1
|
Khan SA, Tayeb RK. Postoperative outcomes of aspirin in microvascular free tissue transfer surgery-A systematic review and meta-analysis. JPRAS Open 2024; 39:49-59. [PMID: 38162533 PMCID: PMC10755481 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Microvascular free tissue transfer surgery is a frequently used technique for head and neck reconstruction involving anticoagulants, and the present study aimed to analyse the postoperative outcomes of aspirin use in conjunction with this procedure. We searched databases for articles published between 2007 and 2022 on microvascular free tissue transfer surgery using aspirin and assessed them for primary and secondary outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were determined through analyses, followed by constructing a forest plot for complication rates. A total of 617 articles were retrieved from the databases, including 14 original full-text articles. Overall complication rates ranged from 0.7-38 % (95 % CI, 17.85 ± 0.503 (±2.8 %) [17.347-18.353]), while flap survival rates ranged from 95-99.2 % (95 % CI, 96.28 ± 0.0956 (±0.10 %) [96.184-96.376]). Two studies reported similar complication rates of 38 %, the highest among all reported studies. The ORs between the studies for the complications and flap survival rates were 2.614 and 0.722, respectively. Although the complication rates associated with aspirin use were not significantly high among the studies, they cannot be ignored. Flap survival rates were independent of the dose and type of anticoagulants used during surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahal A. Khan
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dijon Hospital, France
| | - Ramah K. Tayeb
- King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saiding Q, Chen Y, Wang J, Pereira CL, Sarmento B, Cui W, Chen X. Abdominal wall hernia repair: from prosthetic meshes to smart materials. Mater Today Bio 2023; 21:100691. [PMID: 37455815 PMCID: PMC10339210 DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Hernia reconstruction is one of the most frequently practiced surgical procedures worldwide. Plastic surgery plays a pivotal role in reestablishing desired abdominal wall structure and function without the drawbacks traditionally associated with general surgery as excessive tension, postoperative pain, poor repair outcomes, and frequent recurrence. Surgical meshes have been the preferential choice for abdominal wall hernia repair to achieve the physical integrity and equivalent components of musculofascial layers. Despite the relevant progress in recent years, there are still unsolved challenges in surgical mesh design and complication settlement. This review provides a systemic summary of the hernia surgical mesh development deeply related to abdominal wall hernia pathology and classification. Commercial meshes, the first-generation prosthetic materials, and the most commonly used repair materials in the clinic are described in detail, addressing constrain side effects and rational strategies to establish characteristics of ideal hernia repair meshes. The engineered prosthetics are defined as a transit to the biomimetic smart hernia repair scaffolds with specific advantages and disadvantages, including hydrogel scaffolds, electrospinning membranes, and three-dimensional patches. Lastly, this review critically outlines the future research direction for successful hernia repair solutions by combing state-of-the-art techniques and materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qimanguli Saiding
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, The International Peace Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 910 Hengshan Road, Shanghai, 200030, PR China
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Shanghai, 200025, PR China
| | - Yiyao Chen
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, The International Peace Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 910 Hengshan Road, Shanghai, 200030, PR China
| | - Juan Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Shanghai, 200025, PR China
| | - Catarina Leite Pereira
- I3S – Instituto de Investigação e Inovação Em Saúde and INEB – Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade Do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal
| | - Bruno Sarmento
- I3S – Instituto de Investigação e Inovação Em Saúde and INEB – Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade Do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen 208, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal
- IUCS – Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde, CESPU, Rua Central de Gandra 1317, 4585-116, Gandra, Portugal
| | - Wenguo Cui
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bone and Joint Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Shanghai, 200025, PR China
| | - Xinliang Chen
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Embryo Original Diseases, The International Peace Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 910 Hengshan Road, Shanghai, 200030, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Knoedler S, Hoch CC, Huelsboemer L, Knoedler L, Stögner VA, Pomahac B, Kauke-Navarro M, Colen D. Postoperative free flap monitoring in reconstructive surgery-man or machine? Front Surg 2023; 10:1130566. [PMID: 36911625 PMCID: PMC9992807 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1130566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Free tissue transfer is widely used for the reconstruction of complex tissue defects. The survival of free flaps depends on the patency and integrity of the microvascular anastomosis. Accordingly, the early detection of vascular comprise and prompt intervention are indispensable to increase flap survival rates. Such monitoring strategies are commonly integrated into the perioperative algorithm, with clinical examination still being considered the gold standard for routine free flap monitoring. Despite its widespread acceptance as state of the art, the clinical examination also has its pitfalls, such as the limited applicability in buried flaps and the risk of poor interrater agreement due to inconsistent flap (failure) appearances. To compensate for these shortcomings, a plethora of alternative monitoring tools have been proposed in recent years, each of them with inherent strengths and limitations. Given the ongoing demographic change, the number of older patients requiring free flap reconstruction, e.g., after cancer resection, is rising. Yet, age-related morphologic changes may complicate the free flap evaluation in elderly patients and delay the prompt detection of clinical signs of flap compromise. In this review, we provide an overview of currently available and employed methods for free flap monitoring, with a special focus on elderly patients and how senescence may impact standard free flap monitoring strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Knoedler
- Department of Plastic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital,New Haven, CT, United States
- Correspondence: Samuel Knoedler Martin Kauke-Navarro
| | - Cosima C. Hoch
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rechts der Isar Hospital, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lioba Huelsboemer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital,New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Leonard Knoedler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital,New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Viola A. Stögner
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital,New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Bohdan Pomahac
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital,New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Martin Kauke-Navarro
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital,New Haven, CT, United States
- Correspondence: Samuel Knoedler Martin Kauke-Navarro
| | - David Colen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital,New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|