Intralesional Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection as a New Treatment Measure for Keloids:

Clinical Application of Botulinum Toxin A on Nasal Reconstruction with Expanded Forehead Flap for Asian Patients

BACKGROUND

Because of its unique advantages, frontal expansion has become a common tool for Asian nasal reconstruction, but it has the limitations of prolonging the duration and pain in the expansion area. Based on the fact that the denervation effect of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) has been widely used in the reconstruction of superficial organs, we hypothesized that BTX-A would shorten the length of nasal reconstruction sequence and alleviate the discomfort of patients.

METHODS

A comparative retrospective study was conducted of consecutive patients underwent sequential treatment of nasal reconstruction between June 2010 and July 2012. Data on demographics, BTX-A injection plan and expansion duration were collected and analyzed. Phased pain intensity outcomes were evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS). Photographs were collected during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled in the study; 15 (50%) with and 15 (50%) without BTX-A pre-injection. Demographic data were homogeneous. The duration of the observation group (BTX-A pretreated) (133.87 ± 13.64 days) was significantly shortened versus the control group (164.27 ± 14.08 days, P<0.001). At the initial stage, no significant difference was found in the VAS scores (P=0.64). At the medium stage, the VAS score of the observation group (2.07 ± 0.80) was significantly lower than the control group (3.00 ± 0.53, P<0.01). At the terminal stage, the VAS score of the observation group (1.93 ± 0.59) was significantly lower than the control group (2.73 ± 0.70) but with a narrower disparity.

CONCLUSION

Pre-injection of BTX-A is effective in shortening the duration of the expansion phase, as well as relieving the pain associated with expansion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

The journal asks authors to assign a level of evidence to each article. For a complete description of Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, see the Table of Contents or the online Instructions for Authors at www.springer.com/00266 .

Botulinum Toxin to Improve the Prognosis of Skin Transplantation: A Short Narrative Review

Skin transplantation is a traditional and well-established method of repairing skin loss, especially deep second-degree postburn wounds. Complications often happen amid the healing process, including necrosis and skin contracture, which has raised widespread concern from patients and doctors. Since the first recorded medical application of botulinum toxin for strabismus, accumulating evidence has enclosed all-round potential of botulinum toxin, more than aesthetic management. In recent decades, botulinum toxin also has been revealed to improve the prognosis of skin grafts. This literature review aims to briefly summarize the history and latest advances of its use for skin transplantation.

Recurrence rates in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars with intralesional triamcinolone combined with other intralesional agents

Hypertrophic scars (HTS) and keloids are pathologic scars that are products of a wound healing pathway error attributed to genetic and inflammatory causes (Leventhal et al., Arch Facial Plast Surg 8(6):362-368. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.8.6.362 , 2006). Methods of pathologic scar treatment include intralesional agents, cryotherapy, surgical excision, pressure dressings, topical agents, laser resurfacing, radiotherapy, and other investigational therapies (Leventhal et al. 2006). The recurrence of pathologic scar is high across all treatment modalities, including the use of intralesional agents (Trisliana Perdanasari et al., Arch Plast Surg 41(6):620-629. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.6.620 , 2014). In the treatment of pathologic scar, combination approaches using intralesional agents, such as triamcinolone (TAC), 5-fluorouracil (5FU), verapamil (VER), bleomycin (BLM), and botulinum toxin (BTX), are superior therapies when compared to monotherapy (Yosipovitch et al., J Dermatol Treat 12(2):87-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/095466301317085363 , 2001; Yang et al., Front Med 8:691628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.691628 , 2021; Sun et al., Aesthetic Plast Surg 45(2):791-805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01570-8 , 2021). This review assesses recurrence and the reporting of recurrence in pathologic scar after treatment with intralesional triamcinolone (TAC) in combination with another intralesional agent. A literature review was conducted using research journals from PubMed using the following search terms: [(keloid) AND (triamcinolone) AND (combination) AND (intralesional)], as well as [(keloid) AND (triamcinolone) AND (combination)]. Articles were reviewed and included if the article analyzed  or compared intralesional agents for pathologic scar treatment within the last 10 years. The average follow-up period of included articles (n = 14) that utilized combination intralesional therapy (TAC-X) was approximately 11 months (range 1-24 months). Consistent recurrence rate reporting across studies was lacking. The combination agent with the highest recurrence rate was TAC-5FU (23.3%). The range of reported recurrence rates was 7.5-23.3%. Six studies using various intralesional combination regimens reported 0% recurrence over the follow-up period (TAC-5FU, TAC-BTX, TAC-BLM, TAC-CRY). Three studies did not report recurrence rates. While the efficacy of combination therapy is typically assessed via scar scales, the assessment of recurrence across studies of combination therapy is inconsistent and inadequate, with truncated follow-up periods. While scar recurrence can take place during 1-year post-treatment, long-term follow-up (18-24 months) is needed to characterize recurrence in the treatment of pathologic scar using various intralesional agents. Long-term follow-up periods allow patients to receive accurate prognostic information regarding recurrence after combination intralesional therapy. There are limitations to this review in that comparisons were made across studies with varying outcome variables, including scar size, injection concentration and interval, and follow-up period. Standardized follow-up periods and recurrence rate reporting are integral to furthering the understanding of these therapies and enhancing patient care.

Microneedle delivery of botulinum toxin type A combined with hyaluronic acid for the synergetic management of multiple sternal keloids with oily skin: A retrospective clinical investigation

BACKGROUND

For the treatment of sternal keloids, corticosteroid therapy has side effects including abnormal sebum secretion and acne. Relapse of keloids is common after corticosteroid injection in patients with oily skin. To reduce side effects and keloid recurrence, we used a combination of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) and hyaluronic acid (HA) as synergetic management for multiple sternal keloids in patients with oily skin.

METHODS

In total, 58 patients with multiple sternal keloids who received monthly steroid injections were retrospectively included. Thirty-two patients in the intervention group received an additional injection of BTX-A/HA on the same day as the first injection of the steroid, while the remaining 26 patients were treated as the control group. At baseline and follow-up visits, sebum production and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were assessed as primary outcomes, and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score, keloid recurrence, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and patient satisfaction were assessed as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

In the control group, average sebum production and TEWL were increased to 132% and 104% of baseline, respectively, at the 24-week follow-up. In the intervention group, average sebum production and TEWL reached nadir at the 8-week follow-up and then increased to 96% and 91% of baseline, respectively, at the 24-week follow-up. Sternal keloid relapse was observed in 88.5% of the patients in the control group and none of the patients in the intervention group. The total VSS score at 24 weeks was 11.04 ± 0.14 and 8.93 ± 0.26 (p < 0.001) in the control group and intervention group, respectively, and the VAS score was 75 ± 5.10 and 19.14 ± 3.80 (p < 0.001) in the control group and intervention group, respectively. Higher patient satisfaction was reported in the intervention group.

