Ethical Considerations in the First American Face Transplant:

Youngest Composite Full-Face Transplant: A Model for Vascularized Composite Allograft in Younger Populations

BACKGROUND

The field of face transplantation continues to evolve, with more complex defects being addressed, and, at the same time, increased outcome expectations. Given our unique long-term experience in this field, we consented one of the youngest patients to undergo a full-face transplant.

METHODS

An 18-year-old woman presented with complete destruction of her central face and craniofacial structures. She had coexisting major injuries, including pituitary gland, visual axis, and motor control. After extensive rehabilitation and reconstruction techniques, the patient underwent face transplant on May 4, 2017, at the age of 21 years.

RESULTS

The total operative time for the recipient was 26 hours. There were no major perioperative complications. Since transplant, the patient has undergone 3 revision surgeries. She is near completely independent from a daily life activity standpoint. She has had 1 episode of rejection above grade II that was successfully treated with a short-term increased in immunosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to data in solid organ transplantation where youth is associated with increased risk of rejection, our current algorithm in immunosuppression, combined with this patient's compliance, has led to only 1 rejection episode beyond grade II. This successful transplant can serve as a model for future vascularized composite transplants in younger populations.

Recipient Selection Criteria for Facial Transplantation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Recipient selection is an important determinant of surgical outcomes in facial transplantation (FT). Appropriately, each FT program develops their own guidelines for recipient selection criteria. Currently, there is no resource to simultaneously assess and identify similarities and differences between these guidelines. Such information could be useful in distinguishing areas of FT that are well understood from those that could benefit from further exploration.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the scientific literature from inception to June 18, 2021, using Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus to identify articles pertaining to recipient selection criteria. Clinical trials were identified through the Clinicaltrials.gov registry. United States and international program websites were reviewed for patient-facing information.

RESULTS

Our systematic review yielded 90 suitable articles, 8 clinical trials, and 7 program websites containing the recipient selection criteria of 24 different FT programs. The most reported on recipient criteria were age, positive human immunodeficiency viral status (HIV+), positive hepatitis C viral status, psychosocial stability, and medical compliance. Other criteria were rarely addressed, such as blindness and recipient immune status.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines among different face transplant programs are changing over time. We found consensus on certain recipient selection criteria, but the majority remain program or surgeon dependent, emphasizing that FT is still an evolving procedure. Although most programs reported on their recipient selection criteria, the rationale was often missing. Further discussion about recipient selection criteria and the reasoning behind employing or changing them will help advance the field.

Facial Transplantation: Complications, Outcomes, and Long-Term Management Strategies

Within the past two decades, vascularized facial composite allotransplantation has evolved into a viable option in the reconstructive surgeons' armamentarium for patients with extensive facial disfigurements. As it has expanded the frontiers of microsurgical reconstructive techniques, facial transplantation has come to garner widespread interest within both the medical community and the general public. The procedure has established itself as an amalgamation of the forefronts of reconstructive microsurgery, immunology, and transplantation science. Therein too lies its complexity as multifaceted scientific developments are met with ethical and social issues. Both patients and physicians are faced with the everlasting challenges of immunosuppression regimens and their inherent complications, long-term aesthetic and functional considerations, the role of revision procedures, and the inevitable psychosocial implications. This article reflects on the medical and surgical advancements in facial transplantation surgery and highlights anticipated future challenges. It aims to encourage discussion regarding anticipated barriers to current practice and suggest future directions as we transition into the next phase of facial allograft transplantation.

Anesthetic Considerations in Facial Transplantation: Experience at NYU Langone Health and Systematic Review

Anesthetic considerations are integral to the success of facial transplantation (FT), yet limited evidence exists to guide quality improvement. This study presents an institutional anesthesia protocol, defines reported anesthetic considerations, and provides a comprehensive update to inform future directions of the field.

The Ethics of Facial Allotransplantation: A Systematic Review

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Currently, there are more than 40 cases of facial allotransplantation performed by 13 different groups in 10 countries. Although it has become a potential option to reconstruct and restore the function and appearance of severely facially disfigured individuals, the ethical concerns of facial allotransplantation remain unsolved. We conducted a systematic review to better understand the ethical concerns on facial allotransplantation and the changing trends of the ethical debate over time.

The decade of face transplant outcomes

At the 10th year anniversary of the first face transplantation, 37 patients worldwide, were the recipients of faces coming from human donors. Five patients died due to complications, noncompliance with immunosuppressive medications and development of cancer. Despite the initial debates and ethical concerns, face transplantation became a clinical reality with satisfactory functional outcomes. The areas of controversy still include the impact of life-long immunosuppression on otherwise healthy patients as well as the selection process of face transplant candidates. Other concerns include financial support for this new generation of transplants as well as social re-integration and patients return to work after face transplantation. Based on over 20 years of research experience in the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA), and clinical experience as a leading surgeon of the US first face transplantation, this review will summarize the well-known facts as well as unexpected outcomes and challenges of face transplantation.

