Long-Term Effectiveness of Ear Molding in Infants Using the EarWell Infant Correction System in China

Pediatric Otoplasty and Auricular Molding

With the advent of widespread use of commercial ear molding products, the literature addressing the indications for and timing of perinatal intervention in auricular deformations and malformations has increased significantly. Although the rationale for perinatal ear molding seems to be hormonally mediated, the common assertion that breastfeeding may prolong the window of effective intervention remains without convincing evidence. The common auricular anomalies as well as indications, timing, and methodology of effective intervention including ear molding or surgical otoplasty are reviewed herein.

Efficacy of Classic Ear Molding for Neonatal Ear Deformity: Case Series and Literature Review

Background: We analyzed an original case series of the classic ear-molding method and evaluated the efficacy and complication rate of the method compared to commercial ear-molding products by meta-analysis to draw conclusions on the efficacy of the classic method. Methods: From January 2019 to March 2022, we selected patients who underwent classic ear molding for newborn ear deformities at our institution and reviewed the patient age, treatment time, efficiency and complications. Additionally, the PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched, and meta-analysis (following the PRISMA guidelines) was performed. Results: In the case study, the success rate (excellent and good outcomes) of the classic ear-molding method was 92.6%. The mean age at application and mean duration of application were 5.81 ± 6.09 days and 32.13 ± 7.90 days, respectively. In the systematic review, the classic method group showed a statistically smaller success rate (proportion of 0.79) and statistically smaller complication rate (proportion of 0.05) than the commercial product group (proportion of 0.83). Conclusions: Compared with commercial products, classic ear molding has remarkable and comparable therapeutic effects on neonatal auricular deformities. Additionally, the classic ear-molding method is more suitable for infants with auricular deformities from socioeconomically vulnerable areas. Thus, the classic ear-molding method could be a better option for congenital ear anomalies than commercial ear-molding products.

Treatment of congenital auricle malformation with EarWell Ear Correction Kit: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The effectiveness of EarWell Ear Correction Kit in the treatment of congenital auricle malformation and the incidence of complications are not particularly clear, so we carried out this study to provide a better reference for plastic surgeons to use EarWell Ear Correction Kit in the treatment of congenital auricle malformation.

METHODS

We searched the Chinese and English databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP information databases.

RESULTS

Through this meta-analysis, we found that the effective rate of EarWell Ear Correction Kit was 89.1%. The incidence of complications using EarWell Ear Correction Kit for correction of congenital auricular deformity was 11.4%. In terms of complications, the incidence of skin lesions was 9% and the incidence of dermatitis was 3.4%.

CONCLUSION

EarWell Ear Correction Kit has high efficiency in the correction of congenital auricular deformity and a low incidence of complications. It can be used for the treatment of congenital auricular deformity in patients within 6 months of birth.