Regenerate healing outcomes in unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using quantitative histomorphometry

Amifostine Treatment Mitigates the Damaging Effects of Radiation on Distraction Osteogenesis in the Murine Mandible

According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology, in 2012, more than 53,000 new cases of head and neck cancers (HNCs) were reported in the United States alone and nearly 12,000 deaths occurred relating to HNC. Although radiotherapy (XRT) has increased survival, the adverse effects can be unrelenting and their management is rarely remedial. Current treatment dictates surgical mandibular reconstruction using free tissue transfer. These complex operations entail extended hospitalizations and attendant complications often lead to delays in initiation of adjuvant therapy, jeopardizing prognosis as well as quality of life. The creation of new bone by distraction osteogenesis (DO) generates a replacement of deficient tissue from local substrate and could have immense potential therapeutic ramifications. Radiotherapy drastically impairs bone healing, precluding its use as a reconstructive method for HNC. We posit that the deleterious effects of XRT on bone formation could be pharmacologically mitigated. To test this hypothesis, we used a rodent model of DO and treated with amifostine, a radioprotectant, to assuage the XRT-induced injury on new bone formation. Amifostine had a profound salutary effect on bone regeneration, allowing the successful implementation of DO as a reconstructive technique. The optimization of bone regeneration in the irradiated mandible has immense potential for translation from the bench to the bedside, providing improved therapeutic options for patients subjected to XRT.

A Histomorphometric Analysis of Radiation Damage in an Isogenic Murine Model of Distraction Osteogenesis

PURPOSE

The devastation radiation therapy (XRT) causes to endogenous tissue in patients with head and neck cancer can be a prohibitive obstacle in reconstruction of the mandible, demanding a better understanding of XRT-induced damage and options for reconstruction. This study investigated the cellular damage caused by radiation in an isogenic murine model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO). The authors posited that radiation would result in fewer osteocytes, with increased empty lacunae and immature osteoid.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty Lewis rats were randomly assigned to a DO group (n = 10) or a XRT/DO group (n = 10). These groups underwent an osteotomy and mandibular DO across a 5.1-mm gap. XRT was administered to the XRT/DO group at a fractionated human equivalent dose of 35 Gy before surgery. Animals were sacrificed on postoperative day 40 and mandibles were harvested and sectioned for histologic analysis.

RESULTS

Bone that underwent radiation showed a significantly decreased osteocyte count and complementary increase in empty lacunae compared with non-XRT bone (P = .019 and P = .000). In addition, XRT bone exhibited increased immature osteoid and decreased mature woven bone compared with nonradiated bone (P = .001 and P = .003, respectively). Furthermore, analysis of the ratio of immature osteoid to woven bone volume exhibited a significant increase in the XRT bone, further showing the devastating damage from XRT (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

These results clearly show the cellular diminution that occurs as a result of radiation. This foundational study provides the groundwork on which to investigate cellular therapies in an immuno-privileged model of mandibular DO.

Quantitative histologic evidence of amifostine-induced cytoprotection in an irradiated murine model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis

BACKGROUND

Head and neck cancer management requires adjuvant radiotherapy. The authors have previously demonstrated the damaging effect of a human equivalent dose of radiation on a murine mandibular model of distraction osteogenesis. Using quantitative histomorphometry, the authors' specific aim was to objectively measure amifostine radioprotection of the cellular integrity and tissue quality of an irradiated and distracted regenerate.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned randomly into two groups: radiotherapy/distraction osteogenesis and amifostine/radiotherapy/distraction osteogenesis, which received amifostine before radiotherapy. Both groups received a fractionated human equivalent dose of radiation prior to left mandibular osteotomy with fixator placement. Distraction to 5.1 mm was followed by a 28-day consolidation period. Quantitative histomorphometry was performed on left hemimandibles for osteocytes, empty lacunae, bone volume-to-tissue volume ratio, and osteoid volume-to-tissue volume ratio.

RESULTS

Amifostine/radiotherapy/distraction osteogenesis exhibited bony bridging as opposed to radiotherapy/distraction osteogenesis fibrous unions. Quantitative histomorphometry analysis revealed statistically significant higher osteocyte count and bone volume-to-tissue volume ratio in amifostine-treated mandibles compared with irradiated mandibles. There was a corresponding decrease in empty lacunae and the ratio of osteoid volume-to-tissue volume between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors have successfully established the significant osseous cytoprotective and histoprotective capacity of amifostine for distraction osteogenesis in the face of radiotherapy. The amifostine-sparing effect on bone cellularity correlated with increased bony unions and elimination of fibrous union. The authors posit that the demonstration of similar efficacy of amifostine in the clinic may allow the successful implementation of distraction osteogenesis as a viable reconstructive option for head and neck cancer in the future.