CONCLUSIONS

Microneedle delivery of BTX-A/HA decreases sebum production while improving skin barrier function. Thus, this combined therapy can relieve the side effects of corticosteroid therapy and reduce keloid recurrence.

Concomitant therapy of surgical shave excision and intralesional injections for ear keloids: Early results from a retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Keloids are hypertrophic scars that commonly arise in the ear region. The authors’ objectives were to (1) evaluate effectiveness of surgical shave excision followed by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and onabotulinumtoxinA injections; and (2) evaluate safety and patient satisfaction.

Methods and Materials

This study was a retrospective chart review of patients who received treatment of extralesional surgical shave excision followed by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and onabotulinumtoxinA injections to treat ear keloids at a single outpatient dermatology clinic. A prospective patient questionnaire was administered to the same patient population to collect recurrence and patient satisfaction.

Results

A total of 45 patients were included, consisting of 84.4% females (n = 38) and 15.6% males (n = 7) with a mean age of 25.5 years. Through retrospective chart review, early recurrence was seen in 6.7% of patients (n = 3), and via the prospective patient questionnaire, 11.1% of patients noted early keloid recurrence (n = 5). Of the patients who expressed their level of satisfaction in-clinic, 96.0% (n = 24) reported being satisfied or very satisfied and 4.0% (n = 1) were dissatisfied. Satisfaction was also assessed through the prospective patient questionnaire; of those who consented to the questionnaire, 100.0% (n = 24) were satisfied or very satisfied. Only 20.0% (n = 9) of all patients reported experiencing side effects, consisting of pruritus (11.1%; n = 5), tenderness (4.4%; n = 2), pain (2.2%; n = 1), and mild atrophy (2.2%; n = 1).

Conclusion

Extralesional surgical shave excision followed by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and onabotulinumtoxinA injections may represent a promising treatment option for ear keloids.

Evidence Level: 3 retrospective cohort study.

Lay Summary

Keloids are a type of raised scar, which can be painful and itchy for patients. Keloids can occur on various part of the body, including on the ear. They are challenging to treat and tend to come back. There are many treatment options, however, there is not one universal best treatment for keloids on the ear. We hoped to discover if shave excision followed by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and onabotulinumtoxinA injections is effective at treating keloids on the ear. In order to answer this we completed a chart review of clinic patients, who have already completed the following combination treatment for keloids on the ear. The keloids were treated first by physically removing the bulk of the keloid with a scalpel, which is called shave excision. After the removal, triamcinolone acetonide and onabotulinumtoxinA were injected directly into the keloid. The rate of patient satisfaction and the rate of the keloid returning were collected during in-clinic visits and an optional post-clinic patient questionnaire. The treatment effectiveness and side effects experienced were reported during in-clinic visits. This indicated that with the low rate of side effects, high patient satisfaction, and low rate of keloid return, this treatment combination should be considered as an option for keloids on the ear. However, since this review was completed at one clinic with a small population of patients, it is not fully known if this treatment combination will work for all patients.

Comparison of endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin and steroids immediately after endoscopic submucosal dissection to prevent esophageal stricture: a prospective cohort study

Background: Widespread endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in early esophageal cancer patients is closely associated with esophageal stricture, which dramatically reduces patients' quality of life and increases huge medical burdens. Endoscopic injection of steroid was proved as a protective method for post-ESD strictures. Other materials such as botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) may be potential candidates. We conducted this prospective cohort study to compare the efficacy and feasibility of endoscopic injection of BTX-A and triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for the prevention of esophageal stricture.

Methods: Seventy-eight patients with esophageal mucosal defects of more than two thirds of the circumference were successively enrolled and divided into 3 groups: BTX-A group (group A, n=26), TA group (group B, n=16) and control group (group C, n=36). Patients in group A were immediately injected with BTX-A after ESD, in group B were immediately injected with TA and in group C received ESD only. Endoscopy was performed when patients reported dysphagia symptoms and at 6 and 12 weeks post-ESD in patients without symptoms. Patients who experienced post-ESD esophageal strictures in all groups received bougie dilation. All patients were followed up for one year.

Results: The proportion of patients developing stricture in BTX-A group was 30.00% (intention to treat analysis, 9/30) and 26.92% (per protocol analysis, 7/26), in TA group was 40.90% (intention to treat analysis, 9/22) and 43.75% (per protocol analysis, 7/16), and in control group was 84.21% (intention to treat analysis, 32/38) and 83.33% (per protocol analysis, 30/36) (p<0.001). When further comparing between each of the two groups, the incidence of esophageal stricture was lower in BTX-A group than that in control group (p<0.001), and lower in TA group than that in control group (p=0.004). Furthermore, in entire circumference mucosal defect subgroup, the esophageal stricture was significantly lower in BTX-A group than that in TA group (33.3% vs 100%, p=0.0454).

Conclusions: Endoscopic injection of BTX-A and TA were effective in preventing post-ESD esophageal strictures and BTX-A injection was particularly effective in entire circumference mucosal defect patients. Multi-centered, randomized prospective study with larger sample size should be conducted. (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2100042970, registered 1 February 2021, retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/listbycreater.aspx)

Current Advances in Hypertrophic Scar and Keloid Management

Hypertrophic scars and keloids are caused by excessive tissue response to dermal injury due to local fibroblast proliferation and collagen overproduction. This response occurs because of pathologic wound healing due to dysregulation in the inflammatory, proliferative, and/or remodeling phase. Patients with hypertrophic scars or keloids report reduced quality of life, physical status, and psychological health. Hypertrophic scars or keloids will develop in 30 to 90% of individuals, and despite their prevalence, treatment remains a challenge. Of the treatments currently available for hypertrophic scars and keloids few have been adequately supported by studies with appropriate experimental design. Here, we aim to review the available literature to provide up-to-date information on the etiology, epidemiology, histology, pathophysiology, prevention, and management options available for the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids and highlight areas where further research is required.

Treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Position statement of the Brazilian expert group GREMCIQ

Keloids (K) and hypertrophic scars (HS) are abnormal responses to wound healing that occur as the result of dermal inflammation. Despite the advances on their treatment, many patients still suffer from the negative effects of excessive scarring; its approach is impaired by the lack of objective data on different treatments and the large genetic variability among patients and the difficulties in producing multicentre studies. Their incidence among the Brazilian population is high, as the result of an admixture of Amerindians, Europeans and Africans ancestral roots. With the aim of producing multicentre studies on K and HS, a panel of senior Brazilian dermatologists focused on their treatment was invited to contribute with the K and HS Treatment Brazilian Guidelines. In the first part of this study, different treatment modalities for keloids and HS are fully reviewed by the panel. The second part of the study presents a consensus recommendation of treatment for different types of lesions. More than a literature review, this article aims to show the pitfalls and pearls of each therapeutic option, as well as a therapeutic approach by the Panel of Experts on keloids and Scars on a highly mixed population, providing simple guidelines.

Emerging and Novel Therapies for Keloids: A compendious review

Keloids are abnormal fibroproliferative scars with aggressive dermal growth expanding beyond the borders of the original injury. Different therapeutic modalities, such as corticosteroids, surgical excision, topical silicone gel sheeting, laser therapy, cryotherapy, photodynamic therapy and radiotherapy, have been used to treat keloids; however, none of these modalities has proven completely effective. Recently, researchers have devised several promising anti-keloid therapies including anti-hypertensive pharmaceuticals, calcineurin inhibitors, electrical stimulation, mesenchymal stem cell therapy, microneedle physical contact and ribonucleic acid-based therapies. The present review summarises emerging and novel treatments for keloids. PubMed^® (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA), EMBASE (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands) and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA) were searched for relevant literature published between January 1987 to June 2020. A total of 118 articles were included in this review. A deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying keloid scarring pathogenesis would open further avenues for developing innovative treatments.

Botulinum toxin and platelet rich plasma as innovative therapeutic modalities for keloids

Keloids characterize a definitely challenging type of cutaneous scars for which a diversity of therapeutic modalities has been suggested. The aim of this work was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of intralesional injection of botulinum toxin type-A (BTX-A), platelet rich plasma (PRP), and triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) in keloids. A total of 60 keloids patients were enrolled and divided randomly into three equal groups. Group I treated by intralesional BTX-A injection, group II treated by intralesional PRP injection, and group III treated by intralesional TAC injection. Clinical assessment was done by Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), and dermoscopic examination. Additionally, histopathology and immunohistochemistry of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) expression were evaluated. The results of this study revealed significant improvement of both VSS and VRS in response to all treatment modalities. There was significant improvement of VSS in BTX-A and PRP groups more than TAC group. However, no significant difference observed between BTX-A and PRP groups. Immunohistochemical examination showed significant decrease of CTGF expression after treatment in BTX-A and PRP groups more than TAC group. In conclusion, both BTX-A and PRP could yield a chance for cosmetically better outcomes in keloids treatment than conventional TAC injection.

Tissue Modification in Nonsurgical Facelift Options

Nonsurgical facelifts are a term for a heterogeneous group of procedures used by physicians to improve facial rejuvenation without the use of operative techniques. Patients demand these services due to the reduced recovery time and generally lower risk. However, nonsurgical techniques, to be effective, must induce conformational change in the cells and tissues of the face. Therefore, these techniques are significant procedures that have associated risks. Understanding the tissue modifications and mechanisms of action of these techniques is vital to their safe and effective use. The purpose of this article is to provide a background of tissue modification in nonsurgical facelift options.

Alternative Clinical Indications of Botulinum Toxin

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) is a powerful neurotoxin that inhibits acetylcholine release from presynaptic vesicles. The potency and safety profile of BoNTA grant the toxin vast therapeutic potential. It has been used off-label for a variety of dermatologic conditions. This review aims to analyze published literature regarding the benefits and risks of the off-label use of BoNTA beyond facial lines, including eccrine hidrocystomas, enlarged pores, keloids and hypertrophic scars, hidradenitis suppurativa, hyperhidrosis, masseter muscle hypertrophy, and salivary gland hypertrophy, among others. A MEDLINE search from January 2000 to December 2019 was conducted on the off-label uses of botulinum toxin in dermatology.

Botulinum toxin type A versus 5-Fluorouracil in treatment of keloid

Most therapeutic approaches for keloids remain clinically unsatisfactory. In the last years, intralesional botulinum toxin-A (IL BTX-A) was proposed for treatment of keloids. Our aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy of IL BTX-A and IL 5-Fluorouracil (IL 5-FU) in treatment of keloids. A total of 50 patients with keloids were included in the study, 22 patients (with 26 keloids) were treated with IL BTX-A monthly for up to 6 months and other 22 patients (with 27 keloids) were treated with IL 5-FU weekly for up to 6 weeks, while the remaining 6 patients, each having multiple keloids, were treated with both IL BTX-A for some lesions (8 keloids) and IL 5-FU for their remaining lesions (8 keloids). The clinical improvement was assessed according to flattening of the lesions. Side effects were recorded. A significantly better therapeutic response of keloids was detected after IL BTX-A than IL 5-FU (P = 0.041). IL BTX-A achieved excellent and good flattening of the lesions (58.8% and 20.6%) compared to (31.4% and 17.1%) after IL 5-FU, respectively. In BTX-A treated group, there was no statistically significant difference between the clinical response in small lesions compared to medium and large ones (P = 0.476). While in 5-FU treated group, small and medium lesions showed significantly better response than larger ones (P = 0.009). IL BTX-A caused fewer side effects than IL 5-FU, less pain, itching, no hyperpigmentation and less recurrence. Both IL BTX-A and IL 5-FU showed positive results in treatment of keloids. However, IL BTX-A showed higher clinical efficacy even in large size keloids with less side effects.