The miracle of face transplantation after 10 years

INTRODUCTION

At the 10th year anniversary of the first face transplantation, there are currently 36 patients worldwide, who are the recipients of faces coming from human donors.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Despite the initial debates and ethical concerns, face transplantation became a clinical reality with satisfactory functional outcomes.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

The areas of controversy still include the impact of lifelong immunosuppression on otherwise healthy patients as well as the selection process of face transplant candidates.

GROWING POINTS

Other concerns include financial support for this new generation of transplants as well as social reintegration and patients return to work after face transplantation.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Based on over 20 years of research experience in the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation, and clinical experience as a leading surgeon of the US first face transplantation, this review will summarize the well-known facts as well as unexpected outcomes and challenges of face transplantation.

Craniomaxillofacial reconstruction using allotransplantation and tissue engineering: challenges, opportunities, and potential synergy

The face is composed of an intricate underlying bony/cartilaginous framework that supports muscle, secretory organs, and sophisticated skin/subcutaneous structures. These components are attached through numerous ligaments and interact dynamically with a vast neurovascular network. The most sophisticated autologous reconstructive techniques, utilizing composite free-tissue flaps, are often inadequate to restore extensive maxillofacial defects. Massive craniomaxillofacial (CMF) defects resulting from trauma, oncologic resection, or congenital deformity present a unique challenge to reconstructive surgeons. Therefore, recent advances in craniofacial surgery and immunotherapy spurred the innovation of composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA), which permits reconstruction with tissue composed of all necessary components. However, CMF allotransplantation carries with it side effects of lifelong immunosuppression. Furthermore, the donor skeletal framework may not provide an ideal match, resulting in less than ideal occlusion and soft-tissue anthropometrics. An alternative to transplantation, tissue engineering, has provided hope for regenerating missing tissue and avoiding the need for immunosuppression. Many tissue subtypes, including bone and cartilage, have been successfully created, with sparse reports of clinical application. Tissue-engineered composite tissue required for complete CMF reconstruction continues to elude development, with vascular supply and tissue interactions posing the largest remaining obstacles. We report herein the current status and limitations of CTA and tissue engineering. Furthermore, we describe for the first time our vision of hybridization of CTA and engineering, utilizing the strengths of each strategy.

Recent advances in reconstructive oral and maxillofacial surgery

Reconstruction within the head and neck is challenging. Defects can be anatomically complex and may already be compromised by scarring, inflammation, and infection. Tissue grafts and vascularised flaps (either pedicled or free) bring healthy tissue to a compromised wound for optimal healing and are the current gold standard for the repair of such defects, but disadvantages are their limited availability, the difficulty of shaping the flap to fit the defect and, most importantly, donor site morbidity. The importance of function and aesthetics has driven advances in the accuracy of surgical techniques. We discuss current advances in reconstruction within oral and maxillofacial surgery. Developments in navigation, three-dimensional imaging, stereolithographic models, and the use of custom-made implants can aid and improve the accuracy of existing reconstructive methods. Robotic surgery, which does not modify existing techniques of reconstruction, allows access, resection of tumours, and reconstruction with conventional free flap techniques in the oropharynx without the need for mandibulotomy. Tissue engineering and distraction osteogenesis avoid the need for autologous tissue transfer and can therefore be seen as more conservative methods of reconstruction. Recently, facial allotransplantation has allowed whole anatomical facial units to be replaced with the possibility of sensory recovery and reanimation being completed in a single procedure. However, patients who have facial allotransplants are subject to life-long immunosuppression so this method of reconstruction should be limited to selected cases.

A historical, clinical, and ethical overview of the emerging science of facial transplantation

In the past 5 years, a total of 16 facial transplantation surgeries have been performed in France, China, Spain, and the United States. Facial transplantation has become a surgical option in clinical situations in which soft tissue and bone loss is accompanied by severe cosmetic, sensory, and functional deficiencies due to disease, trauma, or congenital malformations. With the introduction of facial tissue transplantation surgery came complex clinical, technological, and ethical patient care issues. These complex issues included determining patient selection criteria, refining donor tissue procurement techniques, predicting expected functional outcomes, appreciating the limitations of obtaining a fully informed consent for an innovative procedure, and deliberating the immunological response and postoperative immunosuppressant requirements of the recipient. In addition, psychological implications for the patient, societal consequences, and ethical concerns have been discussed. The short-term results have been positive. Results to date indicate that the clinical, technical, and immunological patient care issues in this emerging science appear to mirror those of other reconstructive and organ transplantation procedures. The long-term physical, emotional, and psychological effects on the recipient patient, as well as long-term consequences to the donor's family, are yet to be validated.

Achievements and challenges in composite tissue allotransplantation

Overall, more than 60 hand/forearm/arm transplantations and 16 face transplantations have been performed in the past 12 years. In the European experience summarized here, three grafts have been lost in response to a vascular thrombosis (n = 1), rejection and incompliance with immunosuppression (n = 1) and death (n = 1). The overall functional and esthetic outcome is very satisfactory, but serious side effects and complications related to immunosuppression are challenges hindering progress in this field. The high levels of immunosuppression, skin rejection, nerve regeneration, donor legislation and the acceptance level need to be addressed to promote growth of this promising new field in transplantation and reconstructive surgery.