of postoperative complications. Methods This was a retrospective single-centered analysis of 43 patients (50 breasts) who underwent implant-based reconstruction with MegaDerm® (L&C Bio, Seoul, Korea) and 23 patients (23 breasts) who underwent implant-based reconstruction with DermACELL® (LifeNet Health, Virginia Beach, VA, USA), two types of human-derived acellular dermal matrix. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Demographic variables, surgery-related factors, and complications were compared between a thick matrix group (1.5–2.3 mm) and a thin matrix group (1.0–1.5 mm). The same processes were performed in the nonreverse and reverse matrix insertion groups. Results Baseline demographics and surgery-related data were summarized according to matrix thickness and direction. There were no significant intergroup differences in the demographic variables such as history of smoking, radiation, or chemotherapy. The mean drain volume was significantly higher in the thick matrix group than that in the thin matrix group (p = 0.0445). However, there were no significant differences in overall complication rates by matrix thickness (p = 0.3139). Additionally, there were no significant differences in complications between the nonreverse and reverse matrix insertion groups (p = 0.538). Conclusion Our findings suggest that patients with a thick acellular dermal matrix need a prolonged period for engraftment. However, the thickness did not directly affect the surgical outcomes between the thick and thin matrix groups. Likewise, the orientation in which the acellular dermal matrix was inserted did not affect the surgical outcomes including postoperative complications.
Collapse
|
19
|
Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy with the Use of an Implant and Serratus Anterior Fascia Flap-Initial Clinical Evaluation. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11111142. [PMID: 34834494 PMCID: PMC8623064 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11111142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Prosthesis-based techniques are the predominant form of breast reconstruction worldwide. The most performed surgical technique involves the placement of the expander in a partial submuscular plane. The coverage of the implant remains a difficult management problem that can lead to complications and poor outcomes. The use of the serratus fascia flap may be the best choice to create a subpectoral pocket for the placement of a tissue expander, with excellent results in terms of morbidity and cost-effectiveness. A total of 20 breast reconstructions with the inferolateral coverage with the serratus fascia were performed. Patients demonstrated a low overall complication rate (9.5%), such as seroma and infection, with complete resolution during the follow-up and no major complications. The US examination of the soft tissues over the implant reported thickness measurements that demonstrated a good coverage over the inferolateral area. Our study shows that using the serratus fascia flap to create a pocket with the pectoralis major for the placement of the tissue expander is an effective technique during two-stage breast reconstruction. The resulting low rate of morbidity and the US findings collected reveal the safety of this procedure. Its success relies on appropriate patient selection and specific intraoperative technique principles.
Collapse
|
20
|
Looking beyond the prepectoral breast reconstruction experience: a systematic literature review on associated oncological safety and cancer recurrence incidence. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s00238-021-01868-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|