Efficacy and safety of Nd:YAG laser alone compared with combined Nd:YAG laser with intralesional steroid or botulinum toxin A in the treatment of hypertrophic scars

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nd:YAG laser alone or in combination with intralesional injection of botulinum toxin type A or intralesional injection of steroid in treatment of hypertrophic scars. This study included 45 patients with hypertrophic scars who were randomly divided into three equal groups. All participants received 4 sessions of Nd:YAG laser at 4-week intervals. Immediately after the laser treatment, patients in group II were assigned to intralesional triamcinolone acetonide, and those in group III were assigned to intralesional botulinum toxin type A. All patients were followed up monthly for 3 months after the last session for any recurrence, or side effects. Clinical evaluation of the cases was done by Vancouver Scar Scale. Hypertrophic scars in the three groups showed a significant improvement (p < 0.001) compared with before treatment in all variables (except for pigmentation) and also a significant improvement in pruritus, pain, and patient relief. The highest percentage of improvements was seen in patients treated with Nd:YAG laser combined with intralesional steroid in all variables according to Vancouver Scar Scale. The degree of improvement was negatively correlated with the patients' age. The three treatment modalities were effective, safe with minimal side effects. Nd:YAG laser followed by intralesional injection of Triamcinolone acetonide had the highest percentage of Vancouver Scar Scale reduction. Combination therapy of Nd:YAG laser with intralesional injection of either Triamcinolone acetonide or Botox revealed better results than using Nd:YAG as a single therapeutic modality for HTS.

A Review of Current Keloid Management: Mainstay Monotherapies and Emerging Approaches

Commonly affecting those with skin of color, keloids are an aberrant wound response that leads to wound tissue expanding above and beyond the original cutaneous injury. Keloids are notoriously and particularly difficult to treat because of their tendency to recur after excision. The current standard of care is intralesional steroid (triamcinolone acetonide). However, because no therapy has yet proven to be fully curative, keloid treatments have expanded to include a number of options, from injections to multimodal approaches. This review details current treatment of keloids with injections (bleomycin, verapamil, hyaluronic acid and hyaluronidase, botulinum toxin, and collagenase), cryotherapy, laser, radiofrequency ablation, radiation, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, pentoxifylline, and dupilumab.

The Immunosuppressant Fingolimod (FTY720) for the Treatment of Mechanical Force-Induced Abnormal Scars

Aim

Abnormal scars such as hypertrophic scars (HSs) and keloids are excessively growing scars that exhibit chronic inflammation and capillary vasculogenesis. The lipid mediator sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is important in inflammatory cell recruitment and angiogenesis. Fingolimod (FTY720) is an analog of S1P and thus functionally antagonizes S1P receptors and inhibits the enzyme that produces S1P. We examined the effects of topical FTY720 injections on mechanical force-induced HS progression.

Methods

Mechanical force-induced HSs were generated in C57BL6/J mice by suturing a dorsal incision and applying a stretching device on Days 6, 8, 10, and 12. On Days 8, 10, and 12, intracutaneous FTY720 (10 μM) or control vehicle injections were performed. On Day 14, scar tissues and blood were procured and subjected to histology and flow cytometry.

Results

Flow cytometry showed that FTY720 decreased the frequencies of macrophages with M2 predominance in the scars but had no effect on total, CD4⁺, or CD8a⁺ T cell frequencies. FTY720 also decreased the vascular endothelial cell frequencies in the scar along with the microvessels, as determined by immunohistochemistry. Compared to the vehicles, FTY720 treatment significantly reduced the gross scar area and the cross-sectional scar area on histology. On the other hand, FTY720 tended to reduce white blood cells and significantly reduced the lymphocyte frequencies in the blood.

Conclusion

Topical FTY720 induces M2 predominance and impairs angiogenesis. Therefore, its local immunosuppressive mechanisms differ from those of conventional immunosuppressive agents. Topical FTY720 can be a novel therapeutic option for abnormal scars that are difficult to control with corticosteroids. Its lymphocytopenic effects may be limited by careful optimization of the treatment regimen.

The use of botulinum toxin in keloid scar management: a literature review

INTRODUCTION

Administration of botulinum toxin is an increasingly popular procedure in the medical and aesthetic field. There is emerging evidence that it can influence fibroblast activity and minimise tension around the scar by virtue of muscular chemoimmobilisation. This review aims to explore the current evidence base behind the treatment of keloid scars with botulinum toxin.

METHODS

A detailed literature review was conducted using PubMed Medline, Embase and Web of Science databases. Manuscripts were appraised and classified in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence by an independent consultant in evidence synthesis. The results of this search are presented in descending order of evidence for botulinum toxin as a primary management agent as well as a secondary adjunct following extralesional keloid excision.

DISCUSSION

On the basis of level 1 evidence, botulinum toxin appears to be equivalent to triamcinolone in producing a short-term reduction in keloidal volume, height and vascularity. A number of level 1 and 2 studies also suggest that botulinum toxin may be particularly helpful in alleviating symptoms of keloid associated pain and itch. There are currently limited studies appraising the value of botulinum toxin in the postoperative management of keloid scars.

CONCLUSION

Botulinum toxin may represent a promising agent in the management of keloid scars. However, further research involving large-scale studies with comparative designs and long-term follow-up is warranted to delineate the value of this therapeutic modality in scar management protocols.

Keloids: Current and emerging therapies

Keloids are pathological scars that grow over time and extend beyond the initial site of injury after impaired wound healing. These scars frequently recur and rarely regress. They are aesthetically disfiguring, can cause pain, itching, discomfort as well as psychological stress, often affecting quality of life. Many treatment modalities, including surgical and non-surgical, have been explored and have been reported to be beneficial; however, none have been absolutely satisfactory or optimal for the treatment of all keloid subtypes to date. This poses a major challenge to clinicians. Often, a combinational therapeutic approach appears to offer the best results with higher patient satisfaction compared to monotherapy. The aetiopathogenesis of keloids is not fully elucidated; however, with recent advances in molecular biology and genetics, insight is being gained on the complex process of scar formation and hence new therapeutic and management options for keloids. In this paper, we explore the literature and summarise the general concepts surrounding keloid development and review both current (corticosteroids, surgical excision, silicone-based products, pressure therapy, radiotherapy, cryotherapy, laser therapy, imiquimod and 5-fluorouracil) and emerging (stem cell therapy, mitomycin C, verapamil, interferons, bleomycin, botulinum toxin type A and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) treatments. Increased knowledge and understanding in this area may potentially lead to the discovery and development of novel therapeutic options that are more efficacious for all keloid types.

