Ipsilateral Skin Grafts for Lower Limb Melanoma Reconstruction Are Safe:

The ban of the ipsilateral limb as a skin graft donor site after melanoma excision: A critical review

Split-thickness skin grafts are often applied in the management of primary cutaneous melanoma. It is routine surgical practice to use the contralateral limb because of the alleged risk of donor site metastases that may occur when the ipsilateral limb is used. The rationale and clinical evidence for this routine were assessed in light of current understanding of pathways of metastasis of melanoma. We found the preference for the contralateral limb to go back to Paget's ideas on melanoma spread from 1889, and the clinical observation of five cases of split-thickness skin graft donor site metastases in a series of 226 tumours, published in 1962. We traced ten additional reported cases of melanoma metastases occurring in the skin graft donor site. Contralateral donor sites were involved in seven of these cases. In light of current knowledge, the occurrence and the location of any split skin donor site metastasis are to be considered as mere indicators of an aggressive course of systemic disease. Any location of a split skin donor site, whether ipsilateral or contralateral in relation to the primary tumour, may become the location of metastases but chances that such metastases occur are extremely rare. Because of the lack of evidence in favour of the use of the contralateral limb and because of sound considerations in favour of using the ipsilateral limb, we conclude that there is no objective argument to sustain the dogmatic ban of the ipsilateral limb as a donor site for a split-thickness skin graft in melanoma surgery.