Differences between Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty: Indications, Techniques, Grafts, and Outcomes

Nonsurgical Correction of Surgical Rhinoplasty Complications with Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: A Retrospective Review of 2088 Cases

Background

Surgical rhinoplasty is a highly complex cosmetic procedure with significant revision rates. Unfortunately, surgical revision rhinoplasty is associated with many challenges. Nonsurgical correction of surgical rhinoplasty complications with injectable hyaluronic acid fillers is an alternative with less cost and downtime. In this article, we present the first author's experience with 2088 cases of nonsurgical revision rhinoplasty, including technical considerations, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse events.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was completed on patients 18 years and older who received nonsurgical rhinoplasty treatment between March 2018 and August 2022. Patient demographic data, and data on indications for treatment, volume of filler used, patient-reported satisfaction, and adverse events (including erythema, infection, vascular occlusion, and necrosis) were collected up to 1 year after the initial injection.

Results

A total of 2088 patient cases are included in this study. The most common indications for treatment included bridge collapse or asymmetry (49.0%), an under-projected tip (44.0%), and surface irregularity/scarring (35.4%). The mean volume of filler used at initial treatment was 0.49 mL (SD 0.19). Median patient satisfaction immediately after treatment was 9 (visual analog scale ranging from 1 to 10). The most common adverse event reported at the 2-week follow-up was erythema (36.4%). Three patients presented with skin necrosis (0.47%). All three of these were transient and self-resolving.

Conclusions

Nonsurgical correction of rhinoplasty complications with hyaluronic acid fillers can be a safe, minimally invasive option with high patient satisfaction and immediate and predictable results. This should be considered first line before surgical revision.

Enhanced revision rhinoplasty with processed costal cartilage guided by preoperative computed tomography and 3D scanning

BACKGROUND

Revision rhinoplasty presents unique challenges, particularly in achieving structural integrity and aesthetic harmony. This study explores the efficacy of costal grafts in addressing these challenges, focusing on anatomical corrections and patient outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing revision rhinoplasty with costal grafts. An algorithmic approach was applied to tailor the surgical technique to individual anatomical needs, documented through pre- and postoperative assessments, including CT imaging and 3D scanning.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients were included. Significant improvements were noted in nasal structure and function post-surgery. The mean NOSE score improved from 94.47 ± 5.48 preoperatively to 12.59 ± 13.43 postoperatively, and the mean ROE score increased from 18.44 ± 10.02 to 92.65 ± 13.00, indicating substantial enhancement in both nasal airway function and patient satisfaction. The use of costal grafts facilitated effective corrections for a broad spectrum of nasal deformities, with a complication rate of 2.94%.

CONCLUSIONS

Costal grafts in revision rhinoplasty offer a versatile and effective solution for complex nasal deformities. The algorithmic approach used in this study enhances repeatability and outcomes, suggesting a promising avenue for achieving desired aesthetic and functional results in revision cases. Further research is warranted to optimize techniques and evaluate long-term outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

The Role of Autologous Fat Grafting in Rhinoplasty

Rhinoplasty is one of the most popular aesthetic surgeries worldwide and often includes grafting techniques to achieve optimal results. One of these grafting techniques is autologous fat transfer, which has been used to increase volume, camouflage irregularities, and/or improve the quality of the nasal skin-soft tissue envelope. Moreover, minimally invasive approaches for altering the nasal appearance have recently increased and become known as "liquid" or "nonsurgical rhinoplasty." These nonsurgical approaches include altering the nasal appearance with filler injection to induce volumetric changes in lieu of extensive surgery. The use of fat grafting as a filler is favorable to achieve well-balanced aesthetic results without compromising the nasal skin-soft tissue envelope. This capability is partly because of the regenerative potential of fat grafts, serving to improve the quality of surrounding soft tissues. In contrast, commercial injectable fillers are inert. This article highlights the role of fat grafting in surgical and nonsurgical rhinoplasty to provide surgeons with an overview of the potential of these vastly abundant, biocompatible, and cost-effective grafts.