LAY SUMMARY

Keloids are problematic scars that are difficult to treat and manage. The aetiopathogenesis of keloids is not clear; however, recent advances in molecular biology and genetics are beginning to shed light on the underlying mechanisms implicated in keloid scar formation which will hopefully lead to the development of treatment options for all keloid types. This review summarises current and emerging therapies.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars-Japan Scar Workshop Consensus Document 2018

There has been a long-standing need for guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars that are based on an understanding of the pathomechanisms that underlie these skin fibrotic diseases. This is particularly true for clinicians who deal with Asian and African patients because these ethnicities are highly prone to these diseases. By contrast, Caucasians are less likely to develop keloids and hypertrophic scars, and if they do, the scars tend not to be severe. This ethnic disparity also means that countries vary in terms of their differential diagnostic algorithms. The lack of clear treatment guidelines also means that primary care physicians are currently applying a hotchpotch of treatments, with uneven outcomes. To overcome these issues, the Japan Scar Workshop (JSW) has created a tool that allows clinicians to objectively diagnose and distinguish between keloids, hypertrophic scars, and mature scars. This tool is called the JSW Scar Scale (JSS) and it involves scoring the risk factors of the individual patients and the affected areas. The tool is simple and easy to use. As a result, even physicians who are not accustomed to keloids and hypertrophic scars can easily diagnose them and judge their severity. The JSW has also established a committee that, in cooperation with outside experts in various fields, has prepared a Consensus Document on keloid and hypertrophic scar treatment guidelines. These guidelines are simple and will allow even inexperienced clinicians to choose the most appropriate treatment strategy. The Consensus Document is provided in this article. It describes (1) the diagnostic algorithm for pathological scars and how to differentiate them from clinically similar benign and malignant tumors, (2) the general treatment algorithms for keloids and hypertrophic scars at different medical facilities, (3) the rationale behind each treatment for keloids and hypertrophic scars, and (4) the body site-specific treatment protocols for these scars. We believe that this Consensus Document will be helpful for physicians from all over the world who treat keloids and hypertrophic scars.

Geometric modeling and a retrospective cohort study on the usefulness of fascial tensile reductions in severe keloid surgery

BACKGROUND

Severe keloids are currently treated with surgical resection followed by radiation. Radiotherapy is essential for preventing recurrences. Fascia tensile reduction suturing may also prevent recurrence. We asked whether superficial fascia tensile reduction with or without deep fascia tensile reduction reduced skin mechanical tension and yielded good outcomes.

METHODS

Geometric modeling on 3-dimensional anatomic shapes assessed the effect of superficial fascia tensile reduction with or without deep fascia tensile reduction on skin tension. A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients with severe anterior-chest keloids with Japan Scar Workshop-scar scale classification score ≥ 16 who underwent resection plus fascia tensile reduction plus radiotherapy between 2011 and 2016 and were followed for >18 months. Patient characteristics and 18-month postoperative outcomes were examined. Postoperative outcome was defined as rates of keloid disappearance, improvement, and obvious recurrence.

RESULTS

Maximal mechanical forces placed on the dermis by dermal sutures, dermal sutures plus superficial fascia tensile reduction, and dermal sutures plus superficial fascia tensile reduction plus deep fascia tensile reduction were 4,700, 573, and 697 Pa, respectively. Adding deep fascia tensile reduction to superficial fascia tensile reduction decreased the force on the superficial fascia. Of 77 cohort patients, 27 and 50 underwent superficial fascia tensile reduction and superficial fascia tensile reduction plus deep fascia tensile reduction, respectively. Superficial fascia tensile reduction plus deep fascia tensile reduction patients underwent complete excision more often (60.0% vs 37.0%, P = .046). The groups did not differ in 18-month surgical outcome, including recurrence rate (P = .670).

CONCLUSION

Our 2003 study showed that in anterior-chest keloids, resection plus non-fascial suturing plus radiotherapy led to a 43.1% recurrence. Thus, fascia tensile reduction suturing helps reduce anterior-chest keloid recurrence to ∼5.2%. Superficial fascia tensile reduction plus deep fascia tensile reduction is suitable for relatively large keloids that require total resection. Deep fascia tensile reduction may facilitate superficial fascia tensile reduction but may only be useful when it is technically difficult to achieve reduction with superficial fascia tensile reduction alone.

[Secondary surgical and medical treatment of scars]

The authors, through their experience, take stock of current secondary management of scars whether they are pathological (hypertrophic, cheloid) or dystrophic (enlarged, hypo- or hyper-pigmented, adherent) by presenting surgical or medical solutions.

Botulin Toxin Use in Scars/Keloids Treatment

Botulinum toxin (BTX) is a neurotoxin protein derived from the Clostridium botulinum bacterium that inhibits the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction level whose effects has been used for many years to treat a variety of muscular/neuromuscular conditions and more recently also for cosmetic use.

BTX has experimented in some dermatological conditions which include scar prevention and treatment with good results The complex mechanism underlying those results is not completely understood but several mechanisms were proposed release inhibition of different substances like (TGF)-β, substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and glutamate thus modulating cutaneous inflammation and wound healing.

We analysed the published data on BTX off label applications on scars and keloids retrieved from PubMed.

Alternative Therapies to Fat Grafting in the Craniofacial Region

Autologous fat grafting is a technique with various applications in the craniofacial region ranging from the treatment of wounds, scars, keloids, and soft tissue deformities. In this review, alternative therapies to fat grafting are discussed. These are composed of established therapies like silicone gel or sheeting, corticosteroids, cryotherapy, and laser therapy. Novel applications of negative pressure wound therapy, botulinum toxin A injection, and biologic agents are also reviewed.