Amifostine remediates the degenerative effects of radiation on the mineralization capacity of the murine mandible

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy, a cornerstone of head and neck cancer treatment, causes substantial morbidity to normal adjoining bone. The authors assessed the radioprotective effect of amifostine therapy on the mineralization of the mandible using micro-computed tomography. They hypothesized that amifostine would safeguard the mandible from radiation-induced disruption of the mineralization process and the associated failure of new bone creation.

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into three groups: control (n = 8), radiation therapy (n = 5), and amifostine (n = 8). Animals in the radiation therapy and amifostine groups underwent human bioequivalent radiation of 70 Gy in five fractions to the left hemimandible. Fifty-six days after irradiation, the hemimandibles were harvested for radiomorphometric analyses.

RESULTS

Amifostine-treated animals exhibited less alopecia, mucositis, and weight loss in addition to increased cortical density in comparison with those treated with radiation therapy. Bone and tissue mineral densities showed statistically significant improvement in amifostine versus radiation therapy, and no difference was observed between amifostine and control groups. Detailed micro-computed tomographic analysis further demonstrated significant differences in the mineralization profile when comparing radiation therapy and amifostine. Amifostine maintained regions of lower mineralization consistent with the preservation of normal remodeling.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors have successfully demonstrated the ability of amifostine pretreatment to protect the natural mineralization profile of bone. This reflects the capacity of amifostine prophylaxis to safeguard the normal surrounding mandible from the impediments of collateral damage imposed by irradiation. Further study can correlate these findings with the potential use of amifostine to prevent the devastating associated morbidities of radiotherapy such as pathologic fractures and osteoradionecrosis.

Dose-response effect of human equivalent radiation in the murine mandible: Part II. A biomechanical assessment

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread use of adjuvant irradiation for head and neck cancer, the extent of damage to the underlying bone is not well understood. However, patients can suffer serious clinical consequences, including pathologic fractures, nonunion, and osteoradionecrosis. The authors' specific aim was to objectively quantify the human equivalent radiation dose-response effect of radiation on the biomechanical properties of the murine mandible.

METHODS

Twelve Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into three radiation dosage groups--low (5.91 Gy), middle (7 Gy), and high (8.89 Gy)--delivered in five daily fractions. The fractionation regimen was used to approximate 75, 100, and 150 percent, respectively, of the bioequivalent dose humans receive in conventional head and neck cancer treatment. Fifty-six days after irradiation, hemimandibles were loaded to failure in a uniaxial tension at 0.5 mm/second. Load displacement curves were analyzed for yield and breaking load, and values were considered statistically significant at p<0.05.

RESULTS

The authors' data demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in the yield and breaking load metrics. The authors' reported averages for low, middle, and high radiation dosages were 162, 136, and 69 N, respectively, for yield; and 215, 211, and 141 N, respectively, for breaking load. Both of these quantitative biomechanical properties were diminished in a dose-response pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

In this article, the authors report a dose-response effect in the degradation of the biomechanical properties of the mandible after fractionated human equivalent radiation. The authors' findings and model can now be used to formulate therapies aimed at remediating those effects and augmenting bone regeneration and healing after adjuvant radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients.

Dose-response effect of human equivalent radiation in the murine mandible: part I. A histomorphometric assessment

BACKGROUND

The authors' laboratory previously demonstrated that radiation significantly alters new bone formation in the murine mandible, impeding the use of distraction osteogenesis as a viable reconstructive option after radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. The authors hypothesize that the deleterious effects of radiation on regenerate formation results from a dose-response depletion of essential osteogenic cells. The authors' specific aim was to use quantitative histomorphometry to objectively measure the human equivalent dose-response effects of radiation on the integrity of the mandible's cellular and tissue composition.

METHODS

Twenty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into three radiation dosage groups: low (5.91 Gy), middle (7 Gy), and high (8.89 Gy), delivered in five daily fractions. These dosages approximated 75, 100, and 150 percent, respectively, of the biological equivalent dose the mandible experiences in the clinical regimen of head and neck cancer patients. Hemimandibles were harvested 56 days after radiation and stained with Gomori trichrome. Quantitative histomorphometry was performed using Bioquant software and analysis with a one-way analysis of variance Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

The authors' data revealed a statistically significant diminution in the mean number of osteocytes. The authors also demonstrated a corresponding significant increase in the mean values of empty lacunae. Both of these quantitative histomorphometric changes demonstrated a dose-response relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' study supports their hypothesis that radiation induces a dose-response depletion in osteocytes and an increase in empty lacunae. These reliable and reproducible metrics can now be used to determine the efficacy of therapies aimed at safeguarding the cells essential for optimal bone regeneration and potentially enhance the use of distraction osteogenesis in head and neck cancer patients.