The Use of Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Healing of Thyroidectomy Wounds: A Randomized, Prospective, Placebo-Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Recent research has indicated that botulinum toxin type A may have an inhibitory effect on the formation of fibroblasts and thus possibly decreases the severity of scar formation. Therefore, a trial was designed to assess the effects of botulinum toxin type A on scar formation after thyroid surgery.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was designed. All patients underwent a preoperative survey to assess scar history. All patients underwent a total thyroidectomy, hemithyroidectomy, or parathyroidectomy through a standardized incision. At the conclusion of the case, one half of the incision was injected with botulinum toxin type A, and the other half was injected with saline (placebo). The scars were then evaluated at 4 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively using subjective scar analysis scales.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were enrolled. There was no significant difference in scarring at any of the time points between the botulinum toxin type A-treated and placebo sides of the incision. A subgroup analysis was performed that examined the effects of botulinum toxin type A on those with a severe scar history. This demonstrated a significant decrease in scarring at 6 months postoperatively on the botulinum toxin type A-treated side.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that botulinum toxin type A administration immediately after surgical closure of a thyroid incision does not demonstrate a difference in scar outcomes compared with the control side. However, there was less scarring in subjects who had a severe scar history. This study found opposite results to a similarly designed study. Further study is required to determine the optimal use of botulinum toxin type A for wound healing.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Intralesional triamcinolone alone or in combination with botulinium toxin A is ineffective for the treatment of formed keloid scar: A double blind controlled pilot study

Cutaneous injury can ignite excessive fibroproliferative growth that results in keloid formation. Keloids are associated with significant morbidity related to disfigurement and/or symptoms (e.g., pain and pruritus). First-line treatment of formed keloids involves topical or intralesional steroids. Recurrent or resistant keloids are managed by surgical excision or cryotherapy, followed by steroidal application or adjuvant irradiation. Although adjuvant irradiation appears to be most efficacious, alternative therapeutic options are needed for patients without access to radiation centers. Botulinum Toxin A (BTA) appears to have similar inhibitory effects to irradiation on the cell cycle via downregulation of pathogenic cytokines. Herein, we conducted a study to compare the efficacy of intralesional triamcinolone used alone, or in combination with BTA, in the treatment of formed keloid scars. Twenty patients with a cumulative of 40 keloids completed the study. There was no significant difference between treatment arms with respect to height vascularization, pliability, and pigmentation scores. The addition of BTA resulted in significant symptomatic improvement of pain and pruritus as compared to intralesional triamcinolone alone (p < 0.001). Irradiation is only effective when administered in the adjuvant setting where inhibitory effects on cell cycle and migration are optimized. Future studies with intralesional triamcinolone and BTA should be performed adjuvantly.

Towards an in vitro fibrogenesis model of human vocal fold scarring

Background

Vocal fold (VF) scarring remains a therapeutic dilemma and challenge in modern laryngology. To facilitate corresponding research, we aimed to establish an in vitro fibrogenesis model employing human VF fibroblasts (hVFF) and the principles of macromolecular crowding (MMC).

Methods

Fibrogenesis was promoted by addition of transforming growth factor-β1 to standard medium and medium containing inert macromolecules (MMC). Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and Botox type A were tested for their antifibrotic properties in various doses. Experiments were analyzed with respect to the biosynthesis of collagen, fibronectin, and α-smooth muscle actin using immunofluorescence, silver stain and western blot.

Results

MMC led to favourable enhanced deposition of collagen and other extracellular matrix components, reflecting fibrotic conditions. Low doses of HGF were able to dampen profibrotic effects. This could not be observed for higher HGF concentrations. Botox type A did not show any effects.

Conclusion

Based on the principles of MMC we could successfully establish a laryngeal fibrogenesis model employing hVFF. Our finding of dose-dependent HGF effects is important before going into clinical trials in humans and has never been shown before. Our model provides a novel option to screen various potential antifibrotic compounds under standardized conditions in a short time.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00405-018-4922-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Recent Understandings of Biology, Prophylaxis and Treatment Strategies for Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids

Hypertrophic scars and keloids are fibroproliferative disorders that may arise after any deep cutaneous injury caused by trauma, burns, surgery, etc. Hypertrophic scars and keloids are cosmetically problematic, and in combination with functional problems such as contractures and subjective symptoms including pruritus, these significantly affect patients’ quality of life. There have been many studies on hypertrophic scars and keloids; but the mechanisms underlying scar formation have not yet been well established, and prophylactic and treatment strategies remain unsatisfactory. In this review, the authors introduce and summarize classical concepts surrounding wound healing and review recent understandings of the biology, prevention and treatment strategies for hypertrophic scars and keloids.

Burn injury: Challenges and advances in burn wound healing, infection, pain and scarring

Severe burn injuries are the most traumatic and physically debilitating injuries affecting nearly every organ system and leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Early burn wound excision and skin grafting are common clinical practices that have significantly improved the outcomes for severe burn injured patients by reducing mortality rate and days of hospital stay. However, slow wound healing, infection, pain, and hypertrophic scarring continue to remain a major challenge in burn research and management. In the present article, we review and discuss issues in the current treatment of burn injuries; the advances and novel strategies developed in the past decade that have improved burn management; and also, pioneer ideas and studies in burn research which aims to enhance burn wound care with a focus on burn wound infection, pain management, treatments for scarring and skin tissue engineering.

Botulinum Toxin in the Field of Dermatology: Novel Indications

Since its approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2002 for glabellar wrinkles, botulinum toxin (BTX) has been widely used to correct facial wrinkles. As a result, many consider BTX synonymous with cosmetic dermatology. Recent studies indicate that BTX elicits biological effects on various skin cell types via the modulation of neurotransmitter release, and it seems that BTX has a wider zone of dermatologic influence than originally understood. Clinicians and researchers are now beginning to explore the potential of BTX beyond the amelioration of facial lines and encouraging results are seen with BTX in a variety of skin conditions. In this paper, we review novel dermatological indications of BTX which includes (but not limited to) scar prevention, facial flushing, post-herpetic neuralgia and itch. These areas show great promise, but there is definite need for larger, double-blinded, randomized control trials against established treatments before BTX becomes a clinical reality.

Pathophysiologic Mechanisms and Current Treatments for Cutaneous Sequelae of Burn Wounds

Burn injuries are a pervasive clinical problem. Extensive thermal trauma can be life-threatening or result in long-lasting complications, generating a significant impact on quality of life for patients as well as a cost burden to the healthcare system. The importance of addressing global or systemic issues such as resuscitation and management of inhalation injuries is not disputed but is beyond the scope of this review, which focuses on cutaneous pathophysiologic mechanisms for current treatments, both in the acute and long-term settings. Pathophysiological mechanisms of burn progression and wound healing are mediated by highly complex cascades of cellular and biochemical events, which become dysregulated in slow-healing wounds such as burns. Burns can result in fibroproliferative scarring, skin contractures, or chronic wounds that take weeks or months to heal. Burn injuries are highly individualized owing to wound-specific differences such as burn depth and surface area, in addition to patient-specific factors including genetics, immune competency, and age. Other extrinsic complications such as microbial infection can complicate wound healing, resulting in prolonged inflammation and delayed re-epithelialization. Although mortality is decreasing with advancements in burn care, morbidity from postburn deformities continues to be a challenge. Optimizing specialized acute care and late burn outcome intervention on a patient-by-patient basis is critical for successful management of burn wounds and the associated pathological scar outcome. Understanding the fundamentals of integument physiology and the cellular processes involved in wound healing is essential for designing effective treatment strategies for burn wound care as well as development of future therapies. Published 2018. Compr Physiol 8:371-405, 2018.

Preventive, Cumulative Effects of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Facial Aesthetics

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin Type A (BoNTA) is the gold standard for the treatment of dynamic rhytides in the face. Recently, clinical observation suggests that individuals who receive regular injections of BoNTA experience ongoing wrinkle reduction and improvements in overall skin quality not observed in those treated sporadically.

OBJECTIVE

To review scientific evidence of qualitative changes in the skin and the possibility of indirect or direct effects on fibroblasts affecting fibroblast activity, including collagen production, after repeated treatment with BoNTA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined the literature for supporting evidence of the effect of repeated treatment cycles on wrinkle reduction and skin quality; histological changes in collagen structure; alterations in biomechanical features of the skin; and potential fibroblastic response.

RESULTS

Apparent cumulative improvement on wrinkle reduction and additional skin quality attributes with regular BoNTA treatments suggests an ongoing process of dermal repair. Clinical observation suggests that BoNTA injections stimulate collagen production and lead to a reorganization of the collagen network within the extracellular matrix, which in turn may produce improvements in features associated with more youthful skin. Moreover, evidence suggests that BoNTA may have a direct or indirect effect on fibroblast activity.

CONCLUSION

Clinical observation of progressive wrinkle reduction and qualitative improvements in a number of skin attributes that accumulate with more frequent injections of BoNTA suggest an ongoing process of repair leading to prolonged and cumulative effects.

Approaches for stricture prevention after esophageal endoscopic resection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic resection of extensive esophageal lesions has become more common as endoscopic resection techniques and equipment have developed. However, extensive esophageal endoscopic resections can cause postoperative esophageal strictures, which have a negative impact on the quality of life of patients. We aimed to review current treatments and innovative approaches to prevent esophageal strictures after widespread endoscopic resection of esophageal lesions.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search from 2000 to 2016 using predetermined search terms to identify relevant articles and summarized their results as a narrative review.

RESULTS

A total of 21 original articles and case series were identified. A circumferential mucosal defect involving more than three fourths of the esophageal luminal circumference was the primary risk factor for developing an esophageal stricture after endoscopic resection. Oral and injectable steroid therapy demonstrated promise in preventing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection esophageal strictures, with both strategies significantly reducing the number of required endoscopic balloon dilations. More data are needed on prophylactic self-expandable metal stents, local botulinum toxin injection, and oral tranilast as a strategy to prevent post-endoscopic submucosal dissection esophageal strictures. Although preliminary studies of tissue-shielding resection sites with polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue and autologous cell sheet transplantation have demonstrated promising results, additional larger validation studies are needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral and locally injected/administered steroids are first-line options for the prevention of esophageal strictures, but additional innovative solutions are being developed.

Recent developments in clinical trials of botulinum neurotoxins

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are increasingly used in clinical practice for several indications. Following the pioneering years of discoveries, the recent years have witnessed an increase of new indications and new toxin brands. We review here the clinical trials on BoNTs performed since 2014 and put them into perspective. We also review the ongoing trials listed by the National Institutes of Health registry (Clinicaltrials.gov). The following indications are reviewed here: blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, spasticity, cerebral palsy, urinary incontinence, headache, topical formulations, postoperative cardiac arrhythmia, keloids and scars. For each of these indications the latest trials are reviewed and commented.

Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: Pathophysiology, Classification, and Treatment

BACKGROUND

Keloid and hypertrophic scars represent an aberrant response to the wound healing process. These scars are characterized by dysregulated growth with excessive collagen formation, and can be cosmetically and functionally disruptive to patients.

OBJECTIVE

Objectives are to describe the pathophysiology of keloid and hypertrophic scar, and to compare differences with the normal wound healing process. The classification of keloids and hypertrophic scars are then discussed. Finally, various treatment options including prevention, conventional therapies, surgical therapies, and adjuvant therapies are described in detail.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature review was performed identifying relevant publications pertaining to the pathophysiology, classification, and treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars.

RESULTS

Though the pathophysiology of keloid and hypertrophic scars is not completely known, various cytokines have been implicated, including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and IL-10, as well as various growth factors including transforming growth factor-beta and platelet-derived growth factor. Numerous treatments have been studied for keloid and hypertrophic scars,which include conventional therapies such as occlusive dressings, compression therapy, and steroids; surgical therapies such as excision and cryosurgery; and adjuvant and emerging therapies including radiation therapy, interferon, 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, tacrolimus, sirolimus, bleomycin, doxorubicin, transforming growth factor-beta, epidermal growth factor, verapamil, retinoic acid, tamoxifen, botulinum toxin A, onion extract, silicone-based camouflage, hydrogel scaffold, and skin tension offloading device.

CONCLUSION

Keloid and hypertrophic scars remain a challenging condition, with potential cosmetic and functional consequences to patients. Several therapies exist which function through different mechanisms. Better understanding into the pathogenesis will allow for development of newer and more targeted therapies in the future.

Botulinum Toxin Off-Label Use in Dermatology: A Review

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin is a neurotoxin produced by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum which causes a flaccid muscle paralysis. It is currently used for aesthetic treatments and in the focal hyperhidrosis. Recently, botulinum toxin has also been used experimentally in many other dermatological conditions with good results.

OBJECTIVE

To review and analyze the possible botulinum toxin off-label applications published.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the published data was conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

this potent drug can lead to several off-label indications of interest for dermatologists. Further clinical trials are still needed to better understand the real efficacy and safety of these applications and to standardize injection and dose protocols.

Prevention of esophageal strictures after endoscopic submucosal dissection with the injection of botulinum toxin type A

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for management of widespread superficial esophageal squamous carcinoma is closely associated with esophageal stenosis. We investigated the efficacy and feasibility of endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) for preventing esophageal strictures after ESD for superficial esophageal squamous carcinoma.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas with mucosal defects that exceeded one half of the circumference of the esophagus after ESD treatment were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups (group A, n = 33; group B, n = 34). Patients in group A (BTX-A group) were immediately injected with BTX-A after ESD, whereas patients in group B (control group) received ESD only. Endoscopy was performed when patients reported dysphagia symptoms and at 12 weeks post-ESD in patients without symptoms. Patients who experienced post-ESD esophageal strictures in both groups received bougie dilation.

RESULTS

The number of patients who experienced esophageal strictures in group A (per protocol analysis, 6.1%, 2/33; intention to treat analysis, 11.4%, 4/35) was significantly less than that seen in group B (per protocol analysis, 32.4%, 11/34; intention to treat analysis, 37.8%, 14/37) (P < .05). Moreover, the number of bougie dilation procedures was significantly lower in group A (mean, 1.5; range, 0-2) than in group B (mean, 2.8; range, 0-5) (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic injection of BTX-A was effective in preventing post-ESD esophageal strictures and decreasing the times of bougie dilation procedures. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR-TRC-12003188.).

Alteration of Skin Mechanical Properties in Patients Undergoing Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections of Forehead Rhytides

BACKGROUND

Although application of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) for the treatment of forehead rhytides has become very popular, the effects of its intramuscular injections on the skin mechanical properties remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

We prospectively investigated the alterations in the mechanical properties of the skin of patients who received intramuscular injections of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) for forehead rhytides and compared two injection doses.

METHODS

Of the 42 enrolled patients, one randomly assigned half received intramuscular injections of two units (group I), and the other half received four units (group II) of BTX-A in each injection point. The baseline and post-treatment skin mechanical parameters, including gross elasticity (R2), net elasticity (R5), viscoelastic ratio (R6) and biological elasticity (R7), were measured using the Cutometer(®) and compared.

RESULTS

Treatment with BTX-A resulted in significant overall alterations in the mechanical properties of skin at the injection sites of both treatment groups during the 16-week period, and no significant differences were observed between groups. Significant decreases in biological elasticity, net elasticity and viscoelasticity properties were observed at 2 weeks follow-up and began to recover at that time. All of the skin mechanical properties recovered to baseline levels by 16 weeks of follow-up in both dosage groups, which indicates that the higher dosage (4 units) did not delay relapse compared to the two-unit dosage.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that intramuscular injections of BTX-A significantly regulated the gross elasticity, net elasticity, functional elasticity and viscoelastic elasticity at the injection point over a radius of 1.5 cm at 2, 4 and 8 weeks follow-up. The alteration in the skin measurements had completely diminished by the 16-week follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Botulinum toxin for the prevention and healing of wound scars: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin injections have been investigated for the treatment or prevention of hypertrophic scars in several clinical studies. However, its clinical effectiveness has not yet been established.

OBJECTIVE

To examine all available evidence that support the use of botulinum toxin injections for the treatment or prevention of hypertrophic scars in current clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic review searching the MEDLINE (1966 to 2014), Scopus (2004 to 2014), Popline (1974 to 2014), ClinicalTrials.gov (2008 to 2014) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (1999 to 2014) databases together with reference lists from included studies was conducted.

RESULTS

Ten studies (255 patients) were included. Of these, 123 patients were injected with botulinum toxin type A, nine patients were offered botulinum toxin type B and the remaining 123 patients represented the control groups. Significantly improved cosmetic outcomes were observed among certain studies using the visual analogue scale (experimental group: median score 8.25 [range 6 to 10]) versus control group: median score 6.38 [range 2 to 9]; P<0.001) and the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (experimental group score: 6.7 versus control group score: 4.17; P<0.001) assessments. However, the methodological heterogeneity of the included studies, the lack of control group in the majority of them, the use of subjective scales of measurement and the frequent use of patient self-assessment precluded unbiased results.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence does not support the usage of botulinum toxin. Future randomized controlled trials are needed in the field to reach firm conclusions regarding its place in current clinical practice.

Botulinum toxin for the prevention and healing of wound scars: A systematic review of the literature

Background

Botulinum toxin injections have been investigated for the treatment or prevention of hypertrophic scars in several clinical studies. However, its clinical effectiveness has not yet been established.

Objective

To examine all available evidence that support the use of botulinum toxin injections for the treatment or prevention of hypertrophic scars in current clinical practice.

Methods

A systematic review searching the MEDLINE (1966 to 2014), Scopus (2004 to 2014), Popline (1974 to 2014), ClinicalTrials.gov (2008 to 2014) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (1999 to 2014) databases together with reference lists from included studies was conducted.

Results

Te n studies (255 patients) were included. Of these, 123 patients were injected with botulinum toxin type A, nine patients were offered botulinum toxin type B and the remaining 123 patients represented the control groups. Significantly improved cosmetic outcomes were observed among certain studies using the visual analogue scale (experimental group: median score 8.25 [range 6 to 10]) versus control group: median score 6.38 [range 2 to 9]; P<0.001) and the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (experimental group score: 6.7 versus control group score: 4.17; P<0.001) assessments. However, the methodological heterogeneity of the included studies, the lack of control group in the majority of them, the use of subjective scales of measurement and the frequent use of patient self-assessment precluded unbiased results.

Conclusions

Current evidence does not support the usage of botulinum toxin. Future randomized controlled trials are needed in the field to reach firm conclusions regarding its place in current clinical practice.

Emerging Therapies for Scar Prevention

Significance: There are ∼12 million traumatic lacerations treated in the United States emergency rooms each year, 250 million surgical incisions created worldwide every year, and 11 million burns severe enough to warrant medical treatment worldwide. In the United States, over $20 billion dollars per year are spent on the treatment and management of scars. Recent Advances: Investigations into the management of scar therapies over the last decade have advanced our understanding related to the care of cutaneous scars. Scar treatment methods are presented including topical, intralesional, and mechanical therapies in addition to cryotherapy, radiotherapy, and laser therapy. Critical Issues: Current treatment options for scars have significant limitations. This review presents the current and emerging therapies available for scar management and the scientific evidence for scar management is discussed. Future Directions: Based upon our new understanding of scar formation, innovative scar therapies are being developed. Additional research on the basic science of scar formation will lead to additional advances and novel therapies for the treatment of cutaneous